Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Insights into Imaging 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Critical Review

Enhancing clinician and patient understanding of radiology reports: a scoping review of international guidelines

Authors: Caitlin I. Farmer, Allison M. Bourne, Denise O’Connor, Jeffrey G. Jarvik, Rachelle Buchbinder

Published in: Insights into Imaging | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Imaging reports are the primary method of communicating diagnostic imaging findings between the radiologist and the referring clinician. Guidelines produced by professional bodies provide guidance on content and format of imaging reports, but the extent to which they consider comprehensibility for referring clinicians and their patients is unclear. The objective of this review was to determine the extent to which radiology reporting guidelines consider comprehensibility of imaging reports for referring clinicians and patients.
We performed a scoping review of English-language diagnostic imaging reporting guidelines. We searched electronic databases (OVID MEDLINE, Embase) and websites of radiological professional organisations to identify guidelines. The extent to which the guidelines recommended essential report features such as technical information, content, format and language, as well as features to enhance comprehensibility, such as lay language summaries, was recorded.
Six guidelines from professional bodies representing radiologists from the USA, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, Hong Kong, the UK and Europe were identified from the search. Inconsistencies exist between guidelines in their recommendations, and they rarely consider that patients may read the report. No guideline made recommendations about the reporting of results considering the clinical context, and none recommended features preferred by patients such as lay language summaries. This review identifies an opportunity for future radiology reporting guidelines to give greater consideration to referring clinician and patient preferences.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wallis A, McCoubrie P (2011) The radiology report--are we getting the message across? Clin Radiol 66(11):1015–1022CrossRef Wallis A, McCoubrie P (2011) The radiology report--are we getting the message across? Clin Radiol 66(11):1015–1022CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bosmans JM, Weyler JJ, Parizel PM (2009) Structure and content of radiology reports, a quantitative and qualitative study in eight medical centers. Eur J Radiol 72(2):354–358CrossRef Bosmans JM, Weyler JJ, Parizel PM (2009) Structure and content of radiology reports, a quantitative and qualitative study in eight medical centers. Eur J Radiol 72(2):354–358CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Rosenkrantz AB (2017) Differences in perceptions among radiologists, referring physicians, and patients regarding language for incidental findings reporting. AJR Am J Roentgenol 208(1):140–143CrossRef Rosenkrantz AB (2017) Differences in perceptions among radiologists, referring physicians, and patients regarding language for incidental findings reporting. AJR Am J Roentgenol 208(1):140–143CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Khorasani R, Bates DW, Teeger S, Rothschild JM, Adams DF, Seltzer SE (2003) Is terminology used effectively to convey diagnostic certainty in radiology reports? Acad Radiol 10(6):685–688CrossRef Khorasani R, Bates DW, Teeger S, Rothschild JM, Adams DF, Seltzer SE (2003) Is terminology used effectively to convey diagnostic certainty in radiology reports? Acad Radiol 10(6):685–688CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Nickel B, Barratt A, Copp T, Moynihan R, McCaffery K (2017) Words do matter: a systematic review on how different terminology for the same condition influences management preferences. BMJ Open 7(7):e014129CrossRef Nickel B, Barratt A, Copp T, Moynihan R, McCaffery K (2017) Words do matter: a systematic review on how different terminology for the same condition influences management preferences. BMJ Open 7(7):e014129CrossRef
6.
go back to reference American College of Radiology (2014) ACR Practice parameter for communication of diagnostic imaging findings. American College of Radiology (2014) ACR Practice parameter for communication of diagnostic imaging findings.
7.
go back to reference The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists (2017) Clinical radiology written report guide. The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists: Sydney, Australia. The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists (2017) Clinical radiology written report guide. The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists: Sydney, Australia.
8.
go back to reference Arksey H, O’Malley L (2005) Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol 8(1):19–32CrossRef Arksey H, O’Malley L (2005) Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol 8(1):19–32CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Levac D, Colquhoun H, O'Brien KK (2010) Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci 5:69CrossRef Levac D, Colquhoun H, O'Brien KK (2010) Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci 5:69CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W et al (2018) PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med 169(7):467–473CrossRef Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W et al (2018) PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med 169(7):467–473CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Tessler FN, Middleton WD, Grant EG et al (2017) ACR Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS): white paper of the ACR TI-RADS Committee. J Am Coll Radiol 14(5):587–595CrossRef Tessler FN, Middleton WD, Grant EG et al (2017) ACR Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS): white paper of the ACR TI-RADS Committee. J Am Coll Radiol 14(5):587–595CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Goergen SK, Pool FJ, Turner TJ et al (2013) Evidence-based guideline for the written radiology report: methods, recommendations and implementation challenges. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 57(1):1–7CrossRef Goergen SK, Pool FJ, Turner TJ et al (2013) Evidence-based guideline for the written radiology report: methods, recommendations and implementation challenges. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 57(1):1–7CrossRef
13.
go back to reference The Royal College of Radiologists (2018) Standards for interpretation and reporting of imaging investigations. The Royal College of Radiologists: London, UK. The Royal College of Radiologists (2018) Standards for interpretation and reporting of imaging investigations. The Royal College of Radiologists: London, UK.
14.
go back to reference Hong Kong College of Radiologists (2017) Guide on good medical practice for radiologists. Hong Kong College of Radiologists (2017) Guide on good medical practice for radiologists.
15.
go back to reference European Society of Radiology (ESR) (2011) Good practice for radiological reporting. Guidelines from the European Society of Radiology (ESR). Insights Into Imaging 2(2):93–96CrossRef European Society of Radiology (ESR) (2011) Good practice for radiological reporting. Guidelines from the European Society of Radiology (ESR). Insights Into Imaging 2(2):93–96CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Canadian Association of Radiologists (2010) Standard for communication of diagnostic imaging finding. Canadian Association of Radiologists: Ottawa, Canada. Canadian Association of Radiologists (2010) Standard for communication of diagnostic imaging finding. Canadian Association of Radiologists: Ottawa, Canada.
17.
go back to reference Pool F, Goergen S (2010) Quality of the written radiology report: a review of the literature. J Am Coll Radiol 7(8):634–643CrossRef Pool F, Goergen S (2010) Quality of the written radiology report: a review of the literature. J Am Coll Radiol 7(8):634–643CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Pool FJ, Siemienowicz ML (2019) New RANZCR clinical radiology written report guidelines. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 63(1):7–14CrossRef Pool FJ, Siemienowicz ML (2019) New RANZCR clinical radiology written report guidelines. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 63(1):7–14CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Boland GW, Enzmann DR, Duszak R Jr (2014) Actionable reporting. J Am Coll Radiol 11(9):844–845CrossRef Boland GW, Enzmann DR, Duszak R Jr (2014) Actionable reporting. J Am Coll Radiol 11(9):844–845CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Wickramarachchi BN, Meyer-Rochow GY, McAnulty K, Conaglen JV, Elston MS (2016) Adherence to adrenal incidentaloma guidelines is influenced by radiology report recommendations. ANZ J Surg 86(6):483–486CrossRef Wickramarachchi BN, Meyer-Rochow GY, McAnulty K, Conaglen JV, Elston MS (2016) Adherence to adrenal incidentaloma guidelines is influenced by radiology report recommendations. ANZ J Surg 86(6):483–486CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Heidenreich PA, Gholami P, Sahay A, Massie B, Goldstein MK (2007) Clinical reminders attached to echocardiography reports of patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction increase use of beta-blockers: a randomized trial. Circulation 115(22):2829–2834CrossRef Heidenreich PA, Gholami P, Sahay A, Massie B, Goldstein MK (2007) Clinical reminders attached to echocardiography reports of patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction increase use of beta-blockers: a randomized trial. Circulation 115(22):2829–2834CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Heidenreich PA, Chacko M, Goldstein MK, Atwood JE (2005) ACE inhibitor reminders attached to echocardiography reports of patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. Am J Med 118(9):1034–1037CrossRef Heidenreich PA, Chacko M, Goldstein MK, Atwood JE (2005) ACE inhibitor reminders attached to echocardiography reports of patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. Am J Med 118(9):1034–1037CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Eccles M, Steen N, Grimshaw J et al (2001) Effect of audit and feedback, and reminder messages on primary-care radiology referrals: a randomised trial. Lancet 357(9266):1406–1409CrossRef Eccles M, Steen N, Grimshaw J et al (2001) Effect of audit and feedback, and reminder messages on primary-care radiology referrals: a randomised trial. Lancet 357(9266):1406–1409CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Hall WB, Truitt SG, Scheunemann LP et al (2009) The prevalence of clinically relevant incidental findings on chest computed tomographic angiograms ordered to diagnose pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med 169(21):1961–1965CrossRef Hall WB, Truitt SG, Scheunemann LP et al (2009) The prevalence of clinically relevant incidental findings on chest computed tomographic angiograms ordered to diagnose pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med 169(21):1961–1965CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Koczwara B, Tie M, Esterman A (2003) Are radiologists meeting the needs of Australian medical oncologists? Results of a national survey. Australas Radiol 47(3):268–273CrossRef Koczwara B, Tie M, Esterman A (2003) Are radiologists meeting the needs of Australian medical oncologists? Results of a national survey. Australas Radiol 47(3):268–273CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Hawkins CM, Hall S, Zhang B, Towbin AJ (2014) Creation and implementation of department-wide structured reports: an analysis of the impact on error rate in radiology reports. J Digit Imaging 27(5):581–587CrossRef Hawkins CM, Hall S, Zhang B, Towbin AJ (2014) Creation and implementation of department-wide structured reports: an analysis of the impact on error rate in radiology reports. J Digit Imaging 27(5):581–587CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Johnson AJ, Chen MY, Zapadka ME, Lyders EM, Littenberg B (2010) Radiology report clarity: a cohort study of structured reporting compared with conventional dictation. J Am Coll Radiol 7(7):501–506CrossRef Johnson AJ, Chen MY, Zapadka ME, Lyders EM, Littenberg B (2010) Radiology report clarity: a cohort study of structured reporting compared with conventional dictation. J Am Coll Radiol 7(7):501–506CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Norenberg D, Sommer WH, Thasler W et al (2017) Structured reporting of rectal magnetic resonance imaging in suspected primary rectal cancer: potential benefits for surgical planning and interdisciplinary communication. Invest Radiol 52(4):232–239CrossRef Norenberg D, Sommer WH, Thasler W et al (2017) Structured reporting of rectal magnetic resonance imaging in suspected primary rectal cancer: potential benefits for surgical planning and interdisciplinary communication. Invest Radiol 52(4):232–239CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Gassenmaier S, Armbruster M, Haasters F et al (2017) Structured reporting of MRI of the shoulder - improvement of report quality? Eur Radiol 27(10):4110–4119CrossRef Gassenmaier S, Armbruster M, Haasters F et al (2017) Structured reporting of MRI of the shoulder - improvement of report quality? Eur Radiol 27(10):4110–4119CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Barbosa F, Maciel LM, Vieira EM, Azevedo Marques PM, Elias J, Muglia VF (2010) Radiological reports: a comparison between the transmission efficiency of information in free text and in structured reports. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 65(1):15–21CrossRef Barbosa F, Maciel LM, Vieira EM, Azevedo Marques PM, Elias J, Muglia VF (2010) Radiological reports: a comparison between the transmission efficiency of information in free text and in structured reports. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 65(1):15–21CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Bastuji-Garin S, Schaeffer A, Wolkenstein P et al (1998) Pulmonary embolism; lung scanning interpretation: about words. Chest 114(6):1551–1555CrossRef Bastuji-Garin S, Schaeffer A, Wolkenstein P et al (1998) Pulmonary embolism; lung scanning interpretation: about words. Chest 114(6):1551–1555CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Espeland A, Baerheim A (2007) General practitioners’ views on radiology reports of plain radiography for back pain. Scand J Prim Health Care 25(1):15–19CrossRef Espeland A, Baerheim A (2007) General practitioners’ views on radiology reports of plain radiography for back pain. Scand J Prim Health Care 25(1):15–19CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Grieve FM, Plumb AA, Khan SH (2010) Radiology reporting: a general practitioner’s perspective. Br J Radiol 83(985):17–22CrossRef Grieve FM, Plumb AA, Khan SH (2010) Radiology reporting: a general practitioner’s perspective. Br J Radiol 83(985):17–22CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Johnson AJ, Ying J, Swan JS, Williams LS, Applegate KE, Littenberg B (2004) Improving the quality of radiology reporting: a physician survey to define the target. J Am Coll Radiol 1(7):497–505CrossRef Johnson AJ, Ying J, Swan JS, Williams LS, Applegate KE, Littenberg B (2004) Improving the quality of radiology reporting: a physician survey to define the target. J Am Coll Radiol 1(7):497–505CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Ghali Eskander M, Leung A, Lee D (2010) Style and content of CT and MR imaging lumbar spine reports: radiologist and clinician preferences. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 31(10):1842–1847CrossRef Ghali Eskander M, Leung A, Lee D (2010) Style and content of CT and MR imaging lumbar spine reports: radiologist and clinician preferences. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 31(10):1842–1847CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Gunn AJ, Sahani DV, Bennett SE, Choy G (2013) Recent measures to improve radiology reporting: perspectives from primary care physicians. J Am Coll Radiol 10(2):122–127CrossRef Gunn AJ, Sahani DV, Bennett SE, Choy G (2013) Recent measures to improve radiology reporting: perspectives from primary care physicians. J Am Coll Radiol 10(2):122–127CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Cabarrus M, Naeger DM, Rybkin A, Qayyum A (2015) Patients prefer results from the ordering provider and access to their radiology reports. J Am Coll Radiol 12(6):556–562CrossRef Cabarrus M, Naeger DM, Rybkin A, Qayyum A (2015) Patients prefer results from the ordering provider and access to their radiology reports. J Am Coll Radiol 12(6):556–562CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Bossen JK, Hageman MG, King JD, Ring DC (2013) Does rewording MRI reports improve patient understanding and emotional response to a clinical report? Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(11):3637–3644CrossRef Bossen JK, Hageman MG, King JD, Ring DC (2013) Does rewording MRI reports improve patient understanding and emotional response to a clinical report? Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(11):3637–3644CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Cook TS, Oh SC, Kahn CE Jr (2017) Patients’ use and evaluation of an online system to annotate radiology reports with lay language definitions. Acad Radiol 24(9):1169–1174CrossRef Cook TS, Oh SC, Kahn CE Jr (2017) Patients’ use and evaluation of an online system to annotate radiology reports with lay language definitions. Acad Radiol 24(9):1169–1174CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Hong MK, Feustel C, Agnihotri M, Silverman M, Simoneaux SF, Wilcox L (2017) Supporting families in reviewing and communicating about radiology imaging studies. Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst 2017:5245–5256CrossRef Hong MK, Feustel C, Agnihotri M, Silverman M, Simoneaux SF, Wilcox L (2017) Supporting families in reviewing and communicating about radiology imaging studies. Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst 2017:5245–5256CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Gunn AJ, Gilcrease-Garcia B, Mangano MD, Sahani DV, Boland GW, Choy G (2017) JOURNAL CLUB: structured feedback from patients on actual radiology reports: a novel approach to improve reporting practices. AJR Am J Roentgenol 208(6):1262–1270CrossRef Gunn AJ, Gilcrease-Garcia B, Mangano MD, Sahani DV, Boland GW, Choy G (2017) JOURNAL CLUB: structured feedback from patients on actual radiology reports: a novel approach to improve reporting practices. AJR Am J Roentgenol 208(6):1262–1270CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Jarvik JG, BA Comstock, KT James et al (2015) Lumbar imaging with reporting of epidemiology (LIRE)--protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomized trial. Contemp Clin Trials 45:157–163 Jarvik JG, BA Comstock, KT James et al (2015) Lumbar imaging with reporting of epidemiology (LIRE)--protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomized trial. Contemp Clin Trials 45:157–163
43.
go back to reference McCullough BJ, Johnson GR, Martin BI, Jarvik JG (2012) Lumbar MR imaging and reporting epidemiology: do epidemiologic data in reports affect clinical management? Radiology 262(3):941–946CrossRef McCullough BJ, Johnson GR, Martin BI, Jarvik JG (2012) Lumbar MR imaging and reporting epidemiology: do epidemiologic data in reports affect clinical management? Radiology 262(3):941–946CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Enhancing clinician and patient understanding of radiology reports: a scoping review of international guidelines
Authors
Caitlin I. Farmer
Allison M. Bourne
Denise O’Connor
Jeffrey G. Jarvik
Rachelle Buchbinder
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Insights into Imaging / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1869-4101
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00864-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Insights into Imaging 1/2020 Go to the issue