Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

Drug*placebo interaction effect may bias clinical trials interpretation: hybrid balanced placebo and randomized placebo-controlled design

Authors: Muhammad M. Hammami, Safa Hammami, Reem Al-Swayeh, Eman Al-Gaai, Faduma Abdi Farah, Sophia J. S. De Padua

Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Conventional randomized placebo-controlled study design assumes the absence of drug*placebo interaction. We hypothesized the presence of such an interaction and that conventionally estimated drug effect might be biased. The objectives of the study were to determine the drug*placebo interaction effect (main) and compare conventionally estimated and interaction model-estimated drug effects (secondary).

Methods

We used a hybrid of balanced placebo and randomized placebo-controlled designs. Four hundred eighty healthy volunteers were randomized to three groups. The first received hydroxyzine (25 mg) described as hydroxyzine or placebo, the second received placebo described as hydroxyzine or placebo, and the third received hydroxyzine and placebo described as unknown; each in a randomized crossover design. Seven participants failed to crossover. Group assignment was concealed from participants and study coordinators. Coordinators were blinded to group and intervention assignment. Participants and coordinators were deceived as to study objectives. Main outcomes were mean area-under-the-curve of drowsiness (therapeutic outcome) and mouth-dryness (adverse outcome), self-reported on 100 mm visual analog scale over 7 h. Drug, placebo, placebo + interaction, and total effects were estimated using analysis of covariance by comparing received hydroxyzine/told placebo to received placebo/told placebo, received placebo/told hydroxyzine to received placebo/told placebo, received hydroxyzine/told hydroxyzine to received hydroxyzine/told placebo, and received hydroxyzine/told hydroxyzine to received placebo/told placebo, respectively. Drug effect was also conventionally estimated in the third group.

Results

Mean (SD) age was 31.4 (6.6) years, 65% were males. There was significant difference between placebo + interaction effect and placebo effect for both drowsiness and mouth-dryness with a mean difference (95% confidence interval) of 35.1 (5.6 to 64.6) and 23.8 (2.4 to 45.2) mm*hr, respectively. Total effect was larger than the sum of drug and placebo effects for drowsiness (139.7 (109.8 to 169.6) vs. 99.1 (68.2 to 130.0) mm*hr) and mouth-dryness (63.6 (41.1 to 86.1) vs. 34.7 (11.1 to 58.4) mm*hr). Conventionally estimated drug effect was larger than interaction model-estimated drug effect for drowsiness (69.2 (45.5 to 92.8) vs. (58.3 (31.6 to 85.0) mm*hr) and mouth-dryness (19.9 (5.3 to 34.5) vs. 9.5 (−9.2 to 28.1) mm*hr).

Conclusions

There is significant and important drug*placebo interaction effect that may bias conventionally estimated drug effect.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrial.gov identifier: NCT01501591 (registered December 25, 2011).
Literature
1.
go back to reference Moerman DE, Jonas WB. Deconstructing the placebo effect and finding the meaning response. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136(6):471–6.CrossRefPubMed Moerman DE, Jonas WB. Deconstructing the placebo effect and finding the meaning response. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136(6):471–6.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Kienle GS, Kiene H. The powerful placebo effect: fact or fiction? J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50(12):1311–8.CrossRefPubMed Kienle GS, Kiene H. The powerful placebo effect: fact or fiction? J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50(12):1311–8.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Fillingim RB, Price DD. What is controlled for in placebo-controlled trials? Mayo Clin Proc. 2005;80(9):1119–21.CrossRefPubMed Fillingim RB, Price DD. What is controlled for in placebo-controlled trials? Mayo Clin Proc. 2005;80(9):1119–21.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Kirsch I, Moore TJ, Scoboria A, Nicholls SS. The emperor’s new drugs: An analysis of antidepressant medication data submitted to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Prev Treat. 2002;5(1):23. doi:10.1037/1522-3736.5.1.523a. Kirsch I, Moore TJ, Scoboria A, Nicholls SS. The emperor’s new drugs: An analysis of antidepressant medication data submitted to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Prev Treat. 2002;5(1):23. doi:10.​1037/​1522-3736.​5.​1.​523a.
5.
go back to reference Kirsch I. Are drug and placebo effects in depression additive? Biol Psychiatry. 2000;47(8):733–5.CrossRefPubMed Kirsch I. Are drug and placebo effects in depression additive? Biol Psychiatry. 2000;47(8):733–5.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference de Craen AJM, Kaptchuk TJ, Tijssen JGP, Kleijnen J. Placebos and placebo effects in medicine: historical overview. J R Soc Med. 1999;92(10):511–5.PubMedPubMedCentral de Craen AJM, Kaptchuk TJ, Tijssen JGP, Kleijnen J. Placebos and placebo effects in medicine: historical overview. J R Soc Med. 1999;92(10):511–5.PubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Lund K, Vase L, Petersen GL, Jensen TS, Finnerup NB. Randomised controlled trials may underestimate drug effects: balanced placebo trial design. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(1), e84104.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lund K, Vase L, Petersen GL, Jensen TS, Finnerup NB. Randomised controlled trials may underestimate drug effects: balanced placebo trial design. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(1), e84104.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Enck P, Klosterhalfen S, Weimer K, Horing B, Zipfel S. The placebo response in clinical trials: more questions than answers. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011;366(1572):1889–95.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Enck P, Klosterhalfen S, Weimer K, Horing B, Zipfel S. The placebo response in clinical trials: more questions than answers. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011;366(1572):1889–95.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Hammami MM, Al-Gaai EA, Alvi S, Hammami MB. Interaction between drug and placebo effects: a cross-over balanced placebo design trial. Trials. 2010;11:110.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hammami MM, Al-Gaai EA, Alvi S, Hammami MB. Interaction between drug and placebo effects: a cross-over balanced placebo design trial. Trials. 2010;11:110.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Dickert N, Grady C. What’s the price of a research subject? Approaches to payment for research participation. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(3):198–203.CrossRefPubMed Dickert N, Grady C. What’s the price of a research subject? Approaches to payment for research participation. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(3):198–203.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Simons FER, Simons KJ, Frith EM. The pharmacokinetics and antihistaminic effects of H1 receptor antagonist hydroxyzine. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1984;73:69–75.CrossRefPubMed Simons FER, Simons KJ, Frith EM. The pharmacokinetics and antihistaminic effects of H1 receptor antagonist hydroxyzine. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1984;73:69–75.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Alswayeh R, Alvi SN, Hammami MM. Rapid determination of hydroxyzine concentration in human plasma by high performance liquid chromatography. WJPPS. 2015;4(1):127–37. Alswayeh R, Alvi SN, Hammami MM. Rapid determination of hydroxyzine concentration in human plasma by high performance liquid chromatography. WJPPS. 2015;4(1):127–37.
16.
go back to reference Waring DR. The antidepressant debate and the balanced placebo trial design: an ethical analysis. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2008;31(6):453–62.CrossRefPubMed Waring DR. The antidepressant debate and the balanced placebo trial design: an ethical analysis. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2008;31(6):453–62.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Price DD. Assessing placebo effects without placebo groups: an untapped possibility? Pain. 2001;90(3):201–3.CrossRefPubMed Price DD. Assessing placebo effects without placebo groups: an untapped possibility? Pain. 2001;90(3):201–3.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Lilford RJ, Braunholtz DA. Is the placebo powerless? Correspondence to the Editor. N Eng J Med. 2001;345(17):1277–8. Lilford RJ, Braunholtz DA. Is the placebo powerless? Correspondence to the Editor. N Eng J Med. 2001;345(17):1277–8.
Metadata
Title
Drug*placebo interaction effect may bias clinical trials interpretation: hybrid balanced placebo and randomized placebo-controlled design
Authors
Muhammad M. Hammami
Safa Hammami
Reem Al-Swayeh
Eman Al-Gaai
Faduma Abdi Farah
Sophia J. S. De Padua
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2288
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0269-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2016 Go to the issue