Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Drugs & Aging 4/2008

01-04-2008 | Original Research Article

Drug-Drug Interactions in a Geriatric Outpatient Cohort

Prevalence and Relevance

Authors: Dr Linda R. Tulner, Suzanne V. Frankfort, George J. P. T. Gijsen, Jos P. C. M. van Campen, Cornells H. W. Koks, Jos H. Beijnen

Published in: Drugs & Aging | Issue 4/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The prevalence of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in a geriatric population may be high because of polypharmacy. However, wide variance in the clinical relevance of these interactions has been shown.

Objectives

To explore whether adverse drug reactions (ADRs) as a result of DDIs can be identified by clinical evaluation, to describe the prevalence of ADRs and diminished drug effectiveness as a result of DDIs and to verify whether the top ten most frequent potential DDIs known to public pharmacies are of primary importance in geriatric outpatients in the Netherlands.

Method

All adverse events classified by the Naranjo algorithm as being a possible ADR and drug combinations resulting in diminished drug effectiveness were identified prospectively in 807 geriatric outpatients (mean age 81 years) at their first visit. The setting was a diagnostic day clinic. The Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI) and Beers criteria were used to evaluate drug use and identify possible DDIs. The ten most frequent potential interactions, according to a 1997 national database of public pharmacies (‘Top Ten’) in the Netherlands, and possible adverse events as a result of other interactions, were described. The effects of changes in medication regimen were recorded by checking the medical records.

Results

In 300 patients (44.5% of the 674 patients taking more than one drug), 398 potential DDIs were identified. In 172 (25.5%) of patients taking more than one drug, drug combinations were identified that were responsible for at least one ADR or which possibly resulted in reduced effectiveness of therapy. Eighty-four of the 158 possible ADRs resulting from enhanced action of drugs forming combinations listed in the ‘Top Ten’ were seen in 73 patients. Only four DDIs resulting in less effective therapy that involved drug combinations in the ‘Top Ten’ were identified. Changes in drug regimens pertaining to possible interactions were proposed or put into effect in 111 of the 172 (65%) patients with possible DDIs. Sixty-one (55%) of these patients returned for follow-up. Of these, 49 (80%) were shown to have improved after changes were made to their medication regimen.

Conclusion

In this study, nearly half of the geriatric outpatients attending a diagnostic day clinic who were taking more than one drug were candidates for DDIs. One-quarter of these patients were found to have possible adverse events or diminished treatment effectiveness that may have been at least partly caused by these DDIs. These potential interactions can be identified through clinical evaluation. In the majority of patients (99 of 172) the potential interactions resulting in possible ADRs or diminished effectiveness were not present in the ‘Top Ten’ interactions described by a national database of public pharmacies, a finding that emphasizes that the particular characteristics of geriatric patients (e.g. frequent psychiatric co-morbidities) need to be considered when evaluating their drug use. At least 7% of all patients taking more than one drug, and 80% of those with possible drug interactions whose drug regimen was adjusted, benefited from changes made to their drug regimens.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Rollason V, Vogt N. Reduction of polypharmacy in the elderly. A systematic review of the role of the pharmacist. Drugs Aging 2003; 20: 817–32PubMedCrossRef Rollason V, Vogt N. Reduction of polypharmacy in the elderly. A systematic review of the role of the pharmacist. Drugs Aging 2003; 20: 817–32PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Heerdink ER. Polypharmacy in the elderly in the Netherlands, an overview of available data [in Dutch]. Pharm Weekbl 2002; 137: 1257–9 Heerdink ER. Polypharmacy in the elderly in the Netherlands, an overview of available data [in Dutch]. Pharm Weekbl 2002; 137: 1257–9
3.
go back to reference van der Hooft CS, Sturkenboom MCJM, van Grootheest K, et al. Adverse drug reaction-related hospitalizations: a nationwide study in the Netherlands. Drug Saf 2006; 29(2): 161–8PubMedCrossRef van der Hooft CS, Sturkenboom MCJM, van Grootheest K, et al. Adverse drug reaction-related hospitalizations: a nationwide study in the Netherlands. Drug Saf 2006; 29(2): 161–8PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Mannesse CK, Derkx FH, de Ridder MA, et al. Adverse drug reactions as contributing factor for hospital admission: cross sectional study. BMJ 1997; 315: 1057–8PubMedCrossRef Mannesse CK, Derkx FH, de Ridder MA, et al. Adverse drug reactions as contributing factor for hospital admission: cross sectional study. BMJ 1997; 315: 1057–8PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Köhler GI, Bode-Böger SM, Bgusse R, et al. Drug-drug interactions in medical patients: effects of in-hospital treatment and relation to multiple drug use. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 2000; 38: 504–13PubMed Köhler GI, Bode-Böger SM, Bgusse R, et al. Drug-drug interactions in medical patients: effects of in-hospital treatment and relation to multiple drug use. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 2000; 38: 504–13PubMed
6.
go back to reference Onder G, Pedone C, Landi F, et al. Adverse drug reactions as a cause of hospital admissions: results from the Italian Group of Pharmacoepidemiology in the Elderly (GIFA). J Am Geriatr Soc 2002; 50: 1962–8PubMedCrossRef Onder G, Pedone C, Landi F, et al. Adverse drug reactions as a cause of hospital admissions: results from the Italian Group of Pharmacoepidemiology in the Elderly (GIFA). J Am Geriatr Soc 2002; 50: 1962–8PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Jansen PAF. Clinically relevant drug interactions in the elderly [in Dutch]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2003 Mar 29; 147(13): 595–9PubMed Jansen PAF. Clinically relevant drug interactions in the elderly [in Dutch]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2003 Mar 29; 147(13): 595–9PubMed
8.
go back to reference Zhan C, Correa-de-Araujo R, Bierman AS, et al. Suboptimal prescribing in elderly outpatients: potentially harmful drug-drug and drug-disease combinations. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005; 53: 262–7PubMedCrossRef Zhan C, Correa-de-Araujo R, Bierman AS, et al. Suboptimal prescribing in elderly outpatients: potentially harmful drug-drug and drug-disease combinations. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005; 53: 262–7PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Schmader K, Hanlon JT, Weinberger M, et al. Appropriateness of medication prescribing in ambulatory elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 1994; 42: 1241–7PubMed Schmader K, Hanlon JT, Weinberger M, et al. Appropriateness of medication prescribing in ambulatory elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 1994; 42: 1241–7PubMed
10.
go back to reference Doucet J, Chassagne P, Trivalle C. Drag-drug interactions related to hospital admissions in older adults: a prospective study of 1000 patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 1996; 44: 944–8PubMed Doucet J, Chassagne P, Trivalle C. Drag-drug interactions related to hospital admissions in older adults: a prospective study of 1000 patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 1996; 44: 944–8PubMed
11.
go back to reference Seymour RM, Routledge PA. Important drug-drag interactions in the elderly. Drugs Aging 1998; 12: 485–94PubMedCrossRef Seymour RM, Routledge PA. Important drug-drag interactions in the elderly. Drugs Aging 1998; 12: 485–94PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Hohl CM, Dankoff J, Colcone A, et al. Polypharmacy, adverse drug-related events, and potential adverse drug interactions in elderly patients presenting to an emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 2001; 38: 666–71PubMedCrossRef Hohl CM, Dankoff J, Colcone A, et al. Polypharmacy, adverse drug-related events, and potential adverse drug interactions in elderly patients presenting to an emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 2001; 38: 666–71PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Glintborg B, Andersen SE, Dalhoff K. Drug-drug interactions among recently hospitalised patients — frequent but mostly clinically insignificant. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2005; 61(9): 675–81PubMedCrossRef Glintborg B, Andersen SE, Dalhoff K. Drug-drug interactions among recently hospitalised patients — frequent but mostly clinically insignificant. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2005; 61(9): 675–81PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Bjorkmann IK, Fasrbom J, Schnidt IK, et al. Drug-drag interactions in the elderly. Ann Pharmacother 2002; 36(11): 1675–81CrossRef Bjorkmann IK, Fasrbom J, Schnidt IK, et al. Drug-drag interactions in the elderly. Ann Pharmacother 2002; 36(11): 1675–81CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Bonetti PO, Hartmann K, Kuhn M, et al. Potentielle arzneimittelinteraktionen und Verordnungshäufigkeit von medikamenten mit speziellen instruktionsbedarf bei spittalaustritt. Praxis 2000; 89: 182–9PubMed Bonetti PO, Hartmann K, Kuhn M, et al. Potentielle arzneimittelinteraktionen und Verordnungshäufigkeit von medikamenten mit speziellen instruktionsbedarf bei spittalaustritt. Praxis 2000; 89: 182–9PubMed
16.
go back to reference Heininger-Rothbucher D, Bischinger S, Ulmer H, et al. Incidence and risk of potential adverse drag interactions in the emergency room. Resuscitation 2001; 49: 283–8PubMedCrossRef Heininger-Rothbucher D, Bischinger S, Ulmer H, et al. Incidence and risk of potential adverse drag interactions in the emergency room. Resuscitation 2001; 49: 283–8PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Egger T, Dormann H, Ahne G, et al. Identification of adverse drug reactions in geriatric inpatients using a computerised drag database. Drags Aging 2003; 20(10): 769–76CrossRef Egger T, Dormann H, Ahne G, et al. Identification of adverse drug reactions in geriatric inpatients using a computerised drag database. Drags Aging 2003; 20(10): 769–76CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Saltvedt I, Spigset O, Ruths S, et al. Patterns of drag prescription in a geriatric evaluation and management unit as compared with the general medical wards: a randomised study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2005; 61: 921–8PubMedCrossRef Saltvedt I, Spigset O, Ruths S, et al. Patterns of drag prescription in a geriatric evaluation and management unit as compared with the general medical wards: a randomised study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2005; 61: 921–8PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Chen YF, Avery AJ, Neil KE, et al. Incidence and possible causes of prescribing potentially hazardous/contraindicated drug combinations in general practice. Drag Saf 2005; 28(1): 67–80CrossRef Chen YF, Avery AJ, Neil KE, et al. Incidence and possible causes of prescribing potentially hazardous/contraindicated drug combinations in general practice. Drag Saf 2005; 28(1): 67–80CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Straubhaar B, Kranenbuhl S, Schlienger RG. The prevalence of potential drag-drug interactions in patients with heart failure at hospital discharge. Drag Saf 2006; 29(1): 79–90CrossRef Straubhaar B, Kranenbuhl S, Schlienger RG. The prevalence of potential drag-drug interactions in patients with heart failure at hospital discharge. Drag Saf 2006; 29(1): 79–90CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Peng CC, Glassman PA, Marks IR, et al. Retrospective drag utilization review: incidence of clinically relevant potential drug-drug interactions in a large ambulatory population. J Manag Care Pharm 2003; 9(6): 513–22PubMed Peng CC, Glassman PA, Marks IR, et al. Retrospective drag utilization review: incidence of clinically relevant potential drug-drug interactions in a large ambulatory population. J Manag Care Pharm 2003; 9(6): 513–22PubMed
22.
go back to reference Schalekamp T. Dealing with drug-drug interactions [in Dutch]. Gebu 1997; 31: 87–94 Schalekamp T. Dealing with drug-drug interactions [in Dutch]. Gebu 1997; 31: 87–94
23.
go back to reference Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-Mental State”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975; 12: 189–98PubMedCrossRef Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-Mental State”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975; 12: 189–98PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KA, et al. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies. J Chron Dis 1987; 40(5): 373–83PubMedCrossRef Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KA, et al. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies. J Chron Dis 1987; 40(5): 373–83PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Samsa GP, Hanlon JT, Schmader KE. A summated score for the Medication Appropriateness Index: development and assessment of clinimetric properties including content validity. J Clin Epidemiol 1994; 47: 891–6PubMedCrossRef Samsa GP, Hanlon JT, Schmader KE. A summated score for the Medication Appropriateness Index: development and assessment of clinimetric properties including content validity. J Clin Epidemiol 1994; 47: 891–6PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Busto U, Naranjo CA, Sellers EM. Comparison of two recently published algorithms for assessing the probability of adverse drug reactions. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1982; 13(2): 223–73PubMedCrossRef Busto U, Naranjo CA, Sellers EM. Comparison of two recently published algorithms for assessing the probability of adverse drug reactions. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1982; 13(2): 223–73PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Fick DM, Cooper JW, Wade WE, et al. Updating the Beers criteria for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults: results of a US consensus panel of experts. Arch Intern Med 2003; 163: 2716–24PubMedCrossRef Fick DM, Cooper JW, Wade WE, et al. Updating the Beers criteria for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults: results of a US consensus panel of experts. Arch Intern Med 2003; 163: 2716–24PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Dalton SO, Johansen C, Mellemkjaer L, et al. Use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and risk of upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding: a population-based cohort study. Arch Intern Med 2003; 163(1): 59–64PubMedCrossRef Dalton SO, Johansen C, Mellemkjaer L, et al. Use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and risk of upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding: a population-based cohort study. Arch Intern Med 2003; 163(1): 59–64PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Buurma H, De Smet PAGM, Egberts ACG. Clinical risk management in Dutch community pharmacies: the case of drag-drug interactions. Drag Saf 2006; 29(8): 723–32CrossRef Buurma H, De Smet PAGM, Egberts ACG. Clinical risk management in Dutch community pharmacies: the case of drag-drug interactions. Drag Saf 2006; 29(8): 723–32CrossRef
30.
go back to reference van Roon EN, Flikweert S, le Comte M, et al. Clinical relevance of drug-drug interactions: a structured assessment procedure. Drug Saf 2005; 28(12): 1131–9PubMedCrossRef van Roon EN, Flikweert S, le Comte M, et al. Clinical relevance of drug-drug interactions: a structured assessment procedure. Drug Saf 2005; 28(12): 1131–9PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference van der Linden CMJ, Kerskes MCH, Bijl AM, et al. Represcription after adverse drag reaction in the elderly: a descriptive study. Arch Intern Med 2006; 28: 1666–7CrossRef van der Linden CMJ, Kerskes MCH, Bijl AM, et al. Represcription after adverse drag reaction in the elderly: a descriptive study. Arch Intern Med 2006; 28: 1666–7CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Weingart SN, Toth M, Sands DZ, et al. Physicians’ decisions to override computerized drug alerts in primary care. Arch Intern Med 2003; 163(21): 2625–31PubMedCrossRef Weingart SN, Toth M, Sands DZ, et al. Physicians’ decisions to override computerized drug alerts in primary care. Arch Intern Med 2003; 163(21): 2625–31PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Malone DC, Hutchins DS, Haupert H, et al. Assessment of potential drug-drug interactions with a prescription claims database. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2005; 62(19): 1983–91PubMedCrossRef Malone DC, Hutchins DS, Haupert H, et al. Assessment of potential drug-drug interactions with a prescription claims database. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2005; 62(19): 1983–91PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Howard PA, Ellerbeck EF, Engelman JJ, et al. The nature and frequency of potential warfarin drug interactions that increase the risk of bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation. Pharmacoepidemiol Drag Saf 2002; 11(7): 569–76CrossRef Howard PA, Ellerbeck EF, Engelman JJ, et al. The nature and frequency of potential warfarin drug interactions that increase the risk of bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation. Pharmacoepidemiol Drag Saf 2002; 11(7): 569–76CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Gurwitz JH, Fields TS, Harrold LR, et al. Incidence and preventability of adverse drag events among older persons in the ambulatory setting. JAMA 2003; 289: 1107–16PubMedCrossRef Gurwitz JH, Fields TS, Harrold LR, et al. Incidence and preventability of adverse drag events among older persons in the ambulatory setting. JAMA 2003; 289: 1107–16PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Jabaaij L. Medication in the elderly: what and for what? [in Dutch]. Huisarts en Wetenschap 2003; 46(2): 69CrossRef Jabaaij L. Medication in the elderly: what and for what? [in Dutch]. Huisarts en Wetenschap 2003; 46(2): 69CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Veehof LJ, Stewart R, Haaijer-Ruskamp FM, et al. Chronic polypharmacy in one-third of the elderly in family practice [in Dutch]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1999; 143(2): 93–7PubMed Veehof LJ, Stewart R, Haaijer-Ruskamp FM, et al. Chronic polypharmacy in one-third of the elderly in family practice [in Dutch]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1999; 143(2): 93–7PubMed
Metadata
Title
Drug-Drug Interactions in a Geriatric Outpatient Cohort
Prevalence and Relevance
Authors
Dr Linda R. Tulner
Suzanne V. Frankfort
George J. P. T. Gijsen
Jos P. C. M. van Campen
Cornells H. W. Koks
Jos H. Beijnen
Publication date
01-04-2008
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Drugs & Aging / Issue 4/2008
Print ISSN: 1170-229X
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1969
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00002512-200825040-00007

Other articles of this Issue 4/2008

Drugs & Aging 4/2008 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.