Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Surgery 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Ear Correction | Research

Performance-optimized otoplasty

Authors: Marcelo Souza Assis, Leila Souto Miranda

Published in: BMC Surgery | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

This study proposes a new surgical alternative for the most common deformity in the ears, the so-called "protruding/prominent ears", which is a condition that affects 5% of the Caucasian population (Goulart et al. in Rev Bras Cir Plast 26:602–607, 2011). This technique comes with the benefits of reduced surgical time, shallow learning curve, and a low revision rate.

Methods

We studied a total of 213 patients with an indication for otoplasty from January 2020 to January 2021. Women made up 65% of the study population, while men made up 35%, with an average age of 21 years, the youngest being 7 years of age. The technique presented here corrects all the deformities that cause protruding ears and can be performed together with other ear surgeries, such as surgical treatment of macrotia and lobuloplasty. All surgeries were performed in an outpatient setting under local anesthesia and sedation.

Results

All surgeries followed a performance-optimized protocol, with an average total surgical time of 45 min for a bilateral approach. Revision surgery was needed in 2% of cases, with the most frequent complaint being asymmetry in the upper third of the ears. The complication rate was approximately 7.5%, with 1 case of hematoma, 1 case of mild infection, 2 cases of altered ear sensitivity, 3 cases of keloid scar formation, 6 cases of asymmetry in the upper third of the ears, and 3 cases of irregularities or spikes in the antihelix cartilage. Patient satisfaction was measured using the McDowell/Wright Objectives and Outcome Index (McDowell in Plast Reconstr Surg 41:17–27).

Conclusion

The proposed performance technique is a viable alternative to optimize the surgical time of otoplasty in an outpatient setting. This technique can be performed together with other corrective ear surgeries, has a shallow learning curve, and has a low revision rate.
Level IV: Evidence obtained from multiple time series with or without the intervention, such as case studies.
Literature
5.
go back to reference Steven S, Kent HB. Decoding the DNA of the Toyota production system. Harv Bus Rev. 1999;77:97–107. Steven S, Kent HB. Decoding the DNA of the Toyota production system. Harv Bus Rev. 1999;77:97–107.
7.
go back to reference Peter A, Becky L, Guy J. Otoplasty: critical review of clinical results. The Laryngoscope. Peter A, Becky L, Guy J. Otoplasty: critical review of clinical results. The Laryngoscope.
10.
go back to reference Jones ES, Gibson JAG, Dobbs TD, Whitaker IS. The psychological, social and educational impact of prominent ears: a systematic review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020;73(12):2111–20.CrossRef Jones ES, Gibson JAG, Dobbs TD, Whitaker IS. The psychological, social and educational impact of prominent ears: a systematic review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020;73(12):2111–20.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Goulart FO, Arruda DSV, Karner BM, Gomes PL, Carreirão S. Correction of prominent ears by the cartilaginous incision technique, definition of the antihelix with Mustardé sutures and fixation of the cartilage at the mastoid. Rev Bras Cir Plast. 2011;26(4):602–7. Goulart FO, Arruda DSV, Karner BM, Gomes PL, Carreirão S. Correction of prominent ears by the cartilaginous incision technique, definition of the antihelix with Mustardé sutures and fixation of the cartilage at the mastoid. Rev Bras Cir Plast. 2011;26(4):602–7.
Metadata
Title
Performance-optimized otoplasty
Authors
Marcelo Souza Assis
Leila Souto Miranda
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Surgery / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2482
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01587-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

BMC Surgery 1/2022 Go to the issue