Top

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Research

Drone versus ambulance for blood products transportation: an economic evaluation study

Authors: M. A. Zailani, R. Z. Azma, I. Aniza, A. R. Rahana, M. S. Ismail, I. S. Shahnaz, K. S. Chan, M. Jamaludin, Z. A. Mahdy

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2021

Abstract

Background

Medical transportation is an essential step in health care services, and includes ground, air and water transportation. Among the important uses of medical transportation is the delivery of blood products in the event of a clinical emergency. Drone technology is the latest technological advancement that may revolutionize medical transportation globally. Nonetheless, its economic evaluation is scant and insufficient, whilst its cost-effectiveness remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of drone transportation versus the ambulance.

Methods

The setting of the study was within a developing nation. An economic evaluation study of drone versus ambulance for emergency blood products transportation between the Sabah Women and Children Hospital (SWACH) and the Queen Elizabeth II Hospital (QEH2) on Borneo Island was conducted using the Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (CEA) technique. The total cost of each mode of transportation was calculated using the Activity Based Costing (ABC) method. Travel time was used as a denominator to estimate the Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER).

Results

For one clinical emergency in SWACH, a round trip of blood products transportation from SWACH to QEH2 costs RM1,266.02 (USD307.09) when using the ambulance, while the drone costs RM1,313.28 (USD319.36). The travel time for the drone was much shorter (18 min) compared to the ambulance (34 min). The Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (CER) of ambulance transportation was RM37.23 (USD9.05) per minute whilst the CER of drone transportation was RM72.96 (USD17.74) per minute. The ICER of drone versus ambulance was − 2.95, implying an increase of RM2.95 in cost for every minute saved using a drone instead of an ambulance.

Conclusion

Although drone transportation of blood products costs more per minute compared to the ambulance, the significantly shorter transport time of the drone offset its cost. Thus, we believe there is good economic potential for drone usage for blood products transportation in developing nations particularly if the drone price decreases and its operational lifespan increases. Our limitation of a non-clinical denominator used in this study leads to the recommendation for use of clinical outcomes in future studies.

Available only for authorised users

Stein C, Caetano E. Transportation of blood in a helicopter emergency medical service: the importance of specialised equipment. South Af J Crit Care. 2016. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJCC.2016.v32i2.268.

Developing an Autonomous Cargo Boat for Medical Deliveries. https://blog.werobotics.org/2017/12/05/autonomous-cargo-boat/. Assessed 17 Mar 2021.

Gutierrez MC, Goodnough LT, Druzin M, et al. Postpartum hemorrhage treated with a massive transfusion protocol at a tertiary obstetric center: a retrospective study. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2012;21:230–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2012.03.005.CrossRefPubMed

Zailani MA, Sabudin RZ, Rahman RA, Saiboon IM, Ismail A, Mahdy ZA. Drone for medical products transportation in maternal health care: a systematic review and framework for future research. Medicine. 2020;99(36):e21967. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000021967.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Carrillo-Larco R, Moscoso-Porras M, Taype-Rondan M, et al. The use of unmanned aerial vehicles for health purposes: a systematic review of experimental studies. Glob Health Epidemiol Genom. 2018;3:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1017/gheg.2018.11.CrossRef

Vacca A, Onishi H. Drones: military weapons, surveillance or mapping tools for environmental monitoring? The need for legal framework is required. Transport Res Proc. 2017;25:51–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.209.CrossRef

Malaver A, Motta N, Corke P, et al. Development and integration of a solar powered unmanned aerial vehicle and a wireless sensor network to monitor greenhouse gases. Sensors (Basel). 2015;15:4072–96. https://doi.org/10.3390/s150204072.CrossRef

Entrop AG, Vasenev A. Infrared drones in the construction industry: designing a protocol for building thermography procedures. Energy Procedia. 2017;132:63–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.636.CrossRef

Van de Voorde P, Gautama S, Momont A, et al. The drone ambulance [A-UAS]: golden bullet or just a blank? Resuscitation. 2017;116:46–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.04.037.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Balasingam M. Drones in medicine—the rise of the machines. Int J Clin Pract. 2017;71:1–2. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.12989.CrossRef

11.

Goodchild A, Toy J. Delivery by drone: an evaluation of unmanned aerial vehicle technology in reducing CO2 emissions in the delivery service industry. Transport Res D. 2018;61:58–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.02.017.CrossRef

12.

Amukele TK, Sokoll LJ, Pepper D, et al. Can unmanned aerial systems (drones) be used for the routine transport of chemistry, hematology, and coagulation laboratory specimens? PLoS One. 2015;10:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134020.CrossRef

13.

Claesson A, Fredman D, Svensson L, et al. Unmanned aerial vehicles (drones) in out-of-hospital-cardiac-arrest. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016;24(1):124. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-016-0313-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Laksham KB. Unmanned aerial vehicle (drones) in public health: a SWOT analysis. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2019;8:342–6. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_413_18.CrossRef

15.

Zulkifley MA, Behjati M, Nordin R, et al. Mobile network performance and technical feasibility of LTE-powered unmanned aerial vehicle. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland). 2021;21(8):2848. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21082848.CrossRef

16.

Ochieng WO, Ye T, Scheel C, et al. Uncrewed aircraft systems versus motorcycles to deliver laboratory samples in West Africa: a comparative economic study. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8:e143–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30464-4.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Department of Statistics, Malaysia. https://www.dosm.gov.my/. Assessed 1 Apr 2021.

18.

Ravichandran J, Shamala DK. 5th Report of National Obstetrics Registry, Jan 2016 – Dec 2017. National Obstetrics Registry.

19.

Aniza I, Saperi S, Syed MA. Carta alir klinikal: Penjagaan kesihatan & kawalan. Bangi: Publsiher Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia; 2019. p. 67–211.

20.

Economic Evaluation, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/policy/polaris/economics/cost-effectiveness/index.html. Assessed 15 Mar 2021.

21.

Joseph CG, Cathy JB, Marianne H, et al. The cost-effectiveness ratio in the analysis of health care programs. Handbook Stat. 2000;18:841–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7161(00)18030-7.CrossRef

22.

Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER): York health economics consortium. https://yhec.co.uk/glossary/incremental-cost-effectiveness-ratio-icer/. Assessed on 1 Apr 2021.

23.

Critical infrastructure, DT3 solutions. https://aerodyne.group/infra.html. Assessed on 5 Apr 2021.

24.

Drummond MF, Obrien B, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes second edition: Publisher Oxford Medical Publications; 2004.

25.

Ackerman E, Koziol M. The blood is here: Zipline’s medical delivery drones are changing the game in Rwanda. IEEE Spectr. 2019;56(5):24–31. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSPEC.2019.8701196.CrossRef

Title: Drone versus ambulance for blood products transportation: an economic evaluation study
Authors: M. A. Zailani
R. Z. Azma
I. Aniza
A. R. Rahana
M. S. Ismail
I. S. Shahnaz
K. S. Chan
M. Jamaludin
Z. A. Mahdy
Publication date: 01-12-2021
Publisher: BioMed Central
Published in: BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07321-3

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Drone versus ambulance for blood products transportation: an economic evaluation study

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Development of a brief, generic, modular resource-use measure (ModRUM): cognitive interviews with patients

Examining gender differentials and determinants of private health insurance coverage in Zambia

Length of exposure to long working hours and night work and risk of sickness absence: a register-based cohort study

How can healthcare professionals provide guidance and support to parents of adolescents? Results from a primary care-based study

The factors influencing clinician use of hypertension guidelines in different resource settings: a qualitative study investigating clinicians’ perspectives and experiences

Physical accessibility of primary care facilities for people with disabilities: a cross-sectional survey in 31 countries