Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 9/2017

01-09-2017

Diagnostic value of fourth-generation iterative reconstruction algorithm with low-dose CT protocol in assessment of mesorectal fascia invasion in rectal cancer: comparison with magnetic resonance

Authors: Davide Ippolito, Silvia Girolama Drago, C. R. Talei Franzesi, Alessandra Casiraghi, Sandro Sironi

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 9/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of the article is to compare the diagnostic performance about radiation dose and image quality of low-dose CT with iterative reconstruction algorithm (iDose4) and standard-dose CT in the assessment of mesorectal fascia (MRF) invasion in rectal cancer patients.

Materials and methods

Ninety-one patients with biopsy-proven primary rectal adenocarcinoma underwent CT staging: 42 underwent low-dose CT, 49 underwent standard CT protocol. Low-dose contrast-enhanced MDCT scans were performed on a 256 (ICT, Philips) scanner using 120 kV, automated mAs modulation, iDose4 iterative reconstruction algorithm. Standard-dose MDCT scans were performed on the same scanner with 120 kV, 200–300 mAs. All patients underwent a standard lower abdomen MR study (on 1.5T magnet), including multiplanar sequences, considered as reference standard. Diagnostic accuracy of MRF assessment was determined on CT images for both CT protocols and compared with MRI images. Dose-length product (DLP) and CT dose index (CTDI) calculated for both groups were compared and statistically analyzed.

Results

Low-dose protocol with iDose4 showed high diagnostic quality in assessment of MRF with significant reduction (23%; p = 0.0081) of radiation dose (DLP 2453.47) compared to standard-dose examination (DLP 3194.32).

Conclusions

Low-dose protocol combined with iDose4 reconstruction algorithm offers high-quality images, obtaining significant radiation dose reduction, useful in the evaluation of MRF involvement in rectal cancer patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kulinna C, Eibel R, Matzek W, et al. (2004) Original report C staging of rectal cancer: diagnostic potential of multiplanar reconstructions with MDCT. AJR 183:421–427CrossRefPubMed Kulinna C, Eibel R, Matzek W, et al. (2004) Original report C staging of rectal cancer: diagnostic potential of multiplanar reconstructions with MDCT. AJR 183:421–427CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Beets-Tan RGH, Beets GL, Borstlap ACW, et al. (2000) Preoperative assessment of local tumor extent in advanced rectal cancer: CT or high-resolution MRI? Abdom Imaging 25:533–541CrossRefPubMed Beets-Tan RGH, Beets GL, Borstlap ACW, et al. (2000) Preoperative assessment of local tumor extent in advanced rectal cancer: CT or high-resolution MRI? Abdom Imaging 25:533–541CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Sinha R, Verma R, Rajesh A, Richards CJ (2006) Diagnostic value of multidetector row CT in rectal cancer staging: comparison of multiplanar and axial images with histopathology. Clin Radiol 61:924–931CrossRefPubMed Sinha R, Verma R, Rajesh A, Richards CJ (2006) Diagnostic value of multidetector row CT in rectal cancer staging: comparison of multiplanar and axial images with histopathology. Clin Radiol 61:924–931CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Ippolito D, Drago SG, Franzesi CT, et al. (2016) Rectal cancer staging: multidetector-row computed tomography diagnostic accuracy in assessment of mesorectal fascia invasion. World J Gastroenterol 22:4891–4900CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ippolito D, Drago SG, Franzesi CT, et al. (2016) Rectal cancer staging: multidetector-row computed tomography diagnostic accuracy in assessment of mesorectal fascia invasion. World J Gastroenterol 22:4891–4900CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Ahmetoğlu A, Cansu A, Baki D, et al. (2011) MDCT with multiplanar reconstruction in the preoperative local staging of rectal tumor. Abdom Imaging 36:31–37CrossRefPubMed Ahmetoğlu A, Cansu A, Baki D, et al. (2011) MDCT with multiplanar reconstruction in the preoperative local staging of rectal tumor. Abdom Imaging 36:31–37CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Arapakis I, Efstathopoulos E, Tsitsia V, et al. (2014) Using “iDose4” iterative reconstruction algorithm in adults’ chest-abdomen-pelvis CT examinations: effect on image quality in relation to patient radiation exposure. Br J Radiol 87(1036):20130613CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Arapakis I, Efstathopoulos E, Tsitsia V, et al. (2014) Using “iDose4” iterative reconstruction algorithm in adults’ chest-abdomen-pelvis CT examinations: effect on image quality in relation to patient radiation exposure. Br J Radiol 87(1036):20130613CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography—An increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284CrossRefPubMed Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography—An increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP, et al. (2012) Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet (London, England) 380:499–505CrossRef Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP, et al. (2012) Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet (London, England) 380:499–505CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Sodickson A (2012) Strategies for reducing radiation exposure in multi-detector row CT. Radiol Clin North Am 50:1–14CrossRefPubMed Sodickson A (2012) Strategies for reducing radiation exposure in multi-detector row CT. Radiol Clin North Am 50:1–14CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Gonzalez-Guindalini FD, Ferreira Botelho MP, Töre HG, et al. (2013) MDCT of chest, abdomen, and pelvis using attenuation-based automated tube voltage selection in combination with iterative reconstruction: an intrapatient study of radiation dose and image quality. Am J Roentgenol 201:1075–1082CrossRef Gonzalez-Guindalini FD, Ferreira Botelho MP, Töre HG, et al. (2013) MDCT of chest, abdomen, and pelvis using attenuation-based automated tube voltage selection in combination with iterative reconstruction: an intrapatient study of radiation dose and image quality. Am J Roentgenol 201:1075–1082CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL, et al. (2004) Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology 230:619–628CrossRefPubMed Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL, et al. (2004) Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology 230:619–628CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Ippolito D, Lombardi S, Trattenero C, et al. (2016) CT enterography: diagnostic value of 4th generation iterative reconstruction algorithm in low dose studies in comparison with standard dose protocol for follow-up of patients with Crohn’s disease. Eur J Radiol 85:268–273CrossRefPubMed Ippolito D, Lombardi S, Trattenero C, et al. (2016) CT enterography: diagnostic value of 4th generation iterative reconstruction algorithm in low dose studies in comparison with standard dose protocol for follow-up of patients with Crohn’s disease. Eur J Radiol 85:268–273CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Lee SJ, Park SH, Kim AY, et al. (2011) A prospective comparison of standard-dose CT enterography and 50% reduced-dose CT enterography with and without noise reduction for evaluating Crohn disease. Am J Roentgenol 197:50–57CrossRef Lee SJ, Park SH, Kim AY, et al. (2011) A prospective comparison of standard-dose CT enterography and 50% reduced-dose CT enterography with and without noise reduction for evaluating Crohn disease. Am J Roentgenol 197:50–57CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Mc Collough C, Primak NA, Braun N, et al. (2009) Strategies for reducing radiation dose. Radiol Clin North 47:27–40CrossRef Mc Collough C, Primak NA, Braun N, et al. (2009) Strategies for reducing radiation dose. Radiol Clin North 47:27–40CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Coakley FV, Gould R, Yeh BM, Arenson RL (2011) CT radiation dose: What can you do right now in your practice? Am J Roentgenol 196:619–625CrossRef Coakley FV, Gould R, Yeh BM, Arenson RL (2011) CT radiation dose: What can you do right now in your practice? Am J Roentgenol 196:619–625CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Silva AC, Lawder HJ, Hara A, et al. (2010) Innovations in CT dose reduction strategy: application of the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm. Am J Roentgenol 194:191–199CrossRef Silva AC, Lawder HJ, Hara A, et al. (2010) Innovations in CT dose reduction strategy: application of the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm. Am J Roentgenol 194:191–199CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Khawaja RDA, Singh S, Blake M, et al. (2015) Ultra-low dose abdominal MDCT: using a knowledge-based Iterative Model Reconstruction technique for substantial dose reduction in a prospective clinical study. Eur J Radiol 84:2–10CrossRefPubMed Khawaja RDA, Singh S, Blake M, et al. (2015) Ultra-low dose abdominal MDCT: using a knowledge-based Iterative Model Reconstruction technique for substantial dose reduction in a prospective clinical study. Eur J Radiol 84:2–10CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Maldjian PD, Goldman AR (2013) Reducing radiation dose in body CT: a primer on dose metrics and key CT technical parameters. Am J Roentgenol 200:741–747CrossRef Maldjian PD, Goldman AR (2013) Reducing radiation dose in body CT: a primer on dose metrics and key CT technical parameters. Am J Roentgenol 200:741–747CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Beets-Tan RGH, Lambregts DMJ, Maas M, et al. (2013) Magnetic resonance imaging for the clinical management of rectal cancer patients: recommendations from the 2012 European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) consensus meeting. Eur Radiol 23:2522–2531CrossRefPubMed Beets-Tan RGH, Lambregts DMJ, Maas M, et al. (2013) Magnetic resonance imaging for the clinical management of rectal cancer patients: recommendations from the 2012 European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) consensus meeting. Eur Radiol 23:2522–2531CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Raman SP, Chen Y, Fishman EK (2015) Evolution of imaging in rectal cancer: multimodality imaging with MDCT, MRI, and PET. J Gastrointest Oncol 6:172–184PubMedPubMedCentral Raman SP, Chen Y, Fishman EK (2015) Evolution of imaging in rectal cancer: multimodality imaging with MDCT, MRI, and PET. J Gastrointest Oncol 6:172–184PubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Ploussi A, Alexopoulou E, Economopoulos N, et al. (2014) Patient radiation exposure and image quality evaluation with the use of iDose4 iterative reconstruction algorithm in chest—abdomen—pelvis Ct examinations. Radiat Prot Dosim 158:399–405CrossRef Ploussi A, Alexopoulou E, Economopoulos N, et al. (2014) Patient radiation exposure and image quality evaluation with the use of iDose4 iterative reconstruction algorithm in chest—abdomen—pelvis Ct examinations. Radiat Prot Dosim 158:399–405CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Lee CH, Goo JM, Ye HJ, et al. (2008) Radiation dose modulation techniques in the multidetector CT era: from basics to practice. Radiographics 28:1451–1459CrossRefPubMed Lee CH, Goo JM, Ye HJ, et al. (2008) Radiation dose modulation techniques in the multidetector CT era: from basics to practice. Radiographics 28:1451–1459CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Jhaveri KS, Hosseini-Nik H (2015) MRI of rectal cancer: an overview and update on recent advances. Am J Roentgenol 205:42–55CrossRef Jhaveri KS, Hosseini-Nik H (2015) MRI of rectal cancer: an overview and update on recent advances. Am J Roentgenol 205:42–55CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Chen CY, Hsu JS, Jaw TS, et al. (2015) Lowering radiation dose during dedicated colorectal cancer MDCT: comparison of low tube voltage and sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction at 80 kVp versus blended dual-energy images in a population of patients with low body mass index. Abdom Imaging 40:2867–2876CrossRefPubMed Chen CY, Hsu JS, Jaw TS, et al. (2015) Lowering radiation dose during dedicated colorectal cancer MDCT: comparison of low tube voltage and sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction at 80 kVp versus blended dual-energy images in a population of patients with low body mass index. Abdom Imaging 40:2867–2876CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Koteshwar P, Kakkar C, Sripathi S, et al. (2016) Low dose MDCT with tube current modulation: role in detection of urolithiasis and patient effective dose reduction. J Clin Diagn Res 10:TC01–TC05PubMedPubMedCentral Koteshwar P, Kakkar C, Sripathi S, et al. (2016) Low dose MDCT with tube current modulation: role in detection of urolithiasis and patient effective dose reduction. J Clin Diagn Res 10:TC01–TC05PubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Mulkens TH, Marchal P, Daineffe S, et al. (2007) Comparison of low-dose with standard-dose multidetector CT in cervical spine trauma. Am J Neuroradiol 28:1444–1450CrossRefPubMed Mulkens TH, Marchal P, Daineffe S, et al. (2007) Comparison of low-dose with standard-dose multidetector CT in cervical spine trauma. Am J Neuroradiol 28:1444–1450CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Maxfield MW, Schuster KM, McGillicuddy EA, et al. (2012) Impact of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction on radiation dose in evaluation of trauma patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 73:1406–1411CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Maxfield MW, Schuster KM, McGillicuddy EA, et al. (2012) Impact of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction on radiation dose in evaluation of trauma patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 73:1406–1411CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Kaur H, Choi H, You YN, et al. (2012) MR imaging for preoperative evaluation of primary rectal cancer: practical considerations. Radiographics 32:389–409CrossRefPubMed Kaur H, Choi H, You YN, et al. (2012) MR imaging for preoperative evaluation of primary rectal cancer: practical considerations. Radiographics 32:389–409CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Leipsic J, Nguyen G, Brown J, et al. (2010) A prospective evaluation of dose reduction and image quality in chest CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. Am J Roentgenol 195:1095–1099CrossRef Leipsic J, Nguyen G, Brown J, et al. (2010) A prospective evaluation of dose reduction and image quality in chest CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. Am J Roentgenol 195:1095–1099CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Diagnostic value of fourth-generation iterative reconstruction algorithm with low-dose CT protocol in assessment of mesorectal fascia invasion in rectal cancer: comparison with magnetic resonance
Authors
Davide Ippolito
Silvia Girolama Drago
C. R. Talei Franzesi
Alessandra Casiraghi
Sandro Sironi
Publication date
01-09-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 9/2017
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1138-z

Other articles of this Issue 9/2017

Abdominal Radiology 9/2017 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.