Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Intensive Care Medicine
Published in: Intensive Care Medicine 3/2016

01-03-2016 | Systematic Review

Normocaloric versus hypocaloric feeding on the outcomes of ICU patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors: Paul E. Marik, Michael H. Hooper

Published in: Intensive Care Medicine | Issue 3/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Current clinical practice guidelines recommend providing ICU patients a daily caloric intake estimated to match 80–100 % of energy expenditure (normocaloric goals). However, recent clinical trials of intentional hypocaloric feeding question this approach.

Methods

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the outcomes of ICU patients randomized to intentional hypocaloric or normocaloric goals. We included randomized controlled trials that enrolled ICU patients and compared intentional hypocaloric with normocaloric nutritional goals. We included studies that evaluated both trophic feeding as well as permissive underfeeding. Data sources included MEDLINE, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials and citation review of relevant primary and review articles. The outcomes of interest included hospital acquired infection, hospital mortality, ICU length of stay (LOS) and ventilator-free days (VFDs).

Results

Six studies which enrolled 2517 patients met our inclusion criteria. The mean age and body mass index (BMI) across the studies were 53 ± 5 years and 29.1 ± 1.5 kg/m2, respectively. Two studies compared normocaloric feeding (77 % of goal) with trophic feeding (20 % of goal), while four studies compared normocaloric feeding (72 % of goal) with permissive underfeeding (49 % of goal). Overall, there was no significant difference in the risk of infectious complications (OR 1.03; 95 % CI 0.84–1.27, I 2 = 16 %), hospital mortality (OR 0.91; 95 % CI 0.75–1.11, I 2 = 8 %) or ICU LOS (mean difference 0.05 days; 95 % CI 1.33–1.44 days; I 2 = 37 %) between groups. VFDs were reported in three studies with no significant difference between the normocaloric and intentional hypocaloric groups (data not pooled).

Conclusion

This meta-analysis demonstrated no difference in the risk of acquired infections, hospital mortality, ICU length of stay or ventilator-free days between patients receiving intentional hypocaloric as compared to normocaloric nutritional goals.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Casaer MP, van den Berghe G (2014) Nutrition in the acute phase of critical illness. N Engl J Med 370:1227–1236CrossRef
2.
Heyland DK, Dhaliwal R, Drover JW, Gramlich L, Dodek P, Heyland DK, Dhaliwal R, Drover JW, Gramlich L, Dodek P (2003) Canadian Clinical Practice Guidelines for nutrition support in mechanically ventilated, critically ill adult patients. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 27:355–373CrossRef
3.
McClave SA, Martindale RG, Vanek VW, McCarthy M, Roberts P, Taylor B, Ochoa JB, Napolitano L, Cresci G (2009) Guidelines for the provision and assessment of nutrition support therapy in the adult critically ill patient: Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.). J Parenter Enteral Nutr 33:277–316CrossRef
4.
Heyland DK, Dhaliwal R, Lemieux M, Drover J, Jurewitsch B, Greenwood J, Kutsogiannis J, McCall M, Pagliarello G, Wynn C, Garrel D, Gramlich L, Rahman A, Jeejeebhoy K, Macdonald G, Muscedere J (2015) Canadian clinical practice guidelines. http://​www.​criticalcarenutr​ition.​com/​2015. Accessed 9 Sep 2015
5.
Kreymann KG, Berger MM, Deutz NE, Hiesmayr M, Jolliet P, Kazandjiev G, Nitenberg G, van den Berghe G, Wernerman J, Ebner C, Hartl W, Heymann C, Spies C, DGEM (German Society for Nutritional Medicine) (2006) ESPEN guidelines on enteral nutrition: intensive care. Clin Nutr 25:210–223CrossRef
6.
Alberda C, Gramlich L, Jones N, Jeejeebhoy K, Day AG, Dhaliwal R, Heyland DK (2009) The relationship between nutritional intake and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients: results of an International Multicenter Observational Study. Intensive Care Med 35:1728–1737CrossRef
7.
Elke G, Wang M, Weiler N, Day AG, Heyland DK (2014) Close to recommended caloric and protein intake by enteral nutrition is associated with better clinical outcome of critically ill septic patients: secondary analysis of a large International Nutrition Databse. Crit Care 18:R29CrossRef
8.
Artinian V, Krayem H, DiGiovine B (2006) Effects of early enteral feeding on the outcome of critically ill mechanically ventilated medical patients. Chest 129:960–967CrossRef
9.
Weijs PJ, Stapel SN, de Groot SD, Driessen RH, de Jong E, Girbes AR, van Strack Schijndel RJ, Beishuizen A (2012) Optimal protein and energy nutrition decreases mortality in mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients: a prospective observational cohort study. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 36:60–68CrossRef
10.
Faisy C, Lerolle N, Dachraoui F, Savard JF, Abboud I, Tadie JM, Fagon JY (2009) Impact of energy deficit calculated by a predictive method on outcome in medical patients requiring prolonged acute mechanical ventilation. Br J Nutr 101:1079–1087CrossRef
11.
Singer P, Pichard C, Heidegger CP, Wernerman J (2010) Considering energy deficit in the intensive care unit. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 13:170–176CrossRef
12.
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 339:b2700CrossRef
13.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 339:b2535CrossRef
14.
15.
Rice TW, Morgan S, Hays MA, Bernard GR, Jensen GL, Wheeler AP (2011) A randomized trial of initial trophic versus full-energy enteral nutrition in mechanically ventilated patients with acute respiratory failure. Crit Care Med 39:967–974CrossRef
16.
Rice TW, Wheeler AP, Thompson BT, Steingrub J, Hite RD, Moss M, Morris A, Dong N, Rock P (2012) Initial trophic vs full enteral feeding in patients with acute lung injury. The EDEN randomized trial. JAMA 307:795–803CrossRef
17.
Cochran W (1954) The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics 10:101–129CrossRef
18.
Berlin JA, Laird NM, Sacks HS, Chalmers TC (1989) A comparison of statistical methods for combining event rates from clinical trials. Stat Med 8:141–151CrossRef
19.
Egger M, Smith GD (1998) Bias in location and selection of studies. Br Med J 316:61–66CrossRef
20.
Biljana M, Jelena M, Branislav J, Milorad R, Biljana M, Jelena M, Branislav J, Milorad R (1999) Bias in meta-analysis and funnel plot asymmetry. Stud Health Technol Informat 68:323–328
21.
Arabi YM, Tamim HM, Dhar GS, Al-Dawood A, Al-Sultan M, Sakkijha MH, Kahoul SH, Brits R (2011) Permissive underfeeding and intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr 93:569–577CrossRef
22.
Arabi YM, Aldawood AS, Haddad SH, Al-Dorzi HM, Tamim HM, Jones G, Mehta S, McIntyre L (2015) Permissive underfeeding or standard enteral feeding in critically ill adults. N Engl J Med 372:2398–2408CrossRef
23.
Charles EJ, Petroze RT, Metzger R, Hranjec T, Rosenberger LH, Riccio LM, McLeod MD, Guidry CA, Stukenborg GJ, Swenson BR, Willcutts KF, O’Donnell KB, Sawyer RG (2014) Hypocaloric compared with eucaloric nutritionaql support and its effect on infection rates in a surgical intensive care unit: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr 100:1337–1343CrossRef
24.
25.
Xu Y, Eissa NT (2010) Autophagy in innate and adaptive immunity. Proc Am Thorac Soc 7:22–28CrossRef
26.
Rich KA, Burkett C, Webster P (2003) Cytoplasmic bacteria can be targets for autophagy. Cell Microbiol 5:455–468CrossRef
27.
Levine B, Mizushima N, Virgin HN (2011) Autophagy immun inflamm. Nature 469:323–335CrossRef
28.
Marik PE, Bellomo R (2013) Stress hyperglycemia: an essential survival response! Crit Care 17:305CrossRef
29.
Tappy L, Schwarz JM, Schneiter P, Cayeux C, Revelly JP, Fagerquist C, Jequier E, Chiolero R (1998) Effects of isoenergetic glucose-based or lipid-based parenteral nutrition on glucose metabolism, de novo lipogenesis, and respiratory gas exchanges in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 26:860–867CrossRef
30.
Herridge MS, Cheung AM, Tansey CM, Matte-Martyn A, Diaz-Granados N, Al-Saidi F, Cooper AB, Guest CM (2003) One-year outcomes in survivors of the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 348:683–693CrossRef
31.
Herridge MS, Tansey CM, Matte A, Tomlionson G, Diaz-Granados N, Cooper A, Guest CB, Mazer CD, Mehta A (2011) Functional disability 5 years after acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 364:1293–1304CrossRef
32.
Hoffer LJ, Bistrian BR (2013) Why critically ill patients are protein deprived. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 37:300–309CrossRef
33.
Needham DM, Dinglas VD, Morris PE, Jackson JC, Hough CL, Mendez-Tellez PA, Wozniak AW, Colantuoni E, Ely EW, Rice TW, Hopkins RO (2013) Physical and cognitive performance of acute lung injury patients one year after initial trophic vs full enteral feeding: EDEN trial follow-up. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 188:567–576CrossRef
34.
Needham DM, Dinglas VD, Bienvenu OJ, Colantuoni E, Wozniak AW, Rice TW, Hopkins RO (2013) One-year outcomes in patients with acute lung injury randomised to initial trophic or full enteral feeding: prospective follow-up of EDEN randomised trial. BMJ 346:f1532CrossRef
35.
Heyland DK, Murch L, Cahill N, McCall M, Muscedere J, Stelfox HT, Bray T, Tanguay T, Jiang X, Day AG (2013) Enhanced protein-energy provision via the enteral route feeding protocol in critically ill patients: results of a cluster randomized trial. Crit Care Med 41:2743–2753CrossRef
36.
Braunschweig CA, Sheean PM, Peterson SJ, Perez SG, Freels S, Lateef O, Gurka D, Fantuzzi G (2015) Intensive nutrition in acute lung injury: a clinical trial (INTACT). J Parenter Enteral Nutr 39:13–20CrossRef
37.
Asarian L, Langhans W (2010) A new look on brain mechanisms of acute illness anorexia. Physiol Behav 100:464–471CrossRef
38.
Langhans W (2007) Signals generating anorexia during acute illness. Proc Nutr Soc 66:321–330CrossRef
39.
Choi AM, Ryter SW, Levine B (2013) Autophagy in human health and disease. N Engl J Med 368:651–662CrossRef
40.
Gazzaneo MC, Suryawan A, Orellana RA, Torrazza RM, El-Kadi SW, Wilson FA, Kimball SR, Srivastava N, Nguyen HV, Fiorotto ML, Davis TA (2011) Intermittent bolus feeding has a greater stimulatory effect on protein synthesis in skeletal muscle than continuous feeding in neonatal pigs. J Nutr 141:2152–2158CrossRef
41.
Stoll B, Puiman PJ, Cui L, Chang X, Benight NM, Bauchart-Thevret C, Hartmann B, Holst JJ, Burrin DG (2012) Continuous parenteral and enteral nutrition induces metabolic dysfunction in neonatal pigs. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 36:538–550CrossRef
42.
Chowdhury AH, Murray K, Hoad CL, Costigan C, Marciani L, MacDonald IA, Bowling TE, Lobo DN (2015) Effects of bolus and continuous nasogastric feeding on gastric emptying, small bowel water content, superior mesenteric artery blood flow, and plasma hormone concentrations in heathy adults. A randomized crossover study, Ann Surg (in press)
43.
Marik PE (2015) Feeding critically ill patients the right “whey”:thinking outside the box. Ann Intensive Care 5:11CrossRef
44.
Wischmeyer PE (2015) Ensuring optimal survival and post-ICU qulaity of life in high-risk ICU patients: permissive underfeeding is not safe! Crit Care Med 43:1769–1772CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Normocaloric versus hypocaloric feeding on the outcomes of ICU patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors
Paul E. Marik
Michael H. Hooper
Publication date
01-03-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine / Issue 3/2016
Print ISSN: 0342-4642
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1238
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-015-4131-4

Other articles of this Issue 3/2016

Intensive Care Medicine 3/2016 Go to the issue

Imaging in Intensive Care Medicine

Severe hypercoagulable state on veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Editorial

Value of CVP: an epidemiological or physiological question?

Correspondence

Does night shift, stress or both make us dumber?

Editorial

Lactate-guided resuscitation saves lives: we are not sure

What's New in Intensive Care

What’s new with biomarker-driven clinical strategy in sepsis and circulatory failure?

Imaging in Intensive Care Medicine

Keep an ear to the ground, the answer’s behind