Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Geriatrics
Published in: BMC Geriatrics 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

Development of a new assessment scale for measuring interaction during staff-assisted transfer of residents in dementia special care units

Authors: Charlotta Thunborg, Petra von Heideken Wågert, Eva Götell, Ann-Britt Ivarsson, Anne Söderlund

Published in: BMC Geriatrics | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Mobility problems and cognitive deficits related to transferring or moving persons suffering from dementia are associated with dependency. Physical assistance provided by staff is an important component of residents’ maintenance of mobility in dementia care facilities. Unfortunately, hands-on assistance during transfers is also a source of confusion in persons with dementia, as well as a source of strain in the caregiver. The bidirectional effect of actions in a dementia care dyad involved in transfer is complicated to evaluate. This study aimed to develop an assessment scale for measuring actions related to transferring persons with dementia by dementia care dyads.

Methods

This study was performed in four phases and guided by the framework of the biopsychosocial model and the approach presented by Social Cognitive Theory. These frameworks provided a starting point for understanding reciprocal effects in dyadic interaction. The four phases were 1) a literature review identifying existing assessment scales; 2) analyses of video-recorded transfer of persons with dementia for further generation of items, 3) computing the item content validity index of the 93 proposed items by 15 experts; and 4) expert opinion on the response scale and feasibility testing of the new assessment scale by video observation of the transfer situations.

Results

The development process resulted in a 17-item scale with a seven-point response scale. The scale consists of two sections. One section is related to transfer-related actions (e.g., capability of communication, motor skills performance, and cognitive functioning) of the person with dementia. The other section addresses the caregivers’ facilitative actions (e.g., preparedness of transfer aids, interactional skills, and means of communication and interaction). The literature review and video recordings provided ideas for the item pool. Expert opinion decreased the number of items by relevance ratings and qualitative feedback. No further development of items was performed after feasibility testing of the scale.

Conclusions

To enable assessment of transfer-related actions in dementia care dyads, our new scale shows potential for bridging the gap in this area. Results from this study could provide health care professionals working in dementia care facilities with a useful tool for assessing transfer-related actions.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Williams SW, Williams CS, Zimmerman S, Sloane PD, Preisser JS, Boustani M, et al. Characteristics associated with mobility limitation in long-term care residents with dementia. Gerontologist. 2005;45(1):62–7. Spec No 1.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Oddy R. Promoting Mobility for People with Dementia: A Problem-Solving Approach. 2nd ed. London: Age Concern England; 2003.
3.
4.
Harper CM, Lyles YM. Physiology and complications of bed rest. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1988;36(11):1047–54.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Varnam W. How to mobilise patients with dementia to a standing position. Nurs Older People. 2011;23(8):31–6.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Thunborg C, von Heideken Wågert P, Söderlund A, Götell E. Reciprocal struggling in person transfer tasks – caregivers’ experiences in dementia care. Adv Phys. 2012;14(4):175–82.
7.
Wångblad C, Ekblad M, Wijk H, Ivanoff SD. Experiences of physical strain during person transfer situations in dementia care units. Scand J Caring Sci. 2009;23(4):644–50.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Finkel SI, Costa E, Silva J, Cohen G, Miller S, Sartorius N. Behavioral and psychological signs and symptoms of dementia: a consensus statement on current knowledge and implications for research and treatment. Int Psychogeriatr. 1996;8 Suppl 3:497–500.PubMed
9.
Gitlin LN, Roth DL, Burgio LD, Loewenstein DA, Winter L, Nichols L, et al. Caregiver appraisals of functional dependence in individuals with dementia and associated caregiver upset: psychometric properties of a new scale and response patterns by caregiver and care recipient characteristics. J Aging Health. 2005;17(2):148–71.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
10.
Robert P, Ferris S, Gauthier S, Ihl R, Winblad B, Tennigkeit F. Review of Alzheimer’s disease scales: is there a need for a new multi-domain scale for therapy evaluation in medical practice? Alzheimers Res Ther. 2010;2(4):24. doi:10.1186/alzrt48.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
11.
Reisberg B, Ferris SH, de Leon MJ, Crook T. Global Deterioration Scale (GDS). Psychopharmacol Bull. 1988;24(4):661–3.PubMed
12.
Krzyminska E, Rossa G, Krzyminski S. The Global Deterioration Scale (GDS) and Functional Assessment Staging (FAST) in the diagnosis of Alzheimer type dementia. Psychiatr Pol. 1993;27(2):129–38.PubMed
13.
Chang YL, Bondi MW, McEvoy LK, Fennema-Notestine C, Salmon DP, Galasko D, et al. Global clinical dementia rating of 0.5 in MCI masks variability related to level of function. Neurology. 2011;76(7):652–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
14.
Baumgarten M, Becker R, Gauthier S. Validity and reliability of the dementia behavior disturbance scale. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1990;38(3):221–6.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Cummings JL, Mega M, Gray K, Rosenberg-Thompson S, Carusi DA, Gornbein J. The Neuropsychiatric Inventory: comprehensive assessment of psychopathology in dementia. Neurology. 1994;44(12):2308–14.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Cohen-Mansfield J, Billig N. Agitated behaviors in the elderly. I A Conceptual Rev J Am Geriatr Soc. 1986;34(10):711–21.CrossRef
17.
Bliwise DL, Lee KA. Development of an Agitated Behavior Rating Scale for discrete temporal observations. J Nurs Meas. 1993;1(2):115–24.PubMed
18.
Gaugler JE, Hobday JV, Savik K. The CARES((R)) observational tool: a valid and reliable instrument to assess person-centered dementia care. Geriatr Nurs. 2013;34(3):194–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
19.
Cooper C, Dow B, Hay S, Livingston D, Livingston G. Care workers’ abusive behavior to residents in care homes: a qualitative study of types of abuse, barriers, and facilitators to good care and development of an instrument for reporting of abuse anonymously. Int Psychogeriatr. 2013;25(5):733–41.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Williams CL, Parker C. Development of an observer rating scale for caregiver communication in persons with Alzheimer’s disease. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2012;33(4):244–50.PubMedCrossRef
21.
22.
Bandura A. Social Learning Theory. Prentice-Hall Series in Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs N J: Prentice Hall; 1977.
23.
24.
Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to their Development and Use. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.CrossRef
25.
Mahoney EK, Hurley AC, Volicer L, Bell M, Gianotis P, Hartshorn M, et al. Development and testing of the Resistiveness to Care Scale. Res Nurs Health. 1999;22(1):27–38.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Fayers PM, Machin D. Quality of Life: The Assessment, Analysis, and Interpretation of Patient-Reported Outcomes. 2. rev. ed. Chichester: Wiley; 2007.CrossRef
27.
Cockrell JR, Folstein MF. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Psychopharmacol Bull. 1988;24(4):689–92.PubMed
28.
de Villiers MR, de Villiers PJ, Kent AP. The Delphi technique in health sciences education research. Med Teach. 2005;27(7):639–43.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Morgan PJ, Lam-McCulloch J, Herold-McIlroy J, Tarshis J. Simulation performance checklist generation using the Delphi technique. Can J Anaesth. 2007;54(12):992–7.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Polit DF, Beck CT, Owen SV. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2007;30(4):459–67.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Jensen MP, Karoly P, Braver S. The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods. Pain. 1986;27(1):117–26.PubMedCrossRef
32.
33.
Lichtenstein MJ, Burger MC, Shields SL, Shiavi RG. Comparison of biomechanics platform measures of balance and videotaped measures of gait with a clinical mobility scale in elderly women. J Gerontol. 1990;45(2):M49–54.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Aberg AC, Lindmark B, Lithell H. Development and reliability of the General Motor Function Assessment Scale (GMF)–a performance-based measure of function-related dependence, pain and insecurity. Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25(9):462–72.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Pan AW, Fisher AG. The Assessment of Motor and Process Skills of persons with psychiatric disorders. Am J Occup Ther. 1994;48(9):775–80.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Reisberg B. Functional assessment staging (FAST). Psychopharmacol Bull. 1988;24(4):653–9.PubMed
37.
Mahurin RK, DeBettignies BH, Pirozzolo FJ. Structured assessment of independent living skills: preliminary report of a performance measure of functional abilities in dementia. J Gerontol. 1991;46(2):58–66.CrossRef
38.
Barberger-Gateau P, Commenges D, Gagnon M, Letenneur L, Sauvel C, Dartigues JF. Instrumental activities of daily living as a screening tool for cognitive impairment and dementia in elderly community dwellers. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992;40(11):1129–34.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Basic D, Rowland JT, Conforti DA, Vrantsidis F, Hill K, LoGiudice D, et al. The validity of the Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale (RUDAS) in a multicultural cohort of community-dwelling older persons with early dementia. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2009;23(2):124–9.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Bobholz JH, Brandt J. Assessment of cognitive impairment: relationship of the Dementia Rating Scale to the Mini-Mental State Examination. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 1993;6(4):210–3.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Alexopoulos G, Abrams R, Young R, Shamoian C. Cornell scale for depression in dementia. Biol Psychiatry. 1988;23(3):271–84.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Hughes CP, Berg L, Danziger WL, Coben LA, Martin RL. A new clinical scale for the staging of dementia. Br J Psychiatry. 1982;140:566–72.PubMedCrossRef
43.
Wallin A, Edman A, Blennow K, Gottfries CG, Karlsson I, Regland B, et al. Stepwise comparative status analysis (STEP): a tool for identification of regional brain syndromes in dementia. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 1996;9(4):185–99.PubMedCrossRef
44.
Hurley AC, Volicer BJ, Hanrahan PA, Houde S, Volicer L. Assessment of discomfort in advanced Alzheimer patients. Res Nurs Health. 1992;15(5):369–77.PubMedCrossRef
45.
Grosch K, Medvene L, Wolcott H. Person-centered caregiving instruction for geriatric nursing assistant students: development and evaluation. J Gerontol Nurs. 2008;34(8):23–31.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Campbell JL, Rowe MA, Marsiske M. Behavioral symptoms of dementia: a dyadic effect of caregivers’ stress process? Res Gerontol Nurs. 2011;4(3):168–84.PubMedCrossRef
47.
DeVellis RF. Scale Development: Theory and Applications. 3rd ed. Applied Social Research Methods Series. London: SAGE; 2012.
48.
Friedman-Weieneth JL, Doctoroff GL, Harvey EA, Goldstein LH. The Disruptive Behavior Rating Scale—Parent Version (DBRS-PV): factor analytic structure and validity among young preschool children. J Atten Disord. 2009;13(1):42–55.PubMedCrossRef
49.
Gioia GA, Isquith PK, Guy SC, Kenworthy L. Behavior rating inventory of executive function. Child Neuropsychol. 2000;6(3):235–8.PubMedCrossRef
50.
Lord C, Risi S, Lambrecht L, Cook Jr EH, Leventhal BL, DiLavore PC, et al. The autism diagnostic observation schedule-generic: a standard measure of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism. J Autism Dev Disord. 2000;30(3):205–23.PubMedCrossRef
51.
Messinger DS, Mahoor MH, Chow S-M, Haltigan JD, Cadavid S, Cohn JF. Early emotional communication: Novel approaches to interaction. In: Gratch J, Marsella S, editors. Social Emotions in Nature and Artifact. New York: Oxford University Press; 2014.
52.
Worthington RL, Whittaker TA. Scale development research a content analysis and recommendations for best practices. Couns Psychol. 2006;34(6):806–38.CrossRef
53.
Elder JH. Videotaped behavioral observations: enhancing validity and reliability. Appl Nurs Res. 1999;12(4):206–9.PubMedCrossRef
54.
Heggestad AK, Nortvedt P, Slettebo A. The importance of moral sensitivity when including persons with dementia in qualitative research. Nurs Ethics. 2013;20(1):30–40.PubMedCrossRef
55.
Cabrera-Nguyen P. Author guidelines for reporting scale development and validation results. Soc Soc Work Res. 2010;1(2):99–103.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Development of a new assessment scale for measuring interaction during staff-assisted transfer of residents in dementia special care units
Authors
Charlotta Thunborg
Petra von Heideken Wågert
Eva Götell
Ann-Britt Ivarsson
Anne Söderlund
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Geriatrics / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2318
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-015-0003-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Geriatrics 1/2015 Go to the issue

Study protocol

Vitamin D supplementation to prevent depression and poor physical function in older adults: Study protocol of the D-Vitaal study, a randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial

Research article

Application of simple swallowing provocation test with fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing in a cross-sectional study

Research article

Community-based primary health care for older adults: a qualitative study of the perceptions of clients, caregivers and health care providers

Research article

Association between pain, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and physical function in dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Research article

Senior orienteering athletes as a model of healthy aging: a mixed-method approach

Research article

Longitudinal changes in mobility among nonagenarians: the Vitality 90+ Study
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

Read more

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Pediatric Cardiology Video

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

Cardiopulmonary Comorbidity Video

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Valvular Heart Disease Video

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Heart Failure Video

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.

ACC 2024 Congress Coverage

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Heart Failure Video

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.

Watch now

Semaglutide benefits people with type 2 diabetes and obesity-related heart failure

16-04-2024 Type 2 Diabetes News

Incentivised to exercise

11-04-2024 Lifestyle Modifications News

New intervention for STEMI-related cardiogenic shock

10-04-2024 Myocardial Infarction News

» View more highlights on the ACC 2024 congress hub page

Image Credits