Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 1/2024

01-12-2024 | Enterostomy | Research

Determining a multidisciplinary intraoperative strategy in emergency surgery for bowel obstruction and its impact on outcomes

Authors: Mai-Britt Tolstrup, Anders Peter Skovsen, Ismail Gögenur

Published in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Bowel obstruction accounts for around 50% of all emergency laparotomies. A multidisciplinary (MDT) standardized intraoperative model was applied (definitive, palliative, or damage control surgery) to identify patients suitable for a one-step, definitive surgical procedure favoring anastomosis over stoma, when undergoing surgery for bowel obstruction. The objective was to present mortality according to the strategy applied and to compare the rate of laparoscopic interventions and stoma creations to a historic cohort in surgery for bowel obstruction.

Methods

In a retrospective cohort study, we included patients undergoing emergency surgery for bowel obstruction during a 1-year period at two Copenhagen University Hospitals (2019 and 2021). The MDT model consisted of a 30- and 60-min time-out with variables such as functional and hemodynamic status, presence of malignancy, and surgical capabilities (lap/open). Pre-, intra-, and postoperative data were collected to investigate associations to postoperative complications and mortality. Stoma creation rates and laparoscopies were compared to a historic cohort (2009–2013).

Results

Three hundred sixty-nine patients underwent surgery for bowel obstruction. Intraoperative surgical strategy was definitive in 77.0%, palliative in 22.5%, and damage control surgery in 0.5%. Thirty-day mortality was significantly lower in the definitive patient population (4.6%) compared to the palliative population (21.7%) (p < 0.000). Compared to the historic cohort, laparoscopic surgery for bowel obstruction increased from 5.0 to 26.4% during the 10-year time span, the rate of stoma placements was reduced from 12.0 to 6.1%, p 0.014, and the 30-day mortality decreased from 12.9 to 4.6%, p < 0.000.

Conclusion

An intraoperative improvement strategy can address the specific surgical interventions in patients undergoing surgery for bowel obstruction, favoring anastomosis over stoma whenever resection was needed, and help adjust specific postoperative interventions and care pathways in cases of palliative need.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Scott JW, Olufajo OA, Haider AH et al (2016) Use of national burden to define operative emergency general surgery. JAMA Surg 151(6):e160480CrossRefPubMed Scott JW, Olufajo OA, Haider AH et al (2016) Use of national burden to define operative emergency general surgery. JAMA Surg 151(6):e160480CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Peden CJ, Aggarwal G, Scott M et al (2021) Guidelines for perioperative care for emergency laparotomy enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) society recommendations: part 1 preoperative: diagnosis, rapid assessment and optimization. World J Surg 45(5):1272–1290CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Peden CJ, Aggarwal G, Scott M et al (2021) Guidelines for perioperative care for emergency laparotomy enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) society recommendations: part 1 preoperative: diagnosis, rapid assessment and optimization. World J Surg 45(5):1272–1290CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Tengberg LT, Bay-Nielsen M, Foss NB, AHA study group et al (2017) Multidisciplinary perioperative protocol in patients undergoing acute high-risk abdominal surgery. Br J Surg 104(4):463–471CrossRefPubMed Tengberg LT, Bay-Nielsen M, Foss NB, AHA study group et al (2017) Multidisciplinary perioperative protocol in patients undergoing acute high-risk abdominal surgery. Br J Surg 104(4):463–471CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Liljebdahl MS, Gogenur I, Thygesen LC (2020) Emergency laparotomy in Denmark: a nationwide descriptive study. World J Surg 44:2276–2981 Liljebdahl MS, Gogenur I, Thygesen LC (2020) Emergency laparotomy in Denmark: a nationwide descriptive study. World J Surg 44:2276–2981
5.
go back to reference Sajid MS, Khawaja AH, Baig MK et al (2016) A systematic review comparing laparoscopic vs open adhesiolysis in patients with adhesional small bowel obstruction. Am J Surg 212:138–150CrossRefPubMed Sajid MS, Khawaja AH, Baig MK et al (2016) A systematic review comparing laparoscopic vs open adhesiolysis in patients with adhesional small bowel obstruction. Am J Surg 212:138–150CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Tolstrup MB, Jensen TK, Gӧgenur I (2023) Intraoperative surgical strategy in abdominal emergency surgery. World J Surg 47:162–170CrossRefPubMed Tolstrup MB, Jensen TK, Gӧgenur I (2023) Intraoperative surgical strategy in abdominal emergency surgery. World J Surg 47:162–170CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Weber DG, Bendinelli C, Balogh ZJ (2014) Damage control surgery for abdominal emergencies. BJS 101(1):109–118CrossRef Weber DG, Bendinelli C, Balogh ZJ (2014) Damage control surgery for abdominal emergencies. BJS 101(1):109–118CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ferris FD, Gomez-Batiste X, Connor S et al (2007) Implementing quality palliative care. J Pain Symptom Manage 33(5):533–541CrossRefPubMed Ferris FD, Gomez-Batiste X, Connor S et al (2007) Implementing quality palliative care. J Pain Symptom Manage 33(5):533–541CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Tolstrup MB, Watt SK, Gӧgenur I (2017) Morbidity and mortality rates after emergency abdominal surgery: an analysis of 4346 patients scheduled for emergency laparotomy or laparoscopy Langenbeck’s. Arch Surg 402(4):615–623CrossRef Tolstrup MB, Watt SK, Gӧgenur I (2017) Morbidity and mortality rates after emergency abdominal surgery: an analysis of 4346 patients scheduled for emergency laparotomy or laparoscopy Langenbeck’s. Arch Surg 402(4):615–623CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Gillis C, Ljungqvist O, Carli F (2022) Prehabilitation, enhanced recovery after surgery, or both? A narrative review. BJA 128(3):434–448CrossRefPubMed Gillis C, Ljungqvist O, Carli F (2022) Prehabilitation, enhanced recovery after surgery, or both? A narrative review. BJA 128(3):434–448CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Berkel AE, Bongers BC, Kotte H et al (2022) Effects of community-based exercise prehabilitation for patients scheduled for colorectal surgery with high risk for postoperative complications: results of a randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg 275(2):e299CrossRefPubMed Berkel AE, Bongers BC, Kotte H et al (2022) Effects of community-based exercise prehabilitation for patients scheduled for colorectal surgery with high risk for postoperative complications: results of a randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg 275(2):e299CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Tan BL, Mytton J, Vohra RS et al (2017) A comparison of mortality following emergency laparotomy between populations from New York State and England. Ann Surg 266:280–286CrossRefPubMed Tan BL, Mytton J, Vohra RS et al (2017) A comparison of mortality following emergency laparotomy between populations from New York State and England. Ann Surg 266:280–286CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Keogh K, Smart NJ, Daniels IR (2018) Reply to: “A comparison of mortality following emergency laparotomy between population from New York State and England. Ann Surgery 267(4):e713CrossRef Keogh K, Smart NJ, Daniels IR (2018) Reply to: “A comparison of mortality following emergency laparotomy between population from New York State and England. Ann Surgery 267(4):e713CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Sajid MS, Khawaja AH, Baig MK et al (2016) A systematic review comparing laparoscopic vs open adhesiolysis in patients with adhesional small bowel obstruction. Am J Surg 212(1):138–150CrossRefPubMed Sajid MS, Khawaja AH, Baig MK et al (2016) A systematic review comparing laparoscopic vs open adhesiolysis in patients with adhesional small bowel obstruction. Am J Surg 212(1):138–150CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Broek RT, Krielen P, Van Goor H et al (2018) Bologna guidelines for diagnosis and management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO): 2017 update of the evidence-based guidelines from the world society of emergency surgery ASBO. World J Emerg Surg 19(6):13–24 Broek RT, Krielen P, Van Goor H et al (2018) Bologna guidelines for diagnosis and management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO): 2017 update of the evidence-based guidelines from the world society of emergency surgery ASBO. World J Emerg Surg 19(6):13–24
19.
go back to reference Naumann DN, Bhangu A, Bowley DM et al (2015) Stapled versus handsewn intestinal anastomosis in emergency laparotomy: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Surgery 157(4):609–618CrossRefPubMed Naumann DN, Bhangu A, Bowley DM et al (2015) Stapled versus handsewn intestinal anastomosis in emergency laparotomy: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Surgery 157(4):609–618CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Skovsen AP, Jensen TK, Tolstrup M et al (2024) Small bowel anastomosis in emergency surgery. WJS 48(2):341–349CrossRef Skovsen AP, Jensen TK, Tolstrup M et al (2024) Small bowel anastomosis in emergency surgery. WJS 48(2):341–349CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Peacock O, Bassett MG, Vohra RS et al (2018) Thirty-day mortality in patients undergoing laparotomy for small bowel obstruction. Br J Surg 105(8):1006–1013CrossRefPubMed Peacock O, Bassett MG, Vohra RS et al (2018) Thirty-day mortality in patients undergoing laparotomy for small bowel obstruction. Br J Surg 105(8):1006–1013CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Fevang BT, Fevang J, Viste A et al (2000) Complications and death after surgical treatment of small bowel obstruction: a 35-year institutional experience. Ann Surg 231(4):529–537CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fevang BT, Fevang J, Viste A et al (2000) Complications and death after surgical treatment of small bowel obstruction: a 35-year institutional experience. Ann Surg 231(4):529–537CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Behman R, Nathens AB, Karanicolas P et al (2019) Population-based study of the impact of small bowel obstruction due to adhesions on short- and medium-term mortality. Br J Surg 106(13):1847–1854CrossRefPubMed Behman R, Nathens AB, Karanicolas P et al (2019) Population-based study of the impact of small bowel obstruction due to adhesions on short- and medium-term mortality. Br J Surg 106(13):1847–1854CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Determining a multidisciplinary intraoperative strategy in emergency surgery for bowel obstruction and its impact on outcomes
Authors
Mai-Britt Tolstrup
Anders Peter Skovsen
Ismail Gögenur
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery / Issue 1/2024
Print ISSN: 1435-2443
Electronic ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-024-03292-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 1/2024 Go to the issue