Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Early developed ASD (adjacent segmental disease) in patients after surgical treatment of the spine due to cancer metastases

Author: Grzegorz Guzik

Published in: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The causes of ASD are still relatively unknown. Correlation between clinical status of patients and radiological MRI findings is of primary importance. The radiological classifications proposed by Pfirmann and Oner are most commonly used to assess intradiscal degenerative changes.
The aim of the study was to assess the influence of the extension of spine fixation on the risk of developing ASD in a short time after surgery.

Methods

A total of 332 patients with spinal tumors were treated in our hospital between 2010 and 2013. Of these patients, 287 underwent surgeries. A follow-up MRI examination was performed 12 months after surgical treatment. The study population comprised of 194 patients. Among metastases, breast cancer was predominant (29%); neurological deficits were detected in 76 patients. Metastases were seen in the thoracic (45%) and lumbar (30%) spine; in 25% of cases, they were of multisegmental character. Pathological fractures concerned 88% of the patients. Statistical calculations were made using the χ2 test. Statistical analysis was done using the Statistica v. 10 software. A p value <0.05 was accepted as statistically significant. The study population was divided on seven groups according to applied treatment.

Results

Clinical signs of ASD were noted in only seven patients. Two patients had symptoms of nerve root irritation in the lumbar spine. Twenty-two patients (11%) were diagnosed with ASD according to the MRI classifications by Oner, Rijt, and Ramos, while the more sensitive Pfirmann classification allowed to detect the disease in 46 patients (24%). Healthy or almost healthy discs of Oner type I correlated with the criteria of Pfirmann types II and III. The percentage of the incidence of ASD diagnosed 1 year after the surgery using the Pfirmann classifications was significantly higher than diagnosed according to the clinical examination.

Conclusions

The incidence of ASD in patients after spine surgeries due to cancer metastases does not differ between the study groups. ASD detectability based on clinical signs is significantly lower than ASD detectability based on MR images according to the system by Pfirrmann et.al. ASD risk increase among patients with multilevel fixation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hilibrand AS, Robbins M. Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion? Spine J. 2004;4:190–4.CrossRef Hilibrand AS, Robbins M. Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion? Spine J. 2004;4:190–4.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Asdourian PL. Metastatic disease of the spine. In: Bridwell WH, De Wald RL, editors. The Textbook of Spinal Surgery. II wyd. Philadelphia: Lippincott – Raven Publishers; 1997. p. 2007–50. Asdourian PL. Metastatic disease of the spine. In: Bridwell WH, De Wald RL, editors. The Textbook of Spinal Surgery. II wyd. Philadelphia: Lippincott – Raven Publishers; 1997. p. 2007–50.
3.
go back to reference Askar Z, Wardlaw D, Muthukumar T, et al. Correlation between intervertebral disc morphology and the results in patients undergoing graf ligament stabilisation. Eur Spine J. 2004;13:714–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Askar Z, Wardlaw D, Muthukumar T, et al. Correlation between intervertebral disc morphology and the results in patients undergoing graf ligament stabilisation. Eur Spine J. 2004;13:714–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Boriani S, Weinstein JN, Biagini R. Spine update: primary bone tumors of the spine: terminology and surgical staging. Spine. 1997;22:1036–44.CrossRefPubMed Boriani S, Weinstein JN, Biagini R. Spine update: primary bone tumors of the spine: terminology and surgical staging. Spine. 1997;22:1036–44.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Cheh G, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Adjacent segment disease followinglumbar/ thoracolumbar fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation: a minimum 5-year follow-up. Spine. 2007;32:2253–7.CrossRefPubMed Cheh G, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Adjacent segment disease followinglumbar/ thoracolumbar fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation: a minimum 5-year follow-up. Spine. 2007;32:2253–7.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Dickman CA, Fehlings MG, Gokaslan ZL. Spinal Cord and Spinal Column Tumors Principles and Practise. Thieme New York; 2004. p. 303–333. Dickman CA, Fehlings MG, Gokaslan ZL. Spinal Cord and Spinal Column Tumors Principles and Practise. Thieme New York; 2004. p. 303–333.
7.
go back to reference Ecker RT, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of vertebral column metastases. Mayo Clinic Proc. 2005;80(9):1177–86.CrossRef Ecker RT, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of vertebral column metastases. Mayo Clinic Proc. 2005;80(9):1177–86.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Eleraky M, Papanastassiou I, Tran ND, et al. Comparison of polymethylmethacrylate versus expandable cage in anterior vertebral column reconstruction after posterior extracavitary corpectomy in lumbar and thoracolumbar metastatic spine tumors. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(8):1363–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Eleraky M, Papanastassiou I, Tran ND, et al. Comparison of polymethylmethacrylate versus expandable cage in anterior vertebral column reconstruction after posterior extracavitary corpectomy in lumbar and thoracolumbar metastatic spine tumors. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(8):1363–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Fisher CG, DiPaola CP, Ryken TC, et al. A novel classification system for spinal instability in neoplastic disease: an evidence-based approach and expert consensus from the Spine Oncology Study Group. Spine. 2010;35(22):1221–9.CrossRef Fisher CG, DiPaola CP, Ryken TC, et al. A novel classification system for spinal instability in neoplastic disease: an evidence-based approach and expert consensus from the Spine Oncology Study Group. Spine. 2010;35(22):1221–9.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Frankel BM, Jones T, Wang C. Segmental polymethylmethacrylate augmented pedicle screw fixation in patients with bone softening caused by osteoporosis and metastatic tumor involvement: a clinical evaluation. Neurosurgery. 2007;61(3):531–8.CrossRefPubMed Frankel BM, Jones T, Wang C. Segmental polymethylmethacrylate augmented pedicle screw fixation in patients with bone softening caused by osteoporosis and metastatic tumor involvement: a clinical evaluation. Neurosurgery. 2007;61(3):531–8.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Galasko CSB, Norris HE, Crank S. Spinal instability secondary to metastatic cancer. J Bone Joint Surg. 2000;82A:570–6.CrossRef Galasko CSB, Norris HE, Crank S. Spinal instability secondary to metastatic cancer. J Bone Joint Surg. 2000;82A:570–6.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ghiselli G, Wang JC, Bhatia NN, et al. Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A:1497–503.CrossRefPubMed Ghiselli G, Wang JC, Bhatia NN, et al. Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A:1497–503.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Guzik G. Przerzuty do kręgosłupa – diagnostyka i leczenie. Bielsko Biała: Alfa Medica Press; 2015. Guzik G. Przerzuty do kręgosłupa – diagnostyka i leczenie. Bielsko Biała: Alfa Medica Press; 2015.
14.
go back to reference Helgeson MD, Bevevino AJ, Hilibrand AS. Update on the evidence for adjacent degeneration and disease. Spine J. 2013;13:342–51.CrossRefPubMed Helgeson MD, Bevevino AJ, Hilibrand AS. Update on the evidence for adjacent degeneration and disease. Spine J. 2013;13:342–51.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Kaloostian PE, Yurter A, Zadnik PL, et al. Current paradigms for metastatic spinal disease: an evidence-based review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(1):248–62.CrossRefPubMed Kaloostian PE, Yurter A, Zadnik PL, et al. Current paradigms for metastatic spinal disease: an evidence-based review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(1):248–62.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Kelley SP, Ashford RU, Rao AS, Dickson RA. Primary bone tumours of the spine: a 42-year survey from the Leeds Regional Bone Tumour Registry. Eur Spine J. 2007;16:405–9.CrossRefPubMed Kelley SP, Ashford RU, Rao AS, Dickson RA. Primary bone tumours of the spine: a 42-year survey from the Leeds Regional Bone Tumour Registry. Eur Spine J. 2007;16:405–9.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Kim DH, Chang UK, Kim SH, Bilsky MH. Tumors of the Spine. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2008. Kim DH, Chang UK, Kim SH, Bilsky MH. Tumors of the Spine. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2008.
18.
go back to reference Kumar A, Beastall J, Hughes J, Karadimas EJ, Nicol M, Smith F, Wardlaw D. Changes in the disc space after fractures of the thoracolumbar spine. Spine. 2008;33(26):2909–14.CrossRefPubMed Kumar A, Beastall J, Hughes J, Karadimas EJ, Nicol M, Smith F, Wardlaw D. Changes in the disc space after fractures of the thoracolumbar spine. Spine. 2008;33(26):2909–14.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Levin DA, Hale JJ, Bendo JA. Adjacent segment degeneration following spinal fusion for degenerative disc disease. Biuletin NYU Hosp Joint Dis. 2007;65(1):29–36. Levin DA, Hale JJ, Bendo JA. Adjacent segment degeneration following spinal fusion for degenerative disc disease. Biuletin NYU Hosp Joint Dis. 2007;65(1):29–36.
20.
go back to reference Metcalfe S, Gbejuade H, Patel NR. The posterior transpedicular approach for circumferential decompression and instrumented stabilization with titanium cage vertebrectomy reconstruction for spinal tumors: consecutive case series of 50 patients. Spine. 2012;37(16):1375–83.CrossRefPubMed Metcalfe S, Gbejuade H, Patel NR. The posterior transpedicular approach for circumferential decompression and instrumented stabilization with titanium cage vertebrectomy reconstruction for spinal tumors: consecutive case series of 50 patients. Spine. 2012;37(16):1375–83.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Niosi CA, Zhu QA, Wilson DC, et al. Biomechanical characterization of the three-dimensional kinematic behaviour of the dynesys dynamic stabilization system: an in vitro study. Eur Spine J. 2006;15:913–22.CrossRefPubMed Niosi CA, Zhu QA, Wilson DC, et al. Biomechanical characterization of the three-dimensional kinematic behaviour of the dynesys dynamic stabilization system: an in vitro study. Eur Spine J. 2006;15:913–22.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Sears WR, Sergides IG, Kazemi N, et al. Incidence and prevalence of surgery at segments adjacent to a previous posterior lumbar artrodesis. Spine J. 2011;11(1):11–20.CrossRefPubMed Sears WR, Sergides IG, Kazemi N, et al. Incidence and prevalence of surgery at segments adjacent to a previous posterior lumbar artrodesis. Spine J. 2011;11(1):11–20.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Lee JC, Kim Y, Soh JW, et al. Risc factors of adjacent segment disease requiring surgery after lumbar spinal fusion: comparison of posterior lumbar interbody fusion and posterolateral fusion. Spine. 2014;39(5):339–45.CrossRef Lee JC, Kim Y, Soh JW, et al. Risc factors of adjacent segment disease requiring surgery after lumbar spinal fusion: comparison of posterior lumbar interbody fusion and posterolateral fusion. Spine. 2014;39(5):339–45.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Saavedra-Pozo FM, Deusdara RA, Benzel EC. Adjacent segment disease perspective and review of the literature. Ochsner J. 2014;14:78–83.PubMedPubMedCentral Saavedra-Pozo FM, Deusdara RA, Benzel EC. Adjacent segment disease perspective and review of the literature. Ochsner J. 2014;14:78–83.PubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Radcliff KE, Kepler CK, Jakoi A, Sidhu GS, Rihn J, Vaccaro AR. Adjacent segment disease in the lumbar spine following different treatment interventions. Spine J. 2013;13:1339–49.CrossRefPubMed Radcliff KE, Kepler CK, Jakoi A, Sidhu GS, Rihn J, Vaccaro AR. Adjacent segment disease in the lumbar spine following different treatment interventions. Spine J. 2013;13:1339–49.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Masevnin S, Ptashnikov D, Michaylov D, Meng H, Smekalenkov O, Zaborovskii N. Risk factors for adjacent segment disease development after lumbar fusion. Asian Spine J. 2015;9:239–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Masevnin S, Ptashnikov D, Michaylov D, Meng H, Smekalenkov O, Zaborovskii N. Risk factors for adjacent segment disease development after lumbar fusion. Asian Spine J. 2015;9:239–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Park P, Garton HJ, Gala VC, Hoff JT, McGillicuddy JE. Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004;29:1938–44.CrossRef Park P, Garton HJ, Gala VC, Hoff JT, McGillicuddy JE. Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004;29:1938–44.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Fourney DR, Frangou EM, Ryken TC, et al. Spinal instability neoplastic score: an analysis of reliability and validity from the spine oncology study group. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(22):3072–7.CrossRefPubMed Fourney DR, Frangou EM, Ryken TC, et al. Spinal instability neoplastic score: an analysis of reliability and validity from the spine oncology study group. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(22):3072–7.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Early developed ASD (adjacent segmental disease) in patients after surgical treatment of the spine due to cancer metastases
Author
Grzegorz Guzik
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1749-799X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-017-0574-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 1/2017 Go to the issue