Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 10/2008

01-10-2008 | Original Paper

Endoscopic Ultrasonography Findings in Patients with Non-Specific Changes of the Pancreas on Computed Tomography: A Single-Center Experience

Authors: Shailender Singh, Savio Reddymasu, Sana Waheed, Melissa Vail, Jianghua He, Jyotsna Talapaneni, Mojtaba Olyaee

Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Issue 10/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Inconclusive findings on abdominal computerized tomography (CT) scans such as “enlarged or prominent pancreas” are commonly reported; however, their clinical significance is not clearly understood. The objective was to evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in a cohort of patients with indeterminate findings on CT. We undertook a retrospective, single-center study at a tertiary care university hospital. About 107 consecutive patients (56 men) underwent EUS evaluation for inconclusive CT findings. The main intervention was EUS with fine needle aspiration (FNA) The main outcome measurement was to describe lesions identified by EUS in this cohort of patients. About 22 patients (21%) had pancreatic adenocarcinoma, 14 (13%) had chronic pancreatitis, 28 (26%) had benign lesions, and 35 patients (33%) had a normal EUS exam. Pancreatic cancer was more likely to be found on EUS in patients with significant weight loss (OR 10.1; 95% CI: 3.3–30.60), hyperbilirubinemia (OR 9; 95% CI: 3–26.0), or common bile duct (CBD) dilatation (OR 3.2; 95% CI: 1.25–8.5). The limitations of the study were that we were unable to control the uniformity of CT interpretation because the scans were reviewed by multiple radiologists. There were also limited follow-up data on patients who had benign lesions or normal EUS. In conclusion, EUS is an effective modality for evaluating pancreatic lesions in patients with inconclusive findings on abdominal CT. This assists in the prompt diagnosis and institution of appropriate treatment strategies for a variety of pancreatic diseases including cancer. In the setting of inconclusive CT findings, patients with hyperbilirubinemia, significant weight loss, or CBD dilatation should undergo EUS evaluation as they are at a higher risk of having underlying pancreatic cancer.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Thun MJ (2007) Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin 57(1):43–66PubMed Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Thun MJ (2007) Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin 57(1):43–66PubMed
2.
go back to reference Kłek S, Kulig J, PopielaT, Kołodziejczyk P, Szybiński P, Richter P (2004) The value of modern ultrasonographic techniques and computed tomography in detecting and staging of pancreatic carcinoma. Acta Chir Belg 104(6):659–667PubMed Kłek S, Kulig J, PopielaT, Kołodziejczyk P, Szybiński P, Richter P (2004) The value of modern ultrasonographic techniques and computed tomography in detecting and staging of pancreatic carcinoma. Acta Chir Belg 104(6):659–667PubMed
3.
go back to reference Bluemke DA, Cameron JL, Hruban RH, Pitt HA, Siegelman SS, Soyer P, Fishman EK (1995) Potentially resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: spiral CT assessment with surgical and pathologic correlation. Radiology 197(2):381–385PubMed Bluemke DA, Cameron JL, Hruban RH, Pitt HA, Siegelman SS, Soyer P, Fishman EK (1995) Potentially resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: spiral CT assessment with surgical and pathologic correlation. Radiology 197(2):381–385PubMed
4.
go back to reference Campbell JP, Wilson SR (1988) Pancreatic neoplasms: how useful is evaluation with US? Radiology 167(2):341–344PubMed Campbell JP, Wilson SR (1988) Pancreatic neoplasms: how useful is evaluation with US? Radiology 167(2):341–344PubMed
5.
go back to reference Lynch HT, Smyrk T, Kem SE, Hruben RH, Lightdale CJ, Lemon SJ, Lynch JF, Fusaro LR (1996) Familial pancreatic cancer: a review. Semin Oncol 23(2):251–275PubMed Lynch HT, Smyrk T, Kem SE, Hruben RH, Lightdale CJ, Lemon SJ, Lynch JF, Fusaro LR (1996) Familial pancreatic cancer: a review. Semin Oncol 23(2):251–275PubMed
6.
go back to reference Freeny PC, Traverso LW, Ryan JA (1993) Diagnosis and staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma with dynamic computed tomography. Am J Surg 165(5):600–606PubMedCrossRef Freeny PC, Traverso LW, Ryan JA (1993) Diagnosis and staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma with dynamic computed tomography. Am J Surg 165(5):600–606PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference DeWitt J, Jowell P, Leblanc J, McHenry L, McGreevy K, Kramer H, Volmar K, Sherman S, Gress F (2005) EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic metastases: a multicenter experience. Gastrointest Endosc 61(6):689–696PubMedCrossRef DeWitt J, Jowell P, Leblanc J, McHenry L, McGreevy K, Kramer H, Volmar K, Sherman S, Gress F (2005) EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic metastases: a multicenter experience. Gastrointest Endosc 61(6):689–696PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Soriano A, Castells A, Ayuso M, Ayuso J, de Caralt M, Ginès M, Real M, Gilabert R, Quintó L, Trilla A, Feu F, Montanyá X, Fernández-Cruz L, Navarro R (2004) Preoperative staging and tumor resectability assessment of pancreatic cancer: prospective study comparing endoscopic ultrasonography, helical computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and angiography. Am J Gastroenterol 99(3):492–501PubMedCrossRef Soriano A, Castells A, Ayuso M, Ayuso J, de Caralt M, Ginès M, Real M, Gilabert R, Quintó L, Trilla A, Feu F, Montanyá X, Fernández-Cruz L, Navarro R (2004) Preoperative staging and tumor resectability assessment of pancreatic cancer: prospective study comparing endoscopic ultrasonography, helical computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and angiography. Am J Gastroenterol 99(3):492–501PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Protiva P, Sahai AV, Agarwal B (2001) Endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic neoplasms. Int J Gastrointest Cancer 30(1–2):33–45PubMedCrossRef Protiva P, Sahai AV, Agarwal B (2001) Endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic neoplasms. Int J Gastrointest Cancer 30(1–2):33–45PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Catanzaro A, Richardson S, Veloso H, Isenberg GA, Wong RC, Sivak MV Jr, Chak A (2003) Long-term follow-up of patients with clinically indeterminate suspicion of pancreatic cancer and normal EUS. Gastrointest Endosc 58(6):836–840PubMedCrossRef Catanzaro A, Richardson S, Veloso H, Isenberg GA, Wong RC, Sivak MV Jr, Chak A (2003) Long-term follow-up of patients with clinically indeterminate suspicion of pancreatic cancer and normal EUS. Gastrointest Endosc 58(6):836–840PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ho S, Bonasera RJ, Pollack BJ, Grendell J, Feuerman M, Gress F (2006) A single-center experience of endoscopic ultrasonography for enlarged pancreas on computed tomography. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 4(1):98–103PubMedCrossRef Ho S, Bonasera RJ, Pollack BJ, Grendell J, Feuerman M, Gress F (2006) A single-center experience of endoscopic ultrasonography for enlarged pancreas on computed tomography. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 4(1):98–103PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ryozawa S, Kitoh H, Gondo T, Urayama N, Yamashita H, Ozawa H, Yanai H, Okita K (2005) Usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. J Gastroenterol 40(9):907–911PubMedCrossRef Ryozawa S, Kitoh H, Gondo T, Urayama N, Yamashita H, Ozawa H, Yanai H, Okita K (2005) Usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. J Gastroenterol 40(9):907–911PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Agarwal B, Abu Hamda E, Molke KL, Correa AM, Ho L (2004) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and multidetector spiral CT in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 99(5):844–850PubMedCrossRef Agarwal B, Abu Hamda E, Molke KL, Correa AM, Ho L (2004) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and multidetector spiral CT in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 99(5):844–850PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kulig J, Popiela T, Kołodziejczyk P, Szybínski P, Popiela TJ, Urbank A (2005) The value of imaging techniques in the staging of pancreatic cancer. Surg Endosc 19(3):361–365PubMedCrossRef Kulig J, Popiela T, Kołodziejczyk P, Szybínski P, Popiela TJ, Urbank A (2005) The value of imaging techniques in the staging of pancreatic cancer. Surg Endosc 19(3):361–365PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Guerrini I, Gentili C, Guazzelli M (2006) Alcohol consumption and heavy drinking: a survey in three Italian villages. Alcohol Alcohol 41(3):336–340PubMed Guerrini I, Gentili C, Guazzelli M (2006) Alcohol consumption and heavy drinking: a survey in three Italian villages. Alcohol Alcohol 41(3):336–340PubMed
16.
go back to reference Rösch T (1995) Staging of pancreatic cancer. Analysis of literature results. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 5(4):735–739PubMed Rösch T (1995) Staging of pancreatic cancer. Analysis of literature results. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 5(4):735–739PubMed
17.
go back to reference Klapman JB, Chang KJ, Lee JG, Nguyen P (2005) Negative predictive value of endoscopic ultrasound in a large series of patients with a clinical suspicion of pancreatic cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 100(12):2658–2661PubMedCrossRef Klapman JB, Chang KJ, Lee JG, Nguyen P (2005) Negative predictive value of endoscopic ultrasound in a large series of patients with a clinical suspicion of pancreatic cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 100(12):2658–2661PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Rösch T, Lorenz R, Braig C, Feuerbach S, Siewert JR, Schusdziarra V, Classen M (1991) Endoscopic ultrasound in pancreatic tumor diagnosis. Gastrointest Endosc 37(3):347–352PubMedCrossRef Rösch T, Lorenz R, Braig C, Feuerbach S, Siewert JR, Schusdziarra V, Classen M (1991) Endoscopic ultrasound in pancreatic tumor diagnosis. Gastrointest Endosc 37(3):347–352PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Delbeke D, Pinson CW (2004) Pancreatic tumors: role of imaging in the diagnosis, staging, and treatment. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 11(1):4–10PubMedCrossRef Delbeke D, Pinson CW (2004) Pancreatic tumors: role of imaging in the diagnosis, staging, and treatment. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 11(1):4–10PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Michl P, Pauls S, Gress TM (2006) Evidence-based diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 20(2):227–251PubMedCrossRef Michl P, Pauls S, Gress TM (2006) Evidence-based diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 20(2):227–251PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Mertz HR, Sechopoulos P, Delbeke D, Leach SD (2000) EUS, PET, and CT scanning for evaluation of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc 52(3):367–371PubMedCrossRef Mertz HR, Sechopoulos P, Delbeke D, Leach SD (2000) EUS, PET, and CT scanning for evaluation of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc 52(3):367–371PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Endoscopic Ultrasonography Findings in Patients with Non-Specific Changes of the Pancreas on Computed Tomography: A Single-Center Experience
Authors
Shailender Singh
Savio Reddymasu
Sana Waheed
Melissa Vail
Jianghua He
Jyotsna Talapaneni
Mojtaba Olyaee
Publication date
01-10-2008
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Issue 10/2008
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-008-0204-3

Other articles of this Issue 10/2008

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 10/2008 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.