Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 3/2022

01-03-2022 | Endoscopy | Original Article

Receipt of Serial Endoscopy Procedures Prior to Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Diagnosis Is Associated with Better Survival

Authors: Linda C. Cummings, Tzuyung Doug Kou, Amitabh Chak, Mark D. Schluchter, Seunghee Margevicius, Gregory S. Cooper

Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Issue 3/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The poor prognosis of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) has focused efforts on early detection by serial endoscopic surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus (BE). Previously, we reported that receipt of endoscopy before EAC diagnosis was associated with improved survival.

Aim

We aimed to refine our previous analysis, assessing surveillance as measured by performance of serial endoscopy before EAC diagnosis and evaluating its association with stage and survival.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was performed using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare database. Patients aged ≥ 70 years with EAC diagnosed during 1998–2009 were identified. Diagnosis with BE and receipt of ≥ 2 upper endoscopic procedures within 5 years before cancer diagnosis were identified. We compared a reference group not receiving serial endoscopy to 3 patterns based on ≥ 2 endoscopy dates relative to a timepoint 2 years before cancer diagnosis: “remote,” “recent,” and “sustained.”

Results

Among 5532 patients, 28% (n = 1,575) had localized stage. Thirteen percent (n = 703) received ≥ 2 endoscopic procedures before cancer diagnosis: 224, 298, and 181 in the “recent,” “remote,” and “sustained” groups. Serial endoscopy and prior BE were associated with localized stage (“sustained” group OR 2.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.07, 4.19; prior BE OR 2.68, 95% CI 2.03, 3.56). Serial endoscopy was associated with improved survival even with adjustment for lead time bias (“sustained” group HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.37, 0.55) and length time bias.

Conclusions

Sustained endoscopy was associated with earlier stage and improved survival. These results support the role of sustained surveillance in early detection of EAC.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:7–33CrossRef Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:7–33CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Rustgi AK, El-Serag HB. Esophageal carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:2499–2509CrossRef Rustgi AK, El-Serag HB. Esophageal carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:2499–2509CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Lagergren J, Lagergren P. Recent developments in esophageal adenocarcinoma. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013;63:232–248CrossRef Lagergren J, Lagergren P. Recent developments in esophageal adenocarcinoma. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013;63:232–248CrossRef
4.
go back to reference AGA Institute Medical Position Panel. American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement on the management of Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2011;140:1084–1091CrossRef AGA Institute Medical Position Panel. American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement on the management of Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2011;140:1084–1091CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Shaheen NJ, Falk GW, Iyer PG, Gerson LB. ACG clinical guideline: Diagnosis and management of Barrett’s Esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111:30–50CrossRef Shaheen NJ, Falk GW, Iyer PG, Gerson LB. ACG clinical guideline: Diagnosis and management of Barrett’s Esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111:30–50CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Standards of Practice Committee of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. ASGE guideline on screening and surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;90:335–359CrossRef Standards of Practice Committee of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. ASGE guideline on screening and surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;90:335–359CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Codipilly DC, Chandar AK, Singh S et al. The effect of endoscopic surveillance in patients with Barrett’s esophagus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2018;154:2068–2086CrossRef Codipilly DC, Chandar AK, Singh S et al. The effect of endoscopic surveillance in patients with Barrett’s esophagus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2018;154:2068–2086CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Verbeek RE, Leenders M, Ten Kate FJW et al. Surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus and mortality from esophageal adenocarcinoma: A population-based cohort study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109:1215–1222CrossRef Verbeek RE, Leenders M, Ten Kate FJW et al. Surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus and mortality from esophageal adenocarcinoma: A population-based cohort study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109:1215–1222CrossRef
9.
go back to reference El-Serag HB, Naik AD, Duan Z et al. Surveillance endoscopy is associated with improved outcomes of oesophageal adenocarcinoma detected in patients with Barrett’s oesophagus. Gut. 2016;65:1252–1260CrossRef El-Serag HB, Naik AD, Duan Z et al. Surveillance endoscopy is associated with improved outcomes of oesophageal adenocarcinoma detected in patients with Barrett’s oesophagus. Gut. 2016;65:1252–1260CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Corley DA, Mehtani K, Quesenberry C, Zhao W, de Boer J, Weiss NS. Impact of endoscopic surveillance on mortality from Barrett’s esophagus-associated esophageal adenocarcinomas. Gastroenterology. 2013;145:312–319CrossRef Corley DA, Mehtani K, Quesenberry C, Zhao W, de Boer J, Weiss NS. Impact of endoscopic surveillance on mortality from Barrett’s esophagus-associated esophageal adenocarcinomas. Gastroenterology. 2013;145:312–319CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Tramontano AC, Sheehan DF, Yeh JM et al. The impact of a prior diagnosis of Barrett’s esophagus on esophageal adenocarcinoma survival. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017;112:1256–1264CrossRef Tramontano AC, Sheehan DF, Yeh JM et al. The impact of a prior diagnosis of Barrett’s esophagus on esophageal adenocarcinoma survival. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017;112:1256–1264CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Old O, Moayyedi P, Love S et al. Barrett’s Oesophagus Surveillance versus endoscopy at need Study (BOSS): Protocol and analysis plan for a multicentre randomized controlled trial. J Med Screen. 2015;22:158–164CrossRef Old O, Moayyedi P, Love S et al. Barrett’s Oesophagus Surveillance versus endoscopy at need Study (BOSS): Protocol and analysis plan for a multicentre randomized controlled trial. J Med Screen. 2015;22:158–164CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Cooper GS, Kou TD, Chak A. Receipt of previous diagnoses and endoscopy and outcome from esophageal adenocarcinoma: A population-based study with temporal trends. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:1356–1362CrossRef Cooper GS, Kou TD, Chak A. Receipt of previous diagnoses and endoscopy and outcome from esophageal adenocarcinoma: A population-based study with temporal trends. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:1356–1362CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:613–619CrossRef Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:613–619CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Cook MB, Drahos J, Wood S et al. Pathogenesis and progression of oesophageal adenocarcinoma varies by prior diagnosis of Barrett’s oesophagus. Br J Cancer. 2016;115:1383–1390CrossRef Cook MB, Drahos J, Wood S et al. Pathogenesis and progression of oesophageal adenocarcinoma varies by prior diagnosis of Barrett’s oesophagus. Br J Cancer. 2016;115:1383–1390CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Cummings LC, Kou TD, Schluchter MD, Chak A, Cooper GS. Outcomes after endoscopic versus surgical therapy for early esophageal cancers in an older population. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;94:232–240CrossRef Cummings LC, Kou TD, Schluchter MD, Chak A, Cooper GS. Outcomes after endoscopic versus surgical therapy for early esophageal cancers in an older population. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;94:232–240CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Duffy SW, Nagtegaal ID, Wallis M et al. Correcting for lead time and length bias in estimating the effect of screen detection on cancer survival. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;168:98–104CrossRef Duffy SW, Nagtegaal ID, Wallis M et al. Correcting for lead time and length bias in estimating the effect of screen detection on cancer survival. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;168:98–104CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Bhat SK, McManus DT, Coleman HG et al. Oesophageal adenocarcinoma and prior diagnosis of Barrett’s oesophagus: A population-based study. Gut. 2015;64:20–25CrossRef Bhat SK, McManus DT, Coleman HG et al. Oesophageal adenocarcinoma and prior diagnosis of Barrett’s oesophagus: A population-based study. Gut. 2015;64:20–25CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Rodriguez S, Mattek N, Lieberman D, Fennerty B, Eisen G. Barrett’s esophagus on repeat endoscopy: Should we look more than once? Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:1892–1897CrossRef Rodriguez S, Mattek N, Lieberman D, Fennerty B, Eisen G. Barrett’s esophagus on repeat endoscopy: Should we look more than once? Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:1892–1897CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Zakko L, Visrodia K, Wang KK, Iyer PG. Editorial: The effect of bias on estimation of improved survival after diagnosis of Barrett’s esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017;112:1265–1266CrossRef Zakko L, Visrodia K, Wang KK, Iyer PG. Editorial: The effect of bias on estimation of improved survival after diagnosis of Barrett’s esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017;112:1265–1266CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Receipt of Serial Endoscopy Procedures Prior to Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Diagnosis Is Associated with Better Survival
Authors
Linda C. Cummings
Tzuyung Doug Kou
Amitabh Chak
Mark D. Schluchter
Seunghee Margevicius
Gregory S. Cooper
Publication date
01-03-2022
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Issue 3/2022
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-021-06927-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2022

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 3/2022 Go to the issue

REVIEWER ACKNOWLEDGMENT

Acknowledgment of 2021 Reviewers