Top

Sports Medicine

Published in:

01-08-2015 | Systematic Review

Effects of Oestrogen Treatment on Skeletal Response to Exercise in the Hips and Spine in Postmenopausal Women: A Meta-Analysis

Authors: Renqing Zhao, Zhengang Xu, Meihua Zhao

Published in: Sports Medicine | Issue 8/2015

Abstract

Background

It is recognized that low oestrogen status impairs the skeletal response to mechanical loading in elderly women; therefore, oestrogen administration is expected to increase the osteogenic response to mechanical strain.

Objectives

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the combined effects of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and exercise on femoral neck and lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal women, in comparison with the effects of exercise-only intervention.

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, SPORTDiscus and ProQuest up to May 1, 2014, to ascertain the influence of oestrogen administration and exercise on BMD in postmenopausal women. The study quality and potential publication bias of the included trials were evaluated. The primary end point was the change in BMD from baseline to follow-up. The effect sizes were estimated in terms of the standardized mean difference (SMD). Subgroup analysis was conducted on the basis of exercise categories.

Results

Six studies with a total of 764 postmenopausal women (aged between 51.8 ± 2.9 and 68.0 ± 3.0 years) met the inclusion criteria. The included studies had low and high levels of heterogeneity of hip outcomes (I ² = 0.0 %) and spine outcomes (I ² = 80.8 %), respectively. Fixed- and random-effects models were used for calculating the effect size estimates. The pooled effect sizes associated with the combined interventions of HRT and exercise were significant for femoral neck BMD (SMD 0.220, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.011–0.429, p = 0.039) and lumbar spine BMD (SMD 0.729, 95 % CI 0.186–1.273, p = 0.009) in comparison with the exercise-only intervention. The mixed loading exercise programmes were sensitive to HRT in preventing postmenopausal bone loss in the spine (SMD 1.073, 95 % CI 0.140–2.005, p = 0.024) in comparison with single-mode exercise.

Conclusions

Our findings indicate that oestrogen treatment significantly increases the skeletal response to exercise training in both the hips and the spine in postmenopausal women, which implies that the combination of oestrogen administration and exercise may generate greater effects.

Available only for authorised users

Lorrain J, Paiement G, Chevrier N, et al. Population demographics and socioeconomic impact of osteoporotic fractures in Canada. Menopause. 2003;10(3):228–34.PubMedCrossRef

Kelley GA, Kelley KS, Kohrt WM. Effects of ground and joint reaction force exercise on lumbar spine and femoral neck bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012;13:177.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Martyn-St James M, Carroll S. A meta-analysis of impact exercise on postmenopausal bone loss: the case for mixed loading exercise programmes. Br J Sports Med. 2009;43(12):898–908.PubMedCrossRef

Kemmler W, Bebenek M, von Stengel S, et al. Effect of block-periodized exercise training on bone and coronary heart disease risk factors in early post-menopausal women: a randomized controlled study. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2013;23(1):121–9.PubMedCrossRef

Martyn-St James M, Carroll S. Meta-analysis of walking for preservation of bone mineral density in postmenopausal women. Bone. 2008;43(3):521–31.PubMedCrossRef

Schmitt NM, Schmitt J, Doren M. The role of physical activity in the prevention of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women—an update. Maturitas. 2009;63(1):34–8.PubMedCrossRef

Kemmler W, Engelke K, Weineck J, et al. The Erlangen Fitness Osteoporosis Prevention Study: a controlled exercise trial in early postmenopausal women with low bone density—first-year results. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(5):673–82.PubMed

Martyn-St James M, Carroll S. High-intensity resistance training and postmenopausal bone loss: a meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int. 2006;17(8):1225–40.PubMedCrossRef

Snow CM, Shaw JM, Winters KM, et al. Long-term exercise using weighted vests prevents hip bone loss in postmenopausal women. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2000;55(9):M489–91.PubMedCrossRef

10.

Rhodes EC, Martin AD, Taunton JE, et al. Effects of one year of resistance training on the relation between muscular strength and bone density in elderly women. Br J Sports Med. 2000;34(1):18–22.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

11.

Lanyon LE. Using functional loading to influence bone mass and architecture: objectives, mechanisms, and relationship with estrogen of the mechanically adaptive process in bone. Bone. 1996;18(1 Suppl.):37S–43S.PubMedCrossRef

12.

Lee K, Jessop H, Suswillo R, et al. Endocrinology: bone adaptation requires oestrogen receptor-alpha. Nature. 2003;424(6947):389.PubMedCrossRef

13.

Tobias JH. At the crossroads of skeletal responses to estrogen and exercise. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2003;14(10):441–3.PubMedCrossRef

14.

Ankrom MA, Patterson JA, d’Avis PY, et al. Age-related changes in human oestrogen receptor alpha function and levels in osteoblasts. Biochem J. 1998;333(Pt 3):787–94.PubMedCentralPubMed

15.

Hahn S, Williamson PR, Hutton JL, et al. Assessing the potential for bias in meta-analysis due to selective reporting of subgroup analyses within studies. Stat Med. 2000;19(24):3325–36.PubMedCrossRef

16.

Damien E, Price JS, Lanyon LE. The estrogen receptor’s involvement in osteoblasts’ adaptive response to mechanical strain. J Bone Miner Res. 1998;13(8):1275–82.PubMedCrossRef

17.

Wu J, Wang X, Chiba H, et al. Combined intervention of soy isoflavone and moderate exercise prevents body fat elevation and bone loss in ovariectomized mice. Metabolism. 2004;53(7):942–8.PubMedCrossRef

18.

Wu J, Wang XX, Takasaki M, et al. Cooperative effects of exercise training and genistein administration on bone mass in ovariectomized mice. J Bone Miner Res. 2001;16(10):1829–36.PubMedCrossRef

19.

Bassey EJ, Rothwell MC, Littlewood JJ, et al. Pre- and postmenopausal women have different bone mineral density responses to the same high-impact exercise. J Bone Miner Res. 1998;13(12):1805–13.PubMedCrossRef

20.

Going S, Lohman T, Houtkooper L, et al. Effects of exercise on bone mineral density in calcium-replete postmenopausal women with and without hormone replacement therapy. Osteoporos Int. 2003;14(8):637–43.PubMedCrossRef

21.

Kohrt WM, Snead DB, Slatopolsky E, et al. Additive effects of weight-bearing exercise and estrogen on bone mineral density in older women. J Bone Miner Res. 1995;10(9):1303–11.PubMedCrossRef

22.

Kohrt WM, Ehsani AA, Birge SJ Jr. HRT preserves increases in bone mineral density and reductions in body fat after a supervised exercise program. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1998;84(5):1506–12.

23.

Maddalozzo GF, Widrick JJ, Cardinal BJ, et al. The effects of hormone replacement therapy and resistance training on spine bone mineral density in early postmenopausal women. Bone. 2007;40(5):1244–51.PubMedCrossRef

24.

Milliken LA, Going SB, Houtkooper LB, et al. Effects of exercise training on bone remodeling, insulin-like growth factors, and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with and without hormone replacement therapy. Calcif Tissue Int. 2003;72(4):478–84.PubMedCrossRef

25.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264–9, W64.

26.

Higgins J, Green S. Cochrane reviewers’ handbook 5.0.1 (updated September 2008). Chichester: Wiley; 2008.

27.

Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials. 1996;17(1):1–12.PubMedCrossRef

28.

Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL, et al. Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results from the Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;288(3):321–33.PubMedCrossRef

29.

Anderson GL, Limacher M, Assaf AR, et al. Effects of conjugated equine estrogen in postmenopausal women with hysterectomy: the Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004;291(14):1701–12.PubMedCrossRef

30.

Banks E, Canfell K. Invited commentary: hormone therapy risks and benefits—the Women’s Health Initiative findings and the postmenopausal estrogen timing hypothesis. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;170(1):24–8.PubMedCrossRef

31.

Gurney EP, Nachtigall MJ, Nachtigall LE, et al. The Women’s Health Initiative trial and related studies: 10 years later. A clinician’s view. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2014;142:4–11.PubMedCrossRef

32.

Zhang J, Gao R, Cao P, et al. Additive effects of antiresorptive agents and exercise on lumbar spine bone mineral density in adults with low bone mass: a meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int. 2014;25(5):1585–94.PubMedCrossRef

33.

El-Khoury F, Cassou B, Charles MA, et al. The effect of fall prevention exercise programmes on fall induced injuries in community dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2013;347:f6234.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

34.

Karinkanta S, Piirtola M, Sievanen H, et al. Physical therapy approaches to reduce fall and fracture risk among older adults. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2010;6(7):396–407.PubMedCrossRef

35.

Cummings SR, Black DM, Nevitt MC, et al. Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Lancet. 1993;341(8837):72–5.PubMedCrossRef

36.

Borer KT. Physical activity in the prevention and amelioration of osteoporosis in women: interaction of mechanical, hormonal and dietary factors. Sports Med. 2005;35(9):779–830.PubMedCrossRef

37.

Rubin CT, McLeod KJ. Promotion of bony ingrowth by frequency-specific, low-amplitude mechanical strain. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;298:165–74.PubMed

38.

Pildal J, Hrobjartsson A, Jorgensen KJ, et al. Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials. Int J Epidemiol. 2007;36(4):847–57.PubMedCrossRef

39.

Wood L, Egger M, Gluud LL, et al. Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study. BMJ. 2008;336(7644):601–5.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

40.

Ammann P, Rizzoli R. Bone strength and its determinants. Osteoporos Int. 2003;14(Suppl. 3):S13–8.PubMed

Title: Effects of Oestrogen Treatment on Skeletal Response to Exercise in the Hips and Spine in Postmenopausal Women: A Meta-Analysis
Authors: Renqing Zhao
Zhengang Xu
Meihua Zhao
Publication date: 01-08-2015
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Published in: Sports Medicine / Issue 8/2015
Print ISSN: 0112-1642
Electronic ISSN: 1179-2035
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-015-0338-3

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Effects of Oestrogen Treatment on Skeletal Response to Exercise in the Hips and Spine in Postmenopausal Women: A Meta-Analysis

Abstract

Background

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 8/2015

What are the Differences in Injury Proportions Between Different Populations of Runners? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Gluteal Tendinopathy: A Review of Mechanisms, Assessment and Management

A Social Identity Approach to Sport Psychology: Principles, Practice, and Prospects

Etiology of Femoroacetabular Impingement in Athletes: A Review of Recent Findings

The Optimal Load for Maximal Power Production During Lower-Body Resistance Exercises: A Meta-Analysis

Recreational Snow-Sports Injury Risk Factors and Countermeasures: A Meta-Analysis Review and Haddon Matrix Evaluation