Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology 4/2021

01-12-2021 | Editorial

Does listing of individual contributions in “Mega-Authorship” papers always follow best practice guidelines?

Authors: Roger W. Byard, Robert Vink

Published in: Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology | Issue 4/2021

Login to get access

Excerpt

“There are two kinds of people, those who do the work and those who take the credit. Try to be in the first group; there is less competition there.”
Indira Gandhi (1917-1984)
Literature
1.
go back to reference Endersby JW. Collaborative research in the social sciences: multiple authorship and publication credit. Soc Sci Q. 1996;77:375–92. Endersby JW. Collaborative research in the social sciences: multiple authorship and publication credit. Soc Sci Q. 1996;77:375–92.
2.
go back to reference MacFarlane B. The ethics of multiple authorship: power, performativity and the gift economy. Stud High Educ. 2017;42:1194–210.CrossRef MacFarlane B. The ethics of multiple authorship: power, performativity and the gift economy. Stud High Educ. 2017;42:1194–210.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kwok LS. The white bull effect abusive co-authorship and publication parasitism. J Med Ethics. 2005;31:554–6.CrossRef Kwok LS. The white bull effect abusive co-authorship and publication parasitism. J Med Ethics. 2005;31:554–6.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference da Silva JAT, Dobránszki J. Multiple authorship in scientific manuscripts: ethical challenges, ghost and guest/gift authorship, and the cultural/disciplinary perspective. Sci Eng Ethics. 2016;22:1457–72.CrossRef da Silva JAT, Dobránszki J. Multiple authorship in scientific manuscripts: ethical challenges, ghost and guest/gift authorship, and the cultural/disciplinary perspective. Sci Eng Ethics. 2016;22:1457–72.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Lindsey D. Production and citation measures in the sociology of science: the problem of multiple authorship. Soc Stud Sci. 1980;10:145–62.CrossRef Lindsey D. Production and citation measures in the sociology of science: the problem of multiple authorship. Soc Stud Sci. 1980;10:145–62.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Byard RW. The forensic implications of predatory journals. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2016;12:391–3.CrossRef Byard RW. The forensic implications of predatory journals. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2016;12:391–3.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Does listing of individual contributions in “Mega-Authorship” papers always follow best practice guidelines?
Authors
Roger W. Byard
Robert Vink
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology / Issue 4/2021
Print ISSN: 1547-769X
Electronic ISSN: 1556-2891
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-021-00388-8

Other articles of this Issue 4/2021

Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology 4/2021 Go to the issue