Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Health Services Research
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Research

Development of consensus quality indicators for cancer supportive care: a Delphi study and pilot testing

Authors: Amelia Hyatt, Karla Gough, Holly Chung, Wendy Wood, Ruth Aston, Jo Cockwill, Spiridoula Galetakis, Meinir Krishnasamy

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

High quality supportive care is fundamental to achieve optimal health outcomes for people affected by cancer. Use of quality indicators provides comparative information for monitoring, management, and improvement of care within and across healthcare systems. The aim of this Australian study was to develop and test a minimum viable set of cancer supportive care quality indicators that would be feasible to implement and generate usable data for policy and practice.

Methods

A two-round, modified reactive Delphi process was employed firstto develop the proposed indicators. Participants with expertise in cancer control in Australia, the United Kingdom, and Canada rated their level of agreement on a 7-point Likert scale against criteria assessing the importance, feasibility, and usability of proposed indicators. Relative response frequencies were assessed against pre-specified consensus criteria and a ranking exercise, which delivered the list of proposed indicators. Draft indicators were then presented to a purposive sample of clinicial and health management staff via qualitative interviews at two acute care settings in Melbourne, Australia for feedback regarding feasibility. Desktop audits of online published health service policy and practice descriptions were also conducted at participating acute care settings to confirm health service data availability and feasibility of collection to report against proposed indicators.

Results

Sixteen quality indicators associated with the delivery of quality cancer supportive care in Australian acute healthcare settings met pre-specified criteria for inclusion. Indicators deemed ‘necessary’ were mapped and ranked across five key categories: Screening, Referrals, Data Management, Communication and Training, and Culturally Safe and Accessible Care. Testing confirmed indicators were viewed as feasible by clinical and health management staff, and desktop audits could provide a fast and reasonably effective method to assess general adherence and performance.

Conclusions

The development of quality indicators specific to cancer supportive care provides a strong framework for measurement and monitoring, service improvement, and practice change with the potential to improve health outcomes for people affected by cancer. Evaluation of implementation feasibility of these expert consensus generated quality indicators is recommended.
Literature
1.
Jordan K, Aapro M, Kaasa S, Ripamonti CI, Scotté F, Strasser F, et al. European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) position paper on supportive and palliative care. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(1):36–43.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Fitch M. Supportive care framework. Canad Oncol Nurs J Revue canadienne de soins infirmiers en oncol. 2008;18(1):6–14.CrossRef
3.
Bonomo P, Paderno A, Mattavelli D, Zenda S, Cavalieri S, Bossi P. Quality assessment in supportive care in head and neck cancer. Front Oncol. 2019;926.
4.
Krishnasamy M, Hyatt A, Chung H, Gough K, Fitch M. Refocusing cancer supportive care: a framework for integrated cancer care. Support Care Cancer. 2023;31(1):14.CrossRef
5.
Daly L. Developing a quality cancer system-the role of patient experience. Australian J Cancer Nurs. 2012;13(2):4–8.
6.
Rotar AM, Van den Berg MJ, Kringos DS, Klazinga NS. Reporting and use of the OECD health care quality indicators at national and regional level in 15 countries. Int J Qual Health Care. 2016;28(3):398–404.CrossRefPubMed
7.
8.
Pinkham EP, Teleni L, Nixon JL, McKinnel E, Brown B, Joseph R, et al. Conventional supportive cancer care services in Australia: a national service mapping study (the CIA study). Asia-Pacific J Clin Oncol. 2022;18(3):191–200.
9.
Aiello Bowles EJ, Tuzzio L, Wiese CJ, Kirlin B, Greene SM, Clauser SB, et al. Understanding high-quality cancer care: a summary of expert perspectives. Cancer. 2008;112(4):934–42.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Carinci F, Van Gool K, Mainz J, Veillard J, Pichora E, Januel J, et al. Towards actionable international comparisons of health system performance: expert revision of the OECD framework and quality indicators. Int J Qual Health Care. 2015;27(2):137–46.PubMed
11.
Hughes RG. Tools and Strategies for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety. In: Hughes RG, editor. Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008. Chapter 44.
12.
Mainz J. Defining and classifying clinical indicators for quality improvement. Int J Qual Health Care. 2003;15(6):523–30.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Boulkedid R, Abdoul H, Loustau M, Sibony O, Alberti C. Using and reporting the Delphi method for selecting healthcare quality indicators: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20476.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Langendam MW, Piggott T, Nothacker M, Agarwal A, Armstrong D, Baldeh T, et al. Approaches of integrating the development of guidelines and quality indicators: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):1–11.CrossRef
15.
De Vos M, Graafmans W, Kooistra M, Meijboom B, Van Der Voort P, Westert G. Using quality indicators to improve hospital care: a review of the literature. Int J Qual Health Care. 2009;21(2):119–29.CrossRefPubMed
16.
de Vos MLG, van der Veer SN, Graafmans WC, de Keizer NF, Jager KJ, Westert GP, et al. Implementing quality indicators in intensive care units: exploring barriers to and facilitators of behaviour change. Implement Sci. 2010;5(1):52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
McKenna HP. The Delphi technique: a worthwhile research approach for nursing? J Adv Nurs. 1994;19(6):1221–5.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Trevelyan EG, Robinson N. Delphi methodology in health research: how to do it? Eur J Integr Med. 2015;7(4):423–8.CrossRef
19.
Keeney S, Hasson F, McKenna H. Consulting the oracle: ten lessons from using the Delphi technique in nursing research. J Adv Nurs. 2006;53(2):205–12.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Jünger S, Payne SA, Brine J, Radbruch L, Brearley SG. Guidance on conducting and REporting DElphi studies (CREDES) in palliative care: recommendations based on a methodological systematic review. Palliat Med. 2017;31(8):684–706.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Lorini C, Porchia BR, Pieralli F, Bonaccorsi G. Process, structural, and outcome quality indicators of nutritional care in nursing homes: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):1–14.CrossRef
22.
Group WHOMPSC. An assessment of interactions between global health initiatives and country health systems. Lancet. 2009;373(9681):2137–69.CrossRef
23.
McGlynn EA. Selecting common measures of quality and system performance. Med Care. 2003;41(1 Suppl):I39–47.
24.
Forman J, Damschroder L. Qualitative content analysis. Empirical methods for bioethics: a primer. Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2007.
25.
Thorne S. Interpretive description: qualitative research for applied practice. Routledge; 2016.CrossRef
26.
Troya MI, Greene MC, Santos CG, Shultz JM. Conducting a desk review to inform the mental health and psychosocial support response to the 2016 Ecuador earthquake. Disaster Health. 2016;3(4):90–101.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Greene MC, Jordans MJD, Kohrt BA, Ventevogel P, Kirmayer LJ, Hassan G, et al. Addressing culture and context in humanitarian response: preparing desk reviews to inform mental health and psychosocial support. Confl Heal. 2017;11(1):21.CrossRef
28.
Corrigan JM. Crossing the Quality Chasm. In: Redi P, Compton D, Grossman J, Fanjiang G, editors. Building a Better Delivery System: A New Engineering/Health Care Partnership. National Academies Press (US); 2005. p. 95–102. (http://​www.​nap.​edu/​catalog/​11378.​html).
29.
30.
Brook RH, McGlynn EA, Shekelle PG. Defining and measuring quality of care: a perspective from US researchers. Int J Qual Health Care. 2000;12(4):281–95.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Kim M, Jeong S, McMillan M, Higgins I. Translation of policy and guidelines into practice: lessons learned from implementation of the Cancer pain management guideline. J Hospital Manag Health Policy. 2020;4(12):1–11.
32.
Prior L, Wilson J, Donnelly M, Murphy AW, Smith SM, Byrne M, et al. Translating policy into practice: a case study in the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease. Health Expect. 2014;17(2):291–301.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Hyatt A, Chung H, Aston R, Gough K, Krishnasamy M. Social return on investment economic evaluation of supportive care for lung cancer patients in acute care settings in Australia. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):1–12.CrossRef
34.
Vasse E, Spijker A, Meiland F, Rikkert MO, Moniz-Cook E, Vernooij-Dassen M. Barriers and facilitators in implementing quality indicators for psychosocial dementia care in European countries. A stepwise process for developing and implementing quality indicators to improve psychosocial dementia care in European countries 2012:67.
35.
Levesque J-F, Harris MF, Russell G. Patient-centred access to health care: conceptualising access at the interface of health systems and populations. Int J Equity Health. 2013;12(1):18.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
37.
Blundell HJ, Hine P. Non-communicable diseases: ditch the label and recapture public awareness. Int Health. 2019;11(1):5–6.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Diaz A, Sverdlov AL, Kelly B, Ngo DTM, Bates N, Garvey G. Nexus of Cancer and cardiovascular disease for Australia's first peoples. JCO Glob Oncol. 2020;6:115–9.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Hyatt A, Lipson-Smith R, Schofield P, Gough K, Sze M, Aldridge L, et al. Communication challenges experienced by migrants with cancer: a comparison of migrant and English-speaking Australian-born cancer patients. Health Expect. 2017;20(5):886–95.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Development of consensus quality indicators for cancer supportive care: a Delphi study and pilot testing
Authors
Amelia Hyatt
Karla Gough
Holly Chung
Wendy Wood
Ruth Aston
Jo Cockwill
Spiridoula Galetakis
Meinir Krishnasamy
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-10876-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

BMC Health Services Research 1/2024 Go to the issue

Research

Caregivers’ experiences of accessing HIV Early Infant Diagnosis (EID) services and its barriers and facilitators, India

Research

Views and experiences of healthcare professionals and patients on the implementation of a 23-hour accelerated enhanced recovery programme: a mixed-method study

Research

Perceptions of provider awareness of traditional and cultural treatments among Indigenous people who use unregulated drugs in Vancouver, Canada

Research

Cross-sectional analysis of primary care clinics’ policies, practices, and availability of patient support services during the COVID-19 pandemic

Research

Assessing catastrophic health expenditure and impoverishment in adult asthma care: a cross-sectional study of patients attending six public health clinics in Klang District, Malaysia

Research

Key factors affecting health promoting behaviors among adolescents: a scoping review