Published in:
01-05-2017 | Original Article
Does the working temperature affect the outcome following microwave endometrial ablation?
Published in: Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) | Issue 2/2017
Login to get accessAbstract
Background
Menorrhagia is a common gynaecological complaint, with significant burden to both its sufferers and health service providers. The first line of treatment is usually medical/pharmaceutical although in some cases surgery is required. There are now a number of minimally invasive surgical techniques available that ablate the uterine lining and prevent the need for the removal of the uterus. Microwave endometrial ablation (MEA) is one of these techniques, and this paper investigates the effect of the working temperature on outcome.
Methods
A retrospective case note review of women who underwent MEA between June 2000 and August 2004. All women had a hysteroscopy followed by MEA. The duration of the procedure and mean working temperature of the MEA treatment was calculated. Women were followed up 6–8 months after surgery.
Findings
Two hundred and eleven women underwent the procedure, with an average duration of menorrhagia of 30 months prior to the procedure. Eighty-nine percent attended follow-up, 80 % were satisfied with the procedure and 40 % were amenorrhoeic. When the procedure was performed at higher working temperature within the manufacturers guidelines women were more likely to be amenorrhoeic (78.4 vs. 77.1 °C, p = 0.014).
Conclusion
MEA is more effective in treating menorrhagia when used at a higher operating temperature.