Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Journal of Headache and Pain 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Efficacy and safety of DFN-11 (sumatriptan injection, 3 mg) in adults with episodic migraine: an 8-week open-label extension study

Authors: Stephen Landy, Sagar Munjal, Elimor Brand-Schieber, Alan M. Rapoport

Published in: The Journal of Headache and Pain | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

DFN-11, a 3 mg sumatriptan subcutaneous (SC) autoinjector for acute treatment of migraine, has not been assessed previously in multiple attacks. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of DFN-11 in the acute treatment of multiple migraine attacks.

Methods

This was an 8-week open-label extension of multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled US study. Subjects averaging 2 to 6 episodic migraine attacks per month were randomized to DFN-11 or placebo to treat a single attack of moderate-to-severe intensity and then entered the extension study to assess the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of DFN-11 in multiple attacks of any pain intensity.

Results

Overall, 234 subjects enrolled in the open-label period, and 29 (12.4%) discontinued early. A total of 848 migraine episodes were treated with 1042 doses of open-label DFN-11 and subjects treated a mean (SD) of 3.9 (2.3) attacks. At 2 h postdose in attacks 1 (N = 216), 2 (N = 186), 3 (N = 142) and 4 (N = 110), respectively, pain freedom rates were 57.6%, 64.6%, 61.6%, and 66.3%; pain relief rates were 83.4%, 88.4%, 84.1%, and 81.7%; most bothersome symptom (MBS)-free rates were 69.0%, 76.5%, 77.7%, and 74.7%; nausea-free rates were 78.1%, 84.6%, 86.5%, and 85.7%; photophobia-free rates were 75.3%, 76.4%, 72.3%, and 77.5%; and phonophobia-free rates were 75.2%, 77.5%, 73.6%, and 76.0%. Overall, 40.6% (89/219) of subjects reported treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE), the most common of which were associated with the injection site: swelling (12.8%), pain (11.4%), irritation (6.4%), and bruising (6.4%). Most subjects (65.2%, 58/89) had mild TEAEs; severe TEAEs were reported by 1 subject (treatment-related jaw tightness). Five subjects (2.1%) discontinued due to adverse events, which included mild throat tightness (n = 2), moderate hernia pain (n = 1), moderate hypersensitivity (n = 1), and 1 subject with mild nausea and moderate injection site swelling. There were no serious TEAEs and no new or unexpected safety findings.

Conclusion

DFN-11 was effective, tolerable, and safe in the acute treatment of 4 migraine attacks over 8 weeks, with consistent responses on pain and associated symptoms. Most TEAEs were mild, with a very low incidence of triptan-related TEAEs. DFN-11 is potentially an effective and safe alternative for the acute treatment of migraine.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02569853. Registered 07 October 2015.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lipton RB, Stewart WF, Diamond S et al (2001) Prevalence and burden of migraine in the United States: data from the American migraine study II. Headache 41:646–657CrossRefPubMed Lipton RB, Stewart WF, Diamond S et al (2001) Prevalence and burden of migraine in the United States: data from the American migraine study II. Headache 41:646–657CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Lipton RB, Bigal ME, Diamond M et al (2007) Migraine prevalence, disease burden, and the need for preventive therapy. Neurology 68:343–349CrossRefPubMed Lipton RB, Bigal ME, Diamond M et al (2007) Migraine prevalence, disease burden, and the need for preventive therapy. Neurology 68:343–349CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Lipton RB, Hamelsky SW, Dayno JM (2002) What do patients with migraine want from acute migraine treatment? Headache 42(Suppl 1):3–9CrossRefPubMed Lipton RB, Hamelsky SW, Dayno JM (2002) What do patients with migraine want from acute migraine treatment? Headache 42(Suppl 1):3–9CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Malik SN, Hopkins M, Young WB et al (2006) Acute migraine treatment: patterns of use and satisfaction in a clinical population. Headache 46:773–780CrossRefPubMed Malik SN, Hopkins M, Young WB et al (2006) Acute migraine treatment: patterns of use and satisfaction in a clinical population. Headache 46:773–780CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Davies GM, Santanello N, Lipton R (2000) Determinants of patient satisfaction with migraine therapy. Cephalalgia 20:554–560CrossRefPubMed Davies GM, Santanello N, Lipton R (2000) Determinants of patient satisfaction with migraine therapy. Cephalalgia 20:554–560CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Amoozegar F, Pringsheim T (2009) Rizatriptan for the acute treatment of migraine: consistency, preference, satisfaction, and quality of life. Patient preference and adherence 3:251–258PubMedPubMedCentral Amoozegar F, Pringsheim T (2009) Rizatriptan for the acute treatment of migraine: consistency, preference, satisfaction, and quality of life. Patient preference and adherence 3:251–258PubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Tfelt-Hansen P, Pascual J, Ramadan N et al (2012) Guidelines for controlled trials of drugs in migraine: third edition. A guide for investigators. Cephalalgia 32:6–38CrossRefPubMed Tfelt-Hansen P, Pascual J, Ramadan N et al (2012) Guidelines for controlled trials of drugs in migraine: third edition. A guide for investigators. Cephalalgia 32:6–38CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Tansey MJ, Pilgrim AJ, Martin PM (1993) Long-term experience with sumatriptan in the treatment of migraine. Eur Neurol 33:310–315CrossRefPubMed Tansey MJ, Pilgrim AJ, Martin PM (1993) Long-term experience with sumatriptan in the treatment of migraine. Eur Neurol 33:310–315CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Cady RK, Maizels M, Reeves DL et al (2009) Predictors of adherence to triptans: factors of sustained vs lapsed users. Headache 49:386–394CrossRefPubMed Cady RK, Maizels M, Reeves DL et al (2009) Predictors of adherence to triptans: factors of sustained vs lapsed users. Headache 49:386–394CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Lipton RB, Bigal ME, Stewart WF (2005) Clinical trials of acute treatments for migraine including multiple attack studies of pain, disability, and health-related quality of life. Neurology 65:S50–S58CrossRefPubMed Lipton RB, Bigal ME, Stewart WF (2005) Clinical trials of acute treatments for migraine including multiple attack studies of pain, disability, and health-related quality of life. Neurology 65:S50–S58CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Cady RK, Munjal S, Cady RJ et al (2017) Randomized, double-blind, crossover study comparing DFN-11 injection (3 mg subcutaneous sumatriptan) with 6 mg subcutaneous sumatriptan for the treatment of rapidly-escalating attacks of episodic migraine. J Headache Pain 18:17CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cady RK, Munjal S, Cady RJ et al (2017) Randomized, double-blind, crossover study comparing DFN-11 injection (3 mg subcutaneous sumatriptan) with 6 mg subcutaneous sumatriptan for the treatment of rapidly-escalating attacks of episodic migraine. J Headache Pain 18:17CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
15.
go back to reference (2004) The International Classification of Headache Disorders: 2nd edition. Cephalalgia 24(Suppl 1):9–160 (2004) The International Classification of Headache Disorders: 2nd edition. Cephalalgia 24(Suppl 1):9–160
16.
go back to reference Gobel H, Heinze A, Stolze H et al (1999) Open-labeled long-term study of the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of subcutaneous sumatriptan in acute migraine treatment. Cephalalgia 19:676–683 discussion 626CrossRefPubMed Gobel H, Heinze A, Stolze H et al (1999) Open-labeled long-term study of the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of subcutaneous sumatriptan in acute migraine treatment. Cephalalgia 19:676–683 discussion 626CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Sheftell FD, Weeks RE, Rapoport AM et al (1994) Subcutaneous sumatriptan in a clinical setting: the first 100 consecutive patients with acute migraine in a tertiary care center. Headache 34:67–72CrossRefPubMed Sheftell FD, Weeks RE, Rapoport AM et al (1994) Subcutaneous sumatriptan in a clinical setting: the first 100 consecutive patients with acute migraine in a tertiary care center. Headache 34:67–72CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Visser WH, Jaspers NM, De Vriend RH et al (1996) Chest symptoms after sumatriptan: a two-year clinical practice review in 735 consecutive migraine patients. Cephalalgia 16:554–559CrossRefPubMed Visser WH, Jaspers NM, De Vriend RH et al (1996) Chest symptoms after sumatriptan: a two-year clinical practice review in 735 consecutive migraine patients. Cephalalgia 16:554–559CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Efficacy and safety of DFN-11 (sumatriptan injection, 3 mg) in adults with episodic migraine: an 8-week open-label extension study
Authors
Stephen Landy
Sagar Munjal
Elimor Brand-Schieber
Alan M. Rapoport
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
The Journal of Headache and Pain / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 1129-2369
Electronic ISSN: 1129-2377
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-018-0882-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

The Journal of Headache and Pain 1/2018 Go to the issue