Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research 1/2010

01-01-2010 | Regular Article

Does Meeting the HEDIS Substance Abuse Treatment Engagement Criterion Predict Patient Outcomes?

Authors: Alex HS Harris, PhD, Keith Humphreys, PhD, Thomas Bowe, PhD, Quyen Tiet, PhD, John W. Finney, PhD

Published in: The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research | Issue 1/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

This study examines the patient-level associations between the Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS) substance use disorder (SUD) treatment engagement quality indicator and improvements in clinical outcomes. Administrative and survey data from 2,789 US Department of Veterans Affairs SUD patients were used to estimate the effects of meeting the HEDIS engagement criterion on improvements in Addiction Severity Index Alcohol, Drug, and Legal composite scores. Patients meeting the engagement indicator improved significantly more in all domains than patients who did not engage, and the relationship was stronger for alcohol and legal outcomes for patients seen in outpatient settings. The benefit accrued by those who engaged was statistically significant but clinically modest. These results add to the literature documenting the clinical benefits of treatment entry and engagement. Although these findings only indirectly support the use of the HEDIS engagement measure for its intended purpose—discriminating quality at the facility or system level—they confirm that the processes of care captured by the measure are associated with important patient outcomes.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Donabedian A. The Definition of Quality and Approaches to Assessment. Ann Arbor: Health Administration Press; 1980. Donabedian A. The Definition of Quality and Approaches to Assessment. Ann Arbor: Health Administration Press; 1980.
7.
go back to reference National Committee for Quality Assurance. HEDIS 2006 Volume 2: Technical Specifications. Washington, DC: National Committee for Quality Assurance; 2006. National Committee for Quality Assurance. HEDIS 2006 Volume 2: Technical Specifications. Washington, DC: National Committee for Quality Assurance; 2006.
8.
go back to reference Harris A, Humpheys K, Bowe T, et al. Measuring the quality of substance use disorder treatment: Assessing the VA continuity of care quality measure. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. in press. Harris A, Humpheys K, Bowe T, et al. Measuring the quality of substance use disorder treatment: Assessing the VA continuity of care quality measure. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. in press.
13.
go back to reference McCorry F, Garnick DW, Bartlett J, et al. Developing performance measures for alcohol and other drug services in managed care plans. Joint Commission on Quality Improvement. 2000;26:633–643. McCorry F, Garnick DW, Bartlett J, et al. Developing performance measures for alcohol and other drug services in managed care plans. Joint Commission on Quality Improvement. 2000;26:633–643.
19.
22.
go back to reference Schafer JL. Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data. New York: Chapman & Hall; 1997. Schafer JL. Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data. New York: Chapman & Hall; 1997.
23.
go back to reference Daniels M, Hogan J. Missing Data in Longitudinal Studies: Strategies for Bayesian Modeling and Sensitivity Analysis. New York: Chapman & Hall; 2008. Daniels M, Hogan J. Missing Data in Longitudinal Studies: Strategies for Bayesian Modeling and Sensitivity Analysis. New York: Chapman & Hall; 2008.
24.
go back to reference R Foundation for Statistical Computing. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing [computer program]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2005. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing [computer program]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2005.
25.
go back to reference van Buuren S, Oudshoorn CGM. Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations. R package version 1.14 [computer program]. 2005. van Buuren S, Oudshoorn CGM. Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations. R package version 1.14 [computer program]. 2005.
26.
go back to reference Glynn RJ, Laird NM, Rubin DB. Selection modeling versus mixture modeling with nonignorable nonresponse. In: Wainer H, ed. Drawing Inferences from Self-selected Samples. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 1986:115–142. Glynn RJ, Laird NM, Rubin DB. Selection modeling versus mixture modeling with nonignorable nonresponse. In: Wainer H, ed. Drawing Inferences from Self-selected Samples. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 1986:115–142.
Metadata
Title
Does Meeting the HEDIS Substance Abuse Treatment Engagement Criterion Predict Patient Outcomes?
Authors
Alex HS Harris, PhD
Keith Humphreys, PhD
Thomas Bowe, PhD
Quyen Tiet, PhD
John W. Finney, PhD
Publication date
01-01-2010
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research / Issue 1/2010
Print ISSN: 1094-3412
Electronic ISSN: 2168-6793
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-008-9142-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2010

The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research 1/2010 Go to the issue