Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Hernia 3/2021

Open Access 01-06-2021 | Diastasis Recti | Original Article

Is mesh always necessary in every small umbilical hernia repair? Comparison of standardized primary sutured versus patch repair: retrospective cohort study

Authors: K. Mitura, M. Skolimowska-Rzewuska, A. Rzewuska, D. Wyrzykowska

Published in: Hernia | Issue 3/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

A retrospective analysis was carried out to compare the results of patch repair using ready-made, synthetic mesh (PR) and sutured repair (SR) based on standard protocols. The accumulated recurrence rate was accepted as the primary outcome. Pain at rest and during exercise, cosmetic effect and treatment satisfaction were chosen as the secondary endpoints.

Methods

Adult patients after elective, open surgical repair of a single, primary umbilical hernia < 2 cm in diameter were included. Patients with incarceration or strangulation, after previous umbilical hernia repair or other abdominal surgical interventions were excluded. In the SR group, single-layer sutures were placed using the short-stitch technique. In PR group, a 6.3-mm ready-made Parietene Ventral Patch (Medtronic) was used.

Results

161 patients (104 in PR and 57 in SR groups) were included in the study (22 months follow-up). Nine recurrences were observed [six in PR (5.8%) and three in SR group (5.2%)]. In PR group, three patients (2.9%) reported complaints at rest and none in SR group, while 18 patients (17.3%) in PR group reported pain during exercises and 7 (12.3%) in SR group.

Conclusion

For the smallest umbilical hernias, the use of dense fascia suturing (short-stitch technique) may be an effective alternative to patch repair techniques in patients with no additional risk factors for recurrence. The mesh patch repair method is associated with a significantly higher risk of postsurgical pain. Diastasis recti is a factor favoring umbilical hernia recurrence after both pure tissue repair and patch repair.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Henriksen NA, Montgomery A, Kaufmann R, Berrevoet F, East B, Fischer J, Hope W, Klassen D, Lorenz R, Renard Y, Garcia Urena MA, Simons MP (2020) European and Americas Hernia Societies (EHS and AHS). Guidelines for treatment of umbilical and epigastric hernias from the European Hernia Society and Americas Hernia Society. Br J Surg. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11489CrossRefPubMed Henriksen NA, Montgomery A, Kaufmann R, Berrevoet F, East B, Fischer J, Hope W, Klassen D, Lorenz R, Renard Y, Garcia Urena MA, Simons MP (2020) European and Americas Hernia Societies (EHS and AHS). Guidelines for treatment of umbilical and epigastric hernias from the European Hernia Society and Americas Hernia Society. Br J Surg. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​bjs.​11489CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Christoffersen MW, Helgstrand F, Rosenberg J et al (2013) Lower reoperation rate for recurrence after mesh versus sutured elective repair in small umbilical and epigastric hernias. A nationwide register study. World J Surg 37:2548–2552CrossRef Christoffersen MW, Helgstrand F, Rosenberg J et al (2013) Lower reoperation rate for recurrence after mesh versus sutured elective repair in small umbilical and epigastric hernias. A nationwide register study. World J Surg 37:2548–2552CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Westen M, Christoffersen MW, Jorgensen LN et al (2014) Chronic complaints after simple sutured repair for umbilical or epigastric hernias may be related to recurrence. Langenbecks Arch Surg 399:65–69CrossRef Westen M, Christoffersen MW, Jorgensen LN et al (2014) Chronic complaints after simple sutured repair for umbilical or epigastric hernias may be related to recurrence. Langenbecks Arch Surg 399:65–69CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Nguyen MT, Berger RL, Hicks SC, Davila JA, Li LT, Kao LS, Liang MK (2014) Comparison of outcomes of synthetic mesh vs suture repair of elective primary ventral herniorrhaphy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Surg 149(5):415–421CrossRef Nguyen MT, Berger RL, Hicks SC, Davila JA, Li LT, Kao LS, Liang MK (2014) Comparison of outcomes of synthetic mesh vs suture repair of elective primary ventral herniorrhaphy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Surg 149(5):415–421CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Venclauskas L, Jokubauskas M, Zilinskas J, Zviniene K, Kiudelis M (2017) Long-term follow-up results of umbilical hernia repair. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 12:350–356PubMedPubMedCentral Venclauskas L, Jokubauskas M, Zilinskas J, Zviniene K, Kiudelis M (2017) Long-term follow-up results of umbilical hernia repair. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 12:350–356PubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Kaufmann R, Halm JA, Eker HH, Klitsie PJ, Nieuwenhuizen J, van Geldere D, Simons MP, van der Harst E, van’t Riet M, van der Holt B, Kleinrensink GJ, Jeekel J, Lange JF (2018) Mesh versus suture repair of umbilical hernia in adults: a randomised, double-blind, controlled, multicentre trial. Lancet 3 391(10123):860–869. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30298-8CrossRef Kaufmann R, Halm JA, Eker HH, Klitsie PJ, Nieuwenhuizen J, van Geldere D, Simons MP, van der Harst E, van’t Riet M, van der Holt B, Kleinrensink GJ, Jeekel J, Lange JF (2018) Mesh versus suture repair of umbilical hernia in adults: a randomised, double-blind, controlled, multicentre trial. Lancet 3 391(10123):860–869. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S0140-6736(18)30298-8CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bisgaard T, Kaufmann R, Christoffersen MW, Strandfelt P, Gluud LL (2018) Lower risk of recurrence after mesh repair versus non-mesh sutured repair in open umbilical hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Scand J Surg 108:187–193CrossRef Bisgaard T, Kaufmann R, Christoffersen MW, Strandfelt P, Gluud LL (2018) Lower risk of recurrence after mesh repair versus non-mesh sutured repair in open umbilical hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Scand J Surg 108:187–193CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Porrero JL, Cano-Valderrama O, Villar S, Sánchez-Cabezudo C, Ramos B, Porrero B et al (2019) Umbilical hernia repair with composite prosthesis: a single-centre experience. Hernia 23:143–147CrossRef Porrero JL, Cano-Valderrama O, Villar S, Sánchez-Cabezudo C, Ramos B, Porrero B et al (2019) Umbilical hernia repair with composite prosthesis: a single-centre experience. Hernia 23:143–147CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Tollens T, Den Hondt M, Devroe K, Terry C, Speybroeck S, Aelvoet C et al (2011) Retrospective analysis of umbilical, epigastric, and small incisional hernia repair using the Ventralex™ hernia patch. Hernia 15:531–540CrossRef Tollens T, Den Hondt M, Devroe K, Terry C, Speybroeck S, Aelvoet C et al (2011) Retrospective analysis of umbilical, epigastric, and small incisional hernia repair using the Ventralex™ hernia patch. Hernia 15:531–540CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Dalenbäck J, Andersson C, Ribokas D, Rimbäck G (2013) Long-term follow-up after elective adult umbilical hernia repair: low recurrence rates also after non-mesh repairs. Hernia 17:493–497CrossRef Dalenbäck J, Andersson C, Ribokas D, Rimbäck G (2013) Long-term follow-up after elective adult umbilical hernia repair: low recurrence rates also after non-mesh repairs. Hernia 17:493–497CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Polat C, Dervisoglu A, Senyurek G, Bilgin M, Erzurumlu K, Ozkan K (2005) Umbilical hernia repair with the prolene hernia system. Am J Surg 190:61–64CrossRef Polat C, Dervisoglu A, Senyurek G, Bilgin M, Erzurumlu K, Ozkan K (2005) Umbilical hernia repair with the prolene hernia system. Am J Surg 190:61–64CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Arroyo A, García P, Pérez F, Andreu J, Candela F, Calpena R (2001) Randomized clinical trial comparing suture and mesh repair of umbilical hernia in adults. Br J Surg 88:1321–1323CrossRef Arroyo A, García P, Pérez F, Andreu J, Candela F, Calpena R (2001) Randomized clinical trial comparing suture and mesh repair of umbilical hernia in adults. Br J Surg 88:1321–1323CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Shrestha D, Shrestha A, Shrestha B (2019) Open mesh versus suture repair of umbilical hernia: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg 62:62–66CrossRef Shrestha D, Shrestha A, Shrestha B (2019) Open mesh versus suture repair of umbilical hernia: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg 62:62–66CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Mathes T, Walgenbach M, Siegel R (2016) Suture versus mesh repair in primary and incisional ventral hernias: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg 40:826–835CrossRef Mathes T, Walgenbach M, Siegel R (2016) Suture versus mesh repair in primary and incisional ventral hernias: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg 40:826–835CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Nguyen DH, Nguyen MT, Askenasy EP, Kao LS, Liang MK (2014) Primary fascial closure with laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: systematic review. World J Surg 38:3097–3104CrossRef Nguyen DH, Nguyen MT, Askenasy EP, Kao LS, Liang MK (2014) Primary fascial closure with laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: systematic review. World J Surg 38:3097–3104CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Köhler G, Luketina RR, Emmanuel K (2015) Sutured repair of primary small umbilical and epigastric hernias: concomitant rectus diastasis is a significant risk factor for recurrence. World J Surg 39:121–126CrossRef Köhler G, Luketina RR, Emmanuel K (2015) Sutured repair of primary small umbilical and epigastric hernias: concomitant rectus diastasis is a significant risk factor for recurrence. World J Surg 39:121–126CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Halm JA, Heisterkamp J, Veen HF, Weidema WF (2005) Long-term follow-up after umbilical hernia repair: are there risk factors for recurrence after simple and mesh repair. Hernia 9:334–337CrossRef Halm JA, Heisterkamp J, Veen HF, Weidema WF (2005) Long-term follow-up after umbilical hernia repair: are there risk factors for recurrence after simple and mesh repair. Hernia 9:334–337CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Muschaweck U (2003) Umbilical and epigastric hernia repair. Surg Clin North Am 83(5):1207–1221CrossRef Muschaweck U (2003) Umbilical and epigastric hernia repair. Surg Clin North Am 83(5):1207–1221CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Muysoms FE, Antoniou SA, Bury K, Campanelli G, Conze J, Cuccurullo D, de Beaux AC, Deerenberg EB, East B, Fortelny RH, Gillion JF, Henriksen NA, Israelsson L, Jairam A, Jänes A, Jeekel J, López-Cano M, Miserez M, Morales-Conde S, Sanders DL, Simons MP, Śmietański M, Venclauskas L, Berrevoet F, European Hernia Society (2015) European Hernia Society guidelines on the closure of abdominal wall incisions. Hernia 19(1):1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-014-1342-5CrossRef Muysoms FE, Antoniou SA, Bury K, Campanelli G, Conze J, Cuccurullo D, de Beaux AC, Deerenberg EB, East B, Fortelny RH, Gillion JF, Henriksen NA, Israelsson L, Jairam A, Jänes A, Jeekel J, López-Cano M, Miserez M, Morales-Conde S, Sanders DL, Simons MP, Śmietański M, Venclauskas L, Berrevoet F, European Hernia Society (2015) European Hernia Society guidelines on the closure of abdominal wall incisions. Hernia 19(1):1–24. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10029-014-1342-5CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Is mesh always necessary in every small umbilical hernia repair? Comparison of standardized primary sutured versus patch repair: retrospective cohort study
Authors
K. Mitura
M. Skolimowska-Rzewuska
A. Rzewuska
D. Wyrzykowska
Publication date
01-06-2021
Publisher
Springer Paris
Keyword
Diastasis Recti
Published in
Hernia / Issue 3/2021
Print ISSN: 1265-4906
Electronic ISSN: 1248-9204
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02170-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2021

Hernia 3/2021 Go to the issue