Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Orthopaedic Science 3/2008

Open Access 01-05-2008 | Original Article

Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire. Part 3. Validity study and establishment of the measurement scale

Subcommittee on Low Back Pain and Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation of the Clinical Outcome Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association, Japan

Authors: Mitsuru Fukui, Kazuhiro Chiba, Mamoru Kawakami, Shin-Ichi Kikuchi, Shin-Ichi Konno, Masabumi Miyamoto, Atsushi Seichi, Tadashi Shimamura, Osamu Shirado, Toshihiko Taguchi, Kazuhisa Takahashi, Katsushi Takeshita, Toshikazu Tani, Yoshiaki Toyama, Eiji Wada, Kazuo Yonenobu, Takashi Tanaka, Yoshio Hirota

Published in: Journal of Orthopaedic Science | Issue 3/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The Japanese Orthopaedic Association decided to revise the JOA score for low back pain and to develop a new outcome measure. In February 2002, the first survey was performed with a preliminary questionnaire consisting of 60 evaluation items. Based on findings of that survey, 25 items were selected for a draft of the JOA Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ). The second survey was performed to confirm the reliability of the draft questionnaire. This article further evaluates the validity of this questionnaire and establishes a measurement scale.

Methods

The subjects of this study consisted of 355 patients with low back disorders of any type (201 men, 154 women; mean age 50.7 years). Each patient was asked to fill in a self-administered questionnaire. Superficial validity was checked in terms of the completion rate for filling out the entire questionnaire. Factor analysis was then performed to evaluate the validity of the questionnaire and establish a measurement scale.

Results

As a result of the factor analysis, 25 items were categorized into five factors. The factors were named based on the commonality of the items: social function, mental health, lumbar function, walking ability, and low back pain. To establish a measurement scale for each factor, we determined the coefficient for each item so the difference between the maximum factor scores and minimum factor scores was approximately 100. We adjusted the formula so the maximum for each factor score was 100 and the minimum was 0.

Conclusions

We confirmed the validity of the JOA Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire and est ablished a measurement scale.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Izumida S, Inoue S. Assessment of treatment for low back pain. J Jpn Orthop Assoc 1986;60:391–394 (in Japanese). Izumida S, Inoue S. Assessment of treatment for low back pain. J Jpn Orthop Assoc 1986;60:391–394 (in Japanese).
2.
go back to reference Fukuhara S, Bito S, Green J, Hsiao A, Kurokawa K. Translation, adaptation, and validation of the SF-36 Health Survey for use in Japan. Clin Epidemiol 1998;51:1037–1044.CrossRef Fukuhara S, Bito S, Green J, Hsiao A, Kurokawa K. Translation, adaptation, and validation of the SF-36 Health Survey for use in Japan. Clin Epidemiol 1998;51:1037–1044.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Suzukamo Y, Fukuhara S, Kikuchi S, Konno S, Roland M, Iwamoto Y, et al. Validation of the Japanese version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. J Orthop Sci 2003;8:543–548.CrossRefPubMed Suzukamo Y, Fukuhara S, Kikuchi S, Konno S, Roland M, Iwamoto Y, et al. Validation of the Japanese version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. J Orthop Sci 2003;8:543–548.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Roland M, Morris R. A study of the natural history of back pain. Part 1. development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine 1983;8:141–144.CrossRefPubMed Roland M, Morris R. A study of the natural history of back pain. Part 1. development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine 1983;8:141–144.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Fukui M, Chiba K, Kawakami M, Kikuchi S, Konno S, Miyamoto M, et al. JOA Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire: initial report. J Orthop Sci 2007;12:443–450.CrossRefPubMed Fukui M, Chiba K, Kawakami M, Kikuchi S, Konno S, Miyamoto M, et al. JOA Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire: initial report. J Orthop Sci 2007;12:443–450.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Fukui M, Chiba K, Kawakami M, Kikuchi S, Konno S, Miyamoto M, et al. Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ). Part 2. Verification of the reliability. J Orthop Sci 2007;12:526–532.CrossRefPubMed Fukui M, Chiba K, Kawakami M, Kikuchi S, Konno S, Miyamoto M, et al. Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ). Part 2. Verification of the reliability. J Orthop Sci 2007;12:526–532.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire. Part 3. Validity study and establishment of the measurement scale
Subcommittee on Low Back Pain and Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation of the Clinical Outcome Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association, Japan
Authors
Mitsuru Fukui
Kazuhiro Chiba
Mamoru Kawakami
Shin-Ichi Kikuchi
Shin-Ichi Konno
Masabumi Miyamoto
Atsushi Seichi
Tadashi Shimamura
Osamu Shirado
Toshihiko Taguchi
Kazuhisa Takahashi
Katsushi Takeshita
Toshikazu Tani
Yoshiaki Toyama
Eiji Wada
Kazuo Yonenobu
Takashi Tanaka
Yoshio Hirota
Publication date
01-05-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Science / Issue 3/2008
Print ISSN: 0949-2658
Electronic ISSN: 1436-2023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-008-1213-y

Other articles of this Issue 3/2008

Journal of Orthopaedic Science 3/2008 Go to the issue