Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Medical Oncology 10/2018

01-10-2018 | Original Paper

Dose-dense temozolomide for recurrent high-grade gliomas: a single-center retrospective study

Authors: Catherine R. Garcia, Stacey A. Slone, Rachael M. Morgan, Lindsey Gruber, Sameera S. Kumar, Donita D. Lightner, John L. Villano

Published in: Medical Oncology | Issue 10/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

There are limited treatment modalities after high-grade gliomas recurrence. MGMT depletion modulated by dose-dense temozolomide (ddTMZ) remains a debated therapy for initial TMZ responders. Patients were selected retrospectively from our practice with diagnosis of high-grade gliomas (WHO grade III or IV), and were followed since the start of ddTMZ until death or change of therapy. Twenty-one patients were reviewed, with a median age of 47 (25–61) years and a median of 5.8 (1.5–38.8) cycles of ddTMZ. The majority were males (71.4%). Sixty-six percent received 21 on/28 off ddTMZ schedule, 28.6% daily, and 1 patient received a 7 days on/7 days off schedule. IDH mutation status was available for 18 (85.7%) patients, with 7 (33.3%) IDH mutant and 11 (52.5%) IDH wild type. MGMT methylation was assessed in 6 (28.6%) of the patients, being MGMT methylated in 3 (14.3%) patients, and non-methylated in 3 (14.3%) patients. The majority of patients (57.1%) were receiving ddTMZ in addition to other forms of therapy, including either bevacizumab (38.1%) or tumor-treating fields (TTFields) (19.1%). Overall ddTMZ was well tolerated, with few adverse events reported. The estimated median overall survival after ddTMZ start was 11 months. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6 months. Outcomes did not vary between patients receiving ddTMZ alone or those using TTFields or bevacizumab as concomitant therapy, but there was a trend to longer survival with the use of concomitant TTFields. Our results demonstrate benefit of ddTMZ after previous treatment with standard TMZ dosing with no apparent increase in treatment-related toxicities. In summary, ddTMZ should be considered in TMZ responsive patients and warrants further investigation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Abacioglu U, Caglar HB, Yumuk PF, et al. Efficacy of protracted dose-dense temozolomide in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma. J Neuro-oncol. 2011;103:585–93.CrossRef Abacioglu U, Caglar HB, Yumuk PF, et al. Efficacy of protracted dose-dense temozolomide in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma. J Neuro-oncol. 2011;103:585–93.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Armstrong TS, Won M, Wefel JS, et al. Comparative impact of treatment on patient reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with glioblastoma (GBM) enrolled in RTOG 0825. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:2003–3. Armstrong TS, Won M, Wefel JS, et al. Comparative impact of treatment on patient reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with glioblastoma (GBM) enrolled in RTOG 0825. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:2003–3.
3.
go back to reference Baer JC, Freeman AA, Newlands ES, et al. Depletion of O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase correlates with potentiation of temozolomide and CCNU toxicity in human tumour cells. Br J Cancer. 1993;67:1299–302.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Baer JC, Freeman AA, Newlands ES, et al. Depletion of O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase correlates with potentiation of temozolomide and CCNU toxicity in human tumour cells. Br J Cancer. 1993;67:1299–302.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Balmaceda C, Peereboom D, Pannullo S, et al. Multi-institutional phase II study of temozolomide administered twice daily in the treatment of recurrent high-grade gliomas. Cancer. 2008;112:1139–46.CrossRefPubMed Balmaceda C, Peereboom D, Pannullo S, et al. Multi-institutional phase II study of temozolomide administered twice daily in the treatment of recurrent high-grade gliomas. Cancer. 2008;112:1139–46.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Banissi C, Ghiringhelli F, Chen L, et al. Treg depletion with a low-dose metronomic temozolomide regimen in a rat glioma model. Cancer Immunol Immunother CII. 2009;58:1627–34.CrossRefPubMed Banissi C, Ghiringhelli F, Chen L, et al. Treg depletion with a low-dose metronomic temozolomide regimen in a rat glioma model. Cancer Immunol Immunother CII. 2009;58:1627–34.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Berrocal A, Perez Segura P, Gil M, et al. Extended-schedule dose-dense temozolomide in refractory gliomas. J Neuro-oncol. 2010;96:417–22.CrossRef Berrocal A, Perez Segura P, Gil M, et al. Extended-schedule dose-dense temozolomide in refractory gliomas. J Neuro-oncol. 2010;96:417–22.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Brada M, Stenning S, Gabe R, et al. Temozolomide versus procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine in recurrent high-grade glioma. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:4601–8.CrossRefPubMed Brada M, Stenning S, Gabe R, et al. Temozolomide versus procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine in recurrent high-grade glioma. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:4601–8.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Brandes AA, Carpentier AF, Kesari S, et al. A Phase II randomized study of galunisertib monotherapy or galunisertib plus lomustine compared with lomustine monotherapy in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Neuro-oncology. 2016;18:1146–56.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Brandes AA, Carpentier AF, Kesari S, et al. A Phase II randomized study of galunisertib monotherapy or galunisertib plus lomustine compared with lomustine monotherapy in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Neuro-oncology. 2016;18:1146–56.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Brandes AA, Tosoni A, Cavallo G, et al. Temozolomide 3 weeks on and 1 week off as first-line therapy for recurrent glioblastoma: phase II study from gruppo italiano cooperativo di neuro-oncologia (GICNO). Br J Cancer. 2006;95:1155–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Brandes AA, Tosoni A, Cavallo G, et al. Temozolomide 3 weeks on and 1 week off as first-line therapy for recurrent glioblastoma: phase II study from gruppo italiano cooperativo di neuro-oncologia (GICNO). Br J Cancer. 2006;95:1155–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Caroli M, Locatelli M, Campanella R, et al. Temozolomide in glioblastoma: results of administration at first relapse and in newly diagnosed cases. Is still proposable an alternative schedule to concomitant protocol? J Neuro-oncol. 2007;84:71–7.CrossRef Caroli M, Locatelli M, Campanella R, et al. Temozolomide in glioblastoma: results of administration at first relapse and in newly diagnosed cases. Is still proposable an alternative schedule to concomitant protocol? J Neuro-oncol. 2007;84:71–7.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Cavenee WK, Louis DN, Ohgaki H, et al. WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Lyon: International Agency For Research On Cancer; 2016. Cavenee WK, Louis DN, Ohgaki H, et al. WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Lyon: International Agency For Research On Cancer; 2016.
12.
go back to reference Chamberlain MC, Johnston SK. Salvage therapy with single agent bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma. J Neuro-oncol. 2010;96:259–69.CrossRef Chamberlain MC, Johnston SK. Salvage therapy with single agent bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma. J Neuro-oncol. 2010;96:259–69.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ellingson BM, Wen PY, Cloughesy TF. Modified criteria for radiographic response assessment in glioblastoma clinical trials. Neurotherapeutics. 2017;14:307–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ellingson BM, Wen PY, Cloughesy TF. Modified criteria for radiographic response assessment in glioblastoma clinical trials. Neurotherapeutics. 2017;14:307–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Esteller M, Garcia-Foncillas J, Andion E, et al. Inactivation of the DNA-repair gene MGMT and the clinical response of gliomas to alkylating agents. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:1350–4.CrossRefPubMed Esteller M, Garcia-Foncillas J, Andion E, et al. Inactivation of the DNA-repair gene MGMT and the clinical response of gliomas to alkylating agents. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:1350–4.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Friedman HS, Pluda J, Quinn JA, et al. Phase I trial of carmustine plus O6-benzylguanine for patients with recurrent or progressive malignant glioma. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:3522–8.CrossRefPubMed Friedman HS, Pluda J, Quinn JA, et al. Phase I trial of carmustine plus O6-benzylguanine for patients with recurrent or progressive malignant glioma. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:3522–8.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Friedman HS, Prados MD, Wen PY, et al. Bevacizumab alone and in combination with irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4733–40.CrossRefPubMed Friedman HS, Prados MD, Wen PY, et al. Bevacizumab alone and in combination with irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4733–40.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Galldiks N, Berhorn T, Blau T, et al. “One week on-one week off”: efficacy and side effects of dose-intensified temozolomide chemotherapy: experiences of a single center. J Neuro-oncol. 2013;112:209–15.CrossRef Galldiks N, Berhorn T, Blau T, et al. “One week on-one week off”: efficacy and side effects of dose-intensified temozolomide chemotherapy: experiences of a single center. J Neuro-oncol. 2013;112:209–15.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Ghiringhelli F, Menard C, Puig PE, et al. Metronomic cyclophosphamide regimen selectively depletes CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T cells and restores T and NK effector functions in end stage cancer patients. Cancer Immunol Immunother CII. 2007;56:641–8.CrossRefPubMed Ghiringhelli F, Menard C, Puig PE, et al. Metronomic cyclophosphamide regimen selectively depletes CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T cells and restores T and NK effector functions in end stage cancer patients. Cancer Immunol Immunother CII. 2007;56:641–8.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Gilbert MR, Pugh SL, Aldape K, et al. NRG oncology RTOG 0625: a randomized phase II trial of bevacizumab with either irinotecan or dose-dense temozolomide in recurrent glioblastoma. J Neuro-oncol. 2017;131:193–9.CrossRef Gilbert MR, Pugh SL, Aldape K, et al. NRG oncology RTOG 0625: a randomized phase II trial of bevacizumab with either irinotecan or dose-dense temozolomide in recurrent glioblastoma. J Neuro-oncol. 2017;131:193–9.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Han SJ, Rolston JD, Molinaro AM, et al. Phase II trial of 7 days on/7 days off temozolmide for recurrent high-grade glioma. Neuro-oncology. 2014;16:1255–62.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Han SJ, Rolston JD, Molinaro AM, et al. Phase II trial of 7 days on/7 days off temozolmide for recurrent high-grade glioma. Neuro-oncology. 2014;16:1255–62.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Hegi ME, Diserens AC, Gorlia T, et al. MGMT gene silencing and benefit from temozolomide in glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:997–1003.CrossRefPubMed Hegi ME, Diserens AC, Gorlia T, et al. MGMT gene silencing and benefit from temozolomide in glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:997–1003.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Hilverda K, Bosma I, Heimans JJ, et al. Cognitive functioning in glioblastoma patients during radiotherapy and temozolomide treatment: initial findings. J Neuro-oncol. 2010;97:89–94.CrossRef Hilverda K, Bosma I, Heimans JJ, et al. Cognitive functioning in glioblastoma patients during radiotherapy and temozolomide treatment: initial findings. J Neuro-oncol. 2010;97:89–94.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Khan RB, Raizer JJ, Malkin MG, et al. A phase II study of extended low-dose temozolomide in recurrent malignant gliomas. Neuro Oncology. 2002;4:39–43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Khan RB, Raizer JJ, Malkin MG, et al. A phase II study of extended low-dose temozolomide in recurrent malignant gliomas. Neuro Oncology. 2002;4:39–43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Kreisl TN, Kim L, Moore K, et al. Phase II trial of single-agent bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab plus irinotecan at tumor progression in recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:740–5.CrossRefPubMed Kreisl TN, Kim L, Moore K, et al. Phase II trial of single-agent bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab plus irinotecan at tumor progression in recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:740–5.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Lee SM, Thatcher N, Crowther D, et al. Inactivation of O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells by temozolomide. Br J Cancer. 1994;69:452–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lee SM, Thatcher N, Crowther D, et al. Inactivation of O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells by temozolomide. Br J Cancer. 1994;69:452–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Liu L, Gerson SL. Targeted modulation of MGMT: clinical implications. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:328–31.CrossRefPubMed Liu L, Gerson SL. Targeted modulation of MGMT: clinical implications. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:328–31.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Madsen K, Poulsen HS. Needs for everyday life support for brain tumour patients’ relatives: systematic literature review. Eur J Cancer Care. 2011;20:33–43.CrossRef Madsen K, Poulsen HS. Needs for everyday life support for brain tumour patients’ relatives: systematic literature review. Eur J Cancer Care. 2011;20:33–43.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Mitchell RB, Moschel RC, Dolan ME. Effect of O6-benzylguanine on the sensitivity of human tumor xenografts to 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea and on DNA interstrand cross-link formation. Cancer Res. 1992;52:1171–5.PubMed Mitchell RB, Moschel RC, Dolan ME. Effect of O6-benzylguanine on the sensitivity of human tumor xenografts to 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea and on DNA interstrand cross-link formation. Cancer Res. 1992;52:1171–5.PubMed
29.
go back to reference Nagane M. Dose-dense temozolomide: is it still promising? Neurol Medico-Chir. 2015;55:38–49.CrossRef Nagane M. Dose-dense temozolomide: is it still promising? Neurol Medico-Chir. 2015;55:38–49.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Nayak L, Reardon DA. High-grade Gliomas. Continuum (Minneapolis, MN). 2017;23:1548–63. Nayak L, Reardon DA. High-grade Gliomas. Continuum (Minneapolis, MN). 2017;23:1548–63.
31.
go back to reference Neyns B, Chaskis C, Joosens E, et al. A multicenter cohort study of dose-dense temozolomide (21 of 28 days) for the treatment of recurrent anaplastic astrocytoma or oligoastrocytoma. Cancer Investig. 2008;26:269–77.CrossRef Neyns B, Chaskis C, Joosens E, et al. A multicenter cohort study of dose-dense temozolomide (21 of 28 days) for the treatment of recurrent anaplastic astrocytoma or oligoastrocytoma. Cancer Investig. 2008;26:269–77.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Perry JR, Belanger K, Mason WP, et al. Phase II trial of continuous dose-intense temozolomide in recurrent malignant glioma: RESCUE study. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:2051–7.CrossRefPubMed Perry JR, Belanger K, Mason WP, et al. Phase II trial of continuous dose-intense temozolomide in recurrent malignant glioma: RESCUE study. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:2051–7.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Perry JR, Rizek P, Cashman R, et al. Temozolomide rechallenge in recurrent malignant glioma by using a continuous temozolomide schedule: the “rescue” approach. Cancer. 2008;113:2152–7.CrossRefPubMed Perry JR, Rizek P, Cashman R, et al. Temozolomide rechallenge in recurrent malignant glioma by using a continuous temozolomide schedule: the “rescue” approach. Cancer. 2008;113:2152–7.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Piccioni DE, Selfridge J, Mody RR, et al. Deferred use of bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma is not associated with diminished efficacy. Neuro-oncology. 2014;16:815–22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Piccioni DE, Selfridge J, Mody RR, et al. Deferred use of bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma is not associated with diminished efficacy. Neuro-oncology. 2014;16:815–22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
go back to reference Reardon DA, Omuro A, Brandes AA, et al. OS10.3 Randomized Phase 3 Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Nivolumab vs Bevacizumab in Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma: CheckMate 143. Neuro-oncology. 2017;19:iii21–1.CrossRefPubMedCentral Reardon DA, Omuro A, Brandes AA, et al. OS10.3 Randomized Phase 3 Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Nivolumab vs Bevacizumab in Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma: CheckMate 143. Neuro-oncology. 2017;19:iii21–1.CrossRefPubMedCentral
36.
37.
go back to reference Stupp R, Hegi ME, Gilbert MR, et al. Chemoradiotherapy in malignant glioma: standard of care and future directions. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:4127–36.CrossRefPubMed Stupp R, Hegi ME, Gilbert MR, et al. Chemoradiotherapy in malignant glioma: standard of care and future directions. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:4127–36.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Stupp R, Mason WP, Van Den Bent MJ, et al. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:987–96.CrossRefPubMed Stupp R, Mason WP, Van Den Bent MJ, et al. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:987–96.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Stupp R, Taillibert S, Kanner A, et al. Effect of tumor-treating fields plus maintenance temozolomide vs maintenance temozolomide alone on survival in patients with glioblastoma: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;318:2306–16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Stupp R, Taillibert S, Kanner A, et al. Effect of tumor-treating fields plus maintenance temozolomide vs maintenance temozolomide alone on survival in patients with glioblastoma: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;318:2306–16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
40.
go back to reference Stupp R, Taillibert S, Kanner AA, et al. Maintenance therapy with tumor-treating fields plus temozolomide vs temozolomide alone for glioblastoma: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;314:2535–43.CrossRefPubMed Stupp R, Taillibert S, Kanner AA, et al. Maintenance therapy with tumor-treating fields plus temozolomide vs temozolomide alone for glioblastoma: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;314:2535–43.CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Stupp R, Wong ET, Kanner AA, et al. (2012) NovoTTF-100A versus physician’s choice chemotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma: a randomised phase III trial of a novel treatment modality. Eur J Cancer (Oxford, England: 1990) 48:2192–2202.CrossRef Stupp R, Wong ET, Kanner AA, et al. (2012) NovoTTF-100A versus physician’s choice chemotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma: a randomised phase III trial of a novel treatment modality. Eur J Cancer (Oxford, England: 1990) 48:2192–2202.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Tabatabai G, Wick W, Reifenberger G, et al. Dose-intensified rechallenge with temozolomide: One week on/one week off versus 3 weeks on/one week off in patients with progressive or recurrent glioblastoma (DIRECTOR). J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:TPS2103–3.CrossRef Tabatabai G, Wick W, Reifenberger G, et al. Dose-intensified rechallenge with temozolomide: One week on/one week off versus 3 weeks on/one week off in patients with progressive or recurrent glioblastoma (DIRECTOR). J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:TPS2103–3.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Tolcher AW, Gerson SL, Denis L, et al. Marked inactivation of O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase activity with protracted temozolomide schedules. Br J Cancer. 2003;88:1004–11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tolcher AW, Gerson SL, Denis L, et al. Marked inactivation of O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase activity with protracted temozolomide schedules. Br J Cancer. 2003;88:1004–11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
44.
go back to reference Wefel JS, Cloughesy T, Zazzali JL, et al. Neurocognitive function in patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab. Neuro-oncology. 2011;13:660–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wefel JS, Cloughesy T, Zazzali JL, et al. Neurocognitive function in patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab. Neuro-oncology. 2011;13:660–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
45.
go back to reference Weller M, Tabatabai G, Kastner B, et al. MGMT promoter methylation is a strong prognostic biomarker for benefit from dose-intensified temozolomide rechallenge in progressive glioblastoma: the DIRECTOR trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21:2057–64.CrossRefPubMed Weller M, Tabatabai G, Kastner B, et al. MGMT promoter methylation is a strong prognostic biomarker for benefit from dose-intensified temozolomide rechallenge in progressive glioblastoma: the DIRECTOR trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21:2057–64.CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Wick A, Felsberg J, Steinbach JP, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of temozolomide in an alternating weekly regimen in patients with recurrent glioma. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3357–61.CrossRefPubMed Wick A, Felsberg J, Steinbach JP, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of temozolomide in an alternating weekly regimen in patients with recurrent glioma. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3357–61.CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Wick W, Gorlia T, Bendszus M, et al. Lomustine and bevacizumab in progressive glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1954–63.CrossRefPubMed Wick W, Gorlia T, Bendszus M, et al. Lomustine and bevacizumab in progressive glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1954–63.CrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference Wick W, Puduvalli VK, Chamberlain MC, et al. Phase III study of enzastaurin compared with lomustine in the treatment of recurrent intracranial glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:1168–74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wick W, Puduvalli VK, Chamberlain MC, et al. Phase III study of enzastaurin compared with lomustine in the treatment of recurrent intracranial glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:1168–74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
49.
go back to reference Wong ET, Hess KR, Gleason MJ, et al. Outcomes and prognostic factors in recurrent glioma patients enrolled onto phase II clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:2572–8.CrossRefPubMed Wong ET, Hess KR, Gleason MJ, et al. Outcomes and prognostic factors in recurrent glioma patients enrolled onto phase II clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:2572–8.CrossRefPubMed
50.
51.
go back to reference Yung WK, Albright RE, Olson J, et al. A phase II study of temozolomide vs. procarbazine in patients with glioblastoma multiforme at first relapse. Br J Cancer. 2000;83:588–93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yung WK, Albright RE, Olson J, et al. A phase II study of temozolomide vs. procarbazine in patients with glioblastoma multiforme at first relapse. Br J Cancer. 2000;83:588–93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
52.
go back to reference Zhou Z, Howard TA, Villano JL. Long-term daily temozolomide with dose-dependent efficacy in MGMT promotor methylation negative recurrent high-grade astrocytoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2017;80:1043–6.CrossRefPubMed Zhou Z, Howard TA, Villano JL. Long-term daily temozolomide with dose-dependent efficacy in MGMT promotor methylation negative recurrent high-grade astrocytoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2017;80:1043–6.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Dose-dense temozolomide for recurrent high-grade gliomas: a single-center retrospective study
Authors
Catherine R. Garcia
Stacey A. Slone
Rachael M. Morgan
Lindsey Gruber
Sameera S. Kumar
Donita D. Lightner
John L. Villano
Publication date
01-10-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Medical Oncology / Issue 10/2018
Print ISSN: 1357-0560
Electronic ISSN: 1559-131X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-018-1198-0

Other articles of this Issue 10/2018

Medical Oncology 10/2018 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.