Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 8/2005

01-08-2005 | Gastrointestinal

Distribution of mesorectal lymph nodes in rectal cancer: in vivo MR imaging compared with histopathological examination. Initial observations

Authors: D. M. Koh, G. Brown, L. Temple, H. Blake, A. Raja, P. Toomey, N. Bett, S. Farhat, A. R. Norman, I. Daniels, J. E. Husband

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 8/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

The aim of this work was to determine the distribution of mesorectal lymph nodes using T2-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging compared with histopathological findings in patients with rectal carcinoma. Sixteen patients with rectal carcinoma undergoing primary surgery without pre-operative neoadjuvant treatment were evaluated using 3-mm axial T2-weighted MR imaging. The position of each visible mesorectal node on imaging was localised by measuring its minimum distance from the mesorectal fascia (dm), its minimum distance from the rectal wall (dr) and its distance from the distal tumour margin (dv). Independent assessment of dm, dr and dv was made at histopathological examination. Eighty-five mesorectal nodes on in vivo MR imaging were matched to histopathological findings. On imaging, 67/85 mesorectal nodes were found at the level of the tumour and 84/85 were identified at or within 5 cm proximal to the tumour. Only one out of 85 nodes was seen below the inferior tumour margin. The mean difference of dm and dr obtained on in vivo MR imaging and histopathological examination was 0.7 mm (95% confidence interval, CI, −0.12 to 1.42 mm) and −1.1 mm (95% CI −2.29 to 0.14 mm), respectively. Almost all mesorectal nodes visible on MR imaging were found at the level of tumour or within 5 cm proximal to the tumour. This has implications for the planning of MR imaging and the level of mesorectal transection at surgery.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hida J, Yasutomi M, Maruyama T, Fujimoto K, Uchida T, Okuno K (1997) Lymph node metastases detected in the mesorectum distal to carcinoma of the rectum by the clearing method: justification of total mesorectal excision. J Am Coll Surg 184:584–588PubMed Hida J, Yasutomi M, Maruyama T, Fujimoto K, Uchida T, Okuno K (1997) Lymph node metastases detected in the mesorectum distal to carcinoma of the rectum by the clearing method: justification of total mesorectal excision. J Am Coll Surg 184:584–588PubMed
2.
go back to reference Brown G, Richards CJ, Newcombe RG et al (1999) Rectal carcinoma: thin-section MR imaging for staging in 28 patients. Radiology 211:215–222PubMed Brown G, Richards CJ, Newcombe RG et al (1999) Rectal carcinoma: thin-section MR imaging for staging in 28 patients. Radiology 211:215–222PubMed
3.
go back to reference Blomqvist L, Rubio C, Holm T, Machado M, Hindmarsh T (1999) Rectal adenocarcinoma: assessment of tumour involvement of the lateral resection margin by MRI of resected specimen. Br J Radiol 72:18–23PubMed Blomqvist L, Rubio C, Holm T, Machado M, Hindmarsh T (1999) Rectal adenocarcinoma: assessment of tumour involvement of the lateral resection margin by MRI of resected specimen. Br J Radiol 72:18–23PubMed
4.
go back to reference Beets-Tan RG, Beets GL, Vliegen RF et al (2001) Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in prediction of tumour-free resection margin in rectal cancer surgery. Lancet 357:497–504PubMed Beets-Tan RG, Beets GL, Vliegen RF et al (2001) Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in prediction of tumour-free resection margin in rectal cancer surgery. Lancet 357:497–504PubMed
5.
go back to reference Akasu T, Iinuma G, Fujita T et al (2005) Thin-section MRI with a phased-array coil for preoperative evaluation of pelvic anatomy and tumor extent in patients with rectal cancer. Am J Roentgenol 184:531–538 Akasu T, Iinuma G, Fujita T et al (2005) Thin-section MRI with a phased-array coil for preoperative evaluation of pelvic anatomy and tumor extent in patients with rectal cancer. Am J Roentgenol 184:531–538
6.
go back to reference Brown G, Phillips CJ (2002) Local staging of rectal cancer: the clinical effectiveness of high-resolution MRI. In: Miles A (ed) The effective management of colorectal cancer. Aesculapius Medical Press, London, pp 131–148 Brown G, Phillips CJ (2002) Local staging of rectal cancer: the clinical effectiveness of high-resolution MRI. In: Miles A (ed) The effective management of colorectal cancer. Aesculapius Medical Press, London, pp 131–148
7.
go back to reference Heald RJ (2002) Total mesorectal excision as a standard procedure: the evidence base for improved clinical outcome. In: Miles A (ed) The effective management of colorectal cancer. Aesculapius Medical Press, London, pp 125–130 Heald RJ (2002) Total mesorectal excision as a standard procedure: the evidence base for improved clinical outcome. In: Miles A (ed) The effective management of colorectal cancer. Aesculapius Medical Press, London, pp 125–130
8.
go back to reference Blomqvist L, Machado M, Rubio C et al (2000) Rectal tumour staging: MR imaging using pelvic phased-array and endorectal coils vs endoscopic ultrasonography. Eur Radiol 10:653–660PubMed Blomqvist L, Machado M, Rubio C et al (2000) Rectal tumour staging: MR imaging using pelvic phased-array and endorectal coils vs endoscopic ultrasonography. Eur Radiol 10:653–660PubMed
9.
go back to reference Brown G, Davies S, Williams GT et al (2004) Effectiveness of preoperative staging in rectal cancer: digital rectal examination, endoluminal ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging? Br J Cancer 91:23–29PubMed Brown G, Davies S, Williams GT et al (2004) Effectiveness of preoperative staging in rectal cancer: digital rectal examination, endoluminal ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging? Br J Cancer 91:23–29PubMed
10.
go back to reference Beets-Tan RG, Beets GL (2004) Rectal cancer: review with emphasis on MR imaging. Radiology 232:335–346PubMed Beets-Tan RG, Beets GL (2004) Rectal cancer: review with emphasis on MR imaging. Radiology 232:335–346PubMed
11.
go back to reference Quirke P, Dixon MF (1988) The prediction of local recurrence in rectal adenocarcinoma by histopathological examination. Int J Colorectal Dis 3:127–131PubMed Quirke P, Dixon MF (1988) The prediction of local recurrence in rectal adenocarcinoma by histopathological examination. Int J Colorectal Dis 3:127–131PubMed
12.
go back to reference Steup WH, Moriya Y, van de Velde CJ (2002) Patterns of lymphatic spread in rectal cancer. A topographical analysis on lymph node metastases. Eur J Cancer 38:911–918PubMed Steup WH, Moriya Y, van de Velde CJ (2002) Patterns of lymphatic spread in rectal cancer. A topographical analysis on lymph node metastases. Eur J Cancer 38:911–918PubMed
13.
go back to reference Dworak O (1991) Morphology of lymph nodes in the resected rectum of patients with rectal carcinoma. Pathol Res Pract 187:1020–1024PubMed Dworak O (1991) Morphology of lymph nodes in the resected rectum of patients with rectal carcinoma. Pathol Res Pract 187:1020–1024PubMed
14.
go back to reference Dworak O (1989) Number and size of lymph nodes and node metastases in rectal carcinomas. Surg Endosc 3:96–99PubMed Dworak O (1989) Number and size of lymph nodes and node metastases in rectal carcinomas. Surg Endosc 3:96–99PubMed
15.
go back to reference Andreola S, Leo E, Belli F et al (2001) Adenocarcinoma of the lower third of the rectum surgically treated with a <10-mm distal clearance: preliminary results in 35 N0 patients. Ann Surg Oncol 8:611–615PubMed Andreola S, Leo E, Belli F et al (2001) Adenocarcinoma of the lower third of the rectum surgically treated with a <10-mm distal clearance: preliminary results in 35 N0 patients. Ann Surg Oncol 8:611–615PubMed
16.
go back to reference Beets-Tan RG, Beets GL, Borstlap AC et al (2000) Preoperative assessment of local tumor extent in advanced rectal cancer: CT or high-resolution MRI? Abdom Imaging 25:533–541PubMed Beets-Tan RG, Beets GL, Borstlap AC et al (2000) Preoperative assessment of local tumor extent in advanced rectal cancer: CT or high-resolution MRI? Abdom Imaging 25:533–541PubMed
17.
go back to reference Bissett IP, Fernando CC, Hough DM et al (2001) Identification of the fascia propria by magnetic resonance imaging and its relevance to preoperative assessment of rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 44:259–265PubMed Bissett IP, Fernando CC, Hough DM et al (2001) Identification of the fascia propria by magnetic resonance imaging and its relevance to preoperative assessment of rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 44:259–265PubMed
Metadata
Title
Distribution of mesorectal lymph nodes in rectal cancer: in vivo MR imaging compared with histopathological examination. Initial observations
Authors
D. M. Koh
G. Brown
L. Temple
H. Blake
A. Raja
P. Toomey
N. Bett
S. Farhat
A. R. Norman
I. Daniels
J. E. Husband
Publication date
01-08-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 8/2005
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-2751-8

Other articles of this Issue 8/2005

European Radiology 8/2005 Go to the issue