Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 2/2020

01-02-2020 | Original Paper

Drug-coated balloon angioplasty: predicting outcomes based on different patterns of drug-eluting stent restenosis

Authors: Xi Wang, Wenjie Lu, Xule Wang, Liang Pan, Wanrong Fu, Qiankun Liu, Zhanying Han, Guoju Sun, Xiaofei Qin, Ran Li, Xiaolin Zheng, Yingguang Shan, Chunguang Qiu

Published in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging | Issue 2/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Although drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty is an effective therapy for drug-eluting stent- in stent restenosis (DES-ISR) after coronary stenting, recurrent ISR after DCB angioplasty still occurs. Different patterns of DES-ISR responding to DCB are largely unknown. This study sought to assess outcomes of different patterns of DES-ISR treated with DCB. From December 2014 to December 2016, a total of 160 DES-ISR lesions treated with DCB were retrospectively evaluated. Restenosis patterns were classified into two groups according to Mehran classification: focal, defined as < 10 mm, 58 lesions (36.3%); non-focal, which were diffuse, proliferative, or obstructive, 102 lesions (63.7%). The primary endpoint was binary restenosis rate at 9-month angiographic follow-up. Secondary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 24-month follow-up. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Angiographic follow-up rate was 93.7% (93.1% in the focal group and 94.1% in the non-focal group). The focal group had a lower recurrent restenosis rate compared to the non-focal group (3.7% vs. 33.3%, respectively; P = 0.003) at an average angiographic follow-up of 10 (10.4 ± 6.2) months. There was no difference in MACE between the two groups (6.9% vs. 11.8%, respectively; P = 0.70) at (22.7 ± 9.1) months clinical follow-up. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, focal pattern (OR 13.033; 95% CI 2.441–69.573, P = 0.003) and post-procedure DS% (OR 1.142; 95% CI 1.070–1.218, P = 0.000) were predictive factors of binary restenosis after DCB angioplasty. On multivariate analysis, focal pattern of ISR was a predictive factor of MACE (OR 0.260; 95% CI 0.071–0.959, P = 0.043), and diabetes mellitus (DM) was an independent predictor of MACE after DCB angioplasty (OR 5.045; 95% CI 1.179–21.590, P = 0.029). The present study suggests that DCB provides much better clinical, angiographic outcomes in patients with focal DES-ISR than non-focal DES-ISR.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Scheller B, Hehrlein C, Bocksch W et al (2006) Treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis with a paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter. N Engl J Med 355:2113–2124CrossRef Scheller B, Hehrlein C, Bocksch W et al (2006) Treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis with a paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter. N Engl J Med 355:2113–2124CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Unverdorben M, Vallbracht C, Cremers B et al (2009) Paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter versus paclitaxel-coated stent for the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis. Circulation 119:2986–2994CrossRef Unverdorben M, Vallbracht C, Cremers B et al (2009) Paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter versus paclitaxel-coated stent for the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis. Circulation 119:2986–2994CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Taggart DP, Boyle R, de Belder MA et al (2011) The 2010 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Heart 97:445–446CrossRef Taggart DP, Boyle R, de Belder MA et al (2011) The 2010 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Heart 97:445–446CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Rittger H, Brachmann J, Sinha AM et al (2012) A randomized, multicenter, single-blind trial comparing paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty with plain balloon angioplasty in drug-eluting stent restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 59:1377–1382CrossRef Rittger H, Brachmann J, Sinha AM et al (2012) A randomized, multicenter, single-blind trial comparing paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty with plain balloon angioplasty in drug-eluting stent restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 59:1377–1382CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Byrne RA, Neumann FJ, Mehilli J et al (2013) ISAR-DESIRE 3 investigators. Paclitaxel-eluting balloons, paclitaxel-eluting stents, and balloon angioplasty in patients with restenosis after implantation of a drug-eluting stent (ISAR-DESIRE 3): a randomized, open-label trial. Lancet 381:461–467CrossRef Byrne RA, Neumann FJ, Mehilli J et al (2013) ISAR-DESIRE 3 investigators. Paclitaxel-eluting balloons, paclitaxel-eluting stents, and balloon angioplasty in patients with restenosis after implantation of a drug-eluting stent (ISAR-DESIRE 3): a randomized, open-label trial. Lancet 381:461–467CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Alfonso F, Pérez-Vizcayno MJ, Cárdenas A et al (2014) Rationale and design of the RIBS IV randomized clinical trial (drug-eluting balloons versus everolimus-eluting stents for patients with drug-eluting stent restenosis). EuroIntervention 11(3):336–342CrossRef Alfonso F, Pérez-Vizcayno MJ, Cárdenas A et al (2014) Rationale and design of the RIBS IV randomized clinical trial (drug-eluting balloons versus everolimus-eluting stents for patients with drug-eluting stent restenosis). EuroIntervention 11(3):336–342CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kolh P, Windecker S, Alfonso F et al (2014) 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 46:517–592CrossRef Kolh P, Windecker S, Alfonso F et al (2014) 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 46:517–592CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kastrati A, Mehilli J, vonBeckerath N et al (2005) Sirolimus-eluting stent or paclitaxel-eluting stent vs balloon angioplasty for prevention of recurrences in patients with coronary in-stent restenosis: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 293(2):165–171CrossRef Kastrati A, Mehilli J, vonBeckerath N et al (2005) Sirolimus-eluting stent or paclitaxel-eluting stent vs balloon angioplasty for prevention of recurrences in patients with coronary in-stent restenosis: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 293(2):165–171CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Alfonso F, Pérez-Vizcayno MJ, Hernandez R et al (2006) A randomized comparison of sirolimus-eluting stent with balloon angioplasty in patients with in-stent restenosis: results of the restenosis intrastent: balloon angioplasty versus elective sirolimus-eluting stenting (RIBS-II) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:2152–2160CrossRef Alfonso F, Pérez-Vizcayno MJ, Hernandez R et al (2006) A randomized comparison of sirolimus-eluting stent with balloon angioplasty in patients with in-stent restenosis: results of the restenosis intrastent: balloon angioplasty versus elective sirolimus-eluting stenting (RIBS-II) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:2152–2160CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Dibra A, Kastrati A, Alfonso F et al (2007) Effectiveness of drug-eluting stents in patients with bare-metal in-stent restenosis: meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 49(5):616–623CrossRef Dibra A, Kastrati A, Alfonso F et al (2007) Effectiveness of drug-eluting stents in patients with bare-metal in-stent restenosis: meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 49(5):616–623CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Li J, Liu WL, Yi X et al (2015) Paclitaxel-coated balloons for the treatment of patients with in-stent restenosis: a meta-analysis of angiographic and clinical data. Exp Ther Med 9(6):2285–2292CrossRef Li J, Liu WL, Yi X et al (2015) Paclitaxel-coated balloons for the treatment of patients with in-stent restenosis: a meta-analysis of angiographic and clinical data. Exp Ther Med 9(6):2285–2292CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Cosgrave J, Melzi G, Biondi-Zoccai GG et al (2006) Drug-eluting stentrestenosis the pattern predicts the outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:2399–2404CrossRef Cosgrave J, Melzi G, Biondi-Zoccai GG et al (2006) Drug-eluting stentrestenosis the pattern predicts the outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:2399–2404CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Mehran R, Dangas G, Abizaid AS, Mintz GS, Lansky AJ, Satler LF et al (1999) Angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis: classification and implications for long-term outcome. Circulation 100:1872–1878CrossRef Mehran R, Dangas G, Abizaid AS, Mintz GS, Lansky AJ, Satler LF et al (1999) Angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis: classification and implications for long-term outcome. Circulation 100:1872–1878CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kleber FX, Mathey DG, Rittger H, Scheller B, German Drug-eluting Balloon Consensus Group (2011) How to use the drug-eluting balloon: recommendations by the German Consensus Group. EuroIntervention 7:K125–K128CrossRef Kleber FX, Mathey DG, Rittger H, Scheller B, German Drug-eluting Balloon Consensus Group (2011) How to use the drug-eluting balloon: recommendations by the German Consensus Group. EuroIntervention 7:K125–K128CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Cutlip DE, Windecker S, Mehran R et al (2007) Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized definitions. Circulation 115:2344–2351CrossRef Cutlip DE, Windecker S, Mehran R et al (2007) Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized definitions. Circulation 115:2344–2351CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Habara S, Mitsudo K, Kadota K et al (2011) Effectiveness of Paclitaxel-eluting balloon catheter in patients with sirolimus-eluting stent restenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 4(2):149–154CrossRef Habara S, Mitsudo K, Kadota K et al (2011) Effectiveness of Paclitaxel-eluting balloon catheter in patients with sirolimus-eluting stent restenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 4(2):149–154CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Rittger H, Brachmann J, Sinha AM et al (2012) A randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial comparing paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty with plain balloon angioplasty in drug-eluting stent restenosis: the PEPCAD-DES study. J Am Coll Cardiol 59(15):1377–1382CrossRef Rittger H, Brachmann J, Sinha AM et al (2012) A randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial comparing paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty with plain balloon angioplasty in drug-eluting stent restenosis: the PEPCAD-DES study. J Am Coll Cardiol 59(15):1377–1382CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Habara S, Iwabuchi M, Inoue N et al (2013) A multicenter randomized comparison of paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter with conventional balloon angioplasty in patients with bare-metal stent restenosis and drug-eluting stent restenosis. Am Heart J 166:527–533CrossRef Habara S, Iwabuchi M, Inoue N et al (2013) A multicenter randomized comparison of paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter with conventional balloon angioplasty in patients with bare-metal stent restenosis and drug-eluting stent restenosis. Am Heart J 166:527–533CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Piccolo R, Galasso G, Piscione F et al (2014) Meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing the effectiveness of different strategies for the treatment of drug-eluting stent restenosis. Am J Cardiol 114:1339–1346CrossRef Piccolo R, Galasso G, Piscione F et al (2014) Meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing the effectiveness of different strategies for the treatment of drug-eluting stent restenosis. Am J Cardiol 114:1339–1346CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Alfonso F, Pérez-Vizcayno MJ, Cárdenas A, for the RIBS IV Study Investigators (under the auspices of the Interventional Cardiology Working Group of the Spanish Society of Cardiology), et al (2015) A prospective randomized trial of drug-eluting balloons versus everolimus-eluting stents in patients with in-stent restenosis of drug-eluting stents: the RIBS IV randomized clinical trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 66:23–33 Alfonso F, Pérez-Vizcayno MJ, Cárdenas A, for the RIBS IV Study Investigators (under the auspices of the Interventional Cardiology Working Group of the Spanish Society of Cardiology), et al (2015) A prospective randomized trial of drug-eluting balloons versus everolimus-eluting stents in patients with in-stent restenosis of drug-eluting stents: the RIBS IV randomized clinical trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 66:23–33
21.
go back to reference Siontis GCM, Stefanini GG, Mavridis D et al (2015) Percutaneous coronary interventional strategies for treatment of in-stent restenosis: a network meta-analysis. The Lancet 386:655–664CrossRef Siontis GCM, Stefanini GG, Mavridis D et al (2015) Percutaneous coronary interventional strategies for treatment of in-stent restenosis: a network meta-analysis. The Lancet 386:655–664CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Drug-coated balloon angioplasty: predicting outcomes based on different patterns of drug-eluting stent restenosis
Authors
Xi Wang
Wenjie Lu
Xule Wang
Liang Pan
Wanrong Fu
Qiankun Liu
Zhanying Han
Guoju Sun
Xiaofei Qin
Ran Li
Xiaolin Zheng
Yingguang Shan
Chunguang Qiu
Publication date
01-02-2020
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging / Issue 2/2020
Print ISSN: 1569-5794
Electronic ISSN: 1875-8312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-019-01681-y

Other articles of this Issue 2/2020

The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 2/2020 Go to the issue