Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 11/2008

01-11-2008 | ssat poster presentation

Management of Preoperatively Suspected Choledocholithiasis: A Decision Analysis

Authors: Bilal Kharbutli, Vic Velanovich

Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Issue 11/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The management of symptomatic or incidentally discovered common bile duct (CBD) stones is still controversial. Of patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholelithiasis, 5–15% will also harbor CBD stones, and those with symptoms suggestive of choledocholithiasis will have an even higher incidence. Options for treatment include preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with sphincterotomy (ERCP/ES) followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraoperative cholangiogram (LC/IOC), followed by either laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) or placement of a common bile duct double-lumen catheter with postoperative management. The purpose of this analysis was to determine the optimal management of such patients.

Methods

A decision analysis was performed to analyze the management of patients with suspected common bile duct stones. The basic choice was between preoperative ERCP/ES followed by LC, LC/IOC followed by LCBDE, or common duct double-lumen catheter (Fitzgibbons tube) placement with either expectant management or postoperative ERCP/ES. Data on morbidity and mortality was obtained from the literature. Sensitivity analysis was done varying the incidence of positive CBD stones on IOC with associated morbidity and mortality.

Results

One-stage management of symptomatic CBD stones with LC/LCBDE is associated with less morbidity and mortality (7% and 0.19%) than two-stage management utilizing preoperative ERCP/ES (13.5% and 0.5%). Sensitivity analysis shows that there is an increase in morbidity and mortality for LC/LCBDE as the incidence of positive IOC increases but are still less than two-stage management even with a 100% positive IOC (9.4%, 0.5%). If a double-lumen catheter is to be used for positive IOC, the morbidity would be higher than two-stage management only if the positive IOC incidence is more than 65% but still with no mortality.

Conclusion

LCBDE has lower morbidity and mortality rates compared to preoperative ERCP/ES in the management of patients with suspected CBD stones even if the chance of CBD stones reaches 100%. Using a common duct double-lumen catheter may be considered if LCBDE is not feasible and the chance of CBD stone is less than 65%.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Clayton ESJ, Connor S, Alexakis N, Leandros E. Meta-analysis of endoscopy and surgery versus surgery alone for common bile duct stones with the gallbladder in situ. Br J Surg 2006;93:1185–1191. doi:10.1002/bjs.5568.PubMedCrossRef Clayton ESJ, Connor S, Alexakis N, Leandros E. Meta-analysis of endoscopy and surgery versus surgery alone for common bile duct stones with the gallbladder in situ. Br J Surg 2006;93:1185–1191. doi:10.​1002/​bjs.​5568.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hamouda AH, Goh W, Mahmud S, Khan M, Nassar AHM. Intraoperative cholangiography facilitates simple transcystic clearance of ductal stones in units without expertise for laparoscopic bile duct surgery. Surg Endosc 2007;21:955–959. doi:10.1007/s00464-006-9127-2.PubMedCrossRef Hamouda AH, Goh W, Mahmud S, Khan M, Nassar AHM. Intraoperative cholangiography facilitates simple transcystic clearance of ductal stones in units without expertise for laparoscopic bile duct surgery. Surg Endosc 2007;21:955–959. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-006-9127-2.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Giger U, Michel JM, Vonlanthen R, Becker K, Kocher T, Krähenbühl L. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis: indication, technique, risk and outcome. Arch Surg 2005;390:373–380.CrossRef Giger U, Michel JM, Vonlanthen R, Becker K, Kocher T, Krähenbühl L. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis: indication, technique, risk and outcome. Arch Surg 2005;390:373–380.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Cuschieri A, Lezoche E, Morino M, Croce E, Lacy A, Toouli J et al. Hanna1 GB. E.A.E.S. multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage vs single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and ductal calculi. Surg Endosc 1999;13:952–957. doi:10.1007/s004649901145.PubMedCrossRef Cuschieri A, Lezoche E, Morino M, Croce E, Lacy A, Toouli J et al. Hanna1 GB. E.A.E.S. multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage vs single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and ductal calculi. Surg Endosc 1999;13:952–957. doi:10.​1007/​s004649901145.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hong DF, Xin Y, Chen DW. Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct for cholecystocholedocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 2006;20:424–427. doi:10.1007/s00464-004-8248-8.PubMedCrossRef Hong DF, Xin Y, Chen DW. Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct for cholecystocholedocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 2006;20:424–427. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-004-8248-8.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Tranter SE, Thompson MH. Comparison of endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct. Br J Surg 2002;89:1495–1504.PubMedCrossRef Tranter SE, Thompson MH. Comparison of endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct. Br J Surg 2002;89:1495–1504.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Schroeppel TJ, Lambert PJ, Mathiason MA, Kothari SN. An economic analysis of hospital charges for choledocholithiasis by different treatment strategies. Am Surg 2007;73:472–477.PubMed Schroeppel TJ, Lambert PJ, Mathiason MA, Kothari SN. An economic analysis of hospital charges for choledocholithiasis by different treatment strategies. Am Surg 2007;73:472–477.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Stefanidis G, Karamanolis G, Viazis N, Sgouros S, Papadopoulou E, Ntatsakis K et al. A comparative study of postendoscopic sphincterotomy complications with various types of electrosurgical current in patients with choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc 2003;57:192–197. doi:10.1067/mge.2003.61.PubMedCrossRef Stefanidis G, Karamanolis G, Viazis N, Sgouros S, Papadopoulou E, Ntatsakis K et al. A comparative study of postendoscopic sphincterotomy complications with various types of electrosurgical current in patients with choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc 2003;57:192–197. doi:10.​1067/​mge.​2003.​61.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Enochsson L, Lindberg B, Swahn F, Arnelo U. Intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) to remove common bile duct stones during routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy does not prolong hospitalization. Surg Endosc 2004;18:367–371.PubMedCrossRef Enochsson L, Lindberg B, Swahn F, Arnelo U. Intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) to remove common bile duct stones during routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy does not prolong hospitalization. Surg Endosc 2004;18:367–371.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Sarli L, Pietra N, Franzé A, Colla G, Costi R, Gobbi S, Trivelli M. Routine intravenous cholangiography, selective ERCP, and endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 1999;50:200–208.PubMedCrossRef Sarli L, Pietra N, Franzé A, Colla G, Costi R, Gobbi S, Trivelli M. Routine intravenous cholangiography, selective ERCP, and endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 1999;50:200–208.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Hungness ES, Soper NJ. Management of common bile duct stones. J Gastrointest Surg 2006;10:612–618.PubMedCrossRef Hungness ES, Soper NJ. Management of common bile duct stones. J Gastrointest Surg 2006;10:612–618.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Fitzgibbons RJ, Ryberg AA, Ulualp KM, Nguyen NX, Litke BS, Camps J, McGinn TR, Jenkins JX, Filipi CJ. An alternative technique for treatment of choledocholithiasis found at laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 1995;130:638–642.PubMed Fitzgibbons RJ, Ryberg AA, Ulualp KM, Nguyen NX, Litke BS, Camps J, McGinn TR, Jenkins JX, Filipi CJ. An alternative technique for treatment of choledocholithiasis found at laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 1995;130:638–642.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Shea JA, Healey MJ, Berlin JA, Clarke JR, Malet PF, Staroscik RN, Schwartz JS, Williams SV. Mortality and complications associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg 1996;224:609–620.PubMedCrossRef Shea JA, Healey MJ, Berlin JA, Clarke JR, Malet PF, Staroscik RN, Schwartz JS, Williams SV. Mortality and complications associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg 1996;224:609–620.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Griniatsos J, Karvounis E, Isla A. Early versus delayed single-stage laparoscopic eradication for both gallstones and common bile duct stones in mild acute biliary pancreatitis. Am Surg 2005;71:682–686.PubMed Griniatsos J, Karvounis E, Isla A. Early versus delayed single-stage laparoscopic eradication for both gallstones and common bile duct stones in mild acute biliary pancreatitis. Am Surg 2005;71:682–686.PubMed
25.
go back to reference Akopian G, Blitz J, Vander Laan T. Positive intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is laparoscopic common bile duct exploration necessary? Am Surg 2005;71:750–753.PubMed Akopian G, Blitz J, Vander Laan T. Positive intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is laparoscopic common bile duct exploration necessary? Am Surg 2005;71:750–753.PubMed
26.
go back to reference Thompson MH, Tranter SE. All-comers policy for laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct. Br J Surg 2002;89:1608–1612.PubMedCrossRef Thompson MH, Tranter SE. All-comers policy for laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct. Br J Surg 2002;89:1608–1612.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Weinstein MC, Fineberg HV. Clinical Decision Analysis. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1980. Weinstein MC, Fineberg HV. Clinical Decision Analysis. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1980.
28.
go back to reference Sugiyama M, Izumisato Y, Hatano N, Mori T, Atomi Y. Management of unsuspected common bile duct stones found during laparoscopic cholecystectomy by means of transcystic catheter placement and papillary dilation. Gastrointest Endosc 1999;50:837–840.PubMedCrossRef Sugiyama M, Izumisato Y, Hatano N, Mori T, Atomi Y. Management of unsuspected common bile duct stones found during laparoscopic cholecystectomy by means of transcystic catheter placement and papillary dilation. Gastrointest Endosc 1999;50:837–840.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Giger UF, Michel J-M, Opitz I, Inderbitzin DT, Kocher T, Krähenbühl L. Risk factors for perioperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: analysis of 22,953 consecutive cases from the Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery Database. J Am Coll Surg 2006;203:723–728.PubMedCrossRef Giger UF, Michel J-M, Opitz I, Inderbitzin DT, Kocher T, Krähenbühl L. Risk factors for perioperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: analysis of 22,953 consecutive cases from the Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery Database. J Am Coll Surg 2006;203:723–728.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Phillips EH, Liberman M, Carroll BJ, Fallas MJ, Rosenthal RJ, Hiatt JR. Bile duct stones in the laparoscopic era: is preoperative sphincterotomy necessary? Arch Surg 1995;130:880–886.PubMed Phillips EH, Liberman M, Carroll BJ, Fallas MJ, Rosenthal RJ, Hiatt JR. Bile duct stones in the laparoscopic era: is preoperative sphincterotomy necessary? Arch Surg 1995;130:880–886.PubMed
31.
go back to reference Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Deeik RK, Martinez-Serna T. Eight years’ experience with the use of a transcystic common bile duct duodenal double-lumen catheter for the treatment of choledocholithiasis. Surgery 1998;124:699–706.PubMedCrossRef Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Deeik RK, Martinez-Serna T. Eight years’ experience with the use of a transcystic common bile duct duodenal double-lumen catheter for the treatment of choledocholithiasis. Surgery 1998;124:699–706.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Chang L, Lo S, Stabile BE, Lewis RJ, Toosie K, de Virgilio C. Preoperative versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in mild to moderate gallstone pancreatitis: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 2000;231:82–87.PubMedCrossRef Chang L, Lo S, Stabile BE, Lewis RJ, Toosie K, de Virgilio C. Preoperative versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in mild to moderate gallstone pancreatitis: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 2000;231:82–87.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Acosta JM, Katkhouda N, Debian KA, Groshen SG, Tsao-Wei DD, Berne TV. Early ductal decompression versus conservative management for gallstone pancreatitis with ampullary obstruction: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg 2006;243:33–40.PubMedCrossRef Acosta JM, Katkhouda N, Debian KA, Groshen SG, Tsao-Wei DD, Berne TV. Early ductal decompression versus conservative management for gallstone pancreatitis with ampullary obstruction: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg 2006;243:33–40.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Chijiiwa K, Kozaki N, Naito T, Kameoka N, Tanaka M. Treatment of choice for choledocholithiasis in patients with acute obstructive suppurative cholangitis and liver cirrhosis. Am J Surg 1995;170:356–360.PubMedCrossRef Chijiiwa K, Kozaki N, Naito T, Kameoka N, Tanaka M. Treatment of choice for choledocholithiasis in patients with acute obstructive suppurative cholangitis and liver cirrhosis. Am J Surg 1995;170:356–360.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Management of Preoperatively Suspected Choledocholithiasis: A Decision Analysis
Authors
Bilal Kharbutli
Vic Velanovich
Publication date
01-11-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Issue 11/2008
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Electronic ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-008-0624-6

Other articles of this Issue 11/2008

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 11/2008 Go to the issue