Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 7/2019

01-07-2019 | Musculoskeletal Radiology | Editorial

Encouraging MSK imaging research towards clinical impact is a necessity: opinion paper of the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR)

Authors: Alberto Stefano Tagliafico, David Wilson, Luca Maria Sconfienza, on behalf of the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR) Research Committee

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 7/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Radiology has not been spared in recent economic crises with a substantial reduction in the turnover of imaging equipment. These problems are exacerbated by increasing demand for healthcare across Europe. Therefore, using existing radiological services while rigorously following evidence-based guidelines might improve patient care. Thus, diagnostic pathways should be assessed not only for technical and diagnostic performance but also for their impact on medical and social outcome. In this paper, we report the advice of the Research Committee of ESSR on how we may guide musculoskeletal radiological research towards studies that have useful clinical impact. The ESSR Research Committee intends to encourage research with potential to influence treatment, patient outcome, and social impact.
Key Points
• Research in medical imaging has the potential to improve human health.
• High-level studies have the potential to place radiology at the pinnacle of quality in evidence-based practice.
• The ESSR Research Committee intends to encourage research with potential to influence treatment, patient outcome, and social impact.
Literature
1.
go back to reference European Society of Radiology (ESR) (2015) The consequences of the economic crisis in radiology. Insights Imaging 6(6):573–577CrossRef European Society of Radiology (ESR) (2015) The consequences of the economic crisis in radiology. Insights Imaging 6(6):573–577CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Grady D, Redberg RF (2010) Less is more: how less health care can result in better health. Arch Intern Med 170(9):749–750CrossRefPubMed Grady D, Redberg RF (2010) Less is more: how less health care can result in better health. Arch Intern Med 170(9):749–750CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Fisher ES, Wennberg DE, Stukel TA, Gottlieb DJ, Lucas FL, Pinder EL (2003) The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending. Part 2: health outcomes and satisfaction with care. Ann Intern Med 138(4):288–298CrossRef Fisher ES, Wennberg DE, Stukel TA, Gottlieb DJ, Lucas FL, Pinder EL (2003) The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending. Part 2: health outcomes and satisfaction with care. Ann Intern Med 138(4):288–298CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Thornbury JR (1994) Why should radiologists be interested in technology assessment and outcomes research? AJR Am J Roentgenol 163(5):1027–1030CrossRefPubMed Thornbury JR (1994) Why should radiologists be interested in technology assessment and outcomes research? AJR Am J Roentgenol 163(5):1027–1030CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Thornbury JR, Eugene W (1994) Caldwell lecture. Clinical efficacy of diagnostic imaging: love it or leave it. AJR Am J Roentgenol 162(1):1–8CrossRefPubMed Thornbury JR, Eugene W (1994) Caldwell lecture. Clinical efficacy of diagnostic imaging: love it or leave it. AJR Am J Roentgenol 162(1):1–8CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Burstein D, Mitchell R, Gray ML (2019) Strategically guiding research through careful consideration of the path to impact. Radiology 290(1):5–7CrossRefPubMed Burstein D, Mitchell R, Gray ML (2019) Strategically guiding research through careful consideration of the path to impact. Radiology 290(1):5–7CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Medina LS, Blackmore CC (2006) Evidence-based imaging, 1st edn. Springer, New York, p 18 Medina LS, Blackmore CC (2006) Evidence-based imaging, 1st edn. Springer, New York, p 18
9.
go back to reference Sardanelli F, Hunink MG, Gilbert FJ, Di Leo G, Krestin GP (2010) Evidence-based radiology: why and how? Eur Radiol 20(1):1–15CrossRefPubMed Sardanelli F, Hunink MG, Gilbert FJ, Di Leo G, Krestin GP (2010) Evidence-based radiology: why and how? Eur Radiol 20(1):1–15CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Hollingworth W, Jarvik JG (2007) Technology assessment in radiology: putting the evidence in evidence-based radiology. Radiology 244:31–38CrossRefPubMed Hollingworth W, Jarvik JG (2007) Technology assessment in radiology: putting the evidence in evidence-based radiology. Radiology 244:31–38CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Rossi F, Valdora F, Barabino E, Calabrese M, Tagliafico AS (2018) Muscle mass estimation on breast magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer patients: comparison between psoas muscle area on computer tomography and pectoralis muscle area on MRI. Eur Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5663-0 Rossi F, Valdora F, Barabino E, Calabrese M, Tagliafico AS (2018) Muscle mass estimation on breast magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer patients: comparison between psoas muscle area on computer tomography and pectoralis muscle area on MRI. Eur Radiol. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00330-018-5663-0
Metadata
Title
Encouraging MSK imaging research towards clinical impact is a necessity: opinion paper of the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR)
Authors
Alberto Stefano Tagliafico
David Wilson
Luca Maria Sconfienza
on behalf of the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR) Research Committee
Publication date
01-07-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 7/2019
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06218-4

Other articles of this Issue 7/2019

European Radiology 7/2019 Go to the issue