Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 5/2015

01-05-2015 | Original Article

Diagnostic Performance of Fecal Immunochemical Test and Sigmoidoscopy for Advanced Right-Sided Colorectal Neoplasms

Authors: Inés Castro, Pamela Estevez, Joaquín Cubiella, Vicent Hernandez, Carmen González-Mao, Concepción Rivera, Felipe Iglesias, Lucía Cid, Santiago Soto, Luisa de-Castro, Pablo Vega, Jose Antonio Hermo, Ramiro Macenlle, Alfonso Martínez, Estela Cid, Inés Gil, Mikel Larzabal, Luis Bujanda, Antoni Castells, the COLONPREV study investigators

Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Issue 5/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Colorectal cancer screening effect on right-sided colorectal neoplasia is limited. We compared fecal immunochemical test and simulated sigmoidoscopy diagnostic accuracy for advanced right-sided neoplasia detection.

Methods

We analyzed 1,292 individuals with complete screening colonoscopy with a fecal immunochemical test determination before colonoscopy. Sigmoidoscopy and “hybrid strategy” (sigmoidoscopy or fecal hemoglobin concentration ≥20 µg hemoglobin/g) diagnostic yield were simulated according to UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy, Screening for COlon REctum (SCORE), and Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention (NORCCAP) trials criteria to complete colonic examination. We compared sensitivity and specificity of both strategies and of “hybrid strategy” for advanced right-sided neoplasia with McNemar test.

Results

An advanced right-sided neoplasia was detected in 47 (3.6 %) subjects. A fecal hemoglobin concentration ≥20 µg hemoglobin/g was determined in 6.6 % of the subjects and 10.1, 12.7, and 23.5 % met UK, SCORE, and NORCCAP criteria, respectively. Fecal immunochemical test was statistically more specific than sigmoidoscopy strategies (93.8 %, UK 90.3 %, SCORE 87.7 %, NORCCAP 77.8 %; p < 0.001). In contrast, fecal immunochemical test sensitivity for advanced right-sided neoplasia (17 %) was not statistically different than UK (21.3 %; p = 0.7) or SCORE (23.4 %; p = 0.5), although it was inferior than NORCCAP strategy (42.5 %; p < 0.001). Adding fecal immunochemical test to sigmoidoscopy increased number of positives (8.5–25.7 %), sensitivity (10–30 %), and significantly reduced advanced right-sided neoplasia specificity (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Fecal immunochemical test and sigmoidoscopy diagnostic yield for advanced right-sided neoplasia are low. Fecal immunochemical test is more specific than sigmoidoscopy but less sensitive than sigmoidoscopy according to NORCCAP criteria.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380:2095–2128.CrossRefPubMed Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380:2095–2128.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Hewitson P, Glasziou P, Watson E, et al. Cochrane systematic review of colorectal cancer screening using the fecal occult blood test (hemoccult): an update. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:1541–1549.CrossRefPubMed Hewitson P, Glasziou P, Watson E, et al. Cochrane systematic review of colorectal cancer screening using the fecal occult blood test (hemoccult): an update. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:1541–1549.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:1570–1595.CrossRefPubMed Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:1570–1595.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Atkin WS, Edwards R, Kralj-Hans I, et al. Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet.. 2010;375:1624–1633.CrossRefPubMed Atkin WS, Edwards R, Kralj-Hans I, et al. Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet.. 2010;375:1624–1633.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Holme O, Bretthauer M, Fretheim A, et al. Flexible sigmoidoscopy versus fecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screening in asymptomatic individuals. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2013;9:CD009259.PubMed Holme O, Bretthauer M, Fretheim A, et al. Flexible sigmoidoscopy versus fecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screening in asymptomatic individuals. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2013;9:CD009259.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Sharp L, Tilson L, Whyte S, et al. Cost-effectiveness of population-based screening for colorectal cancer: a comparison of guaiac-based fecal occult blood testing, fecal immunochemical testing and flexible sigmoidoscopy. Br J Cancer. 2012;106:805–816.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Sharp L, Tilson L, Whyte S, et al. Cost-effectiveness of population-based screening for colorectal cancer: a comparison of guaiac-based fecal occult blood testing, fecal immunochemical testing and flexible sigmoidoscopy. Br J Cancer. 2012;106:805–816.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
8.
go back to reference Elmunzer BJ, Hayward RA, Schoenfeld PS, et al. Effect of flexible sigmoidoscopy-based screening on incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS Med. 2012;9:e1001352.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Elmunzer BJ, Hayward RA, Schoenfeld PS, et al. Effect of flexible sigmoidoscopy-based screening on incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS Med. 2012;9:e1001352.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
9.
go back to reference Imperiale TF, Wagner DR, Lin CY, Larkin, et al. Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colorectal findings. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:169–174.CrossRefPubMed Imperiale TF, Wagner DR, Lin CY, Larkin, et al. Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colorectal findings. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:169–174.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Segnan N, Armaroli P, Bonelli L, et al. Once-only sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: follow-up findings of the Italian Randomized Controlled Trial–SCORE. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103:1310–1322.CrossRefPubMed Segnan N, Armaroli P, Bonelli L, et al. Once-only sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: follow-up findings of the Italian Randomized Controlled Trial–SCORE. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103:1310–1322.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Schoen RE, Pinsky PF, Weissfeld JL, et al. Colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality with screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:2345–2357.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Schoen RE, Pinsky PF, Weissfeld JL, et al. Colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality with screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:2345–2357.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
12.
go back to reference Park DI, Ryu S, Kim Y-H, et al. Comparison of guaiac-based and quantitative immunochemical fecal occult blood testing in a population at average risk undergoing colorectal cancer screening. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:2017–2025.CrossRefPubMed Park DI, Ryu S, Kim Y-H, et al. Comparison of guaiac-based and quantitative immunochemical fecal occult blood testing in a population at average risk undergoing colorectal cancer screening. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:2017–2025.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Hol L, van Leerdam ME, van Ballegooijen M, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer: randomised trial comparing guaiac-based and immunochemical fecal occult blood testing and flexible sigmoidoscopy. Gut. 2010;59:62–68.CrossRefPubMed Hol L, van Leerdam ME, van Ballegooijen M, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer: randomised trial comparing guaiac-based and immunochemical fecal occult blood testing and flexible sigmoidoscopy. Gut. 2010;59:62–68.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Haug U, Knudsen AB, Brenner H, et al. Is fecal occult blood testing more sensitive for left-versus right-sided colorectal neoplasia? A systematic literature review. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2011;11:605–616.CrossRefPubMed Haug U, Knudsen AB, Brenner H, et al. Is fecal occult blood testing more sensitive for left-versus right-sided colorectal neoplasia? A systematic literature review. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2011;11:605–616.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Segnan N, Senore C, Andreoni B, et al. Randomized trial of different screening strategies for colorectal cancer: patient response and detection rates. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:347–357.CrossRefPubMed Segnan N, Senore C, Andreoni B, et al. Randomized trial of different screening strategies for colorectal cancer: patient response and detection rates. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:347–357.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Segnan N, Senore C, Andreoni B, et al. Comparing attendance and detection rate of colonoscopy with sigmoidoscopy and FIT for colorectal cancer screening. Gastroenterology.. 2007;132:2304–2312.CrossRefPubMed Segnan N, Senore C, Andreoni B, et al. Comparing attendance and detection rate of colonoscopy with sigmoidoscopy and FIT for colorectal cancer screening. Gastroenterology.. 2007;132:2304–2312.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Littlejohn C, Hilton S, Macfarlane GJ, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence for flexible sigmoidoscopy as a screening method for the prevention of colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2012;99:1488–1500.CrossRefPubMed Littlejohn C, Hilton S, Macfarlane GJ, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence for flexible sigmoidoscopy as a screening method for the prevention of colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2012;99:1488–1500.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Hernandez V, Cubiella J, Gonzalez-Mao MC, et al. Fecal immunochemical test accuracy in average-risk colorectal cancer screening. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:1038–1047.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Hernandez V, Cubiella J, Gonzalez-Mao MC, et al. Fecal immunochemical test accuracy in average-risk colorectal cancer screening. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:1038–1047.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
19.
go back to reference Castro I, Cubiella J, Rivera C, et al. Fecal immunochemical test accuracy in familial risk colorectal cancer screening. Int J Cancer. 2014;134:367–375.CrossRefPubMed Castro I, Cubiella J, Rivera C, et al. Fecal immunochemical test accuracy in familial risk colorectal cancer screening. Int J Cancer. 2014;134:367–375.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Quintero E, Castells A, Bujanda L, et al. Colonoscopy versus fecal immunochemical testing in colorectal-cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:697–706.CrossRefPubMed Quintero E, Castells A, Bujanda L, et al. Colonoscopy versus fecal immunochemical testing in colorectal-cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:697–706.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Jover R, Herráiz M, Alarcón O, et al. Clinical practice guidelines: quality of colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening. Endoscopy. 2012;44:444–451.CrossRefPubMed Jover R, Herráiz M, Alarcón O, et al. Clinical practice guidelines: quality of colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening. Endoscopy. 2012;44:444–451.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Bretthauer M, Gondal G, Larsen K, et al. Design, organization and management of a controlled population screening study for detection of colorectal neoplasia: attendance rates in the NORCCAP study (Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention). Scand J Gastroenterol. 2002;37:568–573.CrossRefPubMed Bretthauer M, Gondal G, Larsen K, et al. Design, organization and management of a controlled population screening study for detection of colorectal neoplasia: attendance rates in the NORCCAP study (Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention). Scand J Gastroenterol. 2002;37:568–573.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Castells A, Bessa X, Quintero E, et al. Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms according to distal colorectal findings: comparison of sigmoidoscopy-based strategies. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105:878–886.CrossRefPubMed Castells A, Bessa X, Quintero E, et al. Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms according to distal colorectal findings: comparison of sigmoidoscopy-based strategies. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105:878–886.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Castells A, Quintero E, Alvarez C, el al. Rate of detection of advanced neoplasms in proximal colon by simulated sigmoidoscopy vs fecal immunochemical tests. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;12:1708–1716.CrossRefPubMed Castells A, Quintero E, Alvarez C, el al. Rate of detection of advanced neoplasms in proximal colon by simulated sigmoidoscopy vs fecal immunochemical tests. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;12:1708–1716.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Cubiella J, Salve M, Díaz-Ondina M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fecal immunochemical test for colorectal cancer in symptomatic patients: comparison with NICE and SIGN referral criteria. Colorectal Dis. 2014;16:O273–O282.CrossRefPubMed Cubiella J, Salve M, Díaz-Ondina M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fecal immunochemical test for colorectal cancer in symptomatic patients: comparison with NICE and SIGN referral criteria. Colorectal Dis. 2014;16:O273–O282.CrossRefPubMed
27.
28.
go back to reference Ogino S, Kawasaki T, Kirkner GJ, et al. Molecular correlates with MGMT promoter methylation and silencing support CpG island methylator phenotype-low (CIMP-low) in colorectal cancer. Gut. 2007;56:1564–1571.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Ogino S, Kawasaki T, Kirkner GJ, et al. Molecular correlates with MGMT promoter methylation and silencing support CpG island methylator phenotype-low (CIMP-low) in colorectal cancer. Gut. 2007;56:1564–1571.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
29.
go back to reference Taupin DR, Corbett M. A comparison of colorectal neoplasia screening tests: a multicentre community-based study of the impact of consumer choice. Med J Aust. 2006;185:238–239.PubMed Taupin DR, Corbett M. A comparison of colorectal neoplasia screening tests: a multicentre community-based study of the impact of consumer choice. Med J Aust. 2006;185:238–239.PubMed
30.
go back to reference Gondal G, Grotmol T, Hofstad B, et al. The Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention (NORCCAP) screening study: baseline findings and implementations for clinical work-up in age groups 50–64 years. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2003;38:635–642.CrossRefPubMed Gondal G, Grotmol T, Hofstad B, et al. The Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention (NORCCAP) screening study: baseline findings and implementations for clinical work-up in age groups 50–64 years. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2003;38:635–642.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Hoff G, Grotmol T, Skovlund E, et al. Risk of colorectal cancer seven years after flexible sigmoidoscopy screening: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2009;338:b1846.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Hoff G, Grotmol T, Skovlund E, et al. Risk of colorectal cancer seven years after flexible sigmoidoscopy screening: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2009;338:b1846.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
32.
go back to reference Zauber AG, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Knudsen AB, et al. Evaluating test strategies for colorectal cancer screening: a decision analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149:659–669.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Zauber AG, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Knudsen AB, et al. Evaluating test strategies for colorectal cancer screening: a decision analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149:659–669.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
33.
go back to reference Kato J, Morikawa T, Kuriyama M, et al. Combination of sigmoidoscopy and a fecal immunochemical test to detect proximal colon neoplasia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol.. 2009;7:1341–1346.CrossRefPubMed Kato J, Morikawa T, Kuriyama M, et al. Combination of sigmoidoscopy and a fecal immunochemical test to detect proximal colon neoplasia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol.. 2009;7:1341–1346.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Wang YR, Cangemi JR, Loftus EV, et al. Increased odds of interval distal colorectal cancer after flexible sigmoidoscopy compared with colonoscopy in older patients in the United States: a population-based analysis of the SEER-Medicare linked database, 2001–2005. Mayo Clin Proc. 2013;88:471–478.CrossRefPubMed Wang YR, Cangemi JR, Loftus EV, et al. Increased odds of interval distal colorectal cancer after flexible sigmoidoscopy compared with colonoscopy in older patients in the United States: a population-based analysis of the SEER-Medicare linked database, 2001–2005. Mayo Clin Proc. 2013;88:471–478.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Imperiale TF, Glowinski EA, Lin-Cooper C, et al. Tailoring colorectal cancer screening by considering risk of advanced proximal neoplasia. Am J Med. 2012;125:1181–1187.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Imperiale TF, Glowinski EA, Lin-Cooper C, et al. Tailoring colorectal cancer screening by considering risk of advanced proximal neoplasia. Am J Med. 2012;125:1181–1187.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
Metadata
Title
Diagnostic Performance of Fecal Immunochemical Test and Sigmoidoscopy for Advanced Right-Sided Colorectal Neoplasms
Authors
Inés Castro
Pamela Estevez
Joaquín Cubiella
Vicent Hernandez
Carmen González-Mao
Concepción Rivera
Felipe Iglesias
Lucía Cid
Santiago Soto
Luisa de-Castro
Pablo Vega
Jose Antonio Hermo
Ramiro Macenlle
Alfonso Martínez
Estela Cid
Inés Gil
Mikel Larzabal
Luis Bujanda
Antoni Castells
the COLONPREV study investigators
Publication date
01-05-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Issue 5/2015
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-014-3434-6

Other articles of this Issue 5/2015

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 5/2015 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.