Top

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Echocardiography | Study protocol

Non-invasive fetal electrocardiography, electrohysterography and speckle-tracking echocardiography in the second trimester: study protocol of a longitudinal prospective cohort study (BEATS-study)

Authors: T. J. Nichting, M. W. E. Frenken, D. A. A. van der Woude, N. H. M. van Oostrum, C. M. de Vet, B. G. van Willigen, J. O. E. H. van Laar, M. van der Ven, S. G. Oei

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2021

Abstract

Background

Worldwide, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), fetal growth restriction (FGR) and preterm birth remain the leading causes of maternal and fetal pregnancy-related mortality and (long-term) morbidity. Fetal cardiac deformation changes can be the first sign of placental dysfunction, which is associated with HDP, FGR and preterm birth. In addition, preterm birth is likely associated with changes in electrical activity across the uterine muscle. Therefore, fetal cardiac function and uterine activity can be used for the early detection of these complications in pregnancy. Fetal cardiac function and uterine activity can be assessed by two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography (2D-STE), non-invasive fetal electrocardiography (NI-fECG), and electrohysterography (EHG). This study aims to generate reference values for 2D-STE, NI-fECG and EHG parameters during the second trimester of pregnancy and to investigate the diagnostic potential of these parameters in the early detection of HDP, FGR and preterm birth.

Methods

In this longitudinal prospective cohort study, eligible women will be recruited from a tertiary care hospital and a primary midwifery practice. In total, 594 initially healthy pregnant women with an uncomplicated singleton pregnancy will be included. Recordings of NI-fECG and EHG will be made weekly from 22 until 28 weeks of gestation and 2D-STE measurements will be performed 4-weekly at 16, 20, 24 and 28 weeks gestational age. Retrospectively, pregnancies complicated with pregnancy-related diseases will be excluded from the cohort. Reference values for 2D-STE, NI-fECG and EHG parameters will be assessed in uncomplicated pregnancies. After, 2D-STE, NI-fCG and EHG parameters measured during gestation in complicated pregnancies will be compared with these reference values.

Discussion

This will be the a large prospective study investigating new technologies that could potentially have a high impact on antepartum fetal monitoring.

Trial registration

Registered on 26 March 2020 in the Dutch Trial Register (NL8769) via https://www.trialregister.nl/trials and registered on 21 October 2020 to the Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects (NL73607.015.20) via https://www.toetsingonline.nl/to/ccmo_search.nsf/Searchform?OpenForm.

Brown MA, Magee LA, Kenny LC, et al. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy ISSHP classification, diagnosis, and management recommendations for international practice. Hypertension. 2018;72(1):24–43. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.10803.CrossRefPubMed

WHO. Preterm birth. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/preterm-birth. Accessed 16 Jun 2020

Uzan J, Carbonnel M, Piconne O, Asmar R, Ayoubi J. Pre-eclampsia: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2011;7:467–74. https://doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S20181.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Verburg BO, Jaddoe VWV, Wladimiroff JW, Hofman A, Witteman JCM, Steegers EAP. Fetal hemodynamic adaptive changes related to intrauterine growth the generation R study. Circulation. 2008;117(5):649–59. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.709717.CrossRefPubMed

Baltabaeva A, Marciniak M, Bijnens B, et al. Regional left ventricular deformation and geometry analysis provides insights in myocardial remodelling in mild to moderate hypertension. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2008;9(4):501–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euje.2007.08.004.CrossRefPubMed

Rodríguez-López M, Cruz-Lemini M, Valenzuela-Alcaraz B, et al. Descriptive analysis of different phenotypes of cardiac remodeling in fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;50(2):207–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.17365.CrossRefPubMed

Edwards CR, Benediktsson R, Lindsay RSSJ. 11 beta-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases: key enzymes in determining tissue-specific glucocorticoid effects. Steroids. 1996;61(4):263–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-128x(96)00033-5.CrossRefPubMed

Murphy VE, Clifton VL. Alterations in human placental 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 and 2 with gestational age and labour. Placenta. 2003;24(7):739–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0143-4004(03)00103-6.CrossRefPubMed

Causevic M, Mohaupt M. 11beta-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 in pregnancy and preeclampsia. Mol Aspects Med. 2007;28(2):220–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mam.2007.04.003.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Dy J, Guan H, Sampath-Kumar R, Richardson BS, Yang K. Placental 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 is reduced in pregnancies complicated with idiopathic intrauterine growth restriction: evidence that this is associated with an attenuated ratio of cortisone to cortisol in the umbilical artery. Placenta. 2008;29(2):193–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2007.10.010.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Mischi M, Chen C, Ignatenko T, et al. Dedicated entropy measures for early assessment of pregnancy progression from single-channel electrohysterography. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2018;65(4):875–84. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2017.2723933.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Rabotti C, Mischi M, van Laar J, Oei G, Bergmans J. Electrohysterographic analysis of uterine contraction propagation with labor progression: a preliminary study. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2007:4135–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2007.4353246.

13.

Kota S, Gayatri K, Jammula S, et al. Endocrinology of parturition. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2013;17(1):50–9. https://doi.org/10.4103/2230-8210.107841.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Zoumakis E, Makrigiannakis A, Margioris AN, Stournaras C, Gravanis A. Endometrial corticotropin-releasing hormone. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1997;26(828):84–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1997.tb48525.x.CrossRef

15.

Grammatopoulos D, Hillhous E. Role of corticotropin-releasing hormone in onset of labour. Lancet. 1999;354(9189):1546–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(99)03418-2.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Germanakis I, Gardiner H. Assessment of fetal myocardial deformation using speckle tracking techniques. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2012;32(1-2):39–46. https://doi.org/10.1159/000330378.CrossRefPubMed

17.

DeVore GR, Polanco B, Satou G, Sklansky M. Two-dimensional speckle tracking of the fetal heart: a practical step-by-step approach for the fetal sonologist. J Ultrasound Med. 2016;35(8):1765–81. https://doi.org/10.7863/ultra.15.08060.CrossRefPubMed

18.

van Oostrum NHM, van der Woude DAA, Clur SAB, Oei SG, van Laar JOEH. Right ventricular dysfunction identified by abnormal strain values precedes evident growth restriction in small for gestational age fetuses. Prenat Diagn. 2020;40(12):1525–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.5805.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Moors S, van Oostrum NHM, Rabotti C, et al. Speckle tracking echocardiography in hypertensive pregnancy disorders: a systematic review. Onstetrical Gynaecol Surv. 2020;75(8):497–509. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.pec.0000526609.89886.37.CrossRef

20.

van Oostrum NHM, Derks K, van der Woude DAA, Clur SA, Oei SG, van Laar JOEH. Two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography in fetal growth restriction: a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;254:87–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.08.052.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Peters CHL, van Laar JOEH, Vullings R, Oei SG, Wijn PFF. Beat-to-beat heart rate detection in multi-lead abdominal fetal ECG recordings. Med Eng Phys. 2012;34(3):333–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.07.025.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Talge NM, Mudd LM, Sikorskii A, Basso O. United States birth weight reference corrected for implausible gestational age estimates. Pediatrics. 2014;133(5):844–53. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-3285.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Quinn JA, Munoz FM, Gonik B, et al. Preterm birth: case definition & guidelines for data collection, analysis, and presentation of immunisation safety data. Vaccine. 2016;34(49):6047–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.03.045.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

24.

Van Oostrum NHM, Oei SG, Van Laar JOEH. Normal fetal cardiac deformation values in pregnancy; a prospective cohort study protocol. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):524. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2662-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

25.

van Oostrum NHM, de Vet CM, van der Woude DAA, Kemps HMC, Oei SG, van Laar JOEH. Fetal strain and strain rate during pregnancy measured with speckle tracking echocardiography: a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;250:178–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.04.002.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Voigt JU, Pedrizzetti G, Lysyansky P, et al. Definitions for a common standard for 2D speckle tracking echocardiography: consensus document of the EACVI/ASE/Industry Task Force to standardize deformation imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;16(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeu184.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Semmler J, Day TG, Georgiopoulos G, et al. Fetal speckle-tracking: impact of angle of insonation and frame rate on global longitudinal strain. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2020;33(9):1141–1146.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2020.03.013.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Rooijakkers MJ, Song S, Rabotti C, et al. Influence of electrode placement on signal quality for ambulatory pregnancy monitoring. Comput Math Methods Med. 2014;2014:960–80. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/960980.CrossRef

29.

Sassi R, Cerutti S, Lombardi F, et al. Advances in heart rate variability signal analysis: Joint position statement by the e-Cardiology ESC Working Group and the European Heart Rhythm Association co-endorsed by the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society. Europace. 2015;17(9):1341–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euv015.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North Americam Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Heart rate variability; standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Circulation. 1996;93(5):1043–65.CrossRef

31.

Van Laar JOEH, Porath MM, Peters CHL, Oei SG. Spectral analysis of fetal heart rate variability for fetal surveillance: review of the literature. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87(3):300–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016340801898950.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Vullings R. Non-invasive fetal electrocardiogram : analysis and interpretation; 2010. https://doi.org/10.6100/IR692881.CrossRef

33.

Stinstra J, Golbach E, Van Leeuwen P, et al. Multicentre study of fetal cardiac time intervals using magnetocardiography. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;109(11):1235–43. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-0528.2002.01057.x.CrossRef

34.

Ayres-De-Campos D, Spong CY, Chandraharan E. FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Cardiotocography. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2015;131(1):13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2016.02.005.CrossRef

35.

Altman DG. In: Chatfield C, Zidek J, editors. Practical statistics for medical research. 1st ed. London: Taylor & Francis Ltd; 2018.

36.

Shah S, Gupta A. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Cardiol Clin. 2019;37(3):345–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccl.2019.04.008.CrossRefPubMed

37.

Martins JG, Biggio JR, Abuhamad A. Society for maternal-fetal medicine consult series #52: diagnosis and management of fetal growth restriction: (Replaces Clinical Guideline Number 3, April 2012). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223(4):B2–B17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2020.05.010.CrossRefPubMed

38.

Miles J, Shevlin M. Applying regression and correlation; a guide for students and researchers. London: Sage Publications Inc; 2000.

39.

Gordijn SJ, Beune IM, Thilaganathan B, et al. Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48(3):333–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.15884.CrossRefPubMed

40.

Grantz KL, Hediger ML, Liu D, Buck Louis GM. Fetal growth standards: the NICHD fetal growth study approach in context with INTERGROWTH-21st and the World Health Organization Multicentre Growth Reference Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(2S):S641–S655.e28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.593.CrossRefPubMed

41.

Pérez-Cruz M, Cruz-Lemini M, Fernández MT, et al. Fetal cardiac function in late-onset intrauterine growth restriction vs small-for-gestational age, as defined by estimated fetal weight, cerebroplacental ratio and uterine artery Doppler. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46(4):465–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.14930.CrossRefPubMed

42.

Figueras F, Gratacós E. Update on the diagnosis and classification of fetal growth restriction and proposal of a stage-based management protocol. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2014;36(2):86–98. https://doi.org/10.1159/000357592.CrossRefPubMed

43.

Warrander LK, Ingram E, Heazell AEP, Johnstone ED. Evaluating the accuracy and precision of sonographic fetal weight estimation models in extremely early-onset fetal growth restriction. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;99(3):364–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13745.CrossRefPubMed

44.

NVOG. NVOG-Richtlijn Foetale Groeirestrictie (FGR). Utrecht: NVOG; 2017. https://www.nvog.nl/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Foetate-groeirestricie-FGR-15-09-2017.pdf

45.

Shah AM, Solomon SD. Myocardial deformation imaging: current status and future directions. Circulation. 2012;125(2):e244–8. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.086348.CrossRefPubMed

46.

Vullings R, van Laar JOEH. Non-invasive fetal electrocardiography for intrapartum cardiotocography. Front Pediatr. 2020;8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2020.599049.

47.

Cohen WR, Hayes-Gill B. Influence of maternal body mass index on accuracy and reliability of external fetal monitoring techniques. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014;93(6):590–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12387.CrossRefPubMed

48.

Vlemminx MWC, Thijssen KMJ, Bajlekov GI, Dieleman JP, Van Der Hout-Van Der Jagt MB, Oei SG. Electrohysterography for uterine monitoring during term labour compared to external tocodynamometry and intra-uterine pressure catheter. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;215:197-205. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.05.027

49.

Cohen WR, Ommani S, Hassan S, et al. Accuracy and reliability of fetal heart rate monitoring using maternal abdominal surface electrodes. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012;91(11):1306–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01533.x.

50.

Warmerdam GJJ, Vullings R, Van Laar JOEH, et al. Detection rate of fetal distress using contraction-dependent fetal heart rate variability analysis. Physiol Meas. 2018;39(2):025008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/aaa925.CrossRefPubMed

51.

Groome LJ, Mooney DM, Bentz LSSK. Spectral analysis of heart rate variability during quiet sleep in normal human fetuses between 36 and 40 weeks of gestation. Early Hum Dev. 1994;38(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-3782(94)90045-0.CrossRefPubMed

52.

Brändle J, Preissl H, Draganova R, et al. Heart rate variability parameters and fetal movement complement fetal behavioral states detection via magnetography to monitor neurovegetative development. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015;9(147):1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00147.CrossRef

53.

Nijhuis JG, Prechtl HF, Martin CB Jr, BR. Are there behavioural states in the human fetus? Early Hum Dev. 1982;6(2):177–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-3782(82)90106-2.CrossRefPubMed

54.

John P, Campbell K, Carmichael L, Natale R, Richardson B. Patterns of human fetal breathing during the last 10 weeks of pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1980;56(1):24–30.

55.

Pillai M, James D. The development of fetal heart rate patterns during normal pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1990;75(5 Pt 1):812–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006250-199011000-00017.CrossRef

56.

Lucovnik M, Maner WL, Chambliss LR, et al. Noninvasive uterine electromyography for prediction of preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204(3):228.e1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.09.024.Noninvasive.CrossRef

57.

Garcia-Casado J, Ye-Lin Y, Prats-Boluda G, Mas-Cabo J, Alberola-Rubio J, Perales A. Electrohysterography in the diagnosis of preterm birth: a review. Physiol Meas. 2018;39(2):02TR01. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/aaad56.CrossRefPubMed

Title: Non-invasive fetal electrocardiography, electrohysterography and speckle-tracking echocardiography in the second trimester: study protocol of a longitudinal prospective cohort study (BEATS-study)
Authors: T. J. Nichting
M. W. E. Frenken
D. A. A. van der Woude
N. H. M. van Oostrum
C. M. de Vet
B. G. van Willigen
J. O. E. H. van Laar
M. van der Ven
S. G. Oei
Publication date: 01-12-2021
Publisher: BioMed Central
Keywords: Echocardiography
Fetal Electrocardiography
Premature Birth
Echocardiography
Fetal Electrocardiography
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-04265-8

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Non-invasive fetal electrocardiography, electrohysterography and speckle-tracking echocardiography in the second trimester: study protocol of a longitudinal prospective cohort study (BEATS-study)

Abstract

Background

Methods

Discussion

Trial registration

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Discussion

Trial registration

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Predictors of placental malaria in Upper West Regional Hospital-Ghana

The Food, Feelings, and Family Study: comparison of the efficacy of traditional methods, social media, and broadcast email to recruit pregnant women to an observational, longitudinal nutrition study

The reliability of maternal audit instruments to assign cause of death in maternal deaths review process: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Level of and factors associated with awareness of gestational diabetes mellitus among pregnant women attending antenatal care at Kawempe National Referral Hospital: a cross sectional study

Placenta percreta after Strassman metroplasty of complete bicornuate uterus: a case report

Men perspectives on attending antenatal care visits with their pregnant partners in Misungwi district, rural Tanzania: a qualitative study