Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Oncology and Therapy 2/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Original Research

Effects of Initiating or Switching to a Six-Monthly Triptorelin Formulation on Prostate Cancer Patient–Healthcare Interactions and Hospital Resource Use: a Real-World, Retrospective, Non-Interventional Study

Authors: Philip Cornford, Kieran Jefferson, Owen Cole, John Gilbody

Published in: Oncology and Therapy | Issue 2/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Luteinising hormone-releasing hormone agonist (LHRHa) injections are currently used in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer, but the frequency of injections may represent a burden to patients and healthcare services. The aim of this study was to collect real-world evidence about clinical and practical outcomes for patients with prostate cancer initiating six-monthly triptorelin, or switching from shorter-acting formulations to six-monthly triptorelin, in hospitals in the DEcapeptyl SERVice Evaluation project.

Methods

Up to 2 years of data were collected retrospectively by physicians from records of 88 patients receiving six-monthly triptorelin at three centres. The primary outcome measure was the change in the number of patient–healthcare interactions (patient reviews, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) tests, and LHRHa injections) over a 24-month treatment period.

Results

This analysis included 47 patients newly initiated on six-monthly triptorelin and 41 who received 12 months of a one- or three-monthly LHRHa before switching to six-monthly triptorelin. After switching to six-monthly triptorelin, there was a statistically significant reduction in patient reviews (46.8%), injections (46.8%), and PSA tests (26.6%; all P < 0.0001). The total number of patient–healthcare interactions was significantly reduced (41.5%; P < 0.0001). Based upon cost of these interactions only, the cost reduction of switching to six-monthly triptorelin was £10,214.85 (£249.14 per patient) over 12 months. At 12 months, median PSA was 1.30 ng/mL (23.50 ng/mL at diagnosis) for newly treated patients and 0.24 ng/mL (0.35 ng/mL at switch) for patients who had switched treatment. No safety issues were identified.

Conclusion

Switching from one- or three-monthly LHRHa to six-monthly triptorelin significantly reduced patient–healthcare interactions and associated costs while maintaining PSA control over a 12-month treatment period. This not only translates into healthcare savings but may release men from the restriction of repeated healthcare interactions and thus improve the overall patient experience as the population of long-term prostate cancer survivors continues to increase.

Funding

Ipsen Limited.
Literature
4.
go back to reference Roehrborn CG, Black LK. The economic burden of prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2011;108:806–13.CrossRef Roehrborn CG, Black LK. The economic burden of prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2011;108:806–13.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Saunders R, Plun-Favreau J, Takizawa C, Valentine WJ. Clinical and economic burden of prostate cancer. Value Health. 2015;18:A449.CrossRef Saunders R, Plun-Favreau J, Takizawa C, Valentine WJ. Clinical and economic burden of prostate cancer. Value Health. 2015;18:A449.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Luengo-Fernandez R, Leal J, Gray A, Sullivan R. Economic burden of cancer across the European Union: a population-based cost analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:1165–74.CrossRef Luengo-Fernandez R, Leal J, Gray A, Sullivan R. Economic burden of cancer across the European Union: a population-based cost analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:1165–74.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Crawford ED, Phillips JM. Six-month gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist depots provide efficacy, safety, convenience, and comfort. Cancer Manag Res. 2011;3:201–9.CrossRef Crawford ED, Phillips JM. Six-month gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist depots provide efficacy, safety, convenience, and comfort. Cancer Manag Res. 2011;3:201–9.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Keating GM. Triptorelin embonate (6-month formulation). Drugs. 2010;70:347–53.CrossRef Keating GM. Triptorelin embonate (6-month formulation). Drugs. 2010;70:347–53.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lundstrom EA, Rencken RK, van Wyk JH, et al. Triptorelin 6-month formulation in the management of patients with locally advanced and metastatic prostate cancer: an open-label, non-comparative, multicentre, phase III study. Clin Drug Investig. 2009;29:757–65.CrossRef Lundstrom EA, Rencken RK, van Wyk JH, et al. Triptorelin 6-month formulation in the management of patients with locally advanced and metastatic prostate cancer: an open-label, non-comparative, multicentre, phase III study. Clin Drug Investig. 2009;29:757–65.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Fode M, Nielsen TK, Al-Hamadani M, Andersen JR, Jakobsen H, Sonksen J. Preferred treatment frequency in patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy for advanced prostate cancer. Scand J Urol. 2014;48:183–8.CrossRef Fode M, Nielsen TK, Al-Hamadani M, Andersen JR, Jakobsen H, Sonksen J. Preferred treatment frequency in patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy for advanced prostate cancer. Scand J Urol. 2014;48:183–8.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Khan A, Davda R, Dumas L, Payne H. Patient survey exploring preferences in frequency of administration of LHRH agonists. Int J Clin Pract. 2012;66:1–4.CrossRef Khan A, Davda R, Dumas L, Payne H. Patient survey exploring preferences in frequency of administration of LHRH agonists. Int J Clin Pract. 2012;66:1–4.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Schulman C. Assessing the attitudes to prostate cancer treatment among European male patients. BJU Int. 2007;100(Suppl 1):6–11.CrossRef Schulman C. Assessing the attitudes to prostate cancer treatment among European male patients. BJU Int. 2007;100(Suppl 1):6–11.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Bolla M, de Reijke TM, Van Tienhoven G, et al. Duration of androgen suppression in the treatment of prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:2516–27.CrossRef Bolla M, de Reijke TM, Van Tienhoven G, et al. Duration of androgen suppression in the treatment of prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:2516–27.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Samper PM, Lopez Carrizosa MC, Perez Casas A, et al. Impact of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy on dose-volume histograms in patients with localized prostate cancer under radical radiation therapy. Clin Transl Oncol. 2006;8:599–605.CrossRef Samper PM, Lopez Carrizosa MC, Perez Casas A, et al. Impact of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy on dose-volume histograms in patients with localized prostate cancer under radical radiation therapy. Clin Transl Oncol. 2006;8:599–605.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Özyiğit G, Akyol F, Önal C, Sari S, Gürdalli S, Yapici B. Combined hormonotherapy and definitive radiation therapy in localized prostate adenocarcinoma. Int J Hematol Oncol. 2015;25:177–89. Özyiğit G, Akyol F, Önal C, Sari S, Gürdalli S, Yapici B. Combined hormonotherapy and definitive radiation therapy in localized prostate adenocarcinoma. Int J Hematol Oncol. 2015;25:177–89.
18.
go back to reference Eisenhardt A, Schneider T, Scheithe K, Colling C, Heidenreich A, Studiengruppe T. Quality of life of patients with prostate cancer under androgen deprivation with GnRH analogues: results of the noninterventional study TRIPTOSIX. Urologe A. 2016;55:176–83.CrossRef Eisenhardt A, Schneider T, Scheithe K, Colling C, Heidenreich A, Studiengruppe T. Quality of life of patients with prostate cancer under androgen deprivation with GnRH analogues: results of the noninterventional study TRIPTOSIX. Urologe A. 2016;55:176–83.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Wex J, Sidhu M, Odeyemi I, Abou-Setta AM, Retsa P, Tombal B. Leuprolide acetate 1-, 3- and 6-monthly depot formulations in androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer in nine European countries: evidence review and economic evaluation. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2013;5:257–69.CrossRef Wex J, Sidhu M, Odeyemi I, Abou-Setta AM, Retsa P, Tombal B. Leuprolide acetate 1-, 3- and 6-monthly depot formulations in androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer in nine European countries: evidence review and economic evaluation. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2013;5:257–69.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Lebret T, Davin JL, Hennequin C, et al. Selection criteria for initiation and renewal of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist therapy in patients with prostate cancer: a French prospective observational study. Ther Adv Urol. 2014;6:205–14.CrossRef Lebret T, Davin JL, Hennequin C, et al. Selection criteria for initiation and renewal of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist therapy in patients with prostate cancer: a French prospective observational study. Ther Adv Urol. 2014;6:205–14.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Effects of Initiating or Switching to a Six-Monthly Triptorelin Formulation on Prostate Cancer Patient–Healthcare Interactions and Hospital Resource Use: a Real-World, Retrospective, Non-Interventional Study
Authors
Philip Cornford
Kieran Jefferson
Owen Cole
John Gilbody
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
Springer Healthcare
Published in
Oncology and Therapy / Issue 2/2018
Print ISSN: 2366-1070
Electronic ISSN: 2366-1089
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40487-018-0087-1

Other articles of this Issue 2/2018

Oncology and Therapy 2/2018 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine