Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Palliative Care 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Study protocol

Effectiveness of the “Living with Cancer” peer self-management support program for persons with advanced cancer and their relatives: study protocol of a non-randomized stepped wedge study

Authors: K. L. Luu, F. E. Witkamp, D. Nieboer, E. M. Bakker, L. W. Kranenburg, C. C. D. van der Rijt, K. Lorig, A. van der Heide, J. A. C. Rietjens

Published in: BMC Palliative Care | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Persons with advanced cancer and their relatives experience physical, emotional, and psychosocial consequences of the illness. Most of the time, they must deal with these themselves. While peer self-management support programs may be helpful, there is little evidence on their value for this population. We present the research protocol of our SMART study that will evaluate the effectiveness of the “Living with Cancer” peer self-management support program, aimed at improving self-management behaviors, self-efficacy, and health-related quality of life of persons with advanced cancer and their relatives.

Methods

We will conduct a non-randomized stepped wedge study in the Netherlands. We will include 130 persons with advanced cancer and 32 relatives. Participants can choose to either start the program within 4 weeks after inclusion or after eight to 10 weeks. The “Living with Cancer” is a peer self-management support program, based on the Chronic Disease Self-Management Program. It consists of six 1,5 hours video-conferencing group meetings with eight to 12 participants, preceded by two or three preparatory audio clips with supportive text per session. The program has the following core components: the learning of self-management skills (action-planning, problem-solving, effective communication, and decision-making), discussing relevant themes (e.g. dealing with pain and fatigue, living with uncertainty, and future planning), and sharing experiences, knowledge, and best practices. The primary outcome for both persons with advanced cancer and relatives is self-management behavior assessed by the subscale “constructive attitudes and approaches” of the Health Education Impact Questionnaire. Secondary outcomes are other self-management behaviors, self-efficacy, health-related quality of life, symptoms, depression and anxiety, and loneliness. Participants complete an online questionnaire at baseline, and after eight and 16 weeks. After each session, they complete a logbook about their experiences. Group meetings will be video recorded.

Discussion

SMART aims to evaluate an innovative program building on an evidence-based self-management program. New features are its use for persons with advanced cancer, the inclusion of relatives, and the video-conferencing format for this population. The use of both quantitative and qualitative analyses will provide valuable insight into the effectiveness and value of this program.

Trial registration

This study was registered in the Dutch Trial Register on October 2021, identifier NL9806.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bodenheimer T, Lorig K, Holman H, Grumbach K. Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. JAMA. 2002;288(19):2469–75.PubMedCrossRef Bodenheimer T, Lorig K, Holman H, Grumbach K. Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. JAMA. 2002;288(19):2469–75.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Coughlin S, Roberts D, O’Neill K, Brooks P. Looking to tomorrow’s healthcare today: a participatory health perspective. Intern Med J. 2018;48(1):92–6.PubMedCrossRef Coughlin S, Roberts D, O’Neill K, Brooks P. Looking to tomorrow’s healthcare today: a participatory health perspective. Intern Med J. 2018;48(1):92–6.PubMedCrossRef
3.
4.
go back to reference Higginson IJ, Costantini M. Dying with cancer, living well with advanced cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2008;44(10):1414–24.PubMedCrossRef Higginson IJ, Costantini M. Dying with cancer, living well with advanced cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2008;44(10):1414–24.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Langbaum T, Smith TJ. Time to study metastatic-cancer survivorship. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(14):1300–2.PubMedCrossRef Langbaum T, Smith TJ. Time to study metastatic-cancer survivorship. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(14):1300–2.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Verduzco-Aguirre HC, Babu D, Mohile SG, Bautista J, Xu H, Culakova E, et al. Associations of uncertainty with psychological health and quality of life in older adults with advanced cancer. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2021;61(2):369–76. e1. Verduzco-Aguirre HC, Babu D, Mohile SG, Bautista J, Xu H, Culakova E, et al. Associations of uncertainty with psychological health and quality of life in older adults with advanced cancer. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2021;61(2):369–76. e1.
7.
go back to reference Palos GR, Mendoza TR, Liao KP, Anderson KO, Garcia-Gonzalez A, Hahn K, et al. Caregiver symptom burden: the risk of caring for an underserved patient with advanced cancer. Cancer. 2011;117(5):1070–9.PubMedCrossRef Palos GR, Mendoza TR, Liao KP, Anderson KO, Garcia-Gonzalez A, Hahn K, et al. Caregiver symptom burden: the risk of caring for an underserved patient with advanced cancer. Cancer. 2011;117(5):1070–9.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kristjanson LJ, Aoun S. Palliative care for families: remembering the hidden patients. Can J Psychiatr. 2004;49(6):359–65.CrossRef Kristjanson LJ, Aoun S. Palliative care for families: remembering the hidden patients. Can J Psychiatr. 2004;49(6):359–65.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Andersen NI, Nielsen CI, Danbjørg DB, Møller PK, Brochstedt KD. Caregivers' need for support in an outpatient Cancer setting. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2019;46(6):757–67.PubMedCrossRef Andersen NI, Nielsen CI, Danbjørg DB, Møller PK, Brochstedt KD. Caregivers' need for support in an outpatient Cancer setting. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2019;46(6):757–67.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lorig KR, Holman HR. Self-management education: history, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms. Ann Behav Med. 2003;26(1):1–7.PubMedCrossRef Lorig KR, Holman HR. Self-management education: history, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms. Ann Behav Med. 2003;26(1):1–7.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Rietjens J, van Dongen S, Witkamp E. Self-management for patients with progressive, life-threatening diseases and their family caregivers. Textbook of Palliative Care: Springer Cham; 2018. p. 1–15. Rietjens J, van Dongen S, Witkamp E. Self-management for patients with progressive, life-threatening diseases and their family caregivers. Textbook of Palliative Care: Springer Cham; 2018. p. 1–15.
12.
go back to reference Barlow J, Wright C, Sheasby J, Turner A, Hainsworth J. Self-management approaches for people with chronic conditions: a review. Patient Educ Couns. 2002;48(2):177–87.PubMedCrossRef Barlow J, Wright C, Sheasby J, Turner A, Hainsworth J. Self-management approaches for people with chronic conditions: a review. Patient Educ Couns. 2002;48(2):177–87.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Brady TJ, Murphy L, O'Colmain BJ, Beauchesne D, Daniels B, Greenberg M, House M, Chervin D. A metaanalysis of health status, health behaviors, and health care utilization outcomes of the Chronic Disease Self-Management Program. Prev Chronic Dis. 2013;10:120112. Brady TJ, Murphy L, O'Colmain BJ, Beauchesne D, Daniels B, Greenberg M, House M, Chervin D. A metaanalysis of health status, health behaviors, and health care utilization outcomes of the Chronic Disease Self-Management Program. Prev Chronic Dis. 2013;10:120112.
14.
go back to reference Allegrante JP, Wells MT, Peterson JC. Interventions to support behavioral self-management of chronic diseases. Annu Rev Public Health. 2019;40:127–46.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Allegrante JP, Wells MT, Peterson JC. Interventions to support behavioral self-management of chronic diseases. Annu Rev Public Health. 2019;40:127–46.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Mead S, Hilton D, Curtis L. Peer support: a theoretical perspective. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2001;25(2):134.PubMedCrossRef Mead S, Hilton D, Curtis L. Peer support: a theoretical perspective. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2001;25(2):134.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Ziegler E, Hill J, Lieske B, Klein J, von dem Knesebeck O, Kofahl C. Empowerment in cancer patients: does peer support make a difference? Psychooncology: A systematic review; 2022. Ziegler E, Hill J, Lieske B, Klein J, von dem Knesebeck O, Kofahl C. Empowerment in cancer patients: does peer support make a difference? Psychooncology: A systematic review; 2022.
17.
go back to reference Walshe C, Roberts D. Peer support for people with advanced cancer: a systematically constructed scoping review of quantitative and qualitative evidence. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2018;12(3):308–22.PubMedCrossRef Walshe C, Roberts D. Peer support for people with advanced cancer: a systematically constructed scoping review of quantitative and qualitative evidence. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2018;12(3):308–22.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kowitt SD, Ellis KR, Carlisle V, Bhushan NL, Black KZ, Brodar K, et al. Peer support opportunities across the cancer care continuum: a systematic scoping review of recent peer-reviewed literature. Support Care Cancer. 2019;27(1):97–108.PubMedCrossRef Kowitt SD, Ellis KR, Carlisle V, Bhushan NL, Black KZ, Brodar K, et al. Peer support opportunities across the cancer care continuum: a systematic scoping review of recent peer-reviewed literature. Support Care Cancer. 2019;27(1):97–108.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Budhwani S, Wodchis WP, Zimmermann C, Moineddin R, Howell D. Self-management, self-management support needs and interventions in advanced cancer: a scoping review. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2019;9(1):12–25.PubMedCrossRef Budhwani S, Wodchis WP, Zimmermann C, Moineddin R, Howell D. Self-management, self-management support needs and interventions in advanced cancer: a scoping review. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2019;9(1):12–25.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Lorig KR, Sobel DS, Stewart AL, Brown BW Jr, Bandura A, Ritter P, et al. Evidence suggesting that a chronic disease self-management program can improve health status while reducing hospitalization: a randomized trial. Med Care. 1999;37(1):5–14. Lorig KR, Sobel DS, Stewart AL, Brown BW Jr, Bandura A, Ritter P, et al. Evidence suggesting that a chronic disease self-management program can improve health status while reducing hospitalization: a randomized trial. Med Care. 1999;37(1):5–14.
22.
go back to reference Banbury A, Nancarrow S, Dart J, Gray L, Parkinson L. Telehealth interventions delivering home-based support group videoconferencing: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(2):e8090.CrossRef Banbury A, Nancarrow S, Dart J, Gray L, Parkinson L. Telehealth interventions delivering home-based support group videoconferencing: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(2):e8090.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gøtzsche PC, Krleža-Jerić K, et al. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(3):200–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gøtzsche PC, Krleža-Jerić K, et al. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(3):200–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Lorig KR, Sobel DS, Ritter PL, Laurent D, Hobbs M. Effect of a self-management program on patients with chronic disease. Eff Clin Pract. 2001;4(6):256–62.PubMed Lorig KR, Sobel DS, Ritter PL, Laurent D, Hobbs M. Effect of a self-management program on patients with chronic disease. Eff Clin Pract. 2001;4(6):256–62.PubMed
25.
go back to reference Risendal B, Dwyer A, Seidel R, Lorig K, Katzenmeyer C, Coombs L, et al. Adaptation of the chronic disease self-management program for cancer survivors: feasibility, acceptability, and lessons for implementation. J Cancer Educ. 2014;29(4):762–71.PubMedCrossRef Risendal B, Dwyer A, Seidel R, Lorig K, Katzenmeyer C, Coombs L, et al. Adaptation of the chronic disease self-management program for cancer survivors: feasibility, acceptability, and lessons for implementation. J Cancer Educ. 2014;29(4):762–71.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Lorig K, Ritter PL, Laurent DD, Yank V. Building better caregivers: a pragmatic 12-month trial of a community-based workshop for caregivers of cognitively impaired adults. J Appl Gerontol. 2019;38(9):1228–52.PubMedCrossRef Lorig K, Ritter PL, Laurent DD, Yank V. Building better caregivers: a pragmatic 12-month trial of a community-based workshop for caregivers of cognitively impaired adults. J Appl Gerontol. 2019;38(9):1228–52.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Van Dongen SI, De Nooijer K, Cramm JM, Francke AL, Oldenmenger WH, Korfage IJ, et al. Self-management of patients with advanced cancer: a systematic review of experiences and attitudes. Palliat Med. 2020;34(2):160–78.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Van Dongen SI, De Nooijer K, Cramm JM, Francke AL, Oldenmenger WH, Korfage IJ, et al. Self-management of patients with advanced cancer: a systematic review of experiences and attitudes. Palliat Med. 2020;34(2):160–78.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
28.
go back to reference van Dongen SI, Stoevelaar R, Kranenburg LW, Noorlandt HW, Witkamp FE, van der Rijt CCD, et al. The views of healthcare professionals on self-management of patients with advanced cancer: an interview study. Patient Educ Couns. 2022;105(1):136–44.PubMedCrossRef van Dongen SI, Stoevelaar R, Kranenburg LW, Noorlandt HW, Witkamp FE, van der Rijt CCD, et al. The views of healthcare professionals on self-management of patients with advanced cancer: an interview study. Patient Educ Couns. 2022;105(1):136–44.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Noorlandt HW, Stoevelaar R, et al. Challenges in selfmanagement of persons living with advanced cancer: A qualitative interview study. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). forthcoming 2022. Noorlandt HW, Stoevelaar R, et al. Challenges in selfmanagement of persons living with advanced cancer: A qualitative interview study. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). forthcoming 2022.
30.
go back to reference Maunsell E, Lauzier S, Brunet J, Pelletier S, Osborne RH, Campbell HS. Health-related empowerment in cancer: validity of scales from the health education impact questionnaire. Cancer. 2014;120(20):3228–36.PubMedCrossRef Maunsell E, Lauzier S, Brunet J, Pelletier S, Osborne RH, Campbell HS. Health-related empowerment in cancer: validity of scales from the health education impact questionnaire. Cancer. 2014;120(20):3228–36.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Cohen SR, Mount BM, Tomas JJN, Mount LF. Existential well-being is an important determinant of quality of life: evidence from the McGill quality of life questionnaire. Cancer. 1996;77(3):576–86.PubMedCrossRef Cohen SR, Mount BM, Tomas JJN, Mount LF. Existential well-being is an important determinant of quality of life: evidence from the McGill quality of life questionnaire. Cancer. 1996;77(3):576–86.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference De Vrieze T, Coeck D, Verbelen H, Devoogdt N, Tjalma W, Gebruers N. Cross-cultural psychometric evaluation of the Dutch McGill-QoL questionnaire for breast cancer patients. Facts Views Vis ObGyn. 2016;8(4):205.PubMed De Vrieze T, Coeck D, Verbelen H, Devoogdt N, Tjalma W, Gebruers N. Cross-cultural psychometric evaluation of the Dutch McGill-QoL questionnaire for breast cancer patients. Facts Views Vis ObGyn. 2016;8(4):205.PubMed
33.
go back to reference Cohen R, Leis AM, Kuhl D, Charbonneau C, Ritvo P, Ashbury FD. QOLLTI-F: measuring family carer quality of life. Palliat Med. 2006;20(8):755–67.PubMedCrossRef Cohen R, Leis AM, Kuhl D, Charbonneau C, Ritvo P, Ashbury FD. QOLLTI-F: measuring family carer quality of life. Palliat Med. 2006;20(8):755–67.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Steffen AM, McKibbin C, Zeiss AM, Gallagher-Thompson D, Bandura A. The revised scale for caregiving self-efficacy: reliability and validity studies. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2002;57(1):P74–86.PubMedCrossRef Steffen AM, McKibbin C, Zeiss AM, Gallagher-Thompson D, Bandura A. The revised scale for caregiving self-efficacy: reliability and validity studies. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2002;57(1):P74–86.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Nijboer C, Triemstra M, Tempelaar R, Sanderman R, van den Bos GAM. Measuring both negative and positive reactions to giving care to cancer patients: psychometric qualities of the caregiver reaction assessment (CRA). Soc Sci Med. 1999;48(9):1259–69.PubMedCrossRef Nijboer C, Triemstra M, Tempelaar R, Sanderman R, van den Bos GAM. Measuring both negative and positive reactions to giving care to cancer patients: psychometric qualities of the caregiver reaction assessment (CRA). Soc Sci Med. 1999;48(9):1259–69.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Spinhoven PH, Ormel J, Sloekers PPA, Kempen G, Speckens AEM, van Hemert AM. A validation study of the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) in different groups of Dutch subjects. Psychol Med. 1997;27(2):363–70.PubMedCrossRef Spinhoven PH, Ormel J, Sloekers PPA, Kempen G, Speckens AEM, van Hemert AM. A validation study of the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) in different groups of Dutch subjects. Psychol Med. 1997;27(2):363–70.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Russell DW. UCLA loneliness scale (version 3): reliability, validity, and factor structure. J Pers Assess. 1996;66(1):20–40.PubMedCrossRef Russell DW. UCLA loneliness scale (version 3): reliability, validity, and factor structure. J Pers Assess. 1996;66(1):20–40.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Ritter PL, Stewart AL, Kaymaz H, Sobel DS, Block DA, Lorig KR. Self-reports of health care utilization compared to provider records. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54(2):136–41.PubMedCrossRef Ritter PL, Stewart AL, Kaymaz H, Sobel DS, Block DA, Lorig KR. Self-reports of health care utilization compared to provider records. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54(2):136–41.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Sangha O, Stucki G, Liang MH, Fossel AH, Katz JN. The self-administered comorbidity questionnaire: a new method to assess comorbidity for clinical and health services research. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;49(2):156–63.PubMedCrossRef Sangha O, Stucki G, Liang MH, Fossel AH, Katz JN. The self-administered comorbidity questionnaire: a new method to assess comorbidity for clinical and health services research. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;49(2):156–63.PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Schlatmann FWM, Hofmeester I, van Balken MR. Met “Ik geef u onze folder mee” heeft een op de tien nóg geen idee. Tijdschr Urol. 2016;6(6):94–6.CrossRef Schlatmann FWM, Hofmeester I, van Balken MR. Met “Ik geef u onze folder mee” heeft een op de tien nóg geen idee. Tijdschr Urol. 2016;6(6):94–6.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Markowitz S, Peters ML. Psychometrische evaluatie van de CD-Risc in een Nederlandstalige populatie: een multi-of unifactorieel meetinstrument om veerkracht te meten. Tijdschr Klin Psychol. 2014;44(1):55–68. Markowitz S, Peters ML. Psychometrische evaluatie van de CD-Risc in een Nederlandstalige populatie: een multi-of unifactorieel meetinstrument om veerkracht te meten. Tijdschr Klin Psychol. 2014;44(1):55–68.
42.
go back to reference Matthys O, De Vleminck A, Dierickx S, Deliens L, Van Goethem V, Lapeire L, et al. Effectiveness of a nurse-delivered (FOCUS+) and a web-based (iFOCUS) psychoeducational intervention for people with advanced cancer and their family caregivers (DIAdIC): study protocol for an international randomized controlled trial. BMC Palliat Care. 2021;20(1):1–18.CrossRef Matthys O, De Vleminck A, Dierickx S, Deliens L, Van Goethem V, Lapeire L, et al. Effectiveness of a nurse-delivered (FOCUS+) and a web-based (iFOCUS) psychoeducational intervention for people with advanced cancer and their family caregivers (DIAdIC): study protocol for an international randomized controlled trial. BMC Palliat Care. 2021;20(1):1–18.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Trijsburg RW, Bogaerds H, Letiche M, Bidzjel L, Duivenvoorden HJ. De ontwikkeling van de Group Cohesion Questionnaire (GCQ); 2004. Trijsburg RW, Bogaerds H, Letiche M, Bidzjel L, Duivenvoorden HJ. De ontwikkeling van de Group Cohesion Questionnaire (GCQ); 2004.
44.
go back to reference Lorig K, Laurent D, Gonzalez V, Sobel D, Minor MA, Gecht-Silver M. Living a healthy life with chronic conditions: self-management skills for heart disease, arthritis, diabetes, depression, asthma, bronchitis. Emphysema and Other Physical and Mental Health Conditions: Bull Publishing Company; 2020. Lorig K, Laurent D, Gonzalez V, Sobel D, Minor MA, Gecht-Silver M. Living a healthy life with chronic conditions: self-management skills for heart disease, arthritis, diabetes, depression, asthma, bronchitis. Emphysema and Other Physical and Mental Health Conditions: Bull Publishing Company; 2020.
45.
go back to reference Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. 2014;348:g1687. Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. 2014;348:g1687.
46.
go back to reference Hu Y, Hoover DR. Non-randomized and randomized stepped-wedge designs using an orthogonalized least squares framework. Stat Methods Med Res. 2018;27(4):1202–18.PubMedCrossRef Hu Y, Hoover DR. Non-randomized and randomized stepped-wedge designs using an orthogonalized least squares framework. Stat Methods Med Res. 2018;27(4):1202–18.PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Hemming K, Haines TP, Chilton PJ, Girling AJ, Lilford RJ. The stepped wedge cluster randomised trial: rationale, design, analysis, and reporting. BMJ. 2015;350:h391. Hemming K, Haines TP, Chilton PJ, Girling AJ, Lilford RJ. The stepped wedge cluster randomised trial: rationale, design, analysis, and reporting. BMJ. 2015;350:h391.
48.
go back to reference Thewes B, Rietjens JAC, van den Berg SW, Compen FR, Abrahams H, Poort H, et al. One way or another: the opportunities and pitfalls of self-referral and consecutive sampling as recruitment strategies for psycho-oncology intervention trials. Psychooncology. 2018;27(8):2056.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Thewes B, Rietjens JAC, van den Berg SW, Compen FR, Abrahams H, Poort H, et al. One way or another: the opportunities and pitfalls of self-referral and consecutive sampling as recruitment strategies for psycho-oncology intervention trials. Psychooncology. 2018;27(8):2056.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
51.
go back to reference Laursen DH, Christensen KB, Christensen U, Frølich A. Assessment of short and long-term outcomes of diabetes patient education using the health education impact questionnaire (HeiQ). BMC Res Notes. 2017;10(1):1–9.CrossRef Laursen DH, Christensen KB, Christensen U, Frølich A. Assessment of short and long-term outcomes of diabetes patient education using the health education impact questionnaire (HeiQ). BMC Res Notes. 2017;10(1):1–9.CrossRef
53.
go back to reference GemsTracker EMC. Equipe Zorgbedrijven. Latest release, 2017, version 1.8. 2, open source (new BSD licence). 2020. GemsTracker EMC. Equipe Zorgbedrijven. Latest release, 2017, version 1.8. 2, open source (new BSD licence). 2020.
54.
go back to reference Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef
55.
go back to reference Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–57.PubMedCrossRef Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–57.PubMedCrossRef
57.
go back to reference Almathami HKY, Win KT, Vlahu-Gjorgievska E. Barriers and facilitators that influence telemedicine-based, real-time, online consultation at patients’ homes: systematic literature review. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(2):e16407.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Almathami HKY, Win KT, Vlahu-Gjorgievska E. Barriers and facilitators that influence telemedicine-based, real-time, online consultation at patients’ homes: systematic literature review. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(2):e16407.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
58.
go back to reference Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Shaw S, Morrison C. Video consultations for covid-19: British Medical Journal Publishing Group; 2020.CrossRef Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Shaw S, Morrison C. Video consultations for covid-19: British Medical Journal Publishing Group; 2020.CrossRef
59.
go back to reference Applebaum AJ, Lichtenthal WG, Pessin HA, Radomski JN, Simay Gökbayrak N, Katz AM, et al. Factors associated with attrition from a randomized controlled trial of meaning-centered group psychotherapy for patients with advanced cancer. Psychooncology. 2012;21(11):1195–204.PubMedCrossRef Applebaum AJ, Lichtenthal WG, Pessin HA, Radomski JN, Simay Gökbayrak N, Katz AM, et al. Factors associated with attrition from a randomized controlled trial of meaning-centered group psychotherapy for patients with advanced cancer. Psychooncology. 2012;21(11):1195–204.PubMedCrossRef
60.
go back to reference Jang RW, Caraiscos VB, Swami N, Banerjee S, Mak E, Kaya E, et al. Simple prognostic model for patients with advanced cancer based on performance status. J Oncol Pract. 2014;10(5):e335–e41.PubMedCrossRef Jang RW, Caraiscos VB, Swami N, Banerjee S, Mak E, Kaya E, et al. Simple prognostic model for patients with advanced cancer based on performance status. J Oncol Pract. 2014;10(5):e335–e41.PubMedCrossRef
61.
go back to reference Kemp E, Trigg J, Beatty L, Christensen C, Dhillon HM, Maeder A, et al. Health literacy, digital health literacy and the implementation of digital health technologies in cancer care: the need for a strategic approach. Health Promot J Austr. 2021;32:104–14.PubMedCrossRef Kemp E, Trigg J, Beatty L, Christensen C, Dhillon HM, Maeder A, et al. Health literacy, digital health literacy and the implementation of digital health technologies in cancer care: the need for a strategic approach. Health Promot J Austr. 2021;32:104–14.PubMedCrossRef
62.
go back to reference Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337:a1655. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337:a1655.
Metadata
Title
Effectiveness of the “Living with Cancer” peer self-management support program for persons with advanced cancer and their relatives: study protocol of a non-randomized stepped wedge study
Authors
K. L. Luu
F. E. Witkamp
D. Nieboer
E. M. Bakker
L. W. Kranenburg
C. C. D. van der Rijt
K. Lorig
A. van der Heide
J. A. C. Rietjens
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Palliative Care / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1472-684X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-022-00994-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

BMC Palliative Care 1/2022 Go to the issue