Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology 4/2016

01-12-2016 | Editorial

The forensic implications of predatory publishing

Author: Roger W. Byard

Published in: Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology | Issue 4/2016

Login to get access

Excerpt

An email that I received recently requested my participation in a conference on “coastal zones” because of my academic standing in the field. It began: “Dear Byard, Greetings for the day! Lets Exploit yourself to the world. Because we believe that ‘You are the one that can inspires the common, to change the recitation of emerging world’” [sic]. The reality is, however, somewhat different—I have never written or presented a paper on “coastal zones”. In fact the only recent experience that I have had of coastal zones is taking my dog for a walk at the beach near Adelaide on weekends. This is hardly an activity to qualify for international pre-eminence, although Lucy (the dog) does seem to enjoy it. The sad fact is that nowadays we all receive persistent marketing emails such as this that are often written in idiosyncratic, hyperbolic, and incorrect English that invite us to be on editorial boards, to write papers, monographs and text books, and to travel to the far reaches of the planet to present at conferences on subjects ranging from oceanographic research to attention deficit disorder. Most, if not all, are in no way related to the specific areas of research or expertise of the recipient. The reason for this is that it is inconsequential to the publishers/organizers, as long as they can have enough participants/contributors who are who willing to pay the often substantial fees that are charged for involvement in such activities. Frankly some of these requests are not too dissimilar to emails that sometimes arrive congratulating the recipient on winning several billion dollars—all that is required are full banking details, including passwords. …
Literature
1.
3.
4.
go back to reference Knoll JL. Open access journals and forensic publishing. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2014;42:315–21.PubMed Knoll JL. Open access journals and forensic publishing. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2014;42:315–21.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Xia J. Predatory journals and their article publishing charges. Learn Pub. 2015;28:69–74.CrossRef Xia J. Predatory journals and their article publishing charges. Learn Pub. 2015;28:69–74.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Clark J, Smith R. Firm action needed on predatory journals. Br Med J. 2015;350:h210.CrossRef Clark J, Smith R. Firm action needed on predatory journals. Br Med J. 2015;350:h210.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Beall J. Medical publishing triage—chronicling predatory open access publishers. Ann Med Surg. 2013;2:47–9.CrossRef Beall J. Medical publishing triage—chronicling predatory open access publishers. Ann Med Surg. 2013;2:47–9.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Xia J, Harmon JL, Connolly KG, Donnelly RM, Anderson MR, Howard HA. Who publishes in “predatory” journals? J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2014;. doi:10.1002/asi.23265. Xia J, Harmon JL, Connolly KG, Donnelly RM, Anderson MR, Howard HA. Who publishes in “predatory” journals? J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2014;. doi:10.​1002/​asi.​23265.
Metadata
Title
The forensic implications of predatory publishing
Author
Roger W. Byard
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology / Issue 4/2016
Print ISSN: 1547-769X
Electronic ISSN: 1556-2891
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-016-9771-3

Other articles of this Issue 4/2016

Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology 4/2016 Go to the issue