Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 7/2019

01-07-2019 | Dexamethasone | Interventional

Pain reduction after lumbar epidural injections using particulate versus non-particulate steroids: intensity of the baseline pain matters

Authors: Marek Tagowski, Zbigniew Lewandowski, Jürg Hodler, Thomas Spiegel, Gerhard W. Goerres

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 7/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To compare pain relief after CT-guided lumbar epidural steroid injections (ESI) using particulate (triamcinolone) and non-particulate (dexamethasone) steroids, and to explore factors affecting the effectiveness of both steroid types.

Methods

This retrospective observational study included 806 patients with lumbar radiculopathy and corresponding MRI or CT abnormalities of the lumbar spine, who were matched using the propensity score method, yielding two cohorts of 209 patients each. Pain intensity was evaluated prior to the procedure using a pain numerical rating scale (NRS) with range 0–10. Reevaluation took place 1 day and 4 weeks post-injection. Logistic regression analysis and cubic splines applied to generalized additive models were implemented to assess the differences in pain reduction after ESI in the analyzed patient groups.

Results

Four weeks post-injection, the overall chance of ≥ 50% pain reduction was lower in the dexamethasone group than that in the triamcinolone group (odds ratio [OR] = 0.55; p < 0.012). In the dexamethasone cohort, the intensity of baseline pain and the presence of a herniated intervertebral disc in the infiltrated segment were both significant and independent predictors of ≥ 50% pain relief. Patients with baseline NRS score ≥ 7 points had markedly less chance of ≥ 50% pain relief than patients with NRS score < 7 (OR = 0.53; p < 0.032), whereas disc herniation increased the chances more than twofold (OR = 2.29; p < 0.044). There was no significant correlation between the effectiveness of triamcinolone and any analyzed concomitant variables.

Conclusions

Triamcinolone was superior for lumbar radiculopathy of severe intensity. For mild to moderate pain, no benefit of using triamcinolone over dexamethasone was found. The effectiveness of dexamethasone was lower for stenotic spinal lesions than for disc herniation.

Key Points

• Triamcinolone is superior to dexamethasone for epidural treatment of severe lumbar radiculopathy.
• For mild to moderate pain, dexamethasone could be equally effective.
• Dexamethasone reduces pain caused by disc herniation much better than it does to pain caused by fixed stenotic spinal lesions.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Friedly J, Chan L, Deyo R (2007) Increases in lumbosacral injections in the Medicare population, 1994 to 2001. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:1754–1760CrossRef Friedly J, Chan L, Deyo R (2007) Increases in lumbosacral injections in the Medicare population, 1994 to 2001. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:1754–1760CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Manchikanti L, Pampati V, Boswell MV, Smith HS, Hirsch JA (2010) Analysis of the growth of epidural injections and costs in the Medicare population: a comparative evaluation of 1997, 2002, and 2006 data. Pain Physician 13:199–212PubMed Manchikanti L, Pampati V, Boswell MV, Smith HS, Hirsch JA (2010) Analysis of the growth of epidural injections and costs in the Medicare population: a comparative evaluation of 1997, 2002, and 2006 data. Pain Physician 13:199–212PubMed
3.
go back to reference Manchikanti L, Pampati V, Falco FJ, Hirsch JA (2013) Assessment of the growth of epidural injections in the Medicare population from 2000 to 2011. Pain Physician 16:E349–E364PubMed Manchikanti L, Pampati V, Falco FJ, Hirsch JA (2013) Assessment of the growth of epidural injections in the Medicare population from 2000 to 2011. Pain Physician 16:E349–E364PubMed
4.
go back to reference Manchikanti L, Pampati V, Falco FJ, Hirsch JA (2015) An updated assessment of utilization of interventional pain management techniques in the Medicare population: 2000–2013. Pain Physician 18:E115–E127PubMed Manchikanti L, Pampati V, Falco FJ, Hirsch JA (2015) An updated assessment of utilization of interventional pain management techniques in the Medicare population: 2000–2013. Pain Physician 18:E115–E127PubMed
5.
go back to reference MacMahon PJ, Eustace SJ, Kavanagh EC (2009) Injectable corticosteroid and local anesthetic preparations: a review for radiologists. Radiology 252:647–661CrossRefPubMed MacMahon PJ, Eustace SJ, Kavanagh EC (2009) Injectable corticosteroid and local anesthetic preparations: a review for radiologists. Radiology 252:647–661CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Racoosin JA, Seymour SM, Cascio L, Gill R (2015) Serious neurologic events after epidural glucocorticoid injection — the FDA’s risk assessment. N Engl J Med 373:2299–2301CrossRefPubMed Racoosin JA, Seymour SM, Cascio L, Gill R (2015) Serious neurologic events after epidural glucocorticoid injection — the FDA’s risk assessment. N Engl J Med 373:2299–2301CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Manchikanti L, Candido KD, Singh V et al (2014) Epidural steroid warning controversy still dogging FDA. Pain Physician 17:E451–E474PubMed Manchikanti L, Candido KD, Singh V et al (2014) Epidural steroid warning controversy still dogging FDA. Pain Physician 17:E451–E474PubMed
9.
go back to reference American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP) (2014) Letter to Margaret Hamburg, MD, Commissioner, and Salma Lemtouni, MD, MPH, Office of the Center Director, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), RE: FDA Safe Use Initiative of Epidural Steroids Evaluation with Assignment of Responsibility to Multisociety Pain Workgroup (MPW) from American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians and 1,040 interventional pain physicians. Available via http://www.asipp.org/ASIPPandUSPhysicianLettertoFDAHamburgandLemtouniwith1040signatures6-26-2014.pdf. Accessed 8 Oct 2017 American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP) (2014) Letter to Margaret Hamburg, MD, Commissioner, and Salma Lemtouni, MD, MPH, Office of the Center Director, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), RE: FDA Safe Use Initiative of Epidural Steroids Evaluation with Assignment of Responsibility to Multisociety Pain Workgroup (MPW) from American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians and 1,040 interventional pain physicians. Available via http://​www.​asipp.​org/​ASIPPandUSPhysic​ianLettertoFDAHa​mburgandLemtouni​with1040signatur​es6-26-2014.​pdf. Accessed 8 Oct 2017
10.
go back to reference Rathmell JP, Benzon HT, Dreyfuss P et al (2015) Safeguards to prevent neurologic complications after epidural steroid injections: consensus opinions from a multidisciplinary working group and national organizations. Anesthesiology 122:974–984CrossRefPubMed Rathmell JP, Benzon HT, Dreyfuss P et al (2015) Safeguards to prevent neurologic complications after epidural steroid injections: consensus opinions from a multidisciplinary working group and national organizations. Anesthesiology 122:974–984CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Gharibo CG, Fakhry M, Diwan S, Kaye AD (2016) Conus medullaris infarction after a right L4 transforaminal epidural steroid injection using dexamethasone. Pain Physician 19:E1211–E1214PubMed Gharibo CG, Fakhry M, Diwan S, Kaye AD (2016) Conus medullaris infarction after a right L4 transforaminal epidural steroid injection using dexamethasone. Pain Physician 19:E1211–E1214PubMed
12.
go back to reference Bensler S, Sutter R, Pfirrmann CW, Peterson CK (2017) Is there a difference in treatment outcomes between epidural injections with particulate versus non-particulate steroids? Eur Radiol 27:1505–1511CrossRefPubMed Bensler S, Sutter R, Pfirrmann CW, Peterson CK (2017) Is there a difference in treatment outcomes between epidural injections with particulate versus non-particulate steroids? Eur Radiol 27:1505–1511CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Bensler S, Sutter R, Pfirrmann CWA, Peterson CK (2018) Particulate versus non-particulate corticosteroids for transforaminal nerve root blocks: comparison of outcomes in 494 patients with lumbar radiculopathy. Eur Radiol 28:946–952CrossRefPubMed Bensler S, Sutter R, Pfirrmann CWA, Peterson CK (2018) Particulate versus non-particulate corticosteroids for transforaminal nerve root blocks: comparison of outcomes in 494 patients with lumbar radiculopathy. Eur Radiol 28:946–952CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Kim JY, Lee JW, Lee GY, Lee E, Yoon CJ, Kang HS (2016) Comparative effectiveness of lumbar epidural steroid injections using particulate vs. non-particulate steroid: an intra-individual comparative study. Skeletal Radiol 45:169–176CrossRefPubMed Kim JY, Lee JW, Lee GY, Lee E, Yoon CJ, Kang HS (2016) Comparative effectiveness of lumbar epidural steroid injections using particulate vs. non-particulate steroid: an intra-individual comparative study. Skeletal Radiol 45:169–176CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Noe CE, Haynsworth RF Jr (2003) Comparison of epidural Depo-Medrol vs. aqueous betamethasone in patients with low back pain. Pain Pract 3:222–225CrossRefPubMed Noe CE, Haynsworth RF Jr (2003) Comparison of epidural Depo-Medrol vs. aqueous betamethasone in patients with low back pain. Pain Pract 3:222–225CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Park CH, Lee SH, Kim BI (2010) Comparison of the effectiveness of lumbar transforaminal epidural injection with particulate and nonparticulate corticosteroids in lumbar radiating pain. Pain Med 11:1654–1658CrossRefPubMed Park CH, Lee SH, Kim BI (2010) Comparison of the effectiveness of lumbar transforaminal epidural injection with particulate and nonparticulate corticosteroids in lumbar radiating pain. Pain Med 11:1654–1658CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Lee JW, Park KW, Chung SK et al (2009) Cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injection for the management of cervical radiculopathy: a comparative study of particulate versus non-particulate steroids. Skeletal Radiol 38:1077–1082CrossRefPubMed Lee JW, Park KW, Chung SK et al (2009) Cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injection for the management of cervical radiculopathy: a comparative study of particulate versus non-particulate steroids. Skeletal Radiol 38:1077–1082CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Kennedy DJ, Plastaras C, Casey E et al (2014) Comparative effectiveness of lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections with particulate versus nonparticulate corticosteroids for lumbar radicular pain due to intervertebral disc herniation: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial. Pain Med 15:548–555CrossRefPubMed Kennedy DJ, Plastaras C, Casey E et al (2014) Comparative effectiveness of lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections with particulate versus nonparticulate corticosteroids for lumbar radicular pain due to intervertebral disc herniation: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial. Pain Med 15:548–555CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Dreyfuss P, Baker R, Bogduk N (2006) Comparative effectiveness of cervical transforaminal injections with particulate and nonparticulate corticosteroid preparations for cervical radicular pain. Pain Med 7:237–242CrossRefPubMed Dreyfuss P, Baker R, Bogduk N (2006) Comparative effectiveness of cervical transforaminal injections with particulate and nonparticulate corticosteroid preparations for cervical radicular pain. Pain Med 7:237–242CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Kim D, Brown J (2011) Efficacy and safety of lumbar epidural dexamethasone versus methylprednisolone in the treatment of lumbar radiculopathy: a comparison of soluble versus particulate steroids. Clin J Pain 27:518–522CrossRefPubMed Kim D, Brown J (2011) Efficacy and safety of lumbar epidural dexamethasone versus methylprednisolone in the treatment of lumbar radiculopathy: a comparison of soluble versus particulate steroids. Clin J Pain 27:518–522CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference El-Yahchouchi C, Geske JR, Carter RE et al (2013) The noninferiority of the nonparticulate steroid dexamethasone vs the particulate steroids betamethasone and triamcinolone in lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections. Pain Med 14:1650–1657CrossRefPubMed El-Yahchouchi C, Geske JR, Carter RE et al (2013) The noninferiority of the nonparticulate steroid dexamethasone vs the particulate steroids betamethasone and triamcinolone in lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections. Pain Med 14:1650–1657CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference McCormick ZL, Cushman D, Marshall B et al (2016) Pain reduction and repeat injections after transforaminal epidural injection with particulate versus nonparticulate steroid for the treatment of chronic painful lumbosacral radiculopathy. PM R 8:1039–1045CrossRefPubMed McCormick ZL, Cushman D, Marshall B et al (2016) Pain reduction and repeat injections after transforaminal epidural injection with particulate versus nonparticulate steroid for the treatment of chronic painful lumbosacral radiculopathy. PM R 8:1039–1045CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Shakir A, Ma V, Mehta B (2013) Comparison of pain score reduction using triamcinolone vs. dexamethasone in cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injections. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 92:768–775CrossRefPubMed Shakir A, Ma V, Mehta B (2013) Comparison of pain score reduction using triamcinolone vs. dexamethasone in cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injections. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 92:768–775CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Denis I, Claveau G, Filiatrault M, Fugère F, Fortin L (2015) Randomized double-blind controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of lumbar transforaminal epidural injections of particulate and nonparticulate corticosteroids for lumbosacral radicular pain. Pain Med 16:1697–1708CrossRefPubMed Denis I, Claveau G, Filiatrault M, Fugère F, Fortin L (2015) Randomized double-blind controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of lumbar transforaminal epidural injections of particulate and nonparticulate corticosteroids for lumbosacral radicular pain. Pain Med 16:1697–1708CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Farrar JT, Young JP Jr, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole RM (2001) Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain 94:149–158CrossRefPubMed Farrar JT, Young JP Jr, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole RM (2001) Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain 94:149–158CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Farrar JT, Portenoy RK, Berlin JA, Kinman JL, Strom BL (2000) Defining the clinically important difference in pain outcome measures. Pain 88:287–294CrossRefPubMed Farrar JT, Portenoy RK, Berlin JA, Kinman JL, Strom BL (2000) Defining the clinically important difference in pain outcome measures. Pain 88:287–294CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Cepeda MS, Africano JM, Polo R, Alcala R, Carr DB (2003) What decline in pain intensity is meaningful to patients with acute pain? Pain 105:151–157CrossRefPubMed Cepeda MS, Africano JM, Polo R, Alcala R, Carr DB (2003) What decline in pain intensity is meaningful to patients with acute pain? Pain 105:151–157CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Hägg O, Fritzell P, Nordwall A (2003) The clinical importance of changes in outcome scores after treatment for chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J 12:12–20PubMed Hägg O, Fritzell P, Nordwall A (2003) The clinical importance of changes in outcome scores after treatment for chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J 12:12–20PubMed
29.
go back to reference Ostelo RW, Deyo R, Stratford P et al (2008) Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: towards international consensus regarding minimal important change. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:90–94CrossRef Ostelo RW, Deyo R, Stratford P et al (2008) Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: towards international consensus regarding minimal important change. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:90–94CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Farrar JT et al (2005) Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain 113:9–19CrossRefPubMed Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Farrar JT et al (2005) Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain 113:9–19CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Wyrwich KW (2008) Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. J Pain 9:105–121CrossRefPubMed Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Wyrwich KW (2008) Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. J Pain 9:105–121CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Salaffi F, Stancati A, Silvestri CA, Ciapetti A, Grassi W (2004) Minimal clinically important changes in chronic musculoskeletal pain intensity measured on a numerical rating scale. Eur J Pain 8:283–291CrossRefPubMed Salaffi F, Stancati A, Silvestri CA, Ciapetti A, Grassi W (2004) Minimal clinically important changes in chronic musculoskeletal pain intensity measured on a numerical rating scale. Eur J Pain 8:283–291CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference O’Donnell C, Cano W, D’Eramo G (2008) Comparison of triamcinolone to dexamethasone in the treatment of low back and leg pain via lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injection. Spine J 8:Supplement-65SCrossRef O’Donnell C, Cano W, D’Eramo G (2008) Comparison of triamcinolone to dexamethasone in the treatment of low back and leg pain via lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injection. Spine J 8:Supplement-65SCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Cano WG (2010) Is the particulate effect real?: comparison of the effectiveness, side effects and complication rate of the low particulate steroid dexamethasone vs. two high particulate steroids, triamcinolone and methylprednisolone when used in lumbar epidural injections. Pain Med 11:1577–1578CrossRef Cano WG (2010) Is the particulate effect real?: comparison of the effectiveness, side effects and complication rate of the low particulate steroid dexamethasone vs. two high particulate steroids, triamcinolone and methylprednisolone when used in lumbar epidural injections. Pain Med 11:1577–1578CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Haley T, Cano W, O’Donnell C (2009) Comparison of triamcinolone to dexamethasone in the treatment of low back and radicular pain via lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injection. Pain Med 10:950 Haley T, Cano W, O’Donnell C (2009) Comparison of triamcinolone to dexamethasone in the treatment of low back and radicular pain via lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injection. Pain Med 10:950
36.
go back to reference Smith MB, Rielly L, Bezucha S, Gaskin C, Brewer RP (2010) Dexamethasone versus methylprednisolone for transforaminal cervical epidural corticosteroid injections: comparative study. Pain Med 11:1583–1584CrossRef Smith MB, Rielly L, Bezucha S, Gaskin C, Brewer RP (2010) Dexamethasone versus methylprednisolone for transforaminal cervical epidural corticosteroid injections: comparative study. Pain Med 11:1583–1584CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Tafazal S, Ng L, Chaudhary N, Sell P (2009) Corticosteroids in peri-radicular infiltration for radicular pain: a randomised double blind controlled trial. One year results and subgroup analysis. Eur Spine J 18:1220–1225CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tafazal S, Ng L, Chaudhary N, Sell P (2009) Corticosteroids in peri-radicular infiltration for radicular pain: a randomised double blind controlled trial. One year results and subgroup analysis. Eur Spine J 18:1220–1225CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
go back to reference Rivest C, Katz JN, Ferrante FM, Jamison RN (1998) Effects of epidural steroid injection on pain due to lumbar spinal stenosis or herniated disks: a prospective study. Arthritis Care Res 11:291–297CrossRefPubMed Rivest C, Katz JN, Ferrante FM, Jamison RN (1998) Effects of epidural steroid injection on pain due to lumbar spinal stenosis or herniated disks: a prospective study. Arthritis Care Res 11:291–297CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Cyteval C, Fescquet N, Thomas E, Decoux E, Blotman F, Taourel P (2006) Predictive factors of efficacy of periradicular corticosteroid injections for lumbar radiculopathy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27:978–982PubMedPubMedCentral Cyteval C, Fescquet N, Thomas E, Decoux E, Blotman F, Taourel P (2006) Predictive factors of efficacy of periradicular corticosteroid injections for lumbar radiculopathy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27:978–982PubMedPubMedCentral
40.
go back to reference Ng LC, Sell P (2004) Outcomes of a prospective cohort study on peri-radicular infiltration for radicular pain in patients with lumbar disc herniation and spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J 13:325–329CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ng LC, Sell P (2004) Outcomes of a prospective cohort study on peri-radicular infiltration for radicular pain in patients with lumbar disc herniation and spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J 13:325–329CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
41.
go back to reference Kwon JW, Lee JW, Kim SH et al (2007) Cervical interlaminar epidural steroid injection for neck pain and cervical radiculopathy: effect and prognostic factors. Skeletal Radiol 36:431–436CrossRefPubMed Kwon JW, Lee JW, Kim SH et al (2007) Cervical interlaminar epidural steroid injection for neck pain and cervical radiculopathy: effect and prognostic factors. Skeletal Radiol 36:431–436CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Candido KD, Raghavendra MS, Chinthagada M, Badiee S, Trepashko DW (2008) A prospective evaluation of iodinated contrast flow patterns with fluoroscopically guided lumbar epidural steroid injections: the lateral parasagittal interlaminar epidural approach versus the transforaminal epidural approach. Anesth Analg 106:638–644CrossRefPubMed Candido KD, Raghavendra MS, Chinthagada M, Badiee S, Trepashko DW (2008) A prospective evaluation of iodinated contrast flow patterns with fluoroscopically guided lumbar epidural steroid injections: the lateral parasagittal interlaminar epidural approach versus the transforaminal epidural approach. Anesth Analg 106:638–644CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Ghai B, Bansal D, Kay JP, Vadaje KS, Wig J (2014) Transforaminal versus parasagittal interlaminar epidural steroid injection in low back pain with radicular pain: a randomized, double-blind, active-control trial. Pain Physician 17:277–290PubMed Ghai B, Bansal D, Kay JP, Vadaje KS, Wig J (2014) Transforaminal versus parasagittal interlaminar epidural steroid injection in low back pain with radicular pain: a randomized, double-blind, active-control trial. Pain Physician 17:277–290PubMed
44.
go back to reference Manchikanti L, Singh V, Pampati V, Falco FJ, Hirsch JA (2015) Comparison of the efficacy of caudal, interlaminar, and transforaminal epidural injections in managing lumbar disc herniation: is one method superior to the other? Korean J Pain 28:11–21CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Manchikanti L, Singh V, Pampati V, Falco FJ, Hirsch JA (2015) Comparison of the efficacy of caudal, interlaminar, and transforaminal epidural injections in managing lumbar disc herniation: is one method superior to the other? Korean J Pain 28:11–21CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
45.
go back to reference Chang-Chien GC, Knezevic NN, McCormick Z, Chu SK, Trescot AM, Candido KD (2014) Transforaminal versus interlaminar approaches to epidural steroid injections: a systematic review of comparative studies for lumbosacral radicular pain. Pain Physician 17:E509–E524PubMed Chang-Chien GC, Knezevic NN, McCormick Z, Chu SK, Trescot AM, Candido KD (2014) Transforaminal versus interlaminar approaches to epidural steroid injections: a systematic review of comparative studies for lumbosacral radicular pain. Pain Physician 17:E509–E524PubMed
46.
go back to reference Hong JH, Park EK, Park KB, Park JH, Jung SW (2017) Comparison of clinical efficacy in epidural steroid injections through transforaminal or parasagittal approaches. Korean J Pain 30:220–228CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hong JH, Park EK, Park KB, Park JH, Jung SW (2017) Comparison of clinical efficacy in epidural steroid injections through transforaminal or parasagittal approaches. Korean J Pain 30:220–228CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
47.
go back to reference Ahadian FM, McGreevy K, Schulteis G (2011) Lumbar transforaminal epidural dexamethasone: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, dose-response trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med 36:572–578CrossRefPubMed Ahadian FM, McGreevy K, Schulteis G (2011) Lumbar transforaminal epidural dexamethasone: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, dose-response trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med 36:572–578CrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference Kang SS, Hwang BM, Son HJ et al (2011) The dosages of corticosteroid in transforaminal epidural steroid injections for lumbar radicular pain due to a herniated disc. Pain Physician 14:361–370PubMed Kang SS, Hwang BM, Son HJ et al (2011) The dosages of corticosteroid in transforaminal epidural steroid injections for lumbar radicular pain due to a herniated disc. Pain Physician 14:361–370PubMed
49.
go back to reference Austin PC (2011) An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behav Res 46:399–424CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Austin PC (2011) An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behav Res 46:399–424CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Pain reduction after lumbar epidural injections using particulate versus non-particulate steroids: intensity of the baseline pain matters
Authors
Marek Tagowski
Zbigniew Lewandowski
Jürg Hodler
Thomas Spiegel
Gerhard W. Goerres
Publication date
01-07-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 7/2019
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06108-9

Other articles of this Issue 7/2019

European Radiology 7/2019 Go to the issue