Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2015

01-08-2015 | Review

Development and validation of the Female Sexual Function Index adaptation for breast cancer patients (FSFI-BC)

Authors: Iris Bartula, Kerry A. Sherman

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 3/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Sexual dysfunction following breast cancer treatment is common and screening for this is recommended. This study determined the reliability, validity, and acceptability of a breast cancer-specific adaptation of the Female Sexual Function Index, the FSFI-BC. This new measure addresses limitations in the FSFI when assessing sexual dysfunction of women with breast cancer regarding applicability to non-sexually active women, measuring distress and changes after cancer. Female breast cancer survivors (n = 596; 429 sexually active, 166 non-sexually active) completed an online survey including demographic/medical information, the FSFI-BC, and scales measuring sexual functioning, fatigue, body image, physical and mental health, and relationship adjustment (Time 1). Three weeks later, 326 women (245 sexually active; 81 non-sexually active) completed the Time 2 survey including the FSFI-BC, and questions regarding its acceptability and perceived change in sexual functioning. Reliability, construct validity, and acceptability were examined using standard scale validation techniques. Exploratory factor analysis delineated seven factors: Changes after cancer, desire/arousal, lubrication, orgasm, pain, satisfaction, and distress, accounting for 79.98 % (sexually active) and 77.19 % (non-active) variance in responses. Acceptable internal consistencies (non-active: α = 0.71–0.96; sexually active: α = 0.89–0.96) and test–retest reliabilities (non-active: r = 0.63–0.86; sexually active: r = 0.71–0.88) were evident. Inter-scale correlations provided evidence for convergent and divergent validities of the FSFI-BC. Both sexually active and non-active women provided positive feedback about the FSFI-BC. The optional partner questions demonstrated clinical utility. With desirable psychometric properties and acceptability to participants, the FSFI-BC is suitable for screening for sexual dysfunction in women with breast cancer.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray F (2015) Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 136(5):E359–E386CrossRefPubMed Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray F (2015) Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 136(5):E359–E386CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference DeSantis C, Ma J, Bryan L, Jemal A (2014) Breast cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin 64(1):52–62CrossRefPubMed DeSantis C, Ma J, Bryan L, Jemal A (2014) Breast cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin 64(1):52–62CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Den Oudsten BL, Van Heck GL, Van der Steeg AFW, Roukema JA, De Vries J (2009) The WHOQOL-100 has good psychometric properties in breast cancer patients. J Clin Epidemiol 62(2):195–205CrossRef Den Oudsten BL, Van Heck GL, Van der Steeg AFW, Roukema JA, De Vries J (2009) The WHOQOL-100 has good psychometric properties in breast cancer patients. J Clin Epidemiol 62(2):195–205CrossRef
4.
go back to reference World Health Organization: defining sexual health: report of a technical consultation on sexual health, 28–31 January 2002. In. Geneva; 2006 World Health Organization: defining sexual health: report of a technical consultation on sexual health, 28–31 January 2002. In. Geneva; 2006
5.
go back to reference Kedde H, van de Wiel HB, Weijmar Schultz WC, Wijsen C (2013) Sexual dysfunction in young women with breast cancer. Support Care Cancer 21(1):271–280CrossRefPubMed Kedde H, van de Wiel HB, Weijmar Schultz WC, Wijsen C (2013) Sexual dysfunction in young women with breast cancer. Support Care Cancer 21(1):271–280CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Knobf MT (2011) Clinical update: psychosocial responses in breast cancer survivors. Semin Oncol Nurs 27(3):e1–e14CrossRefPubMed Knobf MT (2011) Clinical update: psychosocial responses in breast cancer survivors. Semin Oncol Nurs 27(3):e1–e14CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Hahn KME (2008) Sexuality and breast cancer survivorship. In: Hunt KK, Robb GL, Strom EA, Ueno NT (eds) Breast cancer, vol 2. Springer, New York Hahn KME (2008) Sexuality and breast cancer survivorship. In: Hunt KK, Robb GL, Strom EA, Ueno NT (eds) Breast cancer, vol 2. Springer, New York
8.
go back to reference Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, Ferguson D, D’Agostino R Jr (2000) The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther 26(2):191–208CrossRefPubMed Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, Ferguson D, D’Agostino R Jr (2000) The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther 26(2):191–208CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Bartula I, Sherman KA (2013) Screening for sexual dysfunction in women diagnosed with breast cancer: systematic review and recommendations. Breast Cancer Res Treat 141(2):173–185PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Bartula I, Sherman KA (2013) Screening for sexual dysfunction in women diagnosed with breast cancer: systematic review and recommendations. Breast Cancer Res Treat 141(2):173–185PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnostic and statistical manual of psychiatric disorders, 5th edn. American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnostic and statistical manual of psychiatric disorders, 5th edn. American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC
11.
go back to reference World Health Organization (2004) International statistical classification of diseases and health related problems. World Health Organization, Geneva World Health Organization (2004) International statistical classification of diseases and health related problems. World Health Organization, Geneva
12.
go back to reference Baser RE, Li Y, Carter J (2012) Psychometric validation of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) in cancer survivors. Cancer 118(18):4606–4618CrossRefPubMed Baser RE, Li Y, Carter J (2012) Psychometric validation of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) in cancer survivors. Cancer 118(18):4606–4618CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Bartula I, Sherman KA (2015) The Female Sexual Functioning Index (FSFI): evaluation of acceptability, reliability and validity in women with breast cancer. Support Care Cancer Bartula I, Sherman KA (2015) The Female Sexual Functioning Index (FSFI): evaluation of acceptability, reliability and validity in women with breast cancer. Support Care Cancer
14.
go back to reference Meyer-Bahlburg HF, Dolezal C (2007) The female sexual function index: a methodological critique and suggestions for improvement. J Sex Marital Ther 33(3):217–224CrossRefPubMed Meyer-Bahlburg HF, Dolezal C (2007) The female sexual function index: a methodological critique and suggestions for improvement. J Sex Marital Ther 33(3):217–224CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Hayes RD (2008) Assessing female sexual dysfunction in epidimiological studies: why is it necessary to measure both low sexual function and sexually-related distress? Sexual Health 5:215–218CrossRefPubMed Hayes RD (2008) Assessing female sexual dysfunction in epidimiological studies: why is it necessary to measure both low sexual function and sexually-related distress? Sexual Health 5:215–218CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Stephenson KR, Meston CM (2010) Differentiating components of sexual well-being in women: are sexual satisfaction and sexual distress independent constructs? J Sex Med 7(7):2458–2468PubMed Stephenson KR, Meston CM (2010) Differentiating components of sexual well-being in women: are sexual satisfaction and sexual distress independent constructs? J Sex Med 7(7):2458–2468PubMed
17.
go back to reference Coscarelli A, Heinrich RL (1988) Cancer Rehabilitation Evaluation System (CARES): Manual: CARES Consultants Coscarelli A, Heinrich RL (1988) Cancer Rehabilitation Evaluation System (CARES): Manual: CARES Consultants
18.
go back to reference Ganz PA, Schag CAC, Lee JJ, Sim MS (1992) The CARES: a generic measure of health-related quality of life for patients with cancer. Qual Life Res 1(1):19–29CrossRefPubMed Ganz PA, Schag CAC, Lee JJ, Sim MS (1992) The CARES: a generic measure of health-related quality of life for patients with cancer. Qual Life Res 1(1):19–29CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Perez M, Liu Y, Schootman M, Aft RL, Schechtman KB, Gillanders WE, Jeffe DB (2010) Changes in sexual problems over time in women with and without early-stage breast cancer. Menopause 17(5):924–937PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Perez M, Liu Y, Schootman M, Aft RL, Schechtman KB, Gillanders WE, Jeffe DB (2010) Changes in sexual problems over time in women with and without early-stage breast cancer. Menopause 17(5):924–937PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Hopwood P, Fletcher I, Lee A, Ghazal SA (2001) A body image scale for use with cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 37:189–197CrossRefPubMed Hopwood P, Fletcher I, Lee A, Ghazal SA (2001) A body image scale for use with cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 37:189–197CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference De Vries J, Van der Steeg AF, Roukema JA (2010) Psychometric properties of the Fatigue Assessment Scale in women with breast problems. Int J Clin Health Psychol 10(1):125–139 De Vries J, Van der Steeg AF, Roukema JA (2010) Psychometric properties of the Fatigue Assessment Scale in women with breast problems. Int J Clin Health Psychol 10(1):125–139
22.
go back to reference Stewart AL, Hays RD, Ware JE (1988) The MOS Short-Form General Health Survey: reliability and validity in patient population. Med Care 26(7):724–735CrossRefPubMed Stewart AL, Hays RD, Ware JE (1988) The MOS Short-Form General Health Survey: reliability and validity in patient population. Med Care 26(7):724–735CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Graham JM, Liu YJ, Jeziorski JL (2006) The Dyadic Adjustment Scale: a reliability generalisation meta-analysis. J Marriage Fam 68:701–717CrossRef Graham JM, Liu YJ, Jeziorski JL (2006) The Dyadic Adjustment Scale: a reliability generalisation meta-analysis. J Marriage Fam 68:701–717CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Schafer JL, Graham JW (2002) Missing data: our view of the state of the art. Psychol Methods 7(2):147–177CrossRefPubMed Schafer JL, Graham JW (2002) Missing data: our view of the state of the art. Psychol Methods 7(2):147–177CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Streiner DL, Norman GR (1995) Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. Oxford University Press, Oxford Streiner DL, Norman GR (1995) Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. Oxford University Press, Oxford
26.
go back to reference Aday LA, Cornelius LJ (2006) Designing and conducting health surveys, vol 3. Josey-Bass, San Francisco, CA Aday LA, Cornelius LJ (2006) Designing and conducting health surveys, vol 3. Josey-Bass, San Francisco, CA
27.
go back to reference Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH (1994) Psychometric theory, 3rd edn. McGraw Hill, New York Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH (1994) Psychometric theory, 3rd edn. McGraw Hill, New York
28.
go back to reference Hemphill JF (2003) Interpreting the magnitudes of correlation coefficients. Am Psychol 58(1):78–80CrossRefPubMed Hemphill JF (2003) Interpreting the magnitudes of correlation coefficients. Am Psychol 58(1):78–80CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Stewart AL, Ware JE (eds) (1992) Measuring functioning and well-being: the Medical Outcomes Study approach. Duke University Press, Durham Stewart AL, Ware JE (eds) (1992) Measuring functioning and well-being: the Medical Outcomes Study approach. Duke University Press, Durham
30.
go back to reference Fabrigar LR, Wegener DT, MacCallum RC, Strahan EJ (1999) Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychol Methods 4(3):272–299CrossRef Fabrigar LR, Wegener DT, MacCallum RC, Strahan EJ (1999) Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychol Methods 4(3):272–299CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Wiegel M, Meston C, Rosen R (2005) The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): cross-validation and development of clinical cutoff scores. J Sex Marital Ther 31(1):1–20CrossRefPubMed Wiegel M, Meston C, Rosen R (2005) The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): cross-validation and development of clinical cutoff scores. J Sex Marital Ther 31(1):1–20CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Den Oudsten BL, Van Heck GL, Van der Steeg AF, Roukema JA, De Vries J (2010) Clinical factors are not the best predictors of quality of sexual life and sexual functioning in women with early stage breast cancer. Psychooncology 19(6):646–656CrossRef Den Oudsten BL, Van Heck GL, Van der Steeg AF, Roukema JA, De Vries J (2010) Clinical factors are not the best predictors of quality of sexual life and sexual functioning in women with early stage breast cancer. Psychooncology 19(6):646–656CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Aerts L, Christiaens MR, Enzlin P, Neven P, Amant F (2014) Sexual functioning in women after mastectomy versus breast conserving therapy for early-stage breast cancer: a prospective controlled study. Breast 23(5):629–636CrossRefPubMed Aerts L, Christiaens MR, Enzlin P, Neven P, Amant F (2014) Sexual functioning in women after mastectomy versus breast conserving therapy for early-stage breast cancer: a prospective controlled study. Breast 23(5):629–636CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Raggio GA, Butryn ML, Arigo D, Mikorski R, Palmer SC (2014) Prevalence and correlates of sexual morbidity in long-term breast cancer survivors. Psychol Health 29(6):632–650CrossRefPubMed Raggio GA, Butryn ML, Arigo D, Mikorski R, Palmer SC (2014) Prevalence and correlates of sexual morbidity in long-term breast cancer survivors. Psychol Health 29(6):632–650CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference The WHOQOL Group (1998) The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment: development and general psychometric properties. Soc Sci Med 46(12):1569–1585CrossRef The WHOQOL Group (1998) The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment: development and general psychometric properties. Soc Sci Med 46(12):1569–1585CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Development and validation of the Female Sexual Function Index adaptation for breast cancer patients (FSFI-BC)
Authors
Iris Bartula
Kerry A. Sherman
Publication date
01-08-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 3/2015
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3499-8

Other articles of this Issue 3/2015

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2015 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine