Top

Published in:

01-12-2018 | Original Research

Disability Experiences and Perspectives Regarding Reproductive Decisions, Parenting, and the Utility of Genetic Services: a Qualitative Study

Authors: C. Roadhouse, C. Shuman, K. Anstey, K. Sappleton, D. Chitayat, E. Ignagni

Published in: Journal of Genetic Counseling | Issue 6/2018

Abstract

Genetic counselors adopt seemingly contradictory roles: advocating for individuals with genetic conditions while offering prenatal diagnosis and the option of selective termination to prevent the birth of a child with a disability. This duality contributes to the tension between the disability and clinical genetics communities. Varying opinions exist amongst the disability community: some value genetic services while others are opposed. However, there is limited research exploring the opinions of individuals with a disability regarding issues related to reproduction and genetic services in the context of personal experience. This exploratory qualitative study involved interviews with seven women and three men who self-identify as having a disability. We sought to gain their perspectives on experiences with disability, thoughts about reproduction and parenting, and perceptions of genetic services. Transcripts of the interviews were analyzed thematically using qualitative content analysis. Data analysis showed that societal views of disability affected the lived experience and impacted reproductive decision-making for those with a disability. It also showed differing interest in genetic services. Concerns about the perceived collective implications of genetic services were also raised. These findings contribute to the understanding of the disability perspective toward reproductive decision-making and genetic services. A further goal is to promote a meaningful dialogue between the genetics and disability communities, with the potential to enhance the genetic and reproductive care provided to individuals with disabilities.

Abel, K., & Browner, C. (1998). Selective compliance with biomedical authority and the uses of experiential knowledge. In M. Lock & P. Kaufert (Eds.), Pragmatic women and body politics (pp. 310–326). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ahmed, S., Bryant, L., & Hewison, J. (2007). ‘Balance’ is in the eye of the beholder: Providing information to support informed choices in antenatal screening via antenatal screening web resource. Health Expectations, 10, 309–320.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Benjamin, C. M., Colley, A., Donnai, D., Kingston, H., Harris, R., & Kerzin-Storrar, L. (1993). Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1): Knowledge, experience, and reproductive decisions of affected patients and families. Journal of Medical Genetics, 30, 567–574.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Boardman, F. K. (2013). Knowledge is power? The role of experiential knowledge in genetically ‘risky’ reproductive decisions. Sociology of Health and Illness, 36(1), 137–150.CrossRefPubMed

Boardman, F. K. (2014). The expressivist objection to prenatal testing: The experiences of families living with genetic disease. Social Science & Medicine, 107, 18–25.CrossRef

Brasington, C. K. (2007). What I wish I knew then…reflections from personal experience in counseling about Down syndrome. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16, 731–734.CrossRefPubMed

Campbell, F. K., (2008). Refusing able(ness): A preliminary conversation about ableism. M/C Journal, 11(3). http://journal.media-culture.org.au/index.php/mcjournal/article/viewArticle/46. Accessed 21 Sept 2015.

Carroll, F. E., Owen-Smith, A., Shaw, A., & Montgomery, A. A. (2012). A qualitative investigation of the decision-making process of couples considering prenatal screening for Down syndrome. Prenatal Diagnosis, 32, 57–63.CrossRefPubMed

Chen, E. A., & Schiffman, J. F. (2000). Attitudes toward genetic counseling and prenatal diagnosis among a group of individuals with physical disabilities. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 9(2), 137–152.CrossRefPubMed

Chipman, P. (2006). The moral implications of prenatal genetic testing. Penn Bioethics, 2, 13–16.

Cooley, W. C., Graham, E. S., Moeschler, J. B., & Graham, J. M. (1990). Reactions of mothers and medical professionals to a film about Down syndrome. American Journal of Diseases of Children, 144, 1112–1116.PubMed

Deal, M. (2003). Disabled people’s attitudes toward other impairment groups: A hierarchy of impairments. Disability & Society, 18(7), 897–910.CrossRef

Deem, M. (2016). Whole-genome sequencing and disability in the NICU: Exploring practical and ethical challenges. Pediatrics, 137(Suppl 1), S47–S55.CrossRefPubMed

Disabled Persons International. (2005). DPI position paper on the definition of disability. Accessed at http://www.dpi.org/lang-en/resources/topics_detail?page=74.

Edwards, S. (2004). Disability, identity, and the “expressivist objection”. Journal of Medical Ethics, 30, 418–420.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Elo, S., & Kyngas, H. (2007). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115.CrossRef

Esmail, S., Darry, K., Walter, A., & Knupp, H. (2010). Attitudes and perceptions towards disability and sexuality. Disability and Rehabilitation, 32(14), 1148–1155.CrossRefPubMed

Etchegary, H., Potter, B., Howley, H., Cappelli, M., Coyle, D., Graham, I., Walker, M., & Wilson, B. (2008). The influence of experiential knowledge on prenatal screening and testing decisions. Genetic Testing, 12(1), 115–124.CrossRefPubMed

Farrelly, E., Cho, M. K., Erby, L., Roter, D., Stenzel, A., & Ormond, K. (2012). Genetic counseling for prenatal testing: Where is the discussion about disability? Journal of Genetic Counseling, 19, 671.

France, E. F., Locock, L., Hunt, K., Ziebland, S., Fiels, K., & Wyke, S. (2011). Imagined futures: How experiential knowledge of disability affects parents’ decision making about fetal abnormality. Health Expectations, 15, 139–156.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Furu, T., Kaariainen, H., Sankila, E. M., & Norio, R. (1993). Attitudes towards prenatal diagnosis and selective abortion among patients with retinitis pigmentosa or choroidermia as well as among their relatives. Clinical Genetics, 43, 160–165.CrossRefPubMed

Hickerton, C. L., Aitken, M., Hodgson, J., & Delatycki, M. B. (2011). “Did you find that out in time?”: New life trajectories of parents who choose to continue a pregnancy where a genetic disorder is diagnosed or likely. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 158A, 373–383.CrossRefPubMed

Hippman, C., Inglis, A., & Austin, J. (2012). What is a “balanced” description? Insight from parents of individuals with down syndrome. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 21, 35–44.CrossRefPubMed

Hodgson, J., & Weil, J. (2012). Talking about disability in prenatal genetic counseling: A report of two interactive workshops. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 21, 17–23.CrossRefPubMed

Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1277–1288.CrossRefPubMed

Hubbard, R. (2013). Abortion and disability: Who should and should not inhabit the world? In L. J. Davis (Ed.), Disability studies reader (4th ed.). New York: Routledge.

Imrie, R. (2004). Demystifying disability: A review of the international classification of functioning, disability, and health. Sociology of Health & Illness, 26(3), 287–305.CrossRef

Jemta, L., Fugl-Meyer, K. S., & Oberg, K. (2008). On intimacy, sexual activities and exposure to sexual abuse among children and adolescents with mobility impairment. Acta Paediatrica, 97, 641–646.CrossRefPubMed

Kaplan, D. (1993). Prenatal screening and its impact on persons with disabilities. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 36(3), 605–612.CrossRefPubMed

Kelly, S. E. (2009). Choosing not to choose: Reproductive responses of parents of children with genetic conditions or impairments. Sociology of Health and Illness, 31(1), 81–87.CrossRefPubMed

Kevles, D. (2011). From eugenics to patents: Genetics, law, and human rights. Annals of Human Genetics, 75, 326–333.CrossRefPubMed

Killoran, C. (1994). Women with disabilities having children: It’s our right. Sexuality and Disability, 12(2), 121–126.CrossRef

Kirschner, K. L., Ormond, K. E., & Gill, C. J. (2000). The impact of genetic technologies on perceptions of disability. Quality Management in Health Care, 8(3), 19–26.CrossRefPubMed

Landsman, G. H. (2009). Doing everything right in Reconstructing motherhood and disability in the age of ‘perfect’ babies. New York: Routledge.

Larson, E. (1998). Reframing the meaning of disability to families: The embrace of paradox. Social Science & Medicine, 47(7), 865–875.CrossRef

Lenihan, M. (2012). The road less traveled: One genetic counselor’s reflections on disability and the genetic counseling profession. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 21, 784–786.CrossRefPubMed

Lewiecki-Wilson, C., & Cellio, J. (Eds.). (2011). Disability and mothering: Liminal spaces of embodied knowledge. New York: Syracuse UP.

Madeo, A. C., Biesecker, B. B., Brasington, C., Erby, L. H., & Peters, K. F. (2011). The relationship between the genetic counseling profession and the disability community: A commentary. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 155, 1777–1785.CrossRef

Malacrida, C. (2007). Negotiating the dependency/nurturance tightrope: Dilemmas of motherhood and disability. The Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 44(4), 469–493.CrossRef

McAllister, M., Payne, K., Macleod, R., Nicholls, S., Donna, D., & Davies, L. (2008). Patient empowerment in clinical genetic services. Journal of Health Psychology, 13(7), 895–905.CrossRefPubMed

McAllister, M., Graham, D., & Chris, T. (2011). Empowerment: Qualitative underpinning of a new clinical genetics-specific patient-reported outcome. European Journal of Human Genetics, 19(2), 125–130.CrossRefPubMed

McCarthy, H. (2003). The disability rights movement: Experiences and perspectives of selected leaders in the disability community. The Disability Rights Movement, 46, 209–223.

McRuer, R. (2013). Compulsory able-bodiedness and queer/disabled existence. In L. J. Davis (Ed.), Disability studies reader (4th ed.). New York, Routledge.

Minear, M., Alessi, S., Allyse, M., Michie, M., & Chandrasekharan, S. (2015). Noninvasive prenatal genetic testing: Current and emerging ethical, legal, and social issues. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 16, 369–398.CrossRefPubMed

Murphy, N. (2005). Sexuality in children and adolescents with disabilities. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 47, 640–644.CrossRefPubMed

Neergaard, M. A., Olesen, F., Andersen, R. S., & Sondergaard, J. (2009). Qualitative description—The poor cousin of health research? BMC Medical Research Methodology, 9, 52–56.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Ormond, K. E., Gill, C. J., Semik, P., & Kirschner, K. L. (2003). Attitudes of health care trainees about genetics and disability: Issues of access, health care communication, and decision making. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 12(4), 333–349.CrossRefPubMed

Parchomiuk, M. (2014). Social context of disabled parenting. Sexuality and Disability, 32, 231–242.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Parens, E., & Asch, A. (2003). Disability rights critique of prenatal genetic testing: Reflections and recommendations. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 9(1), 40–47.CrossRefPubMed

Patterson, A., & Satz, M. (2002). Genetic counseling and the disabled: Feminism examines the stance of those who stand at the gate. Hypatia, 17(3), 118–142.CrossRefPubMed

Peterson, M. (2012). Disability advocacy and reproductive choice: Engaging with the expressivist objection. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 21, 13–16.CrossRefPubMed

Prilleltensky, O. (2003). A ramp to motherhood: The experiences of mothers with physical disabilities. Sexuality and Disability, 21(1), 21–47.CrossRef

Prillentensky, O. (2004). Motherhood and disability: Children and choices. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef

Resta, R. G. (1997). Eugenics and nondirectiveness in genetic counseling. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 6(2), 255–258.CrossRefPubMed

Resta, R., Biesacker, B. B., Bennett, R. L., Blum, S., Hahn, S. E., Strecker, M. N., & Williams, J. L. (2006). A new definition of genetic counseling: National Society of Genetic Counselors’ task force report. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15(2), 77–83.CrossRefPubMed

Roberts, C., Stough, L., & Parrish, L. (2002). The role of genetic counseling in the elective termination of pregnancies involving fetuses with disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 36(1), 48–55.CrossRefPubMed

Rogel, K. (2009). Practicing what we preach: Genetic counselors, disability, and advocacy. The DNA exchange. Accessed at http://thednaexchange.com/2009/12/14/practicing-what-we-preach-genetic-counselors-disability-and-advocacy/.

Sanborn, E., & Patterson, A. R. (2014). Disability training in the genetic counseling curricula; bridging the gap between genetic counselors and the disability community. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 164A(8), 1909–1915.CrossRefPubMed

Sandelowski, M. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing & Health, 23, 334–340.CrossRef

Saxton, M. (1994). Preface to the special issue on women with disabilities: Reproduction and motherhood. Sexuality and Disability, 12(2), 111–115.CrossRef

Saxton, M. (2013). Disability rights and selective abortion. In L. J. Davis (Ed.), Disability studies reader (4th ed.). New York: Routledge.

Scully, J. L. (2008). Disability and genetics in the era of genomic medicine. Nature Reviews Genetics, 9, 797–802.CrossRefPubMed

Shakespeare, T. (1998). Choices and rights: Eugenics, genetics and disability equality. Disability & Society, 13(5), 665–681.CrossRef

Shakespeare, T. (2005). The social context of individual choice. In D. Wasserman, J. Bickenbach, & R. Wachbroit (Eds.), Quality of life and human difference: Genetic testing, health care, and disability. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Shakespeare, T. (2013). The social model of disability. In L. J. Davis (Ed.), Disability studies reader (4th ed.). New York: Routledge.

Thomas, C. (1997). The baby and the bath water: Disabled women and motherhood in social context. Sociology of Health & Illness, 19(5), 622–643.CrossRef

Turnbull, D. (2000). Genetic counselling: Ethical mediation of eugenic futures? Futures, 32(9–10), 853–865.CrossRefPubMed

Vehmas, S. (2003). Live and let die? Disability in bioethics. New Review of Bioethics, 1, 145–157.CrossRefPubMed

World Health Organization. (2002). Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health: ICF. Accessed at http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/training/icfbeginnersguide.pdf.

World Health Organization. (2004). The United Nations and Disabled Persons. Accessed at http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/enable/dis50y00.htm.

Wu, R. L., Lawson, C. S., Jabs, E. W., & Sanderson, S. C. (2012). Attitudes toward prenatal genetic testing for Treacher Collins syndrome among affected individuals and families. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 158A, 1556–1567.CrossRefPubMed

Title: Disability Experiences and Perspectives Regarding Reproductive Decisions, Parenting, and the Utility of Genetic Services: a Qualitative Study
Authors: C. Roadhouse
C. Shuman
K. Anstey
K. Sappleton
D. Chitayat
E. Ignagni
Publication date: 01-12-2018
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Journal of Genetic Counseling / Issue 6/2018
Print ISSN: 1059-7700
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3599
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-018-0265-1

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Disability Experiences and Perspectives Regarding Reproductive Decisions, Parenting, and the Utility of Genetic Services: a Qualitative Study

Abstract

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 6/2018

Patients’ Views of Treatment-Focused Genetic Testing (TFGT): Some Lessons for the Mainstreaming of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Testing

Correction to: Talking with Children about Adult-Onset Hereditary Cancer Risk: A Developmental Approach for Parents

Genetic Counselors’ Experience with and Opinions on the Management of Newborn Screening Incidental Carrier Findings

Adrenal Insufficiency in Young Children: a Mixed Methods Study of Parents’ Experiences

Genetic Counselors’ Perspectives About Cell-Free DNA: Experiences, Challenges, and Expectations for Obstetricians

All Along the Watchtower: a Case of Long QT Syndrome Misdiagnosis Secondary to Genetic Testing Misinterpretation