Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Gastroenterology 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Endoscopy | Research

A single-center prospective study on pain alleviation during peroral upper endoscopy with an ultrathin endoscope

Authors: Iwao Aya, Ryoji Ichijima, Tomomi Sugita, Masako Nakayama, Ayaka Takasu, Kanako Ogura, Takuji Gotoda, Hirofumi Kogure

Published in: BMC Gastroenterology | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The efficacy of transnasal endoscopy using an ultrathin endoscope has been reported in several studies. However, few studies regarding peroral endoscopy with ultrathin endoscopes with high resolution have been reported. This study investigates the pain alleviation of peroral endoscopy with an ultrathin endoscope.

Methods

Patients with a history of peroral endoscopy using a conventional, normal-diameter scope with no sedation who underwent peroral esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) using a thin scope between April-July 2022 were included in this study. After the procedure, the patients completed a questionnaire evaluating pain during the examination and willingness to repeat the procedure. The physicians were surveyed regarding their level of satisfaction. The primary endpoint was patient satisfaction, which corresponded to the rate of patients who rated the thin endoscope as more comfortable or somewhat more comfortable than the previously-used, conventional endoscope.

Results

One hundred and forty-five patients were included in the analyses. Patient satisfaction was achieved in 86.2% (125/145) of patients. The median visual analog scale pain score was 3 (0–7) points in this study, which is significantly lower than the pain score after the previous endoscopy (5 (0–10) points; p < 0.001). In addition, 96% (24/25) of patients who underwent EGD by an expert and 95.8% (115/120) who underwent EGD by a non-expert were willing to repeat endoscopy using the thin scope (p = 0.69).

Conclusion

Peroral endoscopy using a thin scope reduces patient pain regardless of the endoscopist’s experience.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Gotoda T, Akamatsu T, Abe S, Shimatani M, Nakai Y, Hatta W, et al. Guidelines for sedation in gastroenterological endoscopy (second edition). Dig Endosc. 2021;33:21–53.CrossRefPubMed Gotoda T, Akamatsu T, Abe S, Shimatani M, Nakai Y, Hatta W, et al. Guidelines for sedation in gastroenterological endoscopy (second edition). Dig Endosc. 2021;33:21–53.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference McQuaid KR, Laine L. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials of moderate sedation for routine endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67:910–23.CrossRefPubMed McQuaid KR, Laine L. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials of moderate sedation for routine endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67:910–23.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Tatsumi Y, Harada A, Matsumoto T, Tani T, Nishida H. Current status and evaluation of transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Dig Endosc. 2009;21:141–6.CrossRefPubMed Tatsumi Y, Harada A, Matsumoto T, Tani T, Nishida H. Current status and evaluation of transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Dig Endosc. 2009;21:141–6.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Abe K, Miyaoka M. Trial of transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Dig Endosc. 2006;18:212–17.CrossRef Abe K, Miyaoka M. Trial of transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Dig Endosc. 2006;18:212–17.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Zaman A, Hahn M, Hapke R, Knigge K, Fennerty MB, Katon RM. A randomized trial of peroral versus transnasal unsedated endoscopy using an ultrathin videoendoscope. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;49:279–84.CrossRefPubMed Zaman A, Hahn M, Hapke R, Knigge K, Fennerty MB, Katon RM. A randomized trial of peroral versus transnasal unsedated endoscopy using an ultrathin videoendoscope. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;49:279–84.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Tanuma T, Morita Y, Doyama H. Current status of transnasal endoscopy worldwide using ultrathin videoscope for upper gastrointestinal tract. Dig Endosc. 2016;28:25–31.CrossRefPubMed Tanuma T, Morita Y, Doyama H. Current status of transnasal endoscopy worldwide using ultrathin videoscope for upper gastrointestinal tract. Dig Endosc. 2016;28:25–31.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Despott EJ, Baulf M, Bromley J, Gupta S, Fraser C. Scent: final report of the first UK prospective, randomised, head-to-head trial of transnasal vs oral upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gut. 2010;59:A24.CrossRef Despott EJ, Baulf M, Bromley J, Gupta S, Fraser C. Scent: final report of the first UK prospective, randomised, head-to-head trial of transnasal vs oral upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gut. 2010;59:A24.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Sami SS, Subramanian V, Ortiz-Fernández-Sordo J, Saed A, Singh S, Guha IN. Performance characteristics of unsedated ultrathin video endoscopy in the assessment of the upper GI tract: systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;82:782–92.CrossRefPubMed Sami SS, Subramanian V, Ortiz-Fernández-Sordo J, Saed A, Singh S, Guha IN. Performance characteristics of unsedated ultrathin video endoscopy in the assessment of the upper GI tract: systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;82:782–92.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Parker C, Alexandridis E, Plevris J, O’Hara Panter S. Transnasal endoscopy: no gagging no panic! Front Gastroenterol. 2016;7:246–56.CrossRef Parker C, Alexandridis E, Plevris J, O’Hara Panter S. Transnasal endoscopy: no gagging no panic! Front Gastroenterol. 2016;7:246–56.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Iwamoto J, Mizokami Y, Shimokobe K, Ito M, Hirayama T, Saito Y, et al. Pretreatment methods in transnasal endoscopy. Hepatogastroenterology. 2011;58:842–5.PubMed Iwamoto J, Mizokami Y, Shimokobe K, Ito M, Hirayama T, Saito Y, et al. Pretreatment methods in transnasal endoscopy. Hepatogastroenterology. 2011;58:842–5.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Walter T, Chesnay A-L, Dumortier J, Mege-LeChevallier F, Herview V, Guillaud O, et al. Biopsy specimens obtained with small-caliber endoscopes have comparable diagnostic performances than those obtained with conventional endoscopes. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2010;44:12–7.CrossRefPubMed Walter T, Chesnay A-L, Dumortier J, Mege-LeChevallier F, Herview V, Guillaud O, et al. Biopsy specimens obtained with small-caliber endoscopes have comparable diagnostic performances than those obtained with conventional endoscopes. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2010;44:12–7.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Grant RK, Brindle WM, Robertson AR, Kalla R, Plevris JN. Unsedated Transnasal Endoscopy: a safe, well-tolerated and Accurate Alternative to Standard Diagnostic Peroral Endoscopy. Dig Dis Sci. 2022;67:1937–47.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Grant RK, Brindle WM, Robertson AR, Kalla R, Plevris JN. Unsedated Transnasal Endoscopy: a safe, well-tolerated and Accurate Alternative to Standard Diagnostic Peroral Endoscopy. Dig Dis Sci. 2022;67:1937–47.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Dumortier J, Ponchon T, Scoazec JY, Moulinier B, Zarka F, Paliard P, Lambert R. Prospective evaluation of transnasal esophagastroduodenoscopy: feasibility and study on performance and tolerance. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;49:285–91.CrossRefPubMed Dumortier J, Ponchon T, Scoazec JY, Moulinier B, Zarka F, Paliard P, Lambert R. Prospective evaluation of transnasal esophagastroduodenoscopy: feasibility and study on performance and tolerance. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;49:285–91.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Craig A, Hanlon J, Dent J, Schoeman M. A comparison of transnasal and transoral endoscopy with small-diameter endoscopes in unsedated patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;49:292–6.CrossRefPubMed Craig A, Hanlon J, Dent J, Schoeman M. A comparison of transnasal and transoral endoscopy with small-diameter endoscopes in unsedated patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;49:292–6.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Kawai T, Yanagizawa K, Naito S, Sugimoto H, Fukuzawa M, Gotoda T, et al. Evaluation of gastric cancer diagnosis using new ultrathin transnasal endoscopy with narrow-band imaging: preliminary study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;29:33–6.CrossRefPubMed Kawai T, Yanagizawa K, Naito S, Sugimoto H, Fukuzawa M, Gotoda T, et al. Evaluation of gastric cancer diagnosis using new ultrathin transnasal endoscopy with narrow-band imaging: preliminary study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;29:33–6.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Mulcahy HE, Riches A, Kiely M, Farthing MJ, Fairclough PD. A prospective controlled trial of an ultrathin versus a conventional endoscope in unsedated upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopy. 2001;33:311–6.CrossRefPubMed Mulcahy HE, Riches A, Kiely M, Farthing MJ, Fairclough PD. A prospective controlled trial of an ultrathin versus a conventional endoscope in unsedated upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopy. 2001;33:311–6.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Murata A, Akahoshi K, Sumida Y, Yamamoto H, Nakamura K, Nawaa H. Prospective randomized trial of transnasal versus peroral endoscopy using an ultrathin videoendoscope in unsedated patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;22:482–5.CrossRefPubMed Murata A, Akahoshi K, Sumida Y, Yamamoto H, Nakamura K, Nawaa H. Prospective randomized trial of transnasal versus peroral endoscopy using an ultrathin videoendoscope in unsedated patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;22:482–5.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
A single-center prospective study on pain alleviation during peroral upper endoscopy with an ultrathin endoscope
Authors
Iwao Aya
Ryoji Ichijima
Tomomi Sugita
Masako Nakayama
Ayaka Takasu
Kanako Ogura
Takuji Gotoda
Hirofumi Kogure
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Gastroenterology / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1471-230X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-023-02965-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BMC Gastroenterology 1/2023 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.