Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Orthopaedic Science 5/2011

01-09-2011 | Original Article

Development of the patient-based outcome instrument for the foot and ankle. Part 1: project description and evaluation of the outcome instrument version 1

Authors: Hisateru Niki, Shinobu Tatsunami, Naoki Haraguchi, Takafumi Aoki, Ryuzo Okuda, Yasunori Suda, Masato Takao, Yasuhito Tanaka

Published in: Journal of Orthopaedic Science | Issue 5/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The Clinical Outcomes Committee of the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot conducted a field survey using a novel foot and ankle outcome instrument. We report the development and evaluation of the Outcome Instrument version 1.

Materials and methods

A total of 108 potential questions were extracted from literature published in the interval between 1990 and 2006. Tentative subscales proposed were “Degree of Foot Pain,” “Foot Pain-related,” “Physical Functioning and Daily Living,” “Social Functioning” and “General Health and Well-being.” After pre-testing in two different groups of patients, the Outcome Instrument version 1, which was composed of 46 items selected from the 108 questions, was administered to 256 patients (111 men and 145 women) with foot-and-ankle-related pathologic conditions and 243 healthy volunteers (125 men and 118 women). Cronbach’s alpha coefficients were used for assessment of internal consistency of the instrument. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were utilized for evaluation of construct validity.

Results

Neither a ceiling nor floor effect was observed in the responses from the patients. Significant differences were found in the responses to all of the questions between the patients and volunteers (P < 0.01 each). The Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for each of the expected subscales indicated high reliability for most of the items and subscales. However, EFA extracted an additional subscale that should be interpreted as something related to shoe or shoe-fit. Further, both EFA and CFA indicated that “Degree of Foot Pain” and “Foot Pain-related” subscales were barely discernable with a factor correlation coefficient of 0.927.

Conclusions

The Committee partly revised the instrument, and the new subscales are as follows: “Foot Pain and Pain-related,” “Physical Functioning and Daily Living,” “Social Functioning,” “General Health and Well-being” and “Shoe-related.” Evaluation of the Outcome Instrument version 2 will be reported in the following paper.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Niki H, Aoki H, Inokuchi S, Ozeki S, Kinoshita M, Kura H, Tanaka Y, Noguchi M, Nomura S, Hatori M, Tatsunami S. Development and reliability of a standard rating system for outcome measurement of foot and ankle disorders I: development of standard rating system. J Orthop Sci. 2005;10:457–65.PubMedCrossRef Niki H, Aoki H, Inokuchi S, Ozeki S, Kinoshita M, Kura H, Tanaka Y, Noguchi M, Nomura S, Hatori M, Tatsunami S. Development and reliability of a standard rating system for outcome measurement of foot and ankle disorders I: development of standard rating system. J Orthop Sci. 2005;10:457–65.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Niki H, Aoki H, Inokuchi S, Ozeki S, Kinoshita M, Kura H, Tanaka Y, Noguchi M, Nomura S, Hatori M, Tatsunami S. Development and reliability of a standard rating system for outcome measurem ent of foot and ankle disorders II: interclinician and intraclinician reliability and validity of the newly established standard rating scales and Japanese Orthopaedic Association rating scale. J Orthop Sci. 2005;10:466–74.PubMedCrossRef Niki H, Aoki H, Inokuchi S, Ozeki S, Kinoshita M, Kura H, Tanaka Y, Noguchi M, Nomura S, Hatori M, Tatsunami S. Development and reliability of a standard rating system for outcome measurem ent of foot and ankle disorders II: interclinician and intraclinician reliability and validity of the newly established standard rating scales and Japanese Orthopaedic Association rating scale. J Orthop Sci. 2005;10:466–74.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Fukui M, Chiba K, Kawakami M, Kikuchi S, Konno S, Miyamoto M, Seichi A, Shimamura T, Shirado O, Taguchi T, Takahashi K, Takashita K, Tani T, Toyama Y, Wada E, Yonenobu K, Tanaka T, Hirota Y. Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire. Part 3. Validity study and establishment of the measurement scale: Subcommittee on low back pain and cervical myelopathy evaluation of the Clinical Outcome Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association, Japan. J Orthop Sci. 2008;13:173–9.PubMedCrossRef Fukui M, Chiba K, Kawakami M, Kikuchi S, Konno S, Miyamoto M, Seichi A, Shimamura T, Shirado O, Taguchi T, Takahashi K, Takashita K, Tani T, Toyama Y, Wada E, Yonenobu K, Tanaka T, Hirota Y. Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire. Part 3. Validity study and establishment of the measurement scale: Subcommittee on low back pain and cervical myelopathy evaluation of the Clinical Outcome Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association, Japan. J Orthop Sci. 2008;13:173–9.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ohtori S, Ito T, Yamashita M, Murata Y, Morinaga T, Hirayama J, Kinoshita T, Ataka H, Koshi T, Sekikawa T, Miyagi M, Tanno T, Suzuki M, Aoki Y, Aihara T, Nakamura S, Yamaguchi K, Tauchi T, Hatakeyama K, Takata K, Sameda H, Ozawa T, Hanaoka E, Suzuki H, Akazawa T, Suseki K, Arai H, Kurokawa M, Eguchi Y, Suzuki M, Okamoto Y, Miyagi J, Yamagata M, Toyone T, Takahashi K; Chiba Low Back Pain Research Group. Evaluation of low back pain using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire for lumbar spinal disease in a multicenter study: differences in scores based on age, sex, and type of disease. J Orthop Sci. 2010;15(1):86–91. Ohtori S, Ito T, Yamashita M, Murata Y, Morinaga T, Hirayama J, Kinoshita T, Ataka H, Koshi T, Sekikawa T, Miyagi M, Tanno T, Suzuki M, Aoki Y, Aihara T, Nakamura S, Yamaguchi K, Tauchi T, Hatakeyama K, Takata K, Sameda H, Ozawa T, Hanaoka E, Suzuki H, Akazawa T, Suseki K, Arai H, Kurokawa M, Eguchi Y, Suzuki M, Okamoto Y, Miyagi J, Yamagata M, Toyone T, Takahashi K; Chiba Low Back Pain Research Group. Evaluation of low back pain using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire for lumbar spinal disease in a multicenter study: differences in scores based on age, sex, and type of disease. J Orthop Sci. 2010;15(1):86–91.
5.
go back to reference Imaeda T, Toh S, Nakao Y, Nishida J, Hirata H, Ijichi M, Kohri C, Nagano A. Validation of the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire. J Orthop Sci. 2005;10:353–9.PubMedCrossRef Imaeda T, Toh S, Nakao Y, Nishida J, Hirata H, Ijichi M, Kohri C, Nagano A. Validation of the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire. J Orthop Sci. 2005;10:353–9.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Akai M, Iwaya T, Kurosawa H, Doi T, Nasu T, Hayashi K, Fujino K. Development of new disease-specific QOL measure for patients with knee osteoarthritis; Japanese Knee Osteoarthritis QOL measure (JKOM). J Jpn Orthop Assoc. 2006;80:307–15. Akai M, Iwaya T, Kurosawa H, Doi T, Nasu T, Hayashi K, Fujino K. Development of new disease-specific QOL measure for patients with knee osteoarthritis; Japanese Knee Osteoarthritis QOL measure (JKOM). J Jpn Orthop Assoc. 2006;80:307–15.
7.
go back to reference Johanson NA, Liang MH, Daltroy L, Rudicel S, Richmond J. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons lower limb outcomes assessment instruments: reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2004;86:902–9. Johanson NA, Liang MH, Daltroy L, Rudicel S, Richmond J. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons lower limb outcomes assessment instruments: reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2004;86:902–9.
8.
go back to reference Martin RL, Irrgang JJ, Burdett RG, Conti SF, Van Swearingen JM. Evidence of validity for the foot and ankle ability measure (FAAM). Foot Ankle Int. 2005;26:968–83.PubMed Martin RL, Irrgang JJ, Burdett RG, Conti SF, Van Swearingen JM. Evidence of validity for the foot and ankle ability measure (FAAM). Foot Ankle Int. 2005;26:968–83.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Hale SA, Hertel J. Reliability and sensitivity of the foot and ankle disability index in subjects with chronic ankle instability. J Athl Train. 2004;40:35–40. Hale SA, Hertel J. Reliability and sensitivity of the foot and ankle disability index in subjects with chronic ankle instability. J Athl Train. 2004;40:35–40.
10.
go back to reference Budiman-Mak E, Conrad KJ, Roach KE. The foot function index: a measure of foot pain and disability. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44:561–70.PubMedCrossRef Budiman-Mak E, Conrad KJ, Roach KE. The foot function index: a measure of foot pain and disability. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44:561–70.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Alcock GK, Stratford PW. Validation of the Lower Extremity Function Scale on athletic subjects with ankle sprains. Physiother Can. 2002;54:233–40. Alcock GK, Stratford PW. Validation of the Lower Extremity Function Scale on athletic subjects with ankle sprains. Physiother Can. 2002;54:233–40.
12.
go back to reference Blazeby J, Sprangers M, Cull A. Mogens Groenvold and Andrew Bottomley on behalf of EORTC. Quality of Life Group Guidelines for Developing Questionnaire Modules. 3rd ed. (revised). EORTC: Brussels; 2002. Blazeby J, Sprangers M, Cull A. Mogens Groenvold and Andrew Bottomley on behalf of EORTC. Quality of Life Group Guidelines for Developing Questionnaire Modules. 3rd ed. (revised). EORTC: Brussels; 2002.
13.
go back to reference Listone HA, Turoff M. The Delphi method: techniques and applications. Reading: Addison-Wesley; 1975. Listone HA, Turoff M. The Delphi method: techniques and applications. Reading: Addison-Wesley; 1975.
14.
go back to reference Fukuhara S, Suzukamo Y. Manual of SF-36v2 Japanese version: Institute for Health Outcomes & Process Evaluation Research, Kyoto; 2004. Fukuhara S, Suzukamo Y. Manual of SF-36v2 Japanese version: Institute for Health Outcomes & Process Evaluation Research, Kyoto; 2004.
15.
go back to reference Patrick DL, Deyo RA. Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life. Med care. 1989;27(suppl):S217–S232. Patrick DL, Deyo RA. Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life. Med care. 1989;27(suppl):S217–S232.
16.
go back to reference Westaway MD, Stratford PW, Binkley JM. The patient-specific functional scale: validation of its use in persons with neck dysfunction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998;27:331–8.PubMed Westaway MD, Stratford PW, Binkley JM. The patient-specific functional scale: validation of its use in persons with neck dysfunction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998;27:331–8.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Development of the patient-based outcome instrument for the foot and ankle. Part 1: project description and evaluation of the outcome instrument version 1
Authors
Hisateru Niki
Shinobu Tatsunami
Naoki Haraguchi
Takafumi Aoki
Ryuzo Okuda
Yasunori Suda
Masato Takao
Yasuhito Tanaka
Publication date
01-09-2011
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Science / Issue 5/2011
Print ISSN: 0949-2658
Electronic ISSN: 1436-2023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-011-0130-7

Other articles of this Issue 5/2011

Journal of Orthopaedic Science 5/2011 Go to the issue