Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Original research

Unmanned aerial vehicles (drones) in out-of-hospital-cardiac-arrest

Authors: A. Claesson, D. Fredman, L. Svensson, M. Ringh, J. Hollenberg, P. Nordberg, M. Rosenqvist, T. Djarv, S. Österberg, J. Lennartsson, Y. Ban

Published in: Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The use of an automated external defibrillator (AED) prior to EMS arrival can increase 30-day survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) significantly. Drones or unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) can fly with high velocity and potentially transport devices such as AEDs to the site of OHCAs. The aim of this explorative study was to investigate the feasibility of a drone system in decreasing response time and delivering an AED.

Methods

Data of Global Positioning System (GPS) coordinates from historical OHCA in Stockholm County was used in a model using a Geographic Information System (GIS) to find suitable placements and visualize response times for the use of an AED equipped drone. Two different geographical models, urban and rural, were calculated using a multi-criteria evaluation (MCE) model. Test-flights with an AED were performed on these locations in rural areas.

Results

In total, based on 3,165 retrospective OHCAs in Stockholm County between 2006–2013, twenty locations were identified for the potential placement of a drone.
In a GIS-simulated model of urban OHCA, the drone arrived before EMS in 32 % of cases, and the mean amount of time saved was 1.5 min. In rural OHCA the drone arrived before EMS in 93 % of cases with a mean amount of time saved of 19 min. In these rural locations during (n = 13) test flights, latch-release of the AED from low altitude (3–4 m) or landing the drone on flat ground were the safest ways to deliver an AED to the bystander and were superior to parachute release.

Discussion

The difference in response time for EMS between urban and rural areas is substantial, as is the possible amount of time saved using this UAV-system. However, yet another technical device needs to fit into the chain of survival. We know nothing of how productive or even counterproductive this system might be in clinical reality.

Conclusions

To use drones in rural areas to deliver an AED in OHCA may be safe and feasible. Suitable placement of drone systems can be designed by using GIS models. The use of an AED equipped drone may have the potential to reduce time to defibrillation in OHCA.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Perkins GD. European resuscitation council guidelines for resuscitation 2015: section 2. Adult basic life support and automated external defibrillation. Resuscitation. 2015;95:81–99.CrossRefPubMed Perkins GD. European resuscitation council guidelines for resuscitation 2015: section 2. Adult basic life support and automated external defibrillation. Resuscitation. 2015;95:81–99.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Hasselqvist-Ax I. Early cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2307–15.CrossRefPubMed Hasselqvist-Ax I. Early cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2307–15.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Nordberg P. The survival benefit of dual dispatch of EMS and fire-fighters in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest may differ depending on population density a prospective cohort study. Resuscitation. 2015;90:143–9.CrossRefPubMed Nordberg P. The survival benefit of dual dispatch of EMS and fire-fighters in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest may differ depending on population density a prospective cohort study. Resuscitation. 2015;90:143–9.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Floreano D. Science, technology and the future of small autonomous drones. Nature. 2015;521:460–6.CrossRefPubMed Floreano D. Science, technology and the future of small autonomous drones. Nature. 2015;521:460–6.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Thiels CA. Use of unmanned aerial vehicles for medical product transport. Air Med J. 2015;34:104–8.CrossRefPubMed Thiels CA. Use of unmanned aerial vehicles for medical product transport. Air Med J. 2015;34:104–8.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Dixon SR. Mission control of multiple unmanned aerial vehicles: a workload analysis. Hum Factors. 2005;47:479–87.CrossRefPubMed Dixon SR. Mission control of multiple unmanned aerial vehicles: a workload analysis. Hum Factors. 2005;47:479–87.CrossRefPubMed
8.
10.
go back to reference Ringh M. Survival after public access defibrillation in Stockholm, Sweden, a striking success. Resuscitation. 2015;91:1–7.CrossRefPubMed Ringh M. Survival after public access defibrillation in Stockholm, Sweden, a striking success. Resuscitation. 2015;91:1–7.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Pulver A, Locating AED. Enabled medical drones to enhance cardiac arrest response times. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2016;20:378–89.CrossRefPubMed Pulver A, Locating AED. Enabled medical drones to enhance cardiac arrest response times. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2016;20:378–89.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Amukele TK. Can unmanned aerial systems (drones) Be used for the routine transport of chemistry, hematology, and coagulation laboratory specimens? PLoS One. 2015;29:10(7). Amukele TK. Can unmanned aerial systems (drones) Be used for the routine transport of chemistry, hematology, and coagulation laboratory specimens? PLoS One. 2015;29:10(7).
15.
Metadata
Title
Unmanned aerial vehicles (drones) in out-of-hospital-cardiac-arrest
Authors
A. Claesson
D. Fredman
L. Svensson
M. Ringh
J. Hollenberg
P. Nordberg
M. Rosenqvist
T. Djarv
S. Österberg
J. Lennartsson
Y. Ban
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-016-0313-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine 1/2016 Go to the issue