Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Intensive Care Medicine 11/2017

01-11-2017 | Seven-Day Profile Publication

Early goal-directed nutrition versus standard of care in adult intensive care patients: the single-centre, randomised, outcome assessor-blinded EAT-ICU trial

Authors: Matilde Jo Allingstrup, Jens Kondrup, Jørgen Wiis, Casper Claudius, Ulf Gøttrup Pedersen, Rikke Hein-Rasmussen, Mads Rye Bjerregaard, Morten Steensen, Tom Hartvig Jensen, Theis Lange, Martin Bruun Madsen, Morten Hylander Møller, Anders Perner

Published in: Intensive Care Medicine | Issue 11/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

We assessed the effects of early goal-directed nutrition (EGDN) vs. standard nutritional care in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients.

Methods

We randomised acutely admitted, mechanically ventilated ICU patients expected to stay longer than 3 days in the ICU. In the EGDN group we estimated nutritional requirements by indirect calorimetry and 24-h urinary urea aiming at covering 100% of requirements from the first full trial day using enteral and parenteral nutrition. In the standard of care group we aimed at providing 25 kcal/kg/day by enteral nutrition. If this was not met by day 7, patients were supplemented with parenteral nutrition. The primary outcome was physical component summary (PCS) score of SF-36 at 6 months. We performed multiple imputation for data of the non-responders.

Results

We randomised 203 patients and included 199 in the intention-to-treat analyses; baseline variables were reasonably balanced between the two groups. The EGDN group had less negative energy (p < 0.001) and protein (p < 0.001) balances in the ICU as compared to the standard of care group. The PCS score at 6 months did not differ between the two groups (mean difference 0.0, 95% CI −5.9 to 5.8, p = 0.99); neither did mortality, rates of organ failures, serious adverse reactions or infections in the ICU, length of ICU or hospital stay, or days alive without life support at 90 days.

Conclusions

EGDN did not appear to affect physical quality of life at 6 months or other important outcomes as compared to standard nutrition care in acutely admitted, mechanically ventilated, adult ICU patients.
Clinicaltrials.gov identifier no. NCT01372176.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Van den Berghe G (2017) The 2016 ESPEN Sir David Cuthbertson lecture: interfering with neuroendocrine and metabolic responses to critical illness: From acute to long-term consequences. Clin Nutr 36:348–354CrossRefPubMed Van den Berghe G (2017) The 2016 ESPEN Sir David Cuthbertson lecture: interfering with neuroendocrine and metabolic responses to critical illness: From acute to long-term consequences. Clin Nutr 36:348–354CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Casaer MP, Mesotten D, Hermans G et al (2011) Early versus late parenteral nutrition in critically ill adults. N Engl J Med 365:506–517CrossRefPubMed Casaer MP, Mesotten D, Hermans G et al (2011) Early versus late parenteral nutrition in critically ill adults. N Engl J Med 365:506–517CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Harvey SE, Parrott F, Harrison DA et al (2014) Trial of the route of early nutritional support in critically ill adults. N Engl J Med 371(18):1673–1684CrossRefPubMed Harvey SE, Parrott F, Harrison DA et al (2014) Trial of the route of early nutritional support in critically ill adults. N Engl J Med 371(18):1673–1684CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Singer P, Anbar R, Cohen J et al (2011) The tight calorie control study (TICACOS): a prospective, randomized, controlled pilot study of nutritional support in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 37:601–609CrossRefPubMed Singer P, Anbar R, Cohen J et al (2011) The tight calorie control study (TICACOS): a prospective, randomized, controlled pilot study of nutritional support in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 37:601–609CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Heidegger CP, Berger MM, Graf S et al (2013) Optimisation of energy provision with supplemental parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients: a randomised controlled clinical trial. Lancet 381:385–393CrossRefPubMed Heidegger CP, Berger MM, Graf S et al (2013) Optimisation of energy provision with supplemental parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients: a randomised controlled clinical trial. Lancet 381:385–393CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Doig GS, Simpson F, Sweetman EA et al (2013) Early parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients with short-term relative contraindications to early enteral nutrition: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 309:2130–2138CrossRefPubMed Doig GS, Simpson F, Sweetman EA et al (2013) Early parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients with short-term relative contraindications to early enteral nutrition: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 309:2130–2138CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Kreymann KG, Berger MM, Deutz NEP et al (2006) ESPEN guidelines on enteral nutrition: intensive care. Clin Nutr 25:210–223CrossRefPubMed Kreymann KG, Berger MM, Deutz NEP et al (2006) ESPEN guidelines on enteral nutrition: intensive care. Clin Nutr 25:210–223CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Singer P, Berger MM, van den Berghe G et al (2009) ESPEN guidelines on parenteral nutrition: intensive care. Clin Nutr 28:387–400CrossRefPubMed Singer P, Berger MM, van den Berghe G et al (2009) ESPEN guidelines on parenteral nutrition: intensive care. Clin Nutr 28:387–400CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Dhaliwal R, Cahill N, Lemieux M, Heyland DK (2014) The Canadian critical care nutrition guidelines in 2013: an update on current recommendations and implementation strategies. Nutr Clin Pract 29:29–43CrossRefPubMed Dhaliwal R, Cahill N, Lemieux M, Heyland DK (2014) The Canadian critical care nutrition guidelines in 2013: an update on current recommendations and implementation strategies. Nutr Clin Pract 29:29–43CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Reintam Blaser A, Starkopf J, Alhazzani W et al (2017) Early enteral nutrition in critically ill patients: ESICM clinical practice guidelines. Intensive Care Med 43:380–398CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Reintam Blaser A, Starkopf J, Alhazzani W et al (2017) Early enteral nutrition in critically ill patients: ESICM clinical practice guidelines. Intensive Care Med 43:380–398CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference McClave SA, Taylor BE, Martindale RG et al (2016) Guidelines for the provision and assessment of nutrition support therapy in the adult critically ill patient: Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.). JPEN J Parenter Enter Nutr 40:159–211CrossRef McClave SA, Taylor BE, Martindale RG et al (2016) Guidelines for the provision and assessment of nutrition support therapy in the adult critically ill patient: Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.). JPEN J Parenter Enter Nutr 40:159–211CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Weijs PJM, Stapel SN, de Groot SDW et al (2012) Optimal protein and energy nutrition decreases mortality in mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients: a prospective observational cohort study. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 36:60–68CrossRefPubMed Weijs PJM, Stapel SN, de Groot SDW et al (2012) Optimal protein and energy nutrition decreases mortality in mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients: a prospective observational cohort study. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 36:60–68CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Elke G, Wang M, Weiler N et al (2014) Close to recommended caloric and protein intake by enteral nutrition is associated with better clinical outcome of critically ill septic patients: secondary analysis of a large international nutrition database. Crit Care 18:R29CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Elke G, Wang M, Weiler N et al (2014) Close to recommended caloric and protein intake by enteral nutrition is associated with better clinical outcome of critically ill septic patients: secondary analysis of a large international nutrition database. Crit Care 18:R29CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Oshima T, Deutz NE, Doig G et al (2015) Protein-energy nutrition in the ICU is the power couple: a hypothesis forming analysis. Clin Nutr 35:968–974CrossRefPubMed Oshima T, Deutz NE, Doig G et al (2015) Protein-energy nutrition in the ICU is the power couple: a hypothesis forming analysis. Clin Nutr 35:968–974CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Blackburn GL, Bistrian BR, Maini BS et al (1977) Nutritional and metabolic assessment of the hospitalized putient. JPEN J Parenter Enter Nutr 1:11–22CrossRef Blackburn GL, Bistrian BR, Maini BS et al (1977) Nutritional and metabolic assessment of the hospitalized putient. JPEN J Parenter Enter Nutr 1:11–22CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Mellin-Olsen J, Staender S, Whitaker DK, Smith AF (2010) The Helsinki declaration on patient safety in anaesthesiology. Eur J Anaesthesiol 27:592–597CrossRefPubMed Mellin-Olsen J, Staender S, Whitaker DK, Smith AF (2010) The Helsinki declaration on patient safety in anaesthesiology. Eur J Anaesthesiol 27:592–597CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Allingstrup MJ, Kondrup J, Wiis J et al (2016) Early goal-directed nutrition in ICU patients (EAT-ICU): protocol for a randomised trial. Dan Med J 63:1–6 Allingstrup MJ, Kondrup J, Wiis J et al (2016) Early goal-directed nutrition in ICU patients (EAT-ICU): protocol for a randomised trial. Dan Med J 63:1–6
19.
go back to reference Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF et al (2012) CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Int J Surg 10:28–55CrossRefPubMed Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF et al (2012) CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Int J Surg 10:28–55CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Perner A, Haase N, Guttormsen AB et al (2012) Hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 versus Ringer’s acetate in severe sepsis. N Engl J Med 367:124–134CrossRefPubMed Perner A, Haase N, Guttormsen AB et al (2012) Hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 versus Ringer’s acetate in severe sepsis. N Engl J Med 367:124–134CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Doig GS, Simpson F (2005) Randomization and allocation concealment: a practical guide for researchers. J Crit Care 20:187–191CrossRefPubMed Doig GS, Simpson F (2005) Randomization and allocation concealment: a practical guide for researchers. J Crit Care 20:187–191CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Martindale RG, McClave SA, Vanek VW et al (2009) Guidelines for the provision and assessment of nutrition support therapy in the adult critically ill patient: Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.). JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 37:1757–1761 Martindale RG, McClave SA, Vanek VW et al (2009) Guidelines for the provision and assessment of nutrition support therapy in the adult critically ill patient: Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.). JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 37:1757–1761
23.
go back to reference Finfer S, Chittock DR, Su SY et al (2009) Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med 360:1283–1297CrossRefPubMed Finfer S, Chittock DR, Su SY et al (2009) Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med 360:1283–1297CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Wiener RS, Wiener DC, Larson RJ (2008) Benefits and risks of tight glucose control in critically ill adults: a meta-analysis. JAMA 300:933–944CrossRefPubMed Wiener RS, Wiener DC, Larson RJ (2008) Benefits and risks of tight glucose control in critically ill adults: a meta-analysis. JAMA 300:933–944CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473–483CrossRefPubMed Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473–483CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Chrispin PS, Scotton H, Rogers J et al (1997) Short Form 36 in the intensive care unit: assessment of acceptability, reliability and validity of the questionnaire. Anaesthesia 52:15–23CrossRefPubMed Chrispin PS, Scotton H, Rogers J et al (1997) Short Form 36 in the intensive care unit: assessment of acceptability, reliability and validity of the questionnaire. Anaesthesia 52:15–23CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J et al (1996) The SOFA (sepsis-related organ failure assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. Intensive Care Med 22:707–710CrossRefPubMed Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J et al (1996) The SOFA (sepsis-related organ failure assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. Intensive Care Med 22:707–710CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Calandra T, Cohen J (2005) The International Sepsis Forum consensus conference on definitions of infection in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 33:1538–1548CrossRefPubMed Calandra T, Cohen J (2005) The International Sepsis Forum consensus conference on definitions of infection in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 33:1538–1548CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Schrøder MA, Poulsen JB, Perner A (2011) Acceptable long-term outcome in elderly intensive care unit patients. Dan Med Bull 58:A4297PubMed Schrøder MA, Poulsen JB, Perner A (2011) Acceptable long-term outcome in elderly intensive care unit patients. Dan Med Bull 58:A4297PubMed
30.
go back to reference Fergusson D, Aaron SD, Guyatt G, Hébert P (2002) Post-randomisation exclusions: the intention to treat principle and excluding patients from analysis. BMJ 325:652–654CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fergusson D, Aaron SD, Guyatt G, Hébert P (2002) Post-randomisation exclusions: the intention to treat principle and excluding patients from analysis. BMJ 325:652–654CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
go back to reference Schafer JL, Graham JW (2002) Missing data: our view of the state of the art. Psychol Methods 7:147–177CrossRefPubMed Schafer JL, Graham JW (2002) Missing data: our view of the state of the art. Psychol Methods 7:147–177CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Compher C, Frankenfield D, Keim N, Roth-Yousey L (2006) Best practice methods to apply to measurement of resting metabolic rate in adults: a systematic review. J Am Diet Assoc 106:881–903CrossRefPubMed Compher C, Frankenfield D, Keim N, Roth-Yousey L (2006) Best practice methods to apply to measurement of resting metabolic rate in adults: a systematic review. J Am Diet Assoc 106:881–903CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Sundström M, Tjäder I, Rooyackers O, Wernerman J (2013) Indirect calorimetry in mechanically ventilated patients. A systematic comparison of three instruments. Clin Nutr 32:118–121CrossRefPubMed Sundström M, Tjäder I, Rooyackers O, Wernerman J (2013) Indirect calorimetry in mechanically ventilated patients. A systematic comparison of three instruments. Clin Nutr 32:118–121CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Graf S, Karsegard VL, Viatte V et al (2014) Evaluation of three indirect calorimetry devices in mechanically ventilated patients: which device compares best with the Deltatrac II(®)? A prospective observational study. Clin Nutr 34:60–65CrossRefPubMed Graf S, Karsegard VL, Viatte V et al (2014) Evaluation of three indirect calorimetry devices in mechanically ventilated patients: which device compares best with the Deltatrac II(®)? A prospective observational study. Clin Nutr 34:60–65CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Allingstrup MJ, Kondrup J, Perner A et al (2016) Indirect calorimetry in mechanically ventilated patients: a prospective, randomized, clinical validation of 2 devices against a gold standard. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. doi:10.1177/0148607116662000 Allingstrup MJ, Kondrup J, Perner A et al (2016) Indirect calorimetry in mechanically ventilated patients: a prospective, randomized, clinical validation of 2 devices against a gold standard. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. doi:10.​1177/​0148607116662000​
36.
go back to reference Marik PE, Hooper MH (2015) Normocaloric versus hypocaloric feeding on the outcomes of ICU patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 42(3):316–323CrossRefPubMed Marik PE, Hooper MH (2015) Normocaloric versus hypocaloric feeding on the outcomes of ICU patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 42(3):316–323CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Elke G, van Zanten ARH, Lemieux M et al (2016) Enteral versus parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Crit Care 20:117CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Elke G, van Zanten ARH, Lemieux M et al (2016) Enteral versus parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Crit Care 20:117CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
go back to reference Allingstrup MJ, Esmailzadeh N, Wilkens Knudsen A et al (2012) Provision of protein and energy in relation to measured requirements in intensive care patients. Clin Nutr 31:462–468CrossRefPubMed Allingstrup MJ, Esmailzadeh N, Wilkens Knudsen A et al (2012) Provision of protein and energy in relation to measured requirements in intensive care patients. Clin Nutr 31:462–468CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Hoffer LJ, Bistrian BR (2012) Appropriate protein provision in critical illness: a systematic and narrative review. Am J Clin Nutr 96:591–600CrossRefPubMed Hoffer LJ, Bistrian BR (2012) Appropriate protein provision in critical illness: a systematic and narrative review. Am J Clin Nutr 96:591–600CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Alberda C, Gramlich L, Jones N et al (2009) The relationship between nutritional intake and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients: results of an international multicenter observational study. Intensive Care Med 35:1728–1737CrossRefPubMed Alberda C, Gramlich L, Jones N et al (2009) The relationship between nutritional intake and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients: results of an international multicenter observational study. Intensive Care Med 35:1728–1737CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Early goal-directed nutrition versus standard of care in adult intensive care patients: the single-centre, randomised, outcome assessor-blinded EAT-ICU trial
Authors
Matilde Jo Allingstrup
Jens Kondrup
Jørgen Wiis
Casper Claudius
Ulf Gøttrup Pedersen
Rikke Hein-Rasmussen
Mads Rye Bjerregaard
Morten Steensen
Tom Hartvig Jensen
Theis Lange
Martin Bruun Madsen
Morten Hylander Møller
Anders Perner
Publication date
01-11-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine / Issue 11/2017
Print ISSN: 0342-4642
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1238
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-017-4880-3

Other articles of this Issue 11/2017

Intensive Care Medicine 11/2017 Go to the issue