Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Intensive Care Medicine 5/2007

01-05-2007 | Technical Note

Determination of functional residual capacity by oxygen washin-washout: a validation study

Authors: Stefan Maisch, Stephan H. Boehm, Dieter Weismann, Hajo Reissmann, Marcus Beckmann, Bernd Fuellekrug, Andreas Meyer, Jochen Schulte am Esch

Published in: Intensive Care Medicine | Issue 5/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To validate a new system for functional residual capacity (FRC) measurements using oxygen washin/washout in spontaneously breathing humans. The system (LUFU, Drägerwerk AG, Lübeck, Germany) consists of an unmodified EVITA 4 ventilator, a side-stream paramagnetic oxygen sensor and a dedicated software.

Design

Laboratory study and measurements in spontaneously breathing volunteers.

Setting

Pulmonary function laboratory of a university hospital.

Participants

20 healthy and 15 lung diseased volunteers.

Interventions

FRC was measured by LUFU (LUFU-FRC) and by helium dilution (He-FRC); intra-thoracic gas volume (ITGV) was determined by body plethysmography. Each measurement cycle consisted of four independent LUFU-FRC determinations (step change of FiO2 from 0.21 to 0.5 and back and from 0.21 to 1.0 and back), two helium-dilution runs and two body box measurements. Repeatability and agreement between methods were determined by comparing different measurements of one technique and by comparing different techniques among each other.

Measurements and results

Repeatability of LUFU-FRC was estimated by comparing washin to washout and the different FiO2steps. The difference of the means was 3.7% at the most. Agreement between methods resulted in the following differences (mean ± standard deviation of differences) for healthy and lung-diseased volunteers, respectively: LUFU-FRC vs. He-FRC –0.40 ± 0.50 L (0.02 ± 0.95 L), LUFU-FRC vs. ITGV –0.43 ± 0.54 L (–0.18 ± 0.61 L) and He-FRC vs. ITGV –0.03 ± 0.43 L (–0.20 ± 0.98 L).

Conclusions

LUFU is a non-invasive method for the determination of FRC that requires only minor additional equipment and no modification to the ventilator. It can be used in difficult conditions such as breathing patterns with variations from breath to breath. The results of this study show that LUFU is sufficiently reliable and repeatable to warrant its clinical application.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hedenstierna G (1993) The recording of FRC: Is it of importance and can it be made simple? Intensive Care Med 19:365–366CrossRefPubMed Hedenstierna G (1993) The recording of FRC: Is it of importance and can it be made simple? Intensive Care Med 19:365–366CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Larsson A, Linnarsson C, Jonmarker C, Jonson B, Larsson H, Werner O (1987) Measurement of lung volume by sulfur hexafluoride washout during spontaneous and controlled ventilation: further development of a method. Anesthesiology 67:543–550CrossRefPubMed Larsson A, Linnarsson C, Jonmarker C, Jonson B, Larsson H, Werner O (1987) Measurement of lung volume by sulfur hexafluoride washout during spontaneous and controlled ventilation: further development of a method. Anesthesiology 67:543–550CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Saniie J, Saidel GM, Chester EH (1979) Realtime moment analysis of pulmonary nitrogen washout. J Appl Physiol 46:1184–1190CrossRefPubMed Saniie J, Saidel GM, Chester EH (1979) Realtime moment analysis of pulmonary nitrogen washout. J Appl Physiol 46:1184–1190CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Suter PM, Schlobohm RM (1974) Determination of functional residual capacity during mechanical ventilation. Anesthesiology 41:605–607CrossRefPubMed Suter PM, Schlobohm RM (1974) Determination of functional residual capacity during mechanical ventilation. Anesthesiology 41:605–607CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Wrigge H, Sydow M, Zinserling J, Neumann P, Hinz J, Burchardi H (1998) Determination of functional residual capacity (FRC) by multibreath nitrogen washout in a lung model and in mechanically ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med 24:487–449CrossRefPubMed Wrigge H, Sydow M, Zinserling J, Neumann P, Hinz J, Burchardi H (1998) Determination of functional residual capacity (FRC) by multibreath nitrogen washout in a lung model and in mechanically ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med 24:487–449CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Weismann D, Reissmann H, Maisch S, Füllekrug B, Schulte am Esch J (2006) Determination of functional residual capacity with an oxygen washin/washout: technical description and evaluation. J Clin Mon Comp 20:251–260CrossRef Weismann D, Reissmann H, Maisch S, Füllekrug B, Schulte am Esch J (2006) Determination of functional residual capacity with an oxygen washin/washout: technical description and evaluation. J Clin Mon Comp 20:251–260CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310CrossRefPubMed Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Hildebrand H, Islam MS, Ulmer WT (1984) Comparison between body plethysmographic measurement of the intrathoracic gas volume and oscillatory measurement of the functional residual air capacity in healthy volunteers, miners with and without obstruction of the airways and in patients not exposed to dust but with obstructive airways disease. Prax Klin Pneumol 38:217–219PubMed Hildebrand H, Islam MS, Ulmer WT (1984) Comparison between body plethysmographic measurement of the intrathoracic gas volume and oscillatory measurement of the functional residual air capacity in healthy volunteers, miners with and without obstruction of the airways and in patients not exposed to dust but with obstructive airways disease. Prax Klin Pneumol 38:217–219PubMed
9.
go back to reference Kendrick AH (1996) Comparison of methods of measuring static lung volumes. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis 51:431–439PubMed Kendrick AH (1996) Comparison of methods of measuring static lung volumes. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis 51:431–439PubMed
10.
go back to reference Quanjer PH, Tammeling GJ, Cotes JE, Pedersen OF, Peslin R, Yernault JC (1993) Lung volumes and forced ventilatory flows. Report of the Working Party on Standardization of Lung Function Tests. European Community for Steel and Coal. Official statement of the European Respiratory Society. Eur Respir J 6(Suppl 16):5–40CrossRefPubMed Quanjer PH, Tammeling GJ, Cotes JE, Pedersen OF, Peslin R, Yernault JC (1993) Lung volumes and forced ventilatory flows. Report of the Working Party on Standardization of Lung Function Tests. European Community for Steel and Coal. Official statement of the European Respiratory Society. Eur Respir J 6(Suppl 16):5–40CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Schaanning CG, Gulsvik A (1973) Accuracy and precision of helium dilution technique and body plethysmography in measuring lung volumes. Scand J Lab Invest 32:271–277CrossRef Schaanning CG, Gulsvik A (1973) Accuracy and precision of helium dilution technique and body plethysmography in measuring lung volumes. Scand J Lab Invest 32:271–277CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Germouty J, Charruyer-Latrille G, Boyer M, Charles A, Jaubert A, Chatelut J, Chantegreil D, Germouty C (1970) La mesure de la capacité résiduelle fonctionelle. Comparaison de trois méthodes: Spirographique, radiographique et plethysmographique chez 100 adultes normaux. Poumon 26:589–594 Germouty J, Charruyer-Latrille G, Boyer M, Charles A, Jaubert A, Chatelut J, Chantegreil D, Germouty C (1970) La mesure de la capacité résiduelle fonctionelle. Comparaison de trois méthodes: Spirographique, radiographique et plethysmographique chez 100 adultes normaux. Poumon 26:589–594
14.
go back to reference Rodenstein DO, Stanescu DC (1982) Reassessment of lung volume measurement by helium dilution and by body plethysmography in chronic airflow obstruction. Am Rev Respir Dis 126:1040–1044PubMed Rodenstein DO, Stanescu DC (1982) Reassessment of lung volume measurement by helium dilution and by body plethysmography in chronic airflow obstruction. Am Rev Respir Dis 126:1040–1044PubMed
15.
go back to reference Eichler W, Schumacher J, Roth-Isigkeit A, Braun J, Kuppe H, Klotz KF (2002) Automated evaluation of functional residual capacity by oxygen washout. J Clin Monit 17:195–201CrossRef Eichler W, Schumacher J, Roth-Isigkeit A, Braun J, Kuppe H, Klotz KF (2002) Automated evaluation of functional residual capacity by oxygen washout. J Clin Monit 17:195–201CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Olegard C, Söndergaard S, Houltz E, Lundin S, Stenqvist O (2005) Estimation of functional residual capacity at the bedside using standard monitoring equipment: a modified nitrogen washout/washin technique requiring a small change of the inspired oxygen fraction. Anesth Analg 101:206–212CrossRefPubMed Olegard C, Söndergaard S, Houltz E, Lundin S, Stenqvist O (2005) Estimation of functional residual capacity at the bedside using standard monitoring equipment: a modified nitrogen washout/washin technique requiring a small change of the inspired oxygen fraction. Anesth Analg 101:206–212CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Stenqvist O, Olegard C, Sondergaard S, Odenstedt H, Karason S, Lundin S (2002) Monitoring functional residual capacity (FRC) by quantifying oxygen/carbon dioxide fluxes during a short apnea. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 46:732–739CrossRefPubMed Stenqvist O, Olegard C, Sondergaard S, Odenstedt H, Karason S, Lundin S (2002) Monitoring functional residual capacity (FRC) by quantifying oxygen/carbon dioxide fluxes during a short apnea. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 46:732–739CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Determination of functional residual capacity by oxygen washin-washout: a validation study
Authors
Stefan Maisch
Stephan H. Boehm
Dieter Weismann
Hajo Reissmann
Marcus Beckmann
Bernd Fuellekrug
Andreas Meyer
Jochen Schulte am Esch
Publication date
01-05-2007
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine / Issue 5/2007
Print ISSN: 0342-4642
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1238
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-007-0578-2

Other articles of this Issue 5/2007

Intensive Care Medicine 5/2007 Go to the issue