Top

Osteoporosis International

Published in:

Open Access 01-10-2017 | Original Article

Effect of implementation of guidelines on assessment and diagnosis of vertebral fractures in patients older than 50 years with a recent non-vertebral fracture

Authors: R. Y. van der Velde, S. P. G. Bours, C. E. Wyers, W. F. Lems, P. P. M. M. Geusens, J. P. W. van den Bergh

Published in: Osteoporosis International | Issue 10/2017

Abstract

Summary

We evaluated the impact of a new Dutch guideline on systematic implementation of densitometric Vertebral Fracture Assessment (VFA) in patients with a recent non-vertebral fracture. Systematic implementation resulted in a significant increase of VFA, diagnosis of vertebral fractures (VFs), and percentage of patients eligible for treatment.

Introduction

VFs are underdiagnosed although they are important predictors of fracture risk, independent of age and bone mineral density (BMD). The Dutch guideline on osteoporosis and fracture prevention recommends VFA in all patients aged >50 years with a recent non-VF. Our aim was to evaluate the effect of systematic implementation of densitometric VFA in patients with a recent non-VF at the fracture liaison service (FLS).

Methods

VFA was performed on lateral images of the spine using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and graded according to Genant using Spine Analyzer software.

Results

We evaluated 582 patients before and 484 after implementation (mean age 67 and 66 years; 71 and 74% women, respectively). Performing VFA increased from 4.6 to 97.1% (p < 0.001) and the diagnosis of VFs from 2.2 to 26.2% for grade ≥ 1 (p < 0.001) and from 0.9 to 14.7% for grade ≥ 2 (p < 0.001). Prevalence of VFs increased with age (5.2% in 50–59-year olds to 27.8% in 80+-year olds, p < 0.001), but was similar for both genders, non-VF locations, and BMD. Including patients with osteopenia and a VF increased the percentage of patients eligible for treatment by a quarter, from 31.0% in the pre-guideline to 38.4% in the post-guideline cohort.

Conclusions

Systematic guideline implementation resulted in a significant increase of VFA, diagnosis of VFs, and percentage of patients eligible for treatment. VFA contributes to documenting the high prevalence of VFs in patients visiting the FLS with a non-VF in both genders, at any age, non-VF location, and BMD.

Cauley JA, Palermo L, Vogt M et al (2008) Prevalent vertebral fractures in black women and white women. J Bone Miner Res 23(9):1458–1467CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Melton LJ III, Lane AW, Cooper C, Eastell R, O’Fallon WM, Riggs BL (1993) Prevalence and incidence of vertebral deformities. Osteoporos Int 3(3):113–119CrossRefPubMed

Cummings SR, Melton LJI (2002) Epidemiology and outcomes if osteoporotic fractures. Lancet 359(9319):1761–1767CrossRefPubMed

Delmas PD, van de Langerijt L, Watts NB et al (2005) Underdiagnosis of vertebral fractures is a worldwide problem: the IMPACT study. J Bone Miner Res 20(4):557–563CrossRefPubMed

Fink HA, Milavetz DL, Palermo L et al (2005) What proportion of incident radiographic vertebral deformities is clinically diagnosed and vice versa? J Bone Miner Res 20(7):1216–1222CrossRefPubMed

Cooper C, Atkinson EJ, O’Fallon WM, Melton LJ III (1992) Incidence of clinically diagnosed vertebral fractures: a population-based study in Rochester, Minnesota, 1985–1989. J Bone Miner Res 7(2):221–227CrossRefPubMed

Gehlbach SH, Bigelow C, Heimisdottir M et al (2000) Recognition of vertebral fracture in a clinical setting. Osteoporos Int 11(7):577–582CrossRefPubMed

Gallagher JC, Genant HK, Crans GG, Vargas SJ, Krege JH (2005) Teriparatide reduces the fracture risk associated with increasing number and severity of osteoporotic fractures. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90(3):1583–1587CrossRefPubMed

Black DM, Arden NK, Palermo L et al (1999) Prevalent vertebral deformities predict hip fractures and new vertebral deformities but not wrist fractures. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. J Bone Miner Res 14(5):821–828CrossRefPubMed

10.

Gallacher SJ, Gallagher AP, McQuillian C et al (2007) The prevalence of vertebral fracture amongst patients presenting with non-vertebral fractures. Osteoporos Int 18(2):185–192CrossRefPubMed

11.

Howat I, Carty D, Harrison J, Fraser M, McLellan AR (2007) Vertebral fracture assessment in patients presenting with incident nonvertebral fractures. Clin Endocrinol 67(6):923–930CrossRef

12.

Greenspan SL, von Stetten E, Emond SK, Jones L et al (2001) Instant vertebral assessment: a noninvasive dual X-ray absorptiometry technique to avoid misclassification and clinical mismanagement of osteoporosis. J Clin Densitom 4:373–380CrossRefPubMed

13.

van der Velde R, Takouhi O, Dumitrescu B et al (2015) Performance of statistical models of shape and appearance for semiautomatic segmentations of spinal vertebrae T4–L4 on digitized vertebral fracture assessment images. Spine J 15(6):1248–1254CrossRefPubMed

14.

Genant HK, Wu CY, van Kuijk C, Nevitt MC (1993) Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res 8(9):1137–1148CrossRefPubMed

15.

Center JR, Bliuc D, Nguyen TV, Eisman JA (2007) Risk of subsequent fracture after low-trauma in men and women. JAMA 297(4):387–394CrossRefPubMed

16.

Waterloo S, Nguyen T, Ahmed LA et al (2012a) Important risk factors and attributable risk of vertebral fractures in the population-based Tromso study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 13:163CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

17.

Seeman E, Bianchi G, Khosla S, Kanis J, Orwoll R (2006) Bone fragility in men—where are we? Osteoporos Int 17(11):1577–1583CrossRefPubMed

18.

Waterloo S, Nguyen T, Ahmed LA, Center JR, Morseth B, Nguyen ND, Eisman JA, Sogaard AJ, Emaus N (2012b) Important risk factors and attributable risk of vertebral fractures in the population-based Tromso study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 13:163CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

O’Neil TW, Felsenberg D, Varlow J, Cooper C, Kanis JA, Silman AJ (1996 Jul) The prevalence of vertebral deformity in European men and women: the European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study. J Bone Miner Res 11(7):1010–1018CrossRef

20.

Joes G (1996) Prevalent vertebral deformities in elderly men and women. Osteoporos Int 6(3):233–239CrossRef

21.

Jager PL, Jonkman S, Koolhaas W, Stiekema A et al (2011) Combined vertebral fracture assessment and bone mineral density measurement: a new standard in the diagnosis of osteoporosis in academic populations. Osteoporos Int 22:1059–1068CrossRefPubMed

22.

Schuit SC, van der Klift M, Weel AE, de Laet CE, Burger H, Seeman E, Hofman A, Uiitterlinden AG, van Leeuwen JP, Pols HA (2004) Fracture incidence and association with bone mineral density in elderly men and women: the Rotterdam Study. Bone 34:195–202CrossRefPubMed

23.

Li N, Li X, Xu L, Sun, W, Cheng X and Tian W. Comparison of QTC and DXA: osteoporosis detection rates in postmenopausal women. Int J Endocrinol Vol 2013, Article ID 895474. doi:10.1155/2013/895474

24.

Netelenbos JC, Lems WF, Geussens PP et al (2009) Spine radiographs to improve the identification of women at high risk for fractures. Osteoporosis Int 20:1347–1352CrossRef

25.

Middleton ET, Steel SA (2008) Routine versus targeted vertebral fracture assessment for the detection of vertebral fractures. Osteoporos Int 19:1167–1173CrossRefPubMed

26.

Kuet K-P, Charlesworth D, Peel NFA (2013) Vertebral fracture assessment scans enhance targeting of investigations and treatment within a fracture risk assessment pathway. Osteoporos Int 24:1007–1014CrossRefPubMed

27.

Ferrar L, Jiang G, Schousboe J, DeBold CR, Eastell R (2008) Prevalent vertebral fracture: agreement between different readers, imaging modalities, and diagnostic approaches. J Bone Miner Res 23:417–424CrossRefPubMed

Title: Effect of implementation of guidelines on assessment and diagnosis of vertebral fractures in patients older than 50 years with a recent non-vertebral fracture
Authors: R. Y. van der Velde
S. P. G. Bours
C. E. Wyers
W. F. Lems
P. P. M. M. Geusens
J. P. W. van den Bergh
Publication date: 01-10-2017
Publisher: Springer London
Published in: Osteoporosis International / Issue 10/2017
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Electronic ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-017-4147-4

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Effect of implementation of guidelines on assessment and diagnosis of vertebral fractures in patients older than 50 years with a recent non-vertebral fracture

Abstract

Summary

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusions

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Summary

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 10/2017

The effects of a patient activation intervention on smoking and excessive drinking cessations: results from the PAADRN randomized controlled trial

Gene mutation spectrum and genotype-phenotype correlation in a cohort of Chinese osteogenesis imperfecta patients revealed by targeted next generation sequencing

The cost of a patient activation intervention for achieving successful outcomes: results from the PAADRN randomized controlled trial

Bone mineral density in vocational and professional ballet dancers

Skeletal complications of rheumatoid arthritis

Short-term effects of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on bone mineral density in postmenopausal osteoporotic patients