Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 12/2016

01-11-2016 | Colorectal Cancer

Effect of Neoadjuvant Radiation Dose and Schedule on Nodal Count and Its Prognostic Impact in Stage II–III Rectal Cancer

Authors: Wim Ceelen, MD, PhD, FACS, Wouter Willaert, MD, Machteld Varewyck, MS, Sasha Libbrecht, MD, Els Goetghebeur, PhD, Piet Pattyn, MD, PhD, On behalf of PROCARE

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 12/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

It is unknown how neoadjuvant treatment schedule affects lymph node count (LNC) and lymph node ratio (LNR) and how these correlate with overall survival (OS) in rectal cancer (RC).

Methods

Data were used from the Belgian PROCARE rectal cancer registry on RC patients treated with surgery alone, short-term radiotherapy with immediate surgery (SRT), or chemoradiation with deferred surgery (CRT). The effect of neoadjuvant therapy on LNC was examined using Poisson log-linear analysis. The association of LNC and LNR with overall survival (OS) was studied using Cox proportional hazards models.

Results

Data from 4037 patients were available. Compared with surgery alone, LNC was reduced by 12.3 % after SRT and by 31.3 % after CRT (p < 0.001). In patients with surgery alone, the probability of finding node-positive disease increased with LNC, while after SRT and CRT no increase was noted for more than 12 and 18 examined nodes, respectively. Per node examined, we found a decrease in hazard of death of 2.7 % after surgery alone and 1.5 % after SRT, but no effect after CRT. In stage III patients, the LNR but not (y)pN stage was significantly correlated with OS regardless of neoadjuvant therapy. Specifically, a LNR > 0.4 was associated with a significantly worse outcome.

Conclusions

Nodal counts are reduced in a schedule-dependent manner by neoadjuvant treatment in RC. After chemoradiation, the LNC does not confer any prognostic information. A LNR of >0.4 is associated with a significantly worse outcome in stage III disease, regardless of neoadjuvant therapy type.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ferlay J, Steliarova-Foucher E, Lortet-Tieulent J, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49:1374–403.CrossRefPubMed Ferlay J, Steliarova-Foucher E, Lortet-Tieulent J, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49:1374–403.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Sobin LH GM, Wittekind C, eds. UICC TNM classification of malignant tumours, 7th ed. Wiley-Blackwell: Oxford, 2010; 310. Sobin LH GM, Wittekind C, eds. UICC TNM classification of malignant tumours, 7th ed. Wiley-Blackwell: Oxford, 2010; 310.
3.
go back to reference Ceelen W, Van Nieuwenhove Y, Pattyn P. Prognostic value of the lymph node ratio in stage III colorectal cancer: a systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:2847–55.CrossRefPubMed Ceelen W, Van Nieuwenhove Y, Pattyn P. Prognostic value of the lymph node ratio in stage III colorectal cancer: a systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:2847–55.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Willaert W, Mareel M, Van De Putte D, Van Nieuwenhove Y, Pattyn P, Ceelen W. Lymphatic spread, nodal count and the extent of lymphadenectomy in cancer of the colon. Cancer Treat Rev. 2014;40:405–13.CrossRefPubMed Willaert W, Mareel M, Van De Putte D, Van Nieuwenhove Y, Pattyn P, Ceelen W. Lymphatic spread, nodal count and the extent of lymphadenectomy in cancer of the colon. Cancer Treat Rev. 2014;40:405–13.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Schmoll HJ, Van Cutsem E, Stein A, et al. ESMO Consensus Guidelines for management of patients with colon and rectal cancer. a personalized approach to clinical decision making. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:2479–516.CrossRefPubMed Schmoll HJ, Van Cutsem E, Stein A, et al. ESMO Consensus Guidelines for management of patients with colon and rectal cancer. a personalized approach to clinical decision making. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:2479–516.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Miller ED, Robb BW, Cummings OW, Johnstone PA. The effects of preoperative chemoradiotherapy on lymph node sampling in rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55:1002–7.CrossRefPubMed Miller ED, Robb BW, Cummings OW, Johnstone PA. The effects of preoperative chemoradiotherapy on lymph node sampling in rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55:1002–7.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Govindarajan A, Gonen M, Weiser MR, et al. Challenging the feasibility and clinical significance of current guidelines on lymph node examination in rectal cancer in the era of neoadjuvant therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:4568–73.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Govindarajan A, Gonen M, Weiser MR, et al. Challenging the feasibility and clinical significance of current guidelines on lymph node examination in rectal cancer in the era of neoadjuvant therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:4568–73.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Doll D, Gertler R, Maak M, et al. Reduced lymph node yield in rectal carcinoma specimen after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy has no prognostic relevance. World J Surg. 2009;33:340–7.CrossRefPubMed Doll D, Gertler R, Maak M, et al. Reduced lymph node yield in rectal carcinoma specimen after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy has no prognostic relevance. World J Surg. 2009;33:340–7.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Demetter P, Vandendael T, Sempoux C, et al.; Procare. Need for objective and reproducible criteria in histopathological assessment of total mesorectal excision specimens: lessons from a national improvement project. Colorectal Dis. 2013;15:1351–8.CrossRefPubMed Demetter P, Vandendael T, Sempoux C, et al.; Procare. Need for objective and reproducible criteria in histopathological assessment of total mesorectal excision specimens: lessons from a national improvement project. Colorectal Dis. 2013;15:1351–8.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Jegou D, Penninckx F, Vandendael T, Bertrand C, Van Eycken E. Procare. Completeness and registration bias in PROCARE, a Belgian multidisciplinary project on cancer of the rectum with participation on a voluntary basis. Eur J Cancer. 2015; 51:1099–108. Jegou D, Penninckx F, Vandendael T, Bertrand C, Van Eycken E. Procare. Completeness and registration bias in PROCARE, a Belgian multidisciplinary project on cancer of the rectum with participation on a voluntary basis. Eur J Cancer. 2015; 51:1099–108.
12.
go back to reference Leonard D, Penninckx F, Kartheuser A, Laenen A, Van Eycken E. Procare. Effect of hospital volume on quality of care and outcome after rectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg. 2014;101:1475–82. Leonard D, Penninckx F, Kartheuser A, Laenen A, Van Eycken E. Procare. Effect of hospital volume on quality of care and outcome after rectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg. 2014;101:1475–82.
13.
go back to reference Penninckx F, Kartheuser A, Van de Stadt J, et al. Procare. Outcome following laparoscopic and open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2013;100:1368–75.CrossRefPubMed Penninckx F, Kartheuser A, Van de Stadt J, et al. Procare. Outcome following laparoscopic and open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2013;100:1368–75.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Chang GJ, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Skibber JM, Moyer VA. Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative resection of colon cancer: systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:433–41.CrossRefPubMed Chang GJ, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Skibber JM, Moyer VA. Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative resection of colon cancer: systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:433–41.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Congdon CC. The destructive effect of radiation on lymphatic tissue. Cancer Res. 1966;26:1211–20.PubMed Congdon CC. The destructive effect of radiation on lymphatic tissue. Cancer Res. 1966;26:1211–20.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Elferink MA, Siesling S, Lemmens VE, et al. Variation in lymph node evaluation in rectal cancer: a Dutch nationwide population-based study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:386–95.CrossRefPubMed Elferink MA, Siesling S, Lemmens VE, et al. Variation in lymph node evaluation in rectal cancer: a Dutch nationwide population-based study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:386–95.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Turner J, Vollmer RT. Lymph nodes in colorectal carcinoma. The Poisson probability paradigm. Am J Clin Pathol. 2006;125:866–72.CrossRefPubMed Turner J, Vollmer RT. Lymph nodes in colorectal carcinoma. The Poisson probability paradigm. Am J Clin Pathol. 2006;125:866–72.CrossRefPubMed
19.
20.
go back to reference Choi HK, Law WL, Poon JT. The optimal number of lymph nodes examined in stage II colorectal cancer and its impact of on outcomes. BMC Cancer. 2010;10:267.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Choi HK, Law WL, Poon JT. The optimal number of lymph nodes examined in stage II colorectal cancer and its impact of on outcomes. BMC Cancer. 2010;10:267.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Parsons HM, Tuttle TM, Kuntz KM, Begun JW, McGovern PM, Virnig BA. Association between lymph node evaluation for colon cancer and node positivity over the past 20 years. JAMA. 2011;306:1089–97.CrossRefPubMed Parsons HM, Tuttle TM, Kuntz KM, Begun JW, McGovern PM, Virnig BA. Association between lymph node evaluation for colon cancer and node positivity over the past 20 years. JAMA. 2011;306:1089–97.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference O’Shea A, Aly O, Parnaby CN, Loudon MA, Samuel LM, Murray GI. Increased lymph node yield in colorectal cancer is not necessarily associated with a greater number of lymph node positive cancers. PLoS One. 2014;9:e104991.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral O’Shea A, Aly O, Parnaby CN, Loudon MA, Samuel LM, Murray GI. Increased lymph node yield in colorectal cancer is not necessarily associated with a greater number of lymph node positive cancers. PLoS One. 2014;9:e104991.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Bhangu A, Kiran RP, Brown G, Goldin R, Tekkis P. Establishing the optimum lymph node yield for diagnosis of stage III rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol. 2014;18:709–17.CrossRefPubMed Bhangu A, Kiran RP, Brown G, Goldin R, Tekkis P. Establishing the optimum lymph node yield for diagnosis of stage III rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol. 2014;18:709–17.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Park IJ, Yu CS, Lim SB, et al. Prognostic implications of the number of retrieved lymph nodes of patients with rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18:1845–51.CrossRefPubMed Park IJ, Yu CS, Lim SB, et al. Prognostic implications of the number of retrieved lymph nodes of patients with rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18:1845–51.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Rullier A, Laurent C, Capdepont M, et al. Lymph nodes after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal carcinoma: number, status, and impact on survival. Am J Surg Pathol. 2008;32:45–50.CrossRefPubMed Rullier A, Laurent C, Capdepont M, et al. Lymph nodes after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal carcinoma: number, status, and impact on survival. Am J Surg Pathol. 2008;32:45–50.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Tsai CJ, Crane CH, Skibber JM, et al. Number of lymph nodes examined and prognosis among pathologically lymph node-negative patients after preoperative chemoradiation therapy for rectal adenocarcinoma. Cancer. 2011;117:3713–22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tsai CJ, Crane CH, Skibber JM, et al. Number of lymph nodes examined and prognosis among pathologically lymph node-negative patients after preoperative chemoradiation therapy for rectal adenocarcinoma. Cancer. 2011;117:3713–22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Gill A, Brunson A, Lara P, Jr., Khatri V, Semrad TJ. Implications of lymph node retrieval in locoregional rectal cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy: a California Cancer Registry Study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015;41:647–52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gill A, Brunson A, Lara P, Jr., Khatri V, Semrad TJ. Implications of lymph node retrieval in locoregional rectal cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy: a California Cancer Registry Study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015;41:647–52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Bhatti AB, Akbar A, Hafeez A, et al. Impact of lymph node ratio and number on survival in patients with rectal adenocarcinoma after preoperative chemo radiation. Int J Surg. 2015;13:65–70.CrossRefPubMed Bhatti AB, Akbar A, Hafeez A, et al. Impact of lymph node ratio and number on survival in patients with rectal adenocarcinoma after preoperative chemo radiation. Int J Surg. 2015;13:65–70.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Madbouly KM, Abbas KS, Hussein AM. Metastatic lymph node ratio in stage III rectal carcinoma is a valuable prognostic factor even with less than 12 lymph nodes retrieved: a prospective study. Am J Surg. 2014;207:824–31.CrossRefPubMed Madbouly KM, Abbas KS, Hussein AM. Metastatic lymph node ratio in stage III rectal carcinoma is a valuable prognostic factor even with less than 12 lymph nodes retrieved: a prospective study. Am J Surg. 2014;207:824–31.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Effect of Neoadjuvant Radiation Dose and Schedule on Nodal Count and Its Prognostic Impact in Stage II–III Rectal Cancer
Authors
Wim Ceelen, MD, PhD, FACS
Wouter Willaert, MD
Machteld Varewyck, MS
Sasha Libbrecht, MD
Els Goetghebeur, PhD
Piet Pattyn, MD, PhD
On behalf of PROCARE
Publication date
01-11-2016
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 12/2016
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5363-4

Other articles of this Issue 12/2016

Annals of Surgical Oncology 12/2016 Go to the issue