Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Does household help prevent loneliness among the elderly? An evaluation of a policy reform in the Netherlands

Authors: Jelena Arsenijevic, Wim Groot

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Household help is a community intervention in the Netherlands. Its primary goal is to provide professional help in doing domestic work. A secondary goal of the intervention is to alleviate loneliness. In 2007, a major health care reform and budget cut changed household help. After the reform alleviating loneliness is no longer an aim of the intervention. In this study we evaluate the effects of the policy change in household help on loneliness among older adults in the Netherlands.

Methods

We use SHARE data collected during the period 2004–2013 to compare levels of loneliness among older adults in the Netherlands and those in 9 other European countries (Austria, Belgium, Germany, Denmark, Italy, France, Sweden, Spain and Switzerland). We use a synthetic control method (SCM) based on aggregate data. To check the robustness of our results we also apply a difference-in-differences (DiD) estimator that allows us to estimate the effects of policy changes using individual level data.

Results

In 2004, the prevalence of loneliness ranged between 6.5% in the Netherlands and 15.4% in Italy. Loneliness increased with time for all observed countries. The increase between 2004 and 2013 was highest in France − 30.2%, Italy – 33. 4% and Belgium – 25.0%. The level of loneliness among older adults in the Netherlands increased after 2011. However, it is still lower than in other countries. There was no statistical significant difference in age between waves (67.36 ± 13.7 before 2011 to 68.55 ± 9.24 after 2011, p = 0.01). Based on the DiD estimator, there is no statistically significant difference in the incidence of loneliness between older adults in the Netherlands and those in the control countries.

Conclusion

Our results do not suggest that the policy change and budget cut in 2007 on household help has had an effect on loneliness. In absolute numbers, the prevalence of loneliness has increased since 2011, however we find no evidence that this can be attributed to the policy change.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Peplau LA, et al. Perspectives on loneliness. In: Loneliness: a sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy. New York: Wiley; 1982. p. 1–18. Peplau LA, et al. Perspectives on loneliness. In: Loneliness: a sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy. New York: Wiley; 1982. p. 1–18.
2.
go back to reference de Jong-Gierveld J. Developing and testing a model of loneliness. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987;53(1):119.PubMedCrossRef de Jong-Gierveld J. Developing and testing a model of loneliness. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987;53(1):119.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Masi CM, Chen HY, Hawkley LC, Cacioppo JT. A meta-analysis of interventions to reduce loneliness. Personal Soc Psychol Rev. 2011;15(3):219-66. Masi CM, Chen HY, Hawkley LC, Cacioppo JT. A meta-analysis of interventions to reduce loneliness. Personal Soc Psychol Rev. 2011;15(3):219-66.
4.
go back to reference Fokkema T, De Jong Gierveld J, Dykstra PA. Cross-national differences in older adult loneliness. J Psychol. 2012;146(1–2):201–28.PubMedCrossRef Fokkema T, De Jong Gierveld J, Dykstra PA. Cross-national differences in older adult loneliness. J Psychol. 2012;146(1–2):201–28.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Yang K, Victor C. Age and loneliness in 25 European nations. Ageing Soc. 2011;31(08):1368–88.CrossRef Yang K, Victor C. Age and loneliness in 25 European nations. Ageing Soc. 2011;31(08):1368–88.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Honigh-de Vlaming R, et al. Effect evaluation of a two-year complex intervention to reduce loneliness in non-institutionalised elderly Dutch people. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):1.CrossRef Honigh-de Vlaming R, et al. Effect evaluation of a two-year complex intervention to reduce loneliness in non-institutionalised elderly Dutch people. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):1.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Honigh-de Vlaming R, et al. Determinants of trends in loneliness among Dutch older people over the period 2005-2010. J Aging Health. 2014;26(3):422–40.PubMedCrossRef Honigh-de Vlaming R, et al. Determinants of trends in loneliness among Dutch older people over the period 2005-2010. J Aging Health. 2014;26(3):422–40.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Collins, E., Preventing loneliness and social isolation in older people. 2014, Iriss. Collins, E., Preventing loneliness and social isolation in older people. 2014, Iriss.
12.
go back to reference Deelstra WF. Huishoudelijke hulp in de Wmo. In Huishoudelijke verzorging en de Wmo. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, Houten. 2008. p. 21–35. Deelstra WF. Huishoudelijke hulp in de Wmo. In Huishoudelijke verzorging en de Wmo. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, Houten. 2008. p. 21–35.
13.
go back to reference Putman L. Wmo-en AWBZ-voorzieningen 2009–2012. CPB: Den Hague; 2015. Putman L. Wmo-en AWBZ-voorzieningen 2009–2012. CPB: Den Hague; 2015.
14.
go back to reference Borjas GJ. Immigration and globalization: a review essay. J Econ Lit. 2015;53(4):961–74.CrossRef Borjas GJ. Immigration and globalization: a review essay. J Econ Lit. 2015;53(4):961–74.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Abadie A, Diamond A, Hainmueller J. Comparative politics and the synthetic control method. Am J Polit Sci. 2015;59(2):495–510.CrossRef Abadie A, Diamond A, Hainmueller J. Comparative politics and the synthetic control method. Am J Polit Sci. 2015;59(2):495–510.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Cattan M, et al. Preventing social isolation and loneliness among older people: a systematic review of health promotion interventions. Ageing Soc. 2005;25(01):41–67.CrossRef Cattan M, et al. Preventing social isolation and loneliness among older people: a systematic review of health promotion interventions. Ageing Soc. 2005;25(01):41–67.CrossRef
17.
18.
go back to reference Kreif N, Grieve R, Hangartner D, Turner AJ, Nikolova S, Sutton M. Examination of the synthetic control method for evaluating health policies with multiple treated units. Health Econ. 2016;25(12):1514-28. Kreif N, Grieve R, Hangartner D, Turner AJ, Nikolova S, Sutton M. Examination of the synthetic control method for evaluating health policies with multiple treated units. Health Econ. 2016;25(12):1514-28.
19.
go back to reference Wooldridge JM. Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. Cincinnati: South-Western College Pub; 2015. Wooldridge JM. Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. Cincinnati: South-Western College Pub; 2015.
20.
go back to reference Martina C, Stevens NL. Breaking the cycle of loneliness? Psychological effects of a friendship enrichment program for older women. Aging Ment Health. 2006;10(5):467–75.PubMedCrossRef Martina C, Stevens NL. Breaking the cycle of loneliness? Psychological effects of a friendship enrichment program for older women. Aging Ment Health. 2006;10(5):467–75.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Dimick JB, Ryan AM. Methods for evaluating changes in health care policy: the difference-in-differences approach. Jama. 2014;312(22):2401–2.PubMedCrossRef Dimick JB, Ryan AM. Methods for evaluating changes in health care policy: the difference-in-differences approach. Jama. 2014;312(22):2401–2.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Gillies C, et al. Advancing quantitative methods for the evaluation of complex. Interventions. 2016; Gillies C, et al. Advancing quantitative methods for the evaluation of complex. Interventions. 2016;
Metadata
Title
Does household help prevent loneliness among the elderly? An evaluation of a policy reform in the Netherlands
Authors
Jelena Arsenijevic
Wim Groot
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-6004-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Public Health 1/2018 Go to the issue