Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 1/2023

Open Access 05-12-2022 | Research Article

Electrophysiological and Psychophysical Measures of Temporal Pitch Sensitivity in Normal-hearing Listeners

Authors: François Guérit, Andrew J. Harland, Matthew L. Richardson, Robin Gransier, John C. Middlebrooks, Jan Wouters, Robert P. Carlyon

Published in: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

To obtain combined behavioural and electrophysiological measures of pitch perception, we presented harmonic complexes, bandpass filtered to contain only high-numbered harmonics, to normal-hearing listeners. These stimuli resemble bandlimited pulse trains and convey pitch using a purely temporal code. A core set of conditions consisted of six stimuli with baseline pulse rates of 94, 188 and 280 pps, filtered into a HIGH (3365–4755 Hz) or VHIGH (7800–10,800 Hz) region, alternating with a 36% higher pulse rate. Brainstem and cortical processing were measured using the frequency following response (FFR) and auditory change complex (ACC), respectively. Behavioural rate change difference limens (DLs) were measured by requiring participants to discriminate between a stimulus that changed rate twice (up-down or down-up) during its 750-ms presentation from a constant-rate pulse train. FFRs revealed robust brainstem phase locking whose amplitude decreased with increasing rate. Moderate-sized but reliable ACCs were obtained in response to changes in purely temporal pitch and, like the psychophysical DLs, did not depend consistently on the direction of rate change or on the pulse rate for baseline rates between 94 and 280 pps. ACCs were larger and DLs lower for stimuli in the HIGH than in the VHGH region. We argue that the ACC may be a useful surrogate for behavioural measures of rate discrimination, both for normal-hearing listeners and for cochlear-implant users. We also showed that rate DLs increased markedly when the baseline rate was reduced to 48 pps, and compared the behavioural and electrophysiological findings to recent cat data obtained with similar stimuli and methods.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Moore BCJ, Glasberg BR, Peters RW (1985) Relative dominance of individual partials in determining the pitch of complex tones. J Acoust Soc Am 77:1853–1860CrossRef Moore BCJ, Glasberg BR, Peters RW (1985) Relative dominance of individual partials in determining the pitch of complex tones. J Acoust Soc Am 77:1853–1860CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hoekstra A (1979) Frequency discrimination and frequency analysis in hearing. In: Institute of Audiology, University Hospital, Groningen, Netherlands. Hoekstra A (1979) Frequency discrimination and frequency analysis in hearing. In: Institute of Audiology, University Hospital, Groningen, Netherlands.
4.
go back to reference Houtsma AJM, Smurzynski J (1990) J.F.Schouten revisited: pitch of complex tones having many high-order harmonics. J Acoust Soc Am 87:304–310CrossRef Houtsma AJM, Smurzynski J (1990) J.F.Schouten revisited: pitch of complex tones having many high-order harmonics. J Acoust Soc Am 87:304–310CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Shackleton TM, Carlyon RP (1994) The role of resolved and unresolved harmonics in pitch perception and frequency modulation discrimination. J Acoust Soc Am 95:3529–3540PubMedCrossRef Shackleton TM, Carlyon RP (1994) The role of resolved and unresolved harmonics in pitch perception and frequency modulation discrimination. J Acoust Soc Am 95:3529–3540PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Moore BCJ, Carlyon RP (2005) Perception of pitch by people with cochlear hearing loss and by cochlear implant users. In: Plack CJ, Oxenham AJ (eds) Springer Handbook of Auditory Research: Pitch Perception. Springer, New York, pp 234–277 Moore BCJ, Carlyon RP (2005) Perception of pitch by people with cochlear hearing loss and by cochlear implant users. In: Plack CJ, Oxenham AJ (eds) Springer Handbook of Auditory Research: Pitch Perception. Springer, New York, pp 234–277
7.
go back to reference Wouters J, McDermott HJ, Francart T (2015) Sound coding in cochlear implants. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 32:67 Wouters J, McDermott HJ, Francart T (2015) Sound coding in cochlear implants. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 32:67
8.
go back to reference Coffey EBJ, Herholz SC, Chepesiuk AMP, Baillet S, Zatorre RJ (2016) Cortical contributions to the auditory frequency-following response revealed by MEG. Nat Commun 7 Coffey EBJ, Herholz SC, Chepesiuk AMP, Baillet S, Zatorre RJ (2016) Cortical contributions to the auditory frequency-following response revealed by MEG. Nat Commun 7
9.
go back to reference Coffey EBJ, Nicol T, White-Schwoch T, Chandrasekaran B, Krizman J, Skoe E, Zatorre RJ, Kraus N (2019) Evolving perspectives on the sources of the frequency-following response. Nat Commun 10 Coffey EBJ, Nicol T, White-Schwoch T, Chandrasekaran B, Krizman J, Skoe E, Zatorre RJ, Kraus N (2019) Evolving perspectives on the sources of the frequency-following response. Nat Commun 10
10.
go back to reference Gorina-Careta N, Kurkela JLO, Hämäläinen J, Astikainen P, Escera C (2021) Neural generators of the frequency-following response elicited to stimuli of low and high frequency: a magnetoencephalographic (MEG) study. Neuroimage 231. Gorina-Careta N, Kurkela JLO, Hämäläinen J, Astikainen P, Escera C (2021) Neural generators of the frequency-following response elicited to stimuli of low and high frequency: a magnetoencephalographic (MEG) study. Neuroimage 231.
11.
go back to reference Holmes E, Purcell DW, Carlyon RP, Gockel HE, Johnsrude IS (2018) Attentional modulation of envelope-following responses at lower (93–109 Hz) but not higher (217–233 Hz) modulation rates. J Assoc Otolaryngol 19:83–97CrossRef Holmes E, Purcell DW, Carlyon RP, Gockel HE, Johnsrude IS (2018) Attentional modulation of envelope-following responses at lower (93–109 Hz) but not higher (217–233 Hz) modulation rates. J Assoc Otolaryngol 19:83–97CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Tichko P, Skoe E (2017) Frequency-dependent fine structure in the frequency-following response: the byproduct of multiple generators. Hear Res 348:1–15PubMedCrossRef Tichko P, Skoe E (2017) Frequency-dependent fine structure in the frequency-following response: the byproduct of multiple generators. Hear Res 348:1–15PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Krishnan A, Plack CJ (2011) Neural encoding in the human brainstem relevant to the pitch of complex tones. Hear Res 275:110–119PubMedCrossRef Krishnan A, Plack CJ (2011) Neural encoding in the human brainstem relevant to the pitch of complex tones. Hear Res 275:110–119PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Oxenham AJ, Keebler MV (2008) Complex pitch perception above the “existence region” of pitch. In: J Assoc Otolaryngol Midwinter Metting, p 140. Phoenix, AZ, USA Oxenham AJ, Keebler MV (2008) Complex pitch perception above the “existence region” of pitch. In: J Assoc Otolaryngol Midwinter Metting, p 140. Phoenix, AZ, USA
15.
go back to reference Brown CJ, Etler C, He S, O’Brien S, Erenberg S, Kim JR, Dhuldhoya AN, Abbas PJ (2008) The electrically evoked auditory change complex: preliminary results from Nucleus cochlear implant users. Ear Hearing 29:704–717PubMedCrossRef Brown CJ, Etler C, He S, O’Brien S, Erenberg S, Kim JR, Dhuldhoya AN, Abbas PJ (2008) The electrically evoked auditory change complex: preliminary results from Nucleus cochlear implant users. Ear Hearing 29:704–717PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference He S, Grose JH, Teagle HFB, Buchman CA (2014) Objective measures of electrode discrimination with electrically evoked auditory change complex and speech-perception abilities in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder. Ear Hearing 35:E63–E74PubMedCrossRef He S, Grose JH, Teagle HFB, Buchman CA (2014) Objective measures of electrode discrimination with electrically evoked auditory change complex and speech-perception abilities in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder. Ear Hearing 35:E63–E74PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Martin BA, Boothroyd A (2000) Cortical, auditory, evoked potentials in response to changes of spectrum and amplitude. J Acoust Soc Am 107:2155–2161PubMedCrossRef Martin BA, Boothroyd A (2000) Cortical, auditory, evoked potentials in response to changes of spectrum and amplitude. J Acoust Soc Am 107:2155–2161PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Mathew R, Undurraga J, Li GP, Meerton L, Boyle P, Shaida A, Selvadurai D, Jiang D, Vickers D (2017) Objective assessment of electrode discrimination with the auditory change complex in adult cochlear implant users. Hear Res 354:86–101PubMedCrossRef Mathew R, Undurraga J, Li GP, Meerton L, Boyle P, Shaida A, Selvadurai D, Jiang D, Vickers D (2017) Objective assessment of electrode discrimination with the auditory change complex in adult cochlear implant users. Hear Res 354:86–101PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Ostroff JM, Martin BA, Boothroyd A (1998) Cortical evoked response to acoustic change within a syllable. Ear Hearing 19:290–297PubMedCrossRef Ostroff JM, Martin BA, Boothroyd A (1998) Cortical evoked response to acoustic change within a syllable. Ear Hearing 19:290–297PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Presacco A, Middlebrooks JC (2018) Tone-evoked acoustic change complex (ACC) recorded in a sedated animal model. JARO J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 19:451–466PubMedCentralCrossRef Presacco A, Middlebrooks JC (2018) Tone-evoked acoustic change complex (ACC) recorded in a sedated animal model. JARO J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 19:451–466PubMedCentralCrossRef
21.
22.
go back to reference Undurraga JA, Van Yper L, Bance M, McAlpine D, Vickers D (2021) Neural encoding of spectro-temporal cues at slow and near speech-rate in cochlear implant users. Hear Res 403:108160PubMedCrossRef Undurraga JA, Van Yper L, Bance M, McAlpine D, Vickers D (2021) Neural encoding of spectro-temporal cues at slow and near speech-rate in cochlear implant users. Hear Res 403:108160PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Gransier R, Guérit F, Carlyon RP, Wouters J (2021) Frequency following responses and rate change complexes in cochlear implant users. Hear Res 404:108200PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Gransier R, Guérit F, Carlyon RP, Wouters J (2021) Frequency following responses and rate change complexes in cochlear implant users. Hear Res 404:108200PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Bernstein JG, Oxenham AJ (2003) Pitch discrimination of diotic and dichotic tone complexes: harmonic resolvability or harmonic number? J Acoust Soc Am 113:3323–3334PubMedCrossRef Bernstein JG, Oxenham AJ (2003) Pitch discrimination of diotic and dichotic tone complexes: harmonic resolvability or harmonic number? J Acoust Soc Am 113:3323–3334PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Carlyon RP (1996) Masker asynchrony impairs the fundamental-frequency discrimination of unresolved harmonics. J Acoust Soc Am 99:525–533PubMedCrossRef Carlyon RP (1996) Masker asynchrony impairs the fundamental-frequency discrimination of unresolved harmonics. J Acoust Soc Am 99:525–533PubMedCrossRef
26.
28.
go back to reference Macherey O, Carlyon RP (2014) Re-examining the upper limit of temporal pitch. J Acoust Soc Am 136:3186–3199PubMedCrossRef Macherey O, Carlyon RP (2014) Re-examining the upper limit of temporal pitch. J Acoust Soc Am 136:3186–3199PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Deeks JM, Gockel HE, Carlyon RP (2013) Further investigations of complex pitch perception in the absence of a place-rate match. J Acoust Soc Am 133:377–388PubMedCrossRef Deeks JM, Gockel HE, Carlyon RP (2013) Further investigations of complex pitch perception in the absence of a place-rate match. J Acoust Soc Am 133:377–388PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Gockel HE, Carlyon RP, Mehta A, Plack CJ (2011) The Frequency Following Response (FFR) may reflect pitch-bearing information but is not a direct representation of pitch. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 12:767–782PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Gockel HE, Carlyon RP, Mehta A, Plack CJ (2011) The Frequency Following Response (FFR) may reflect pitch-bearing information but is not a direct representation of pitch. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 12:767–782PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Gockel HE, Krugliak A, Plack CJ, Carlyon RP (2015) Specificity of the human frequency following response for carrier and modulation frequency assessed using adaptation. JARO J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 16:747–762PubMedCentralCrossRef Gockel HE, Krugliak A, Plack CJ, Carlyon RP (2015) Specificity of the human frequency following response for carrier and modulation frequency assessed using adaptation. JARO J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 16:747–762PubMedCentralCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Gockel HE, Farooq R, Muhammed L, Plack CJ, Carlyon RP (2012) Differences between psychoacoustic and frequency following response measures of distortion tone level and masking. J Acoust Soc Am 132:2524–2535 Gockel HE, Farooq R, Muhammed L, Plack CJ, Carlyon RP (2012) Differences between psychoacoustic and frequency following response measures of distortion tone level and masking. J Acoust Soc Am 132:2524–2535
34.
go back to reference Dobie RA, Wilson MJ (1996) A comparison of t test, F test, and coherence methods of detecting steady-state auditory-evoked potentials, distortion-product otoacoustic emissions, or other sinusoids. J Acoust Soc Am 100:2236–2246PubMedCrossRef Dobie RA, Wilson MJ (1996) A comparison of t test, F test, and coherence methods of detecting steady-state auditory-evoked potentials, distortion-product otoacoustic emissions, or other sinusoids. J Acoust Soc Am 100:2236–2246PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Elberling C, Kristensen SG, Don M (2012) Auditory brainstem responses to chirps delivered by different insert earphones. J Acoust Soc Am 131:2091–2100PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Elberling C, Kristensen SG, Don M (2012) Auditory brainstem responses to chirps delivered by different insert earphones. J Acoust Soc Am 131:2091–2100PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Martin GK, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Probst R, Coats AC (1988) Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in a non-human primate. I. Basic features and relations to other emissions. HearRes 33:49–68 Martin GK, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Probst R, Coats AC (1988) Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in a non-human primate. I. Basic features and relations to other emissions. HearRes 33:49–68
37.
go back to reference Deprez H, Gransier R, Hofmann M, van Wieringen A, Wouters J, Moonen M (2017) Characterization of cochlear implant artifacts in electrically evoked auditory steady-state responses. Biomed Signal Process Control 31:127–138CrossRef Deprez H, Gransier R, Hofmann M, van Wieringen A, Wouters J, Moonen M (2017) Characterization of cochlear implant artifacts in electrically evoked auditory steady-state responses. Biomed Signal Process Control 31:127–138CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Krishnan A (1999) Human frequency-following responses to two-tone approximations of steady-state vowels. Audiol Neurootol 4:95–103PubMedCrossRef Krishnan A (1999) Human frequency-following responses to two-tone approximations of steady-state vowels. Audiol Neurootol 4:95–103PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Krishnan A (2006) Frequency-following response. In: Auditory evoked potentials: basic principles and clinical applications (Burkard R, Don M, Eggermont J, eds), pp 313–333 Krishnan A (2006) Frequency-following response. In: Auditory evoked potentials: basic principles and clinical applications (Burkard R, Don M, Eggermont J, eds), pp 313–333
40.
go back to reference Skoe E, Kraus N (2010) Auditory brain stem response to complex sounds: a tutorial. Ear Hearing 31:1–23CrossRef Skoe E, Kraus N (2010) Auditory brain stem response to complex sounds: a tutorial. Ear Hearing 31:1–23CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Elberling C, Don M, Cebulla M, Sturzebecher E (2007) Auditory steady-state responses to chirp stimuli based on cochlear traveling wave delay. J Acoust Soc Am 122:2772–2785PubMedCrossRef Elberling C, Don M, Cebulla M, Sturzebecher E (2007) Auditory steady-state responses to chirp stimuli based on cochlear traveling wave delay. J Acoust Soc Am 122:2772–2785PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Ruggero MA, Temchin AN (2007) Similarity of traveling-wave delays in the hearing organs of humans and other tetrapods. JARO J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 8:153–166PubMedCentralCrossRef Ruggero MA, Temchin AN (2007) Similarity of traveling-wave delays in the hearing organs of humans and other tetrapods. JARO J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 8:153–166PubMedCentralCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Moore BCJ, Glasberg BR (1990) Frequency discrimination of complex tones with overlapping and non-overlapping harmonics. J Acoust Soc Am 87:2163–2177PubMedCrossRef Moore BCJ, Glasberg BR (1990) Frequency discrimination of complex tones with overlapping and non-overlapping harmonics. J Acoust Soc Am 87:2163–2177PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Plack CJ, Carlyon RP (1995) Differences in frequency modulation detection and fundamental frequency discrimination between complex tones consisting of resolved and unresolved harmonics. J Acoust Soc Am 98:1355–1364CrossRef Plack CJ, Carlyon RP (1995) Differences in frequency modulation detection and fundamental frequency discrimination between complex tones consisting of resolved and unresolved harmonics. J Acoust Soc Am 98:1355–1364CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Plack CJ, Watkinson RK (2010) Perceived continuity and pitch shifts for complex tones with unresolved harmonics. J Acoust Soc Am 128:1922–1929PubMedCrossRef Plack CJ, Watkinson RK (2010) Perceived continuity and pitch shifts for complex tones with unresolved harmonics. J Acoust Soc Am 128:1922–1929PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Arzounian D, de Kerangal M, de Cheveigne A (2017) Sequential dependencies in pitch judgments. J Acoust Soc Am 142:3047PubMedCrossRef Arzounian D, de Kerangal M, de Cheveigne A (2017) Sequential dependencies in pitch judgments. J Acoust Soc Am 142:3047PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Krumbholz K, Patterson RD, Pressnitzer D (2000) The lower limit of pitch as determined by rate discrimination. J Acoust Soc Am 108:1170–1180PubMedCrossRef Krumbholz K, Patterson RD, Pressnitzer D (2000) The lower limit of pitch as determined by rate discrimination. J Acoust Soc Am 108:1170–1180PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Stahl P, Macherey O, Meunier S, Roman S (2016) Rate discrimination at low pulse rates in normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners: influence of intracochlear stimulation site. J Acoust Soc Am 139:1578PubMedCrossRef Stahl P, Macherey O, Meunier S, Roman S (2016) Rate discrimination at low pulse rates in normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners: influence of intracochlear stimulation site. J Acoust Soc Am 139:1578PubMedCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Bernstein JGW, Oxenham AJ (2006) The relationship between frequency selectivity and pitch discrimination: effects of stimulus level. J Acoust Soc Am 120:3916–3928PubMedCrossRef Bernstein JGW, Oxenham AJ (2006) The relationship between frequency selectivity and pitch discrimination: effects of stimulus level. J Acoust Soc Am 120:3916–3928PubMedCrossRef
51.
52.
go back to reference Don M, Kwong B, Tanaka C (2005) A diagnostic test for Meniere’s disease and cochlear hydrops: impaired high-pass noise masking of auditory brainstem response. Otol Neurotol 26:711–722PubMedCrossRef Don M, Kwong B, Tanaka C (2005) A diagnostic test for Meniere’s disease and cochlear hydrops: impaired high-pass noise masking of auditory brainstem response. Otol Neurotol 26:711–722PubMedCrossRef
53.
go back to reference He S, Grose JH, Buchman CA (2012) Auditory discrimination: the relationship between psychophysical and electrophysiological measures. Int J Audiol 51:771–782PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef He S, Grose JH, Buchman CA (2012) Auditory discrimination: the relationship between psychophysical and electrophysiological measures. Int J Audiol 51:771–782PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
54.
go back to reference Martin BA, Boothroyd A (1999) Cortical, auditory, event-related potentials in response to periodic and aperiodic stimuli with the same spectral envelope. Ear Hearing 20:33–44PubMedCrossRef Martin BA, Boothroyd A (1999) Cortical, auditory, event-related potentials in response to periodic and aperiodic stimuli with the same spectral envelope. Ear Hearing 20:33–44PubMedCrossRef
55.
go back to reference Carcagno S, Plack CJ (2011) Subcortical plasticity following perceptual learning in a pitch discrimination task. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 12:89–100PubMedCrossRef Carcagno S, Plack CJ (2011) Subcortical plasticity following perceptual learning in a pitch discrimination task. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 12:89–100PubMedCrossRef
56.
go back to reference Han JH, Dimitrijevic A (2015) Acoustic change responses to amplitude modulation: a novel method to quantify cortical temporal processing and hemispheric asymmetry. Front Neurosci 9 Han JH, Dimitrijevic A (2015) Acoustic change responses to amplitude modulation: a novel method to quantify cortical temporal processing and hemispheric asymmetry. Front Neurosci 9
57.
go back to reference Ritter S, Dosch HG, Specht HJ, Rupp A (2005) Neuromagnetic responses reflect the temporal pitch change of regular interval sounds. Neuroimage 27:533–543PubMedCrossRef Ritter S, Dosch HG, Specht HJ, Rupp A (2005) Neuromagnetic responses reflect the temporal pitch change of regular interval sounds. Neuroimage 27:533–543PubMedCrossRef
58.
go back to reference Rupp A, Hauck M, Dosch HG, Patterson RD (2018) The effect of age on Huggins’ pitch processing and its location in auditory cortex. Acta Acust Acust 104:783–786CrossRef Rupp A, Hauck M, Dosch HG, Patterson RD (2018) The effect of age on Huggins’ pitch processing and its location in auditory cortex. Acta Acust Acust 104:783–786CrossRef
59.
go back to reference Seither-Preisler A, Patterson RD, Krumbholz K, Seither S, Luetkenhoener B (2006) From noise to pitch: transient and sustained responses of the auditory evoked field. Hear Res 218:50–63PubMedCrossRef Seither-Preisler A, Patterson RD, Krumbholz K, Seither S, Luetkenhoener B (2006) From noise to pitch: transient and sustained responses of the auditory evoked field. Hear Res 218:50–63PubMedCrossRef
60.
61.
go back to reference Gockel H, Moore BCJ, Patterson RD, Meddis R (2003) Louder sounds can produce less forward, masking: effects of component phase in complex tones. J Acoust Soc Am 114:978–990PubMedCrossRef Gockel H, Moore BCJ, Patterson RD, Meddis R (2003) Louder sounds can produce less forward, masking: effects of component phase in complex tones. J Acoust Soc Am 114:978–990PubMedCrossRef
62.
go back to reference Kim JR, Brown CJ, Abbas PJ, Etler CP, O’Brien S (2009) The effect of changes in stimulus level on electrically evoked cortical auditory potentials. Ear Hear 30:320–329PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Kim JR, Brown CJ, Abbas PJ, Etler CP, O’Brien S (2009) The effect of changes in stimulus level on electrically evoked cortical auditory potentials. Ear Hear 30:320–329PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
63.
go back to reference Ortiz JA, Wright BA (2010) Differential rates of consolidation of conceptual and stimulus learning following training on an auditory skill. Exp Brain Res 201:441–451PubMedCrossRef Ortiz JA, Wright BA (2010) Differential rates of consolidation of conceptual and stimulus learning following training on an auditory skill. Exp Brain Res 201:441–451PubMedCrossRef
64.
go back to reference Arzounian D, de Kerangal M, de Cheveigne A (2017) A sliding two-alternative forced-choice paradigm for pitch discrimination. J Acoust Soc Am 142:167PubMedCrossRef Arzounian D, de Kerangal M, de Cheveigne A (2017) A sliding two-alternative forced-choice paradigm for pitch discrimination. J Acoust Soc Am 142:167PubMedCrossRef
65.
go back to reference Jesteadt W, Bilger RC (1974) Intensity and frequency discrimination in one- and two-interval paradigms. J Acoust Soc Am 55:1266–1276PubMedCrossRef Jesteadt W, Bilger RC (1974) Intensity and frequency discrimination in one- and two-interval paradigms. J Acoust Soc Am 55:1266–1276PubMedCrossRef
66.
go back to reference Mathias SR, Bailey PJ, Semal C, Demany L (2011) A note about insensitivity to pitch-change direction. J Acoust Soc Am 130:EL129-EL134 Mathias SR, Bailey PJ, Semal C, Demany L (2011) A note about insensitivity to pitch-change direction. J Acoust Soc Am 130:EL129-EL134
67.
go back to reference Semal C, Demany L (2006) Individual differences in the sensitivity to pitch direction. J Acoust Soc Am 120:3907–3915PubMedCrossRef Semal C, Demany L (2006) Individual differences in the sensitivity to pitch direction. J Acoust Soc Am 120:3907–3915PubMedCrossRef
68.
go back to reference Carlyon RP, Deeks JM, Guérit F, Lamping W, Billig AJ, Large CH, Harris P (2018) Evaluation of possible effects of a potassium channel modulator on temporal processing by cochlear implant listeners. J Asssoc Res Otalryngol 19:668–680 Carlyon RP, Deeks JM, Guérit F, Lamping W, Billig AJ, Large CH, Harris P (2018) Evaluation of possible effects of a potassium channel modulator on temporal processing by cochlear implant listeners. J Asssoc Res Otalryngol 19:668–680
69.
go back to reference Chambers AR, Pilati N, Balaram P, Large CH, Kaczmarek LK, Polley DB (2017) Pharmacological modulation of Kv3.1 mitigates auditory midbrain temporal processing deficits following auditory nerve damage. Sci Rep 7:17496 Chambers AR, Pilati N, Balaram P, Large CH, Kaczmarek LK, Polley DB (2017) Pharmacological modulation of Kv3.1 mitigates auditory midbrain temporal processing deficits following auditory nerve damage. Sci Rep 7:17496
70.
71.
go back to reference Middlebrooks J, Snyder R (2009) Enhanced transmission of temporal fine structure using penetrating auditory nerve electrodes. In: Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 32nd Midwinter Research Meeting p328. Baltimore, Maryland, USA Middlebrooks J, Snyder R (2009) Enhanced transmission of temporal fine structure using penetrating auditory nerve electrodes. In: Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 32nd Midwinter Research Meeting p328. Baltimore, Maryland, USA
72.
go back to reference Vollmer M, Beitel RE, Schreiner CE, Leake PA (2017) Passive stimulation and behavioral training differentially transform temporal processing in the inferior colliculus and primary auditory cortex. J Neurophysiol 117:47–64PubMedCrossRef Vollmer M, Beitel RE, Schreiner CE, Leake PA (2017) Passive stimulation and behavioral training differentially transform temporal processing in the inferior colliculus and primary auditory cortex. J Neurophysiol 117:47–64PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Electrophysiological and Psychophysical Measures of Temporal Pitch Sensitivity in Normal-hearing Listeners
Authors
François Guérit
Andrew J. Harland
Matthew L. Richardson
Robin Gransier
John C. Middlebrooks
Jan Wouters
Robert P. Carlyon
Publication date
05-12-2022
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology / Issue 1/2023
Print ISSN: 1525-3961
Electronic ISSN: 1438-7573
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-022-00879-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 1/2023 Go to the issue