Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urology and Nephrology 2/2013

01-04-2013 | Urology - Original Paper

Development of a quality of life scale specific for patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia

Authors: Kamil Cam, Talha Muezzinoglu, Omer Aydemir, Recep Buyukalpelli, Gokhan Toktas, Hakan Gemalmaz

Published in: International Urology and Nephrology | Issue 2/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The improvement of quality of life (QoL) should be the major concern in any proposed treatment modality for any disorder. The objective of this study was to develop a new easy to use benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)-specific QoL scale that may guide the treatment policy in BPH.

Methods

A total of 118 items addressing BPH-specific QoL were produced. After an elimination process, a 20-question scale was developed. This new scale, Short Form (SF)-36 and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), was then administered to 50 healthy men (control group), and 108 BPH patients who received medical or surgical treatment. Reliability assessment consisted of internal consistency evaluation by the Cronbach’s alpha reliability test. In construct validity, factor analysis was performed using principal component analysis with Varimax rotation. Response to change of this new form was also evaluated.

Results

Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of this scale was found to be 0.8464. Item-total correlation coefficients were between 0.3298 and 0.7886 (p < 0.0001). Factor analysis for construct validity revealed four factors. The correlation coefficients were found to be r = 0.801 (p < 0.0001) with the total IPSS, and this new QoL scale had a relatively sufficient correlation with all domains of the SF-36. Moreover, a QoL score obtained by the summation of individual grades of each item may provide valuable information just like total IPSS. The mean QoL score was 4.96 ± 9.58 and 20.28 ± 9.14 in controls and BPH patients, respectively (p < 0.0001). Moreover, QoL score significantly improved by both medical and surgical treatment.

Conclusions

The new BPH-specific QoL was shown to be reliable and valid.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chute CG, Panser LA, Girman CJ et al (1993) The prevalence of prostatism: a population-based survey of urinary symptoms. J Urol 150:85–89PubMed Chute CG, Panser LA, Girman CJ et al (1993) The prevalence of prostatism: a population-based survey of urinary symptoms. J Urol 150:85–89PubMed
2.
go back to reference Garraway WM, Collins GN, Lee RJ (1991) High prevalence of benign prostatic hypertrophy in the community. Lancet 338:469–471PubMedCrossRef Garraway WM, Collins GN, Lee RJ (1991) High prevalence of benign prostatic hypertrophy in the community. Lancet 338:469–471PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Chapple CR (2003) The total approach in lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH) management: introduction and conclusions. Eur Urol Suppl 2:1–5CrossRef Chapple CR (2003) The total approach in lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH) management: introduction and conclusions. Eur Urol Suppl 2:1–5CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Novara G, Galfano A, Gardi M et al (2006) Critical review of guidelines for BPH diagnosis and treatment strategy. Eur Urol Suppl 5:418–429CrossRef Novara G, Galfano A, Gardi M et al (2006) Critical review of guidelines for BPH diagnosis and treatment strategy. Eur Urol Suppl 5:418–429CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Fourcade RO, Théret N, Taïeb C, BPH USAGE Study Group (2008) Profile and management of patients treated for the first time for lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia in four European countries. BJU Int 101:1111–1118PubMedCrossRef Fourcade RO, Théret N, Taïeb C, BPH USAGE Study Group (2008) Profile and management of patients treated for the first time for lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia in four European countries. BJU Int 101:1111–1118PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Roehrborn CG, Bartsch G, Kirby R et al (2001) Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a comparative, international overview. Urology 58:642–650PubMedCrossRef Roehrborn CG, Bartsch G, Kirby R et al (2001) Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a comparative, international overview. Urology 58:642–650PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Eckhardt MD, van Venrooij GE, van Melick HH, Boon TA (2001) Prevalence and bothersomeness of lower urinary tract symptoms in benign prostatic hyperplasia and their impact on well-being. J Urol 166:563–568PubMedCrossRef Eckhardt MD, van Venrooij GE, van Melick HH, Boon TA (2001) Prevalence and bothersomeness of lower urinary tract symptoms in benign prostatic hyperplasia and their impact on well-being. J Urol 166:563–568PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Montorsi F, Moncada I (2006) Safety and tolerability of treatment for BPH. Eur Urol Suppl 5:1004–1012CrossRef Montorsi F, Moncada I (2006) Safety and tolerability of treatment for BPH. Eur Urol Suppl 5:1004–1012CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Telliac P (1998) Relief of BPO or improvement in quality of life? Eur Urol 34(Suppl.2):3–9CrossRef Telliac P (1998) Relief of BPO or improvement in quality of life? Eur Urol 34(Suppl.2):3–9CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Peters TJ, Donovan JL, Kay HE et al (1997) The International Continence Society “Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia” Study: the botherosomeness of urinary symptoms. J Urol 157:885–889PubMedCrossRef Peters TJ, Donovan JL, Kay HE et al (1997) The International Continence Society “Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia” Study: the botherosomeness of urinary symptoms. J Urol 157:885–889PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Speakman MJ (1999) Who should be treated and how? Evidence-based medicine in symptomatic BPH. Eur Urol 36(Suppl 3):40–51PubMedCrossRef Speakman MJ (1999) Who should be treated and how? Evidence-based medicine in symptomatic BPH. Eur Urol 36(Suppl 3):40–51PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Abrams P, Donovan JL, de la Rosette JJ, Schäfer W (1997) International Continence Society “Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia” Study: background, aims, and methodology. Neurourol Urodyn 16:79–91PubMedCrossRef Abrams P, Donovan JL, de la Rosette JJ, Schäfer W (1997) International Continence Society “Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia” Study: background, aims, and methodology. Neurourol Urodyn 16:79–91PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Tsang KK, Garraway WM (1993) Impact of benign prostatic hyperplasia on general well-being of men. Prostate 23:1–7PubMedCrossRef Tsang KK, Garraway WM (1993) Impact of benign prostatic hyperplasia on general well-being of men. Prostate 23:1–7PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Trueman P, Hood SC, Nayak U, Mrazek MF (1999) Prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms and self-reported diagnosed BPH and their quality of life in a community based survey of men in the UK. Br J Urol 83:410–415 Trueman P, Hood SC, Nayak U, Mrazek MF (1999) Prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms and self-reported diagnosed BPH and their quality of life in a community based survey of men in the UK. Br J Urol 83:410–415
16.
go back to reference Madersbacher S, Alivizatos G, Nordling J, Sanz CR, Emberton M, de la Rosette JJ (2004) EAU 2004 guidelines on assessment, therapy and follow-up of men with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic obstruction (BPH guidelines). Eur Urol 46:547–554PubMedCrossRef Madersbacher S, Alivizatos G, Nordling J, Sanz CR, Emberton M, de la Rosette JJ (2004) EAU 2004 guidelines on assessment, therapy and follow-up of men with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic obstruction (BPH guidelines). Eur Urol 46:547–554PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Homma Y, Araki I, Igawa Y et al (2009) Clinical guideline for male lower urinary tract symptoms. Int J Urol 16:775–790PubMedCrossRef Homma Y, Araki I, Igawa Y et al (2009) Clinical guideline for male lower urinary tract symptoms. Int J Urol 16:775–790PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Witjes WP, de la Rosette JJ, Donovan JL (1997) The International Continence Society “Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia” Study: international differences in lower urinary tract symptoms and related bother. J Urol 157:1295–3000PubMedCrossRef Witjes WP, de la Rosette JJ, Donovan JL (1997) The International Continence Society “Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia” Study: international differences in lower urinary tract symptoms and related bother. J Urol 157:1295–3000PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Barry MJ (1997) Editorial comment: the International Continence Society “Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia” Study: international differences in lower urinary tract symptoms and related bother. J Urol 157:1300CrossRef Barry MJ (1997) Editorial comment: the International Continence Society “Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia” Study: international differences in lower urinary tract symptoms and related bother. J Urol 157:1300CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Ushijima S, Ukimura O, Okihara K, Mizutani Y, Kawauchi A, Miki T (2006) Visual analog scale questionnaire to assess quality of life specific to each symptom of the International Prostate Symptom Score. J Urol 17:665–671CrossRef Ushijima S, Ukimura O, Okihara K, Mizutani Y, Kawauchi A, Miki T (2006) Visual analog scale questionnaire to assess quality of life specific to each symptom of the International Prostate Symptom Score. J Urol 17:665–671CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Shi J, Sun Z, Cai T, Yang L (2004) Development and validation of a quality-of-life scale for Chinese patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. BJU Int 94:837–844PubMedCrossRef Shi J, Sun Z, Cai T, Yang L (2004) Development and validation of a quality-of-life scale for Chinese patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. BJU Int 94:837–844PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Guo Y, Shi J, Hu M, Sun Z (2009) Construction and validation of a short-form quality-of-life scale for Chinese patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Health Qual Life Outcomes 7:24PubMedCrossRef Guo Y, Shi J, Hu M, Sun Z (2009) Construction and validation of a short-form quality-of-life scale for Chinese patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Health Qual Life Outcomes 7:24PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 20:37–46CrossRef Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 20:37–46CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Bruskewitz RC, Reda DJ, Wasson JH, Barrett L, Phelan M (1997) Testing to predict outcome after transurethral resection of the prostate. J Urol 157:1304–1308PubMedCrossRef Bruskewitz RC, Reda DJ, Wasson JH, Barrett L, Phelan M (1997) Testing to predict outcome after transurethral resection of the prostate. J Urol 157:1304–1308PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Flanigan RC, Reda DJ, Wasson JH, Anderson RJ, Abdellatif M, Bruskewitz RC (1998) 5-year outcome of surgical resection and watchful waiting for men with moderately symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: a Department of Veterans Affairs cooperative study. J Urol 160:12–17PubMedCrossRef Flanigan RC, Reda DJ, Wasson JH, Anderson RJ, Abdellatif M, Bruskewitz RC (1998) 5-year outcome of surgical resection and watchful waiting for men with moderately symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: a Department of Veterans Affairs cooperative study. J Urol 160:12–17PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Development of a quality of life scale specific for patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia
Authors
Kamil Cam
Talha Muezzinoglu
Omer Aydemir
Recep Buyukalpelli
Gokhan Toktas
Hakan Gemalmaz
Publication date
01-04-2013
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
International Urology and Nephrology / Issue 2/2013
Print ISSN: 0301-1623
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2584
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-013-0384-4

Other articles of this Issue 2/2013

International Urology and Nephrology 2/2013 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine