Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 4/2016

01-04-2016 | Original Scientific Report

Suture Versus Mesh Repair in Primary and Incisional Ventral Hernias: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Authors: Tim Mathes, Maren Walgenbach, Robert Siegel

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 4/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Today, ventral hernia repair is predominantly performed with meshes. There is no meta-analysis of high quality evidence that compares the results of suture to mesh repair. The objective of this systematic review with meta-analysis is to compare patient centred outcomes of suture versus mesh repair.

Methods

A systematic literature search was performed in EMBASE, MEDLINE and CENTRAL (inception to 06/2014). Furthermore a hand search was performed. RCTs comparing suture versus mesh repair in primary and incisional ventral hernia repair were included. Data on patient characteristics, interventions and results were extracted in standardized tables. Risk of bias was assessed with the cochrane risk of bias tool. Results of studies were pooled with a meta-analysis. All steps were performed by two reviewers. Discrepancies were discussed until a consensus.

Results

The search in the databases resulted in 1560 hits. After screening, 10 randomized controlled trials including 1215 patients satisfied all inclusion criteria. Risk of bias was moderate to high. The relative risk for recurrence was 0.36 [95% CI (0.27, 0.49); I 2 = 0; heterogeneity p = 0.70]. Other complications did not differ significantly. Results for chronic pain were heterogeneous across studies.

Conclusion

Mesh repair reduces the number of recurrences significantly. In patients without recurrence mesh repairs seem to be associated with a risk of chronic pain especially if the mesh is fixed sublay.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sauerland S, Walgenbach M, Habermalz B et al (2011) Laparoscopic versus open surgical techniques for ventral or incisional hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 16(3):CD007781 Sauerland S, Walgenbach M, Habermalz B et al (2011) Laparoscopic versus open surgical techniques for ventral or incisional hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 16(3):CD007781
2.
go back to reference Itani KM, Hur K, Kim LT et al (2010) Comparison of laparoscopic and open repair with mesh for the treatment of ventral incisional hernia: a randomized trial. Arch Surg 145(4):322–328CrossRefPubMed Itani KM, Hur K, Kim LT et al (2010) Comparison of laparoscopic and open repair with mesh for the treatment of ventral incisional hernia: a randomized trial. Arch Surg 145(4):322–328CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Abdel-Baki NA, Bessa SS, Abdel-Razek AH (2007) Comparison of prosthetic mesh repair and tissue repair in the emergency management of incarcerated para-umbilical hernia: a prospective randomized study. Hernia 11(2):163–167CrossRefPubMed Abdel-Baki NA, Bessa SS, Abdel-Razek AH (2007) Comparison of prosthetic mesh repair and tissue repair in the emergency management of incarcerated para-umbilical hernia: a prospective randomized study. Hernia 11(2):163–167CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Venclauskas L, Maleckas A, Kiudelis M (2010) One-year follow-up after incisional hernia treatment: results of a prospective randomized study. Hernia 14:575CrossRefPubMed Venclauskas L, Maleckas A, Kiudelis M (2010) One-year follow-up after incisional hernia treatment: results of a prospective randomized study. Hernia 14:575CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference DeMaria EJ, Moss JM, Sugerman HJ (2000) Laparoscopic intraperitoneal polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) prosthetic patch repair of ventral hernia. Prospective comparison to open prefascial polypropylene mesh repair. Surg Endosc 14(4):326–329CrossRefPubMed DeMaria EJ, Moss JM, Sugerman HJ (2000) Laparoscopic intraperitoneal polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) prosthetic patch repair of ventral hernia. Prospective comparison to open prefascial polypropylene mesh repair. Surg Endosc 14(4):326–329CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference LeBlanc KA, Booth WV (1993) Laparoscopic repair of incisional abdominal hernias using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene: preliminary findings. Surg Laparosc Endosc 3(1):39–41PubMed LeBlanc KA, Booth WV (1993) Laparoscopic repair of incisional abdominal hernias using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene: preliminary findings. Surg Laparosc Endosc 3(1):39–41PubMed
7.
go back to reference Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 151(4):264–269CrossRefPubMed Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 151(4):264–269CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Higgins JPT, Green S (eds) (2011). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions Version 5.1.0. The cochrane collaboration. http://www.cochrane-handbook.org. Accessed Mar 2011 Higgins JPT, Green S (eds) (2011). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions Version 5.1.0. The cochrane collaboration. http://www.​cochrane-handbook.​org. Accessed Mar 2011
9.
10.
go back to reference Hartling L, Hamm MP, Milne A et al (2013) Testing the risk of bias tool showed low reliability between individual reviewers and across consensus assessments of reviewer pairs. J Clin Epidemiol 66(9):973–981CrossRefPubMed Hartling L, Hamm MP, Milne A et al (2013) Testing the risk of bias tool showed low reliability between individual reviewers and across consensus assessments of reviewer pairs. J Clin Epidemiol 66(9):973–981CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Hartling L, Ospina M, Liang Y et al (2009) Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional study. BMJ 339:b4012PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Hartling L, Ospina M, Liang Y et al (2009) Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional study. BMJ 339:b4012PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Ammar SA (2010) Management of complicated umbilical hernias in cirrhotic patients using permanent mesh: randomized clinical trial. Hernia 14(1):35–38CrossRefPubMed Ammar SA (2010) Management of complicated umbilical hernias in cirrhotic patients using permanent mesh: randomized clinical trial. Hernia 14(1):35–38CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Arroyo A, Garcia P, Perez F et al (2001) Randomized clinical trial comparing suture and mesh repair of umbilical hernia in adults. Br J Surg 88(10):1321–1323CrossRefPubMed Arroyo A, Garcia P, Perez F et al (2001) Randomized clinical trial comparing suture and mesh repair of umbilical hernia in adults. Br J Surg 88(10):1321–1323CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Burger JW, Luijendijk RW, Hop WC et al (2004) Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg 240(4):578–583PubMedCentralPubMed Burger JW, Luijendijk RW, Hop WC et al (2004) Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg 240(4):578–583PubMedCentralPubMed
15.
go back to reference Korenkov M, Sauerland S, Arndt M et al (2002) Randomized clinical trial of suture repair, polypropylene mesh or autodermal hernioplasty for incisional hernia. Br J Surg 89(1):50–56CrossRefPubMed Korenkov M, Sauerland S, Arndt M et al (2002) Randomized clinical trial of suture repair, polypropylene mesh or autodermal hernioplasty for incisional hernia. Br J Surg 89(1):50–56CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Polat C, Dervisoglu A, Senyurek G et al (2005) Umbilical hernia repair with the prolene hernia system. Am J Surg 190(1):61–64CrossRefPubMed Polat C, Dervisoglu A, Senyurek G et al (2005) Umbilical hernia repair with the prolene hernia system. Am J Surg 190(1):61–64CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference de Vries Reilingh TS, van Goor H, Charbon JA et al (2007) Repair of giant midline abdominal wall hernias: “components separation technique” versus prosthetic repair : interim analysis of a randomized controlled trial. World J Surg 31(4):756–763. doi:10.1007/s00268-006-0502-x CrossRefPubMed de Vries Reilingh TS, van Goor H, Charbon JA et al (2007) Repair of giant midline abdominal wall hernias: “components separation technique” versus prosthetic repair : interim analysis of a randomized controlled trial. World J Surg 31(4):756–763. doi:10.​1007/​s00268-006-0502-x CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, van den Tol MP et al (2000) A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med 343(6):392–398CrossRefPubMed Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, van den Tol MP et al (2000) A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med 343(6):392–398CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Weber G, Baracs J, Horvath OP (2010) [“Onlay” mesh provides significantly better results than “sublay” reconstruction. Prospective randomized multicenter study of abdominal wall reconstruction with sutures only, or with surgical mesh–results of a five-years follow-up]. Magy Seb 63(5):302–311CrossRefPubMed Weber G, Baracs J, Horvath OP (2010) [“Onlay” mesh provides significantly better results than “sublay” reconstruction. Prospective randomized multicenter study of abdominal wall reconstruction with sutures only, or with surgical mesh–results of a five-years follow-up]. Magy Seb 63(5):302–311CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Lal K, Laghari ZH, Laghari AA et al (2012) A comparative study of anatomical repair versus mesh repair in paraumbilical hernia. Med Channel 19(2):110–113 Lal K, Laghari ZH, Laghari AA et al (2012) A comparative study of anatomical repair versus mesh repair in paraumbilical hernia. Med Channel 19(2):110–113
21.
go back to reference Nguyen MT, Berger RL, Hicks SC et al (2014) Comparison of outcomes of synthetic mesh vs suture repair of elective primary ventral herniorrhaphy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Surg 149(5):415–421CrossRefPubMed Nguyen MT, Berger RL, Hicks SC et al (2014) Comparison of outcomes of synthetic mesh vs suture repair of elective primary ventral herniorrhaphy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Surg 149(5):415–421CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference den Hartog D, Dur AH, Tuinebreijer WE et al (2008) Open surgical procedures for incisional hernias. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 16(3):CD006438 den Hartog D, Dur AH, Tuinebreijer WE et al (2008) Open surgical procedures for incisional hernias. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 16(3):CD006438
23.
go back to reference Aslani N, Brown CJ (2010) Does mesh offer an advantage over tissue in the open repair of umbilical hernias? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hernia 14(5):455–462CrossRefPubMed Aslani N, Brown CJ (2010) Does mesh offer an advantage over tissue in the open repair of umbilical hernias? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hernia 14(5):455–462CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Timmermans L, de Goede B, van Dijk SM et al (2014) Meta-analysis of sublay versus onlay mesh repair in incisional hernia surgery. Am J Surg 207(6):980–988CrossRefPubMed Timmermans L, de Goede B, van Dijk SM et al (2014) Meta-analysis of sublay versus onlay mesh repair in incisional hernia surgery. Am J Surg 207(6):980–988CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Sajid MS, Parampalli U, McFall MR (2013) A meta-analysis comparing tacker mesh fixation with suture mesh fixation in laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair. Hernia 17(2):159–166CrossRefPubMed Sajid MS, Parampalli U, McFall MR (2013) A meta-analysis comparing tacker mesh fixation with suture mesh fixation in laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair. Hernia 17(2):159–166CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Suture Versus Mesh Repair in Primary and Incisional Ventral Hernias: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Authors
Tim Mathes
Maren Walgenbach
Robert Siegel
Publication date
01-04-2016
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 4/2016
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3311-2

Other articles of this Issue 4/2016

World Journal of Surgery 4/2016 Go to the issue