Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Mental Health Systems 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Study protocol

Development of programme theory for integration of service user and caregiver involvement in mental health system strengthening: protocol for realist systematic review

Authors: Sisay Abayneh, Heidi Lempp, Jill Manthorpe, Charlotte Hanlon

Published in: International Journal of Mental Health Systems | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There is international recognition of the need for service user and caregiver involvement in mental health system strengthening. However, little is known about how best to integrate this approach into the mental healthcare system; what works to advance involvement, under what conditions, how and when does involvement bring added value, and how can it work in resource-poor settings in low and middle-income countries.

Objective

To describe the methodology for a realist systematic review protocol to synthesise the evidence to explain the contexts, outcomes, and underlying mechanisms for involvement of service users with severe mental health problems and their caregivers in mental healthcare policy-making and planning, advocacy, service development, monitoring and improvement.

Methods/designs

The proposed realist systematic review will involve five steps: (i) clarifying the review scope, (ii) a systematic search for evidence, (iii) evidence appraisal and data extraction, (iv) data analysis, (v) synthesis of evidence and formation of revised programme theory. Inputs from a formative qualitative study, consultative Theory of Change meetings with key stakeholder groups, and scoping reviews will be used to identify candidate theory/theories that will guide the selection, appraisal and analysis of studies, and refine the Theory of Change model that will be piloted and evaluated. Synthesis of data will be undertaken using realist logic, constant comparison and thematic analysis. In a consultative meeting with stakeholders the Theory of Change model will then be situated with respect to relevant programme theories and adapted to incorporate the synthesized evidence of relevance to the local context. The finalized Theory of Change model will be piloted and evaluated in a primary health care setting in rural Ethiopia.

Discussion

Realist review methodology has not been applied to the area of mental health service user involvement in low- and middle-income country settings. In this protocol, we describe how this contextualized approach will be applied to identify and refine a theory-driven and transferable model of involvement of service users, embedded in ongoing work in Ethiopia.
Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42018084595
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Thornicroft G, Tansella M. Growing recognition of the importance of service user involvement in mental health service planning and evaluation. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2005;14(1):1–3.CrossRef Thornicroft G, Tansella M. Growing recognition of the importance of service user involvement in mental health service planning and evaluation. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2005;14(1):1–3.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Doughty C, Tse S. Can consumer-led mental health services be equally effective? An integrative review of CLMH services in high-income countries. Community Ment Health J. 2011;47(3):252–66.CrossRefPubMed Doughty C, Tse S. Can consumer-led mental health services be equally effective? An integrative review of CLMH services in high-income countries. Community Ment Health J. 2011;47(3):252–66.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Wallcraft J, Amering M, Freidin J, Davar B, Froggatt D, Jafri H, Javed A, Katontoka S, Raja S, Rataemane S. Partnerships for better mental health worldwide: WPA recommendations on best practices in working with service users and family carers. World Psychiatry. 2011;10(3):229–36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wallcraft J, Amering M, Freidin J, Davar B, Froggatt D, Jafri H, Javed A, Katontoka S, Raja S, Rataemane S. Partnerships for better mental health worldwide: WPA recommendations on best practices in working with service users and family carers. World Psychiatry. 2011;10(3):229–36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
5.
go back to reference Carman KL, Dardess P, Maurer M, Sofaer S, Adams K, Bechtel C, Sweeney J. Patient and family engagement: a framework for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies. Health Aff. 2013;32(2):223–31.CrossRef Carman KL, Dardess P, Maurer M, Sofaer S, Adams K, Bechtel C, Sweeney J. Patient and family engagement: a framework for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies. Health Aff. 2013;32(2):223–31.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hickey G, Kipping C. Exploring the concept of user involvement in mental health through a participation continuum. J Clin Nurs. 1998;7(1):83–8.CrossRefPubMed Hickey G, Kipping C. Exploring the concept of user involvement in mental health through a participation continuum. J Clin Nurs. 1998;7(1):83–8.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Crawford MJ, Rutter D, Manley C, Weaver T, Bhui K, Fulop N, Tyrer P. Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of health care. BMJ. 2002;325(7375):1263.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Crawford MJ, Rutter D, Manley C, Weaver T, Bhui K, Fulop N, Tyrer P. Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of health care. BMJ. 2002;325(7375):1263.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Millar SL, Chambers M, Giles M. Service user involvement in mental health care: an evolutionary concept analysis. Health Expect. 2016;19(2):209–21.CrossRefPubMed Millar SL, Chambers M, Giles M. Service user involvement in mental health care: an evolutionary concept analysis. Health Expect. 2016;19(2):209–21.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Tait L, Lester H. Encouraging user involvement in mental health services. Adv Psychiatr Treat. 2005;11(3):168–75.CrossRef Tait L, Lester H. Encouraging user involvement in mental health services. Adv Psychiatr Treat. 2005;11(3):168–75.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Wright-Berryman JL, McGuire AB, Salyers MP. A review of consumer-provided services on assertive community treatment and intensive case management teams: implications for future research and practice. J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc. 2011;17(1):37–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wright-Berryman JL, McGuire AB, Salyers MP. A review of consumer-provided services on assertive community treatment and intensive case management teams: implications for future research and practice. J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc. 2011;17(1):37–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Simpson EL, House AO. Involving users in the delivery and evaluation of mental health services: systematic review. Br J Psychiatry. 2002;325(7375):1265. Simpson EL, House AO. Involving users in the delivery and evaluation of mental health services: systematic review. Br J Psychiatry. 2002;325(7375):1265.
12.
go back to reference Bee P, Price O, Baker J, Lovell K. Systematic synthesis of barriers and facilitators to service user-led care planning. Br J Psychiatry. 2015;207(2):104–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bee P, Price O, Baker J, Lovell K. Systematic synthesis of barriers and facilitators to service user-led care planning. Br J Psychiatry. 2015;207(2):104–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Newman D, O’Reilly P, Lee SH, Kennedy C. Mental health service users’ experiences of mental health care: an integrative literature review. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2015;22(3):171–82.CrossRefPubMed Newman D, O’Reilly P, Lee SH, Kennedy C. Mental health service users’ experiences of mental health care: an integrative literature review. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2015;22(3):171–82.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Saraceno B, van Ommeren M, Batniji R, Cohen A, Gureje O, Mahoney J, Sridhar D, Underhill C. Barriers to improvement of mental health services in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet. 2007;370(9593):1164–74.CrossRefPubMed Saraceno B, van Ommeren M, Batniji R, Cohen A, Gureje O, Mahoney J, Sridhar D, Underhill C. Barriers to improvement of mental health services in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet. 2007;370(9593):1164–74.CrossRefPubMed
16.
17.
go back to reference Thornicroft G, Alem A, Santos RA, Barley E, Drake RE, Gregorio G, Hanlon C, Ito H, Latimer E, Law A. WPA guidance on steps, obstacles and mistakes to avoid in the implementation of community mental health care. World Psychiatry. 2010;9(2):67–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Thornicroft G, Alem A, Santos RA, Barley E, Drake RE, Gregorio G, Hanlon C, Ito H, Latimer E, Law A. WPA guidance on steps, obstacles and mistakes to avoid in the implementation of community mental health care. World Psychiatry. 2010;9(2):67–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Semrau M, Lempp H, Keynejad R, Evans-Lacko S, Mugisha J, Raja S, Lamichhane J, Alem A, Thornicroft G, Hanlon C. Service user and caregiver involvement in mental health system strengthening in low-and middle-income countries: systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16(1):79.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Semrau M, Lempp H, Keynejad R, Evans-Lacko S, Mugisha J, Raja S, Lamichhane J, Alem A, Thornicroft G, Hanlon C. Service user and caregiver involvement in mental health system strengthening in low-and middle-income countries: systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16(1):79.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Semrau M, Evans-Lacko S, Alem A, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Chisholm D, Gureje O, Hanlon C, Jordans M, Kigozi F, Lempp H. Strengthening mental health systems in low-and middle-income countries: the Emerald programme. BMC Med. 2015;13(1):79.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Semrau M, Evans-Lacko S, Alem A, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Chisholm D, Gureje O, Hanlon C, Jordans M, Kigozi F, Lempp H. Strengthening mental health systems in low-and middle-income countries: the Emerald programme. BMC Med. 2015;13(1):79.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Abayneh S, Lempp H, Alem A, Alemayehu D, Eshetu T, Lund C, Semrau M, Thornicroft G, Hanlon C. Service user involvement in mental health system strengthening in a rural African setting: qualitative study. BMC Psychiatry. 2017;17(1):187.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Abayneh S, Lempp H, Alem A, Alemayehu D, Eshetu T, Lund C, Semrau M, Thornicroft G, Hanlon C. Service user involvement in mental health system strengthening in a rural African setting: qualitative study. BMC Psychiatry. 2017;17(1):187.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Kleintjes S, Lund C, Swartz L. Barriers to the participation of people with psychosocial disability in mental health policy development in South Africa: a qualitative study of perspectives of policy makers, professionals, religious leaders and academics. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2013;13(1):17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kleintjes S, Lund C, Swartz L. Barriers to the participation of people with psychosocial disability in mental health policy development in South Africa: a qualitative study of perspectives of policy makers, professionals, religious leaders and academics. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2013;13(1):17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Gallivan J, Kovacs Burns K, Bellows M, Eigenseher C. The many faces of patient engagement. J Particip Med. 2012;4:e32. Gallivan J, Kovacs Burns K, Bellows M, Eigenseher C. The many faces of patient engagement. J Particip Med. 2012;4:e32.
23.
go back to reference Tritter JQ, McCallum A. The snakes and ladders of user involvement: moving beyond Arnstein. Health Policy. 2006;76(2):156–68.CrossRefPubMed Tritter JQ, McCallum A. The snakes and ladders of user involvement: moving beyond Arnstein. Health Policy. 2006;76(2):156–68.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Pawson R, Greenhalgh T, Harvey G, Walshe K. Realist review-a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005;10(1_suppl):21–34.CrossRefPubMed Pawson R, Greenhalgh T, Harvey G, Walshe K. Realist review-a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005;10(1_suppl):21–34.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Grimshaw J. A guide to knowledge synthesis: a knowledge synthesis chapter. Ottawa: Canadian Institutes of Health Research; 2010. Grimshaw J. A guide to knowledge synthesis: a knowledge synthesis chapter. Ottawa: Canadian Institutes of Health Research; 2010.
27.
go back to reference Pawson R, Greenhalgh T, Harvey G, Walshe K. Realist synthesis: an introduction. RMP Methods Paper 2/2004 Manchester, UK: ESRC Research Methods Programme, University of Manchester; 2004. Pawson R, Greenhalgh T, Harvey G, Walshe K. Realist synthesis: an introduction. RMP Methods Paper 2/2004 Manchester, UK: ESRC Research Methods Programme, University of Manchester; 2004.
28.
go back to reference Rycroft-Malone J, McCormack B, Hutchinson AM, DeCorby K, Bucknall TK, Kent B, Schultz A, Snelgrove-Clarke E, Stetler CB, Titler M. Realist synthesis: illustrating the method for implementation research. Implement Sci. 2012;7(1):33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rycroft-Malone J, McCormack B, Hutchinson AM, DeCorby K, Bucknall TK, Kent B, Schultz A, Snelgrove-Clarke E, Stetler CB, Titler M. Realist synthesis: illustrating the method for implementation research. Implement Sci. 2012;7(1):33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Pawson R. Evidence-based policy: a realist perspective. London: Sage; 2006.CrossRef Pawson R. Evidence-based policy: a realist perspective. London: Sage; 2006.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic evaluation. London: Sage; 1997. Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic evaluation. London: Sage; 1997.
32.
go back to reference Bhaskar R. A realist theory of science. London: Routledge; 2008. Bhaskar R. A realist theory of science. London: Routledge; 2008.
33.
go back to reference Delanty G. Social Science: beyond constructivism and realism. Buckingham: Open University Press Google Scholar; 1997. Delanty G. Social Science: beyond constructivism and realism. Buckingham: Open University Press Google Scholar; 1997.
34.
go back to reference Wilson V, McCormack B. Critical realism as emancipatory action: the case for realistic evaluation in practice development. Nurs Philos. 2006;7(1):45–57.CrossRefPubMed Wilson V, McCormack B. Critical realism as emancipatory action: the case for realistic evaluation in practice development. Nurs Philos. 2006;7(1):45–57.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Greenhalgh T, Wong G, Westhorp G, Pawson R. Protocol-realist and meta-narrative evidence synthesis: evolving standards (RAMESES). BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11(1):115.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Greenhalgh T, Wong G, Westhorp G, Pawson R. Protocol-realist and meta-narrative evidence synthesis: evolving standards (RAMESES). BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11(1):115.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
go back to reference Pawson R. The science of evaluation: a realist manifesto. New York: Sage; 2013.CrossRef Pawson R. The science of evaluation: a realist manifesto. New York: Sage; 2013.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Bonell C, Fletcher A, Morton M, Lorenc T, Moore L. Realist randomised controlled trials: a new approach to evaluating complex public health interventions. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75(12):2299–306.CrossRefPubMed Bonell C, Fletcher A, Morton M, Lorenc T, Moore L. Realist randomised controlled trials: a new approach to evaluating complex public health interventions. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75(12):2299–306.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Staley K, Buckland SA, Hayes H, Tarpey M. ‘The missing links’: understanding how context and mechanism influence the impact of public involvement in research. Health Expect. 2014;17(6):755–64.CrossRefPubMed Staley K, Buckland SA, Hayes H, Tarpey M. ‘The missing links’: understanding how context and mechanism influence the impact of public involvement in research. Health Expect. 2014;17(6):755–64.CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Domecq JP, Prutsky G, Elraiyah T, Wang Z, Nabhan M, Shippee N, Brito JP, Boehmer K, Hasan R, Firwana B. Patient engagement in research: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):89.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Domecq JP, Prutsky G, Elraiyah T, Wang Z, Nabhan M, Shippee N, Brito JP, Boehmer K, Hasan R, Firwana B. Patient engagement in research: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):89.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
41.
go back to reference Wong G, Westhorp G, Pawson R, Greenhalgh T. Realist synthesis: RAMESES training materials. London: University of Oxford: RAMESES Project; 2013. Wong G, Westhorp G, Pawson R, Greenhalgh T. Realist synthesis: RAMESES training materials. London: University of Oxford: RAMESES Project; 2013.
42.
go back to reference Marchal B, van Belle S, van Olmen J, Hoerée T, Kegels G. Is realist evaluation keeping its promise? A review of published empirical studies in the field of health systems research. Evaluation. 2012;18(2):192–212.CrossRef Marchal B, van Belle S, van Olmen J, Hoerée T, Kegels G. Is realist evaluation keeping its promise? A review of published empirical studies in the field of health systems research. Evaluation. 2012;18(2):192–212.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Reuters T. EndNote. New York: Thomson Reuters; 2011. Reuters T. EndNote. New York: Thomson Reuters; 2011.
44.
go back to reference Brennan N, Bryce M, Pearson M, Wong G, Cooper C, Archer J. Understanding how appraisal of doctors produces its effects: a realist review protocol. BMJ Open. 2014;4(6):e005466.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Brennan N, Bryce M, Pearson M, Wong G, Cooper C, Archer J. Understanding how appraisal of doctors produces its effects: a realist review protocol. BMJ Open. 2014;4(6):e005466.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
45.
go back to reference Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
46.
go back to reference Rycroft-Malone J, Burton C, Hall B, McCormack B, Nutley S, Seddon D, Williams L. Improving skills and care standards in the support workforce for older people: a realist review. BMJ Open. 2014;4(5):e005356.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rycroft-Malone J, Burton C, Hall B, McCormack B, Nutley S, Seddon D, Williams L. Improving skills and care standards in the support workforce for older people: a realist review. BMJ Open. 2014;4(5):e005356.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
47.
go back to reference Bunn F, Goodman C, Malone JR, Jones PR, Burton C, Rait G, Trivedi D, Bayer A, Sinclair A. Managing diabetes in people with dementia: protocol for a realist review. Syst Rev. 2016;5(1):5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bunn F, Goodman C, Malone JR, Jones PR, Burton C, Rait G, Trivedi D, Bayer A, Sinclair A. Managing diabetes in people with dementia: protocol for a realist review. Syst Rev. 2016;5(1):5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
48.
go back to reference Ritzer G. Metatheorizing in sociology. Lexinton: Lexington Books; 1991. p. 113–31. Ritzer G. Metatheorizing in sociology. Lexinton: Lexington Books; 1991. p. 113–31.
49.
go back to reference Roen K, Arai L, Roberts H, Popay J. Extending systematic reviews to include evidence on implementation: methodological work on a review of community-based initiatives to prevent injuries. Soc Sci Med. 2006;63(4):1060–71.CrossRefPubMed Roen K, Arai L, Roberts H, Popay J. Extending systematic reviews to include evidence on implementation: methodological work on a review of community-based initiatives to prevent injuries. Soc Sci Med. 2006;63(4):1060–71.CrossRefPubMed
50.
go back to reference Pearson M, Hunt H, Cooper C, Shepperd S, Pawson R, Anderson R. Intermediate care: a realist review and conceptual framework. Final report. Southampton: NIHR Service Delivery and Organisation Programme; 2013. Pearson M, Hunt H, Cooper C, Shepperd S, Pawson R, Anderson R. Intermediate care: a realist review and conceptual framework. Final report. Southampton: NIHR Service Delivery and Organisation Programme; 2013.
51.
go back to reference Pearson M, Brand S, Quinn C, Shaw J, Maguire M, Michie S, Briscoe S, Lennox C, Stirzaker A, Kirkpatrick T. Using realist review to inform intervention development: methodological illustration and conceptual platform for collaborative care in offender mental health. Implement Sci. 2015;10(1):134.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pearson M, Brand S, Quinn C, Shaw J, Maguire M, Michie S, Briscoe S, Lennox C, Stirzaker A, Kirkpatrick T. Using realist review to inform intervention development: methodological illustration and conceptual platform for collaborative care in offender mental health. Implement Sci. 2015;10(1):134.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
52.
go back to reference Greenhalgh T, Potts HW, Wong G, Bark P, Swinglehurst D. Tensions and paradoxes in electronic patient record research: a systematic literature review using the meta-narrative method. Milbank Q. 2009;87(4):729–88.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Greenhalgh T, Potts HW, Wong G, Bark P, Swinglehurst D. Tensions and paradoxes in electronic patient record research: a systematic literature review using the meta-narrative method. Milbank Q. 2009;87(4):729–88.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
53.
go back to reference Wallace A, Croucher K, Quilgars D, Baldwin S. Meeting the challenge: developing systematic reviewing in social policy. Policy Polit. 2004;32(4):455–70.CrossRef Wallace A, Croucher K, Quilgars D, Baldwin S. Meeting the challenge: developing systematic reviewing in social policy. Policy Polit. 2004;32(4):455–70.CrossRef
54.
go back to reference Higgins JP, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, vol. 4. Chichester: Wiley; 2011. Higgins JP, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, vol. 4. Chichester: Wiley; 2011.
55.
go back to reference Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Westhorp G, Pawson R. Development of methodological guidance, publication standards and training materials for realist and meta-narrative reviews: the RAMESES (Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses–Evolving Standards) project. Health Service Delivery Research, No 2:30. Southamptom, UK: NIHR Journals Library; 2014. Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Westhorp G, Pawson R. Development of methodological guidance, publication standards and training materials for realist and meta-narrative reviews: the RAMESES (Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses–Evolving Standards) project. Health Service Delivery Research, No 2:30. Southamptom, UK: NIHR Journals Library; 2014.
56.
go back to reference Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef
57.
go back to reference Meyer SB, Lunnay B. The application of abductive and retroductive inference for the design and analysis of theory-driven sociological research. Sociol Res Online. 2013;18(1):12.CrossRef Meyer SB, Lunnay B. The application of abductive and retroductive inference for the design and analysis of theory-driven sociological research. Sociol Res Online. 2013;18(1):12.CrossRef
58.
go back to reference Fram SM. The constant comparative analysis method outside of grounded theory. Qual Rep. 2013;18(1):1. Fram SM. The constant comparative analysis method outside of grounded theory. Qual Rep. 2013;18(1):1.
61.
go back to reference Davies P, Walker AE, Grimshaw JM. A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations. Implement Sci. 2010;5(1):14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Davies P, Walker AE, Grimshaw JM. A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations. Implement Sci. 2010;5(1):14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
62.
go back to reference Goicolea I, Hurtig AK, San Sebastian M, Vives-Cases C, Marchal B. Developing a programme theory to explain how primary health care teams learn to respond to intimate partner violence: a realist case-study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15(1):228.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Goicolea I, Hurtig AK, San Sebastian M, Vives-Cases C, Marchal B. Developing a programme theory to explain how primary health care teams learn to respond to intimate partner violence: a realist case-study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15(1):228.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Development of programme theory for integration of service user and caregiver involvement in mental health system strengthening: protocol for realist systematic review
Authors
Sisay Abayneh
Heidi Lempp
Jill Manthorpe
Charlotte Hanlon
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
International Journal of Mental Health Systems / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1752-4458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-018-0220-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

International Journal of Mental Health Systems 1/2018 Go to the issue