Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Virchows Archiv 4/2018

Open Access 01-04-2018 | Review and Perspectives

Dilemmas for the pathologist in the oncologic assessment of pancreatoduodenectomy specimens

An overview of different grossing approaches and the relevance of the histopathological characteristics in the oncologic assessment of pancreatoduodenectomy specimens

Authors: Eline Soer, Lodewijk Brosens, Marc van de Vijver, Frederike Dijk, Marie-Louise van Velthuysen, Arantza Farina-Sarasqueta, Hans Morreau, Johan Offerhaus, Lianne Koens, Joanne Verheij

Published in: Virchows Archiv | Issue 4/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

A pancreatoduodenectomy specimen is complex, and there is much debate on how it is best approached by the pathologist. In this review, we provide an overview of topics relevant for current clinical practice in terms of gross dissection, and macro- and microscopic assessment of the pancreatoduodenectomy specimen with a suspicion of suspected pancreatic cancer. Tumor origin, tumor size, degree of differentiation, lymph node status, and resection margin status are universally accepted as prognostic for survival. However, different guidelines diverge on important issues, such as the diagnostic criteria for evaluating the completeness of resection. The macroscopic assessment of the site of origin in periampullary tumors and cystic lesions is influenced by the grossing method. Bi-sectioning of the head of the pancreas may offer an advantage in this respect, as this method allows for optimal visualization of the periampullary area. However, a head-to-head comparison of the assessment of clinically relevant parameters, using axial slicing versus bi-sectioning, is not available yet and the gold standard to compare both techniques prospectively might be subject of debate. Further studies are required to validate the various dissection protocols used for pancreatoduodenectomy specimens and their specific value in the assessment of pathological parameters relevant for prognosis.
Literature
4.
go back to reference The Royal College of Pathologists (2013) Standards and datasets for reporting cancers. Dataset for the histopathological reporting of carcinomas of the pancreas, ampulla of vater and common bile duct. The Royal College of Pathologists, London. The Royal College of Pathologists (2013) Standards and datasets for reporting cancers. Dataset for the histopathological reporting of carcinomas of the pancreas, ampulla of vater and common bile duct. The Royal College of Pathologists, London.
5.
go back to reference Adsay V, Ohike N, Tajiri T, Kim GE, Krasinskas A, Balci S, Bagci P, Basturk O, Bandyopadhyay S, Jang KT, Kooby DA, Maithel SK, Sarmiento J, Staley CA, Gonzalez RS, Kong SY, Goodman M (2012) Ampullary region carcinomas: definition and site specific classification with delineation of four clinicopathologically and prognostically distinct subsets in an analysis of 249 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 36:1592–1608. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0b013e31826399d8 CrossRefPubMed Adsay V, Ohike N, Tajiri T, Kim GE, Krasinskas A, Balci S, Bagci P, Basturk O, Bandyopadhyay S, Jang KT, Kooby DA, Maithel SK, Sarmiento J, Staley CA, Gonzalez RS, Kong SY, Goodman M (2012) Ampullary region carcinomas: definition and site specific classification with delineation of four clinicopathologically and prognostically distinct subsets in an analysis of 249 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 36:1592–1608. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1097/​PAS.​0b013e31826399d8​ CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference College of American Pathologists (2017) Cancer protocols. Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with tumors of the endocrine pancreas. College of American Pathologists, Northfield College of American Pathologists (2017) Cancer protocols. Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with tumors of the endocrine pancreas. College of American Pathologists, Northfield
9.
go back to reference Brierley JD, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C (2017) TNM classification of malignant tumours. Eight edition. Wiley, New York Brierley JD, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C (2017) TNM classification of malignant tumours. Eight edition. Wiley, New York
10.
go back to reference Shia J, Agaram NP, Olgac S, Cobanov B, Adsay VKD (2014) Adenocarcinoma of the minor duodenal papilla and its precursor lesions: a clinical and pathologic study. Am J Surg Pathol 38:526–533CrossRefPubMed Shia J, Agaram NP, Olgac S, Cobanov B, Adsay VKD (2014) Adenocarcinoma of the minor duodenal papilla and its precursor lesions: a clinical and pathologic study. Am J Surg Pathol 38:526–533CrossRefPubMed
13.
14.
go back to reference Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, Theise ND (2010) WHO classification of Tumours of the digestive system, fourth edition. Int. Agency Res. Cancer, vol. 3, p. 417 Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, Theise ND (2010) WHO classification of Tumours of the digestive system, fourth edition. Int. Agency Res. Cancer, vol. 3, p. 417
18.
go back to reference de Jong MC, Li F, Cameron JL, Wolfgang CL, Edil BH, Herman JM, Choti MA, Eckhauser F, Hirose K, Schulick RD, Pawlik TM (2011) Re-evaluating the impact of tumor size on survival following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol 103:656–662. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.21883 CrossRefPubMed de Jong MC, Li F, Cameron JL, Wolfgang CL, Edil BH, Herman JM, Choti MA, Eckhauser F, Hirose K, Schulick RD, Pawlik TM (2011) Re-evaluating the impact of tumor size on survival following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol 103:656–662. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​jso.​21883 CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Saka B, Balci S, Basturk O, Bagci P, Postlewait LM, Maithel S, Knight J, el-Rayes B, Kooby D, Sarmiento J, Muraki T, Oliva I, Bandyopadhyay S, Akkas G, Goodman M, Reid MD, Krasinskas A, Everett R, Adsay V (2016) Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is spread to the peripancreatic soft tissue in the majority of resected cases, rendering the AJCC T-stage protocol (7th edition) inapplicable and insignificant: a size-based staging system (pT1: ≤2, pT2: >2–≤4, pT3: &gt). Ann Surg Oncol 23:2010–2018. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5093-7 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Saka B, Balci S, Basturk O, Bagci P, Postlewait LM, Maithel S, Knight J, el-Rayes B, Kooby D, Sarmiento J, Muraki T, Oliva I, Bandyopadhyay S, Akkas G, Goodman M, Reid MD, Krasinskas A, Everett R, Adsay V (2016) Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is spread to the peripancreatic soft tissue in the majority of resected cases, rendering the AJCC T-stage protocol (7th edition) inapplicable and insignificant: a size-based staging system (pT1: ≤2, pT2: >2–≤4, pT3: &gt). Ann Surg Oncol 23:2010–2018. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1245/​s10434-016-5093-7 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) (2017) TNM classification of malignant tumours, 8th edn. Wiley Blackwell, New York Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) (2017) TNM classification of malignant tumours, 8th edn. Wiley Blackwell, New York
25.
go back to reference Furukawa T, Hatori T, Fujita I, Yamamoto M, Kobayashi M, Ohike N, Morohoshi T, Egawa S, Unno M, Takao S, Osako M, Yonezawa S, Mino-Kenudson M, Lauwers GY, Yamaguchi H, Ban S, Shimizu M (2011) Prognostic relevance of morphological types of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas. Gut 60:509–516. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2010.210567 CrossRefPubMed Furukawa T, Hatori T, Fujita I, Yamamoto M, Kobayashi M, Ohike N, Morohoshi T, Egawa S, Unno M, Takao S, Osako M, Yonezawa S, Mino-Kenudson M, Lauwers GY, Yamaguchi H, Ban S, Shimizu M (2011) Prognostic relevance of morphological types of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas. Gut 60:509–516. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1136/​gut.​2010.​210567 CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Basturk O, Hong S-M, Wood LD, Adsay NV, Albores-Saavedra J, Biankin AV, Brosens LA, Fukushima N, Goggins M, Hruban RH, Kato Y, Klimstra DS, Klöppel G, Krasinskas A, Longnecker DS, Matthaei H, Offerhaus GJ, Shimizu M, Takaori K, Terris B, Yachida S, Esposito I, Furukawa T, Baltimore Consensus Meeting (2015) A revised classification system and recommendations from the Baltimore consensus meeting for neoplastic precursor lesions in the pancreas. Am J Surg Pathol 39:1730–1741. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000000533 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Basturk O, Hong S-M, Wood LD, Adsay NV, Albores-Saavedra J, Biankin AV, Brosens LA, Fukushima N, Goggins M, Hruban RH, Kato Y, Klimstra DS, Klöppel G, Krasinskas A, Longnecker DS, Matthaei H, Offerhaus GJ, Shimizu M, Takaori K, Terris B, Yachida S, Esposito I, Furukawa T, Baltimore Consensus Meeting (2015) A revised classification system and recommendations from the Baltimore consensus meeting for neoplastic precursor lesions in the pancreas. Am J Surg Pathol 39:1730–1741. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1097/​PAS.​0000000000000533​ CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Bouvet M, Gamagami RA, Gilpin EA, Romeo O, Sasson A, Easter DW, Moossa AR (2000) Factors influencing survival after resection for periampullary neoplasms. Am J Surg 180:13–17CrossRefPubMed Bouvet M, Gamagami RA, Gilpin EA, Romeo O, Sasson A, Easter DW, Moossa AR (2000) Factors influencing survival after resection for periampullary neoplasms. Am J Surg 180:13–17CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Delpero JR, Bachellier P, Regenet N, Le Treut YP, Paye F, Carrere N et al (2014) Pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a French multicentre prospective evaluation of resection margins in 150 evaluable specimens. HPB (Oxford) 16:20–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/hpb.12061 CrossRef Delpero JR, Bachellier P, Regenet N, Le Treut YP, Paye F, Carrere N et al (2014) Pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a French multicentre prospective evaluation of resection margins in 150 evaluable specimens. HPB (Oxford) 16:20–33. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​hpb.​12061 CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Verbeke CS (2008) Resection margins and R1 rates in pancreatic cancer—are we there yet? Histopathology 52:787–796CrossRefPubMed Verbeke CS (2008) Resection margins and R1 rates in pancreatic cancer—are we there yet? Histopathology 52:787–796CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Pathologists C of A (2016) Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with carcinoma of the pancreas Pathologists C of A (2016) Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with carcinoma of the pancreas
39.
go back to reference Hruban RH, Pitman MB, Klimstra DS (2017) Tumors of the pancreas (Afip atlas of tumor pathology; 4th series fascicle 6). American Registry of Pathology, Washington Hruban RH, Pitman MB, Klimstra DS (2017) Tumors of the pancreas (Afip atlas of tumor pathology; 4th series fascicle 6). American Registry of Pathology, Washington
41.
go back to reference Konstantinidis IT, Warshaw AL, Allen JN, Blaszkowsky LS, Castillo CF-D, Deshpande V, Hong TS, Kwak EL, Lauwers GY, Ryan DP, Wargo JA, Lillemoe KD, Ferrone CR (2013) Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: is there a survival difference for R1 resections versus locally advanced unresectable tumors? What is a “true” R0 resection? Ann Surg 257:731–736. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e318263da2f CrossRefPubMed Konstantinidis IT, Warshaw AL, Allen JN, Blaszkowsky LS, Castillo CF-D, Deshpande V, Hong TS, Kwak EL, Lauwers GY, Ryan DP, Wargo JA, Lillemoe KD, Ferrone CR (2013) Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: is there a survival difference for R1 resections versus locally advanced unresectable tumors? What is a “true” R0 resection? Ann Surg 257:731–736. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1097/​SLA.​0b013e318263da2f​ CrossRefPubMed
52.
go back to reference Basturk O, Saka B, Balci S, Postlewait LM, Knight J, Goodman M, Kooby D, Sarmiento JM, el-Rayes B, Choi H, Bagci P, Krasinskas A, Quigley B, Reid MD, Akkas G, Maithel SK, Adsay V (2015) Substaging of lymph node status in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma has strong prognostic correlations: proposal for a revised N classification for TNM staging. Ann Surg Oncol 22:1187–1195. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4861-0 CrossRef Basturk O, Saka B, Balci S, Postlewait LM, Knight J, Goodman M, Kooby D, Sarmiento JM, el-Rayes B, Choi H, Bagci P, Krasinskas A, Quigley B, Reid MD, Akkas G, Maithel SK, Adsay V (2015) Substaging of lymph node status in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma has strong prognostic correlations: proposal for a revised N classification for TNM staging. Ann Surg Oncol 22:1187–1195. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1245/​s10434-015-4861-0 CrossRef
53.
go back to reference Japan Pancreas Society. Classification of Pancreatic Carcinoma (2nd English edn). n.d Japan Pancreas Society. Classification of Pancreatic Carcinoma (2nd English edn). n.d
55.
58.
go back to reference Williams JL, Nguyen AH, Rochefort M, Muthusamy VR, Wainberg ZA, Dawson DW, Tomlinson JS, Hines OJ, Reber HA, Donahue TR (2015) Pancreatic cancer patients with lymph node involvement by direct tumor extension have similar survival to those with node-negative disease. J Surg Oncol 112:396–402. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.24011 CrossRefPubMed Williams JL, Nguyen AH, Rochefort M, Muthusamy VR, Wainberg ZA, Dawson DW, Tomlinson JS, Hines OJ, Reber HA, Donahue TR (2015) Pancreatic cancer patients with lymph node involvement by direct tumor extension have similar survival to those with node-negative disease. J Surg Oncol 112:396–402. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​jso.​24011 CrossRefPubMed
60.
go back to reference Yekebas E-FF, Bogoevski D, Bubenheim M, Link B-CBC, Kaifi J-TT, Wachowiak R et al (2006) Strong prognostic value of nodal and bone marrow micro-involvement in patients with pancreatic ductal carcinoma receiving no adjuvant chemotherapy. World J Gastroenterol 12:6515–6521CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yekebas E-FF, Bogoevski D, Bubenheim M, Link B-CBC, Kaifi J-TT, Wachowiak R et al (2006) Strong prognostic value of nodal and bone marrow micro-involvement in patients with pancreatic ductal carcinoma receiving no adjuvant chemotherapy. World J Gastroenterol 12:6515–6521CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
63.
go back to reference Luchini C, Veronese N, Pea A, Sergi G, Manzato E, Nottegar A, Solmi M, Capelli P, Scarpa A (2016) Extranodal extension in N1-adenocarcinoma of the pancreas and papilla of Vater: a systematic review and meta-analysis of its prognostic significance. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 28:205–209. https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000000520 PubMed Luchini C, Veronese N, Pea A, Sergi G, Manzato E, Nottegar A, Solmi M, Capelli P, Scarpa A (2016) Extranodal extension in N1-adenocarcinoma of the pancreas and papilla of Vater: a systematic review and meta-analysis of its prognostic significance. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 28:205–209. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1097/​MEG.​0000000000000520​ PubMed
66.
go back to reference Chatterjee D, Katz MH, Rashid A, Varadhachary GR, Wolff RA, Wang H, Lee JE, Pisters PWT, Vauthey JN, Crane C, Gomez HF, Abbruzzese JL, Fleming JB, Wang H (2012) Histologic grading of the extent of residual carcinoma following neoadjuvant chemoradiation in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a predictor for patient outcome. Cancer 118:3182–3190. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.26651 CrossRefPubMed Chatterjee D, Katz MH, Rashid A, Varadhachary GR, Wolff RA, Wang H, Lee JE, Pisters PWT, Vauthey JN, Crane C, Gomez HF, Abbruzzese JL, Fleming JB, Wang H (2012) Histologic grading of the extent of residual carcinoma following neoadjuvant chemoradiation in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a predictor for patient outcome. Cancer 118:3182–3190. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​cncr.​26651 CrossRefPubMed
67.
go back to reference Washington MK, Berlin J, Branton PA, Burgart LJ, Carter DK, Compton CC, Fitzgibbons PL, Frankel WL, Jessup JM, Kakar S, Minsky B, Nakhleh RE, Vauthey JN, Members of the Cancer Committee, College of American Pathologists (2010) Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with carcinoma of the perihilar bile ducts. Arch Pathol Lab Med 134:e19–e24. https://doi.org/10.1043/1543-2165-134.4.e19 PubMed Washington MK, Berlin J, Branton PA, Burgart LJ, Carter DK, Compton CC, Fitzgibbons PL, Frankel WL, Jessup JM, Kakar S, Minsky B, Nakhleh RE, Vauthey JN, Members of the Cancer Committee, College of American Pathologists (2010) Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with carcinoma of the perihilar bile ducts. Arch Pathol Lab Med 134:e19–e24. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1043/​1543-2165-134.​4.​e19 PubMed
68.
go back to reference Evans DB, Varadhachary GR, Crane CH, Sun CC, Lee JE, Pisters PWT, Vauthey JN, Wang H, Cleary KR, Staerkel GA, Charnsangavej C, Lano EA, Ho L, Lenzi R, Abbruzzese JL, Wolff RA (2008) Preoperative gemcitabine-based chemoradiation for patients with resectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head. J Clin Oncol 26:3496–3502. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.15.8634 CrossRefPubMed Evans DB, Varadhachary GR, Crane CH, Sun CC, Lee JE, Pisters PWT, Vauthey JN, Wang H, Cleary KR, Staerkel GA, Charnsangavej C, Lano EA, Ho L, Lenzi R, Abbruzzese JL, Wolff RA (2008) Preoperative gemcitabine-based chemoradiation for patients with resectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head. J Clin Oncol 26:3496–3502. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1200/​JCO.​2007.​15.​8634 CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Dilemmas for the pathologist in the oncologic assessment of pancreatoduodenectomy specimens
An overview of different grossing approaches and the relevance of the histopathological characteristics in the oncologic assessment of pancreatoduodenectomy specimens
Authors
Eline Soer
Lodewijk Brosens
Marc van de Vijver
Frederike Dijk
Marie-Louise van Velthuysen
Arantza Farina-Sarasqueta
Hans Morreau
Johan Offerhaus
Lianne Koens
Joanne Verheij
Publication date
01-04-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Virchows Archiv / Issue 4/2018
Print ISSN: 0945-6317
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2307
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-018-2321-5

Other articles of this Issue 4/2018

Virchows Archiv 4/2018 Go to the issue