Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 8/2005

01-08-2005 | Hepatobiliary-Pancreas

Accuracy of computed tomographic intravenous cholangiography (CT-IVC) with iotroxate in the detection of choledocholithiasis

Authors: Robert N. Gibson, Janette M. Vincent, Tony Speer, Neil A. Collier, Keith Noack

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 8/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

To determine the accuracy of computed tomographic intravenous cholangiography (CT-IVC) for detection of choledocholithiasis. Sixty-five patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) underwent CT-IVC prior to ERC, using a single detector helical CT following intravenous infusion of 100 ml iotroxate. Patients with bilirubin levels >3 times normal were excluded. ERC was indeterminate in three patients (4.7%) and CT-IVC in four (6.3%). Twenty-three patients had ductal calculi at ERC, and CT-IVC was positive in 22, with two false positives and one false negative: sensitivity 95.6%, specificity 94.3%. Stones were multiple in nine and solitary in 14. Of the 14 solitary stones, ten were ≤5 mm and eight were ≤4 mm. The bilirubin level in positive cases was within normal in 20. Maximum intensity projection (MIP) reformats showed stones in only 27% of cases and surface rendered (SR) reformats in none. CT-IVC is highly accurate for detection of ductal calculi, including single small calculi, with a normal or near normal serum bilirubin. Axial images should be used for interpretation rather than MIP or SR reformats.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Baron RL (1997) Diagnosing choledocholithiasis: how far can we push helical CT? [editorial; comment]. Radiology 203:601–603 Baron RL (1997) Diagnosing choledocholithiasis: how far can we push helical CT? [editorial; comment]. Radiology 203:601–603
2.
go back to reference Neitlich JD, Topazian M, Smith RC, Gupta A, Burrell MI, Rosenfield AT (1997) Detection of choledocholithiasis: comparison of unenhanced helical CT and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography [see comments]. Radiology 203:753–757PubMed Neitlich JD, Topazian M, Smith RC, Gupta A, Burrell MI, Rosenfield AT (1997) Detection of choledocholithiasis: comparison of unenhanced helical CT and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography [see comments]. Radiology 203:753–757PubMed
3.
go back to reference Chan YL, Chan AC, Lam WW et al (1996) Choledocholithiasis: comparison of MR cholangiography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Radiology 200:85–89 Chan YL, Chan AC, Lam WW et al (1996) Choledocholithiasis: comparison of MR cholangiography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Radiology 200:85–89
4.
go back to reference Reinhold C et al (1998) Choledocholithiasis: evaluation of MR cholangiography for diagnosis. Radiology 209:435–442PubMed Reinhold C et al (1998) Choledocholithiasis: evaluation of MR cholangiography for diagnosis. Radiology 209:435–442PubMed
5.
go back to reference Reuther G, Kiefer B, Tuchmann A (1996) Cholangiography before biliary surgery: single-shot MR cholangiography versus intravenous cholangiography. Radiology 198:561–566 Reuther G, Kiefer B, Tuchmann A (1996) Cholangiography before biliary surgery: single-shot MR cholangiography versus intravenous cholangiography. Radiology 198:561–566
6.
go back to reference Varghese JC, Liddell RP, Farrell MA, Murray FE, Osborne H, Lee MJ (1999) The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis. Clin Radiol 54:604–614CrossRef Varghese JC, Liddell RP, Farrell MA, Murray FE, Osborne H, Lee MJ (1999) The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis. Clin Radiol 54:604–614CrossRef
7.
go back to reference de Ledinghen V et al (1999) Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: EUS or magnetic resonance cholangiography? A prospective controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc 49:26–31PubMed de Ledinghen V et al (1999) Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: EUS or magnetic resonance cholangiography? A prospective controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc 49:26–31PubMed
8.
go back to reference Zidi SH, Prat F, Le Guen O, Rondeau Y, Pelletier G (2000) Performance characteristics of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the staging of malignant hilar strictures. Gut 46:103–106CrossRefPubMed Zidi SH, Prat F, Le Guen O, Rondeau Y, Pelletier G (2000) Performance characteristics of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the staging of malignant hilar strictures. Gut 46:103–106CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Guibaud L, Bret PM, Reinhold C, Atri M, Barkun AN (1995) Bile duct obstruction and choledocholithiasis: diagnosis with MR cholangiography. Radiology 197:109–115 Guibaud L, Bret PM, Reinhold C, Atri M, Barkun AN (1995) Bile duct obstruction and choledocholithiasis: diagnosis with MR cholangiography. Radiology 197:109–115
10.
go back to reference Prat F, Chapat O, Ducot B et al (1998) Predictive factors for survival of patients with inoperable malignant distal biliary strictures: a practical management guideline. Gut 42:76–80 Prat F, Chapat O, Ducot B et al (1998) Predictive factors for survival of patients with inoperable malignant distal biliary strictures: a practical management guideline. Gut 42:76–80
11.
go back to reference Stockberger SM, Wass JL, Sherman S, Lehman GA, Kopecky KK (1994) Intravenous cholangiography with helical CT: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography [see comments]. Radiology 192:675–680PubMed Stockberger SM, Wass JL, Sherman S, Lehman GA, Kopecky KK (1994) Intravenous cholangiography with helical CT: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography [see comments]. Radiology 192:675–680PubMed
12.
go back to reference Kwon AH, Uetsuji S, Yamada O, Inoue T, Kamiyama Y, Boku T (1995) Three-dimensional reconstruction of the biliary tract using spiral computed tomography. Br J Surg 82:260–263 Kwon AH, Uetsuji S, Yamada O, Inoue T, Kamiyama Y, Boku T (1995) Three-dimensional reconstruction of the biliary tract using spiral computed tomography. Br J Surg 82:260–263
13.
go back to reference Klein HM, Wein B, Truong S, Pfingsten FP, Gunther RW (1993) Computed tomographic cholangiography using spiral scanning and 3D image processing. Br J Radiol 66:762–767PubMed Klein HM, Wein B, Truong S, Pfingsten FP, Gunther RW (1993) Computed tomographic cholangiography using spiral scanning and 3D image processing. Br J Radiol 66:762–767PubMed
14.
go back to reference Hoglund M, Muren C, Boijsen MW (1990) Computed tomography with intravenous cholangiography contrast: a method for visualizing choledochal cysts. Eur J Radiol 10:159–161; discussion 162–153CrossRef Hoglund M, Muren C, Boijsen MW (1990) Computed tomography with intravenous cholangiography contrast: a method for visualizing choledochal cysts. Eur J Radiol 10:159–161; discussion 162–153CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Hase T, Kodama M, Shibata J et al (1997) Three-dimensional helical computed tomography with intravenous cholangiography for sclerosing cholangitis manifested as postcholecystectomy symptom. J Clin Gastroenterol 24:169–172CrossRef Hase T, Kodama M, Shibata J et al (1997) Three-dimensional helical computed tomography with intravenous cholangiography for sclerosing cholangitis manifested as postcholecystectomy symptom. J Clin Gastroenterol 24:169–172CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kinami S, Yao T, Kurachi M, Ishizaki Y (1999) Clinical evaluation of 3D-CT cholangiography for preoperative examination in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Gastroenterol 34:111–118CrossRefPubMed Kinami S, Yao T, Kurachi M, Ishizaki Y (1999) Clinical evaluation of 3D-CT cholangiography for preoperative examination in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Gastroenterol 34:111–118CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Berggren P, Farago I, Gabrielsson N, Thor K (1997) Intravenous cholangiography before 1,000 consecutive laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Br J Surg 84:472–476CrossRef Berggren P, Farago I, Gabrielsson N, Thor K (1997) Intravenous cholangiography before 1,000 consecutive laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Br J Surg 84:472–476CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Couse N, Egan T, Delaney P (1996) Intravenous cholangiography reduces the need for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography before laparoscopic cholecystectomy [see comments]. Br J Surg 83:335 Couse N, Egan T, Delaney P (1996) Intravenous cholangiography reduces the need for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography before laparoscopic cholecystectomy [see comments]. Br J Surg 83:335
19.
go back to reference Grunshaw ND, Lansdown MRJ, Milkins RC et al (1993) The intravenous cholangiogram-time for reappraisal in the age of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Minim Invasive Ther 2:S36 Grunshaw ND, Lansdown MRJ, Milkins RC et al (1993) The intravenous cholangiogram-time for reappraisal in the age of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Minim Invasive Ther 2:S36
20.
go back to reference Jansen M, Truong S, Treutner KH, Neuerburg J, Schraven C, Schumpelick V (1999) Value of intravenous cholangiography prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg 23:693–696; discussion 697 Jansen M, Truong S, Treutner KH, Neuerburg J, Schraven C, Schumpelick V (1999) Value of intravenous cholangiography prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg 23:693–696; discussion 697
21.
go back to reference Kwon AH, Inui H, Imamura A, Uetsuji S, Kamiyama Y (1998) Preoperative assessment for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: feasibility of using spiral computed tomography. Ann Surg 227:351–356CrossRef Kwon AH, Inui H, Imamura A, Uetsuji S, Kamiyama Y (1998) Preoperative assessment for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: feasibility of using spiral computed tomography. Ann Surg 227:351–356CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Lindsey I, Nottle PD, Sacharias N (1997) Preoperative screening for common bile duct stones with infusion cholangiography: review of 1,000 patients. Ann Surg 226:174–178CrossRef Lindsey I, Nottle PD, Sacharias N (1997) Preoperative screening for common bile duct stones with infusion cholangiography: review of 1,000 patients. Ann Surg 226:174–178CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Patel JC, McInnes GC, Bagley JS, Needham G, Krukowski ZH (1993) The role of intravenous cholangiography in pre-operative assessment for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Radiol 66:1125–1127 Patel JC, McInnes GC, Bagley JS, Needham G, Krukowski ZH (1993) The role of intravenous cholangiography in pre-operative assessment for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Radiol 66:1125–1127
24.
go back to reference Chopra S, Chintapalli KN, Ramakrishna K, Rhim H, Dodd GD III (2000) Helical CT cholangiography with oral cholecystographic contrast material. Radiology 214:596–601PubMed Chopra S, Chintapalli KN, Ramakrishna K, Rhim H, Dodd GD III (2000) Helical CT cholangiography with oral cholecystographic contrast material. Radiology 214:596–601PubMed
25.
go back to reference Soto JA, Velez SM (1999) Choledocholithiasis: diagnosis with oral contrast-enhanced CT cholangiography. Am J Roentgenol 172:943–948 Soto JA, Velez SM (1999) Choledocholithiasis: diagnosis with oral contrast-enhanced CT cholangiography. Am J Roentgenol 172:943–948
26.
go back to reference Polkowski M, Palucki J, Regula J, Tilszer A, Butruk E (1999) Helical computed tomographic cholangiography versus endosonography for suspected bile duct stones: a prospective blinded study in non-jaundiced patients. Gut 45:744–749 [Record as supplied by publisher] Polkowski M, Palucki J, Regula J, Tilszer A, Butruk E (1999) Helical computed tomographic cholangiography versus endosonography for suspected bile duct stones: a prospective blinded study in non-jaundiced patients. Gut 45:744–749 [Record as supplied by publisher]
27.
go back to reference Cabada Giadas T, Sarria Octavio de Toledo L, Martinez-Berganza Asensio MT et al (2002) Helical CT cholangiography in the evaluation of the biliary tract: application to the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. Abdom Imaging 27:61–70CrossRef Cabada Giadas T, Sarria Octavio de Toledo L, Martinez-Berganza Asensio MT et al (2002) Helical CT cholangiography in the evaluation of the biliary tract: application to the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. Abdom Imaging 27:61–70CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Lindsell DR (1990) Ultrasound imaging of pancreas and biliary tract. Lancet 335:390–393CrossRef Lindsell DR (1990) Ultrasound imaging of pancreas and biliary tract. Lancet 335:390–393CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Laing F, Jeffrey R, Wing V (1984) Improved visualization of choledocholithiasis by sonography. Am J Roentgenol 143:949–952 Laing F, Jeffrey R, Wing V (1984) Improved visualization of choledocholithiasis by sonography. Am J Roentgenol 143:949–952
30.
go back to reference Cronan JJ (1986) US diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: a reappraisal. Radiology 161:133–134 Cronan JJ (1986) US diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: a reappraisal. Radiology 161:133–134
31.
go back to reference Stott MA, Farrands PA, Guyer PB, Dewbury KC, Browning JJ, Sutton R (1991) Ultrasound of the common bile duct in patients undergoing cholecystectomy. J Clin Ultrasound 19:73–76 Stott MA, Farrands PA, Guyer PB, Dewbury KC, Browning JJ, Sutton R (1991) Ultrasound of the common bile duct in patients undergoing cholecystectomy. J Clin Ultrasound 19:73–76
32.
go back to reference Laing AD, Gibson RN (1999) Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Australas Radiol 43:284–293CrossRef Laing AD, Gibson RN (1999) Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Australas Radiol 43:284–293CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Stabile Ianora AA, Memeo M, Scardapane A, Rotondo A, Angelelli G (2003) Oral contrast-enhanced three-dimensional helical-CT cholangiography: clinical applications. Eur Radiol 13:867–873PubMed Stabile Ianora AA, Memeo M, Scardapane A, Rotondo A, Angelelli G (2003) Oral contrast-enhanced three-dimensional helical-CT cholangiography: clinical applications. Eur Radiol 13:867–873PubMed
34.
go back to reference Nilsson U (1987) Adverse reactions to iotroxate at intravenous cholangiography. A prospective clinical investigation and review of the literature. Acta Radiol 28:571–575 Nilsson U (1987) Adverse reactions to iotroxate at intravenous cholangiography. A prospective clinical investigation and review of the literature. Acta Radiol 28:571–575
35.
go back to reference Fulcher AS, Turner MA (1998) Pitfalls of MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). J Comput Assist Tomogr 22:845–850CrossRef Fulcher AS, Turner MA (1998) Pitfalls of MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). J Comput Assist Tomogr 22:845–850CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Itoh S, Ikeda M, Ota T, Satake H, Takai K, Ishigaki T (2003) Assessment of the pancreatic and intrapancreatic bile ducts using 0.5-mm collimation and multiplanar reformatted images in multislice CT. Eur Radiol 13:277–285PubMed Itoh S, Ikeda M, Ota T, Satake H, Takai K, Ishigaki T (2003) Assessment of the pancreatic and intrapancreatic bile ducts using 0.5-mm collimation and multiplanar reformatted images in multislice CT. Eur Radiol 13:277–285PubMed
Metadata
Title
Accuracy of computed tomographic intravenous cholangiography (CT-IVC) with iotroxate in the detection of choledocholithiasis
Authors
Robert N. Gibson
Janette M. Vincent
Tony Speer
Neil A. Collier
Keith Noack
Publication date
01-08-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 8/2005
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2606-8

Other articles of this Issue 8/2005

European Radiology 8/2005 Go to the issue

Calendar of Events

Calendar of Events, 15/8