Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2017

01-10-2017 | Clinical trial

Does biomarker information impact breast cancer patients’ preferences and physician recommendation for adjuvant chemotherapy?

Authors: Ann H. Partridge, Karen Sepucha, Anne O’Neill, Kathy D. Miller, Emily Baker, Chau T. Dang, Donald W. Northfelt, George W. Sledge, Bryan P. Schneider

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to examine how biomarker information would impact patients’ preferences and physicians’ recommendations for adjuvant breast cancer therapy.

Methods

At the 18-month follow-up, participants in a large, double-blind randomized controlled trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with bevacizumab or placebo (E5103) were surveyed about their preferred treatment (either chemotherapy A alone or chemotherapy A+B) in two hypothetical scenarios: (1) without biomarker information; and (2) after learning that they tested positive for a “B-receptor” which modestly increased both the benefit and toxicity expected with chemotherapy A+B. We performed a cross-sectional analysis of the prospectively collected survey data and used the McNemar’s test to examine changes in treatment preferences. A one-time survey of clinical investigators who enrolled patients on the trial evaluated physician recommendations in response to the same biomarker information.

Results

439 patients completed both scenarios on 18-month survey. Most participants preferred A+B in both scenario 1 and 2 (77 and 76% respectively). The increase in benefit and toxicity associated with the positive biomarker information in scenario 2 led 60/439 (14%) of patients to switch their treatment preference. The corresponding physician survey revealed that most physicians chose regimen A+B in scenario 1 (77%), and moreso after the biomarker information was available in scenario 2 (84%).

Conclusions

Information about a positive biomarker indicating increased benefit and toxicity from additional chemotherapy did not change many participants’ preferred treatment. The majority preferred the most effective course in both scenarios. Similarly, most investigators discounted increased toxicity and valued increased benefit. Parent Trial Registration: NCT00433511
Literature
1.
go back to reference Schneider BP, Wang M, Radovich M, Sledge GW, Badve S, Thor A, Flockhart DA, Hancock B, Davidson N, Gralow J, Dickler M, Perez EA, Cobleigh M, Shenkier T, Edgerton S, Miller KD (2008) Association of vascular endothelial growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 genetic polymorphisms with outcome in a trial of paclitaxel compared with paclitaxel plus bevacizumab in advanced breast cancer: ECOG 2100. J Clin Oncol 26:4672–4678. doi:10.1200/JCO.2008.16.1612 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schneider BP, Wang M, Radovich M, Sledge GW, Badve S, Thor A, Flockhart DA, Hancock B, Davidson N, Gralow J, Dickler M, Perez EA, Cobleigh M, Shenkier T, Edgerton S, Miller KD (2008) Association of vascular endothelial growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 genetic polymorphisms with outcome in a trial of paclitaxel compared with paclitaxel plus bevacizumab in advanced breast cancer: ECOG 2100. J Clin Oncol 26:4672–4678. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2008.​16.​1612 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Schneider BP, Gray RJ, Radovich M, Shen F, Vance G, Li L, Jiang G, Miller KD, Gralow JR, Dickler MN, Cobleigh MA, Perez EA, Shenkier TN, Vang Nielsen K, Muller S, Thor A, Sledge GW Jr, Sparano JA, Davidson NE, Badve SS (2013) Prognostic and predictive value of tumor vascular endothelial growth factor gene amplification in metastatic breast cancer treated with paclitaxel with and without bevacizumab; results from ECOG 2100 trial. Clin Cancer Res 19:1281–1289. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-3029 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schneider BP, Gray RJ, Radovich M, Shen F, Vance G, Li L, Jiang G, Miller KD, Gralow JR, Dickler MN, Cobleigh MA, Perez EA, Shenkier TN, Vang Nielsen K, Muller S, Thor A, Sledge GW Jr, Sparano JA, Davidson NE, Badve SS (2013) Prognostic and predictive value of tumor vascular endothelial growth factor gene amplification in metastatic breast cancer treated with paclitaxel with and without bevacizumab; results from ECOG 2100 trial. Clin Cancer Res 19:1281–1289. doi:10.​1158/​1078-0432.​CCR-12-3029 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Harris LN, Ismaila N, McShane LM, Andre F, Collyar DE, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Hammond EH, Kuderer NM, Liu MC, Mennel RG, Van Poznak C, Bast RC, Hayes DF (2016) Use of biomarkers to guide decisions on adjuvant systemic therapy for women with early-stage invasive breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol 34:1134–1150. doi:10.1200/JCO.2015.65.2289 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Harris LN, Ismaila N, McShane LM, Andre F, Collyar DE, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Hammond EH, Kuderer NM, Liu MC, Mennel RG, Van Poznak C, Bast RC, Hayes DF (2016) Use of biomarkers to guide decisions on adjuvant systemic therapy for women with early-stage invasive breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol 34:1134–1150. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2015.​65.​2289 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
8.
go back to reference Yusuf RA, Rogith D, Hovick SR, Peterson SK, Burton-Chase AM, Fellman BM, Li Y, McKinney C, Bernstam EV, Meric-Bernstam F (2015) Attitudes toward molecular testing for personalized cancer therapy. Cancer 121:243–250. doi:10.1002/cncr.28966 CrossRefPubMed Yusuf RA, Rogith D, Hovick SR, Peterson SK, Burton-Chase AM, Fellman BM, Li Y, McKinney C, Bernstam EV, Meric-Bernstam F (2015) Attitudes toward molecular testing for personalized cancer therapy. Cancer 121:243–250. doi:10.​1002/​cncr.​28966 CrossRefPubMed
9.
10.
go back to reference Leggett LE, Lorenzetti DL, Noseworthy T, Tiwana S, Mackean G, Clement F (2014) Experiences and attitudes toward risk of recurrence testing in women with breast cancer: a systematic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat 144:457–465. doi:10.1007/s10549-014-2900-3 CrossRefPubMed Leggett LE, Lorenzetti DL, Noseworthy T, Tiwana S, Mackean G, Clement F (2014) Experiences and attitudes toward risk of recurrence testing in women with breast cancer: a systematic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat 144:457–465. doi:10.​1007/​s10549-014-2900-3 CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Brewer NT, Edwards AS, O’Neill SC, Tzeng JP, Carey LA, Rimer BK (2009) When genomic and standard test results diverge: implications for breast cancer patients’ preference for chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 117:25–29. doi:10.1007/s10549-008-0175-2 CrossRefPubMed Brewer NT, Edwards AS, O’Neill SC, Tzeng JP, Carey LA, Rimer BK (2009) When genomic and standard test results diverge: implications for breast cancer patients’ preference for chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 117:25–29. doi:10.​1007/​s10549-008-0175-2 CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Lo SS, Mumby PB, Norton J, Rychlik K, Smerage J, Kash J, Chew HK, Gaynor ER, Hayes DF, Epstein A, Albain KS (2010) Prospective multicenter study of the impact of the 21-gene recurrence score assay on medical oncologist and patient adjuvant breast cancer treatment selection. J Clin Oncol 28:1671–1676. doi:10.1200/JCO.2008.20.2119 CrossRefPubMed Lo SS, Mumby PB, Norton J, Rychlik K, Smerage J, Kash J, Chew HK, Gaynor ER, Hayes DF, Epstein A, Albain KS (2010) Prospective multicenter study of the impact of the 21-gene recurrence score assay on medical oncologist and patient adjuvant breast cancer treatment selection. J Clin Oncol 28:1671–1676. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2008.​20.​2119 CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Britton A, McKee M, Black N, McPherson K, Sanderson C, Bain C (1999) Threats to applicability of randomised trials: exclusions and selective participation. J Health Serv Res Policy 4:112–121CrossRef Britton A, McKee M, Black N, McPherson K, Sanderson C, Bain C (1999) Threats to applicability of randomised trials: exclusions and selective participation. J Health Serv Res Policy 4:112–121CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Does biomarker information impact breast cancer patients’ preferences and physician recommendation for adjuvant chemotherapy?
Authors
Ann H. Partridge
Karen Sepucha
Anne O’Neill
Kathy D. Miller
Emily Baker
Chau T. Dang
Donald W. Northfelt
George W. Sledge
Bryan P. Schneider
Publication date
01-10-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-017-4338-x

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2017 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine