Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research

Determinants of orphan drugs prices in France: a regression analysis

Authors: Daria Korchagina, Aurelie Millier, Anne-Lise Vataire, Samuel Aballea, Bruno Falissard, Mondher Toumi

Published in: Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The introduction of the orphan drug legislation led to the increase in the number of available orphan drugs, but the access to them is often limited due to the high price. Social preferences regarding funding orphan drugs as well as the criteria taken into consideration while setting the price remain unclear. The study aimed at identifying the determinant of orphan drug prices in France using a regression analysis.

Methods

All drugs with a valid orphan designation at the moment of launch for which the price was available in France were included in the analysis. The selection of covariates was based on a literature review and included drug characteristics (Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) class, treatment line, age of target population), diseases characteristics (severity, prevalence, availability of alternative therapeutic options), health technology assessment (HTA) details (actual benefit (AB) and improvement in actual benefit (IAB) scores, delay between the HTA and commercialisation), and study characteristics (type of study, comparator, type of endpoint). The main data sources were European public assessment reports, HTA reports, summaries of opinion on orphan designation of the European Medicines Agency, and the French insurance database of drugs and tariffs. A generalized regression model was developed to test the association between the annual treatment cost and selected covariates.

Results

A total of 68 drugs were included. The mean annual treatment cost was €96,518. In the univariate analysis, the ATC class (p = 0.01), availability of alternative treatment options (p = 0.02) and the prevalence (p = 0.02) showed a significant correlation with the annual cost. The multivariate analysis demonstrated significant association between the annual cost and availability of alternative treatment options, ATC class, IAB score, type of comparator in the pivotal clinical trial, as well as commercialisation date and delay between the HTA and commercialisation.

Conclusion

The orphan drug pricing is a multivariate phenomenon. The complex association between drug prices and the studied attributes and shows that payers integrate multiple variables in decision making when setting orphan drug prices. The interpretation of the study results is limited by the small sample size and the complex data structure.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Gammie T, Lu CY, Babar ZU-D. Access to orphan drugs: a comprehensive review of legislations, regulations and policies in 35 countries. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0140002.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gammie T, Lu CY, Babar ZU-D. Access to orphan drugs: a comprehensive review of legislations, regulations and policies in 35 countries. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0140002.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Roos JC, Hyry HI, Cox TM. Orphan drug pricing may warrant a competition law investigation. BMJ. 2010;341:c6471.CrossRefPubMed Roos JC, Hyry HI, Cox TM. Orphan drug pricing may warrant a competition law investigation. BMJ. 2010;341:c6471.CrossRefPubMed
4.
6.
go back to reference Simoens S, Cassiman D, Dooms M, Picavet E. Orphan drugs for rare diseases: is it time to revisit their special market access status? Drugs. 2012;72:1437–43.CrossRefPubMed Simoens S, Cassiman D, Dooms M, Picavet E. Orphan drugs for rare diseases: is it time to revisit their special market access status? Drugs. 2012;72:1437–43.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference DataMonitor Healthcare. Orphan drug trends 2011. Reference code: HC00143-001; 2011. DataMonitor Healthcare. Orphan drug trends 2011. Reference code: HC00143-001; 2011.
8.
go back to reference Rodrigues J, Korchagina D, Rémuzat C, Brunet J, Tavella F. Orphan drug approvals in Europe: historical review and trends. Value Health. 2014;17:A539.CrossRefPubMed Rodrigues J, Korchagina D, Rémuzat C, Brunet J, Tavella F. Orphan drug approvals in Europe: historical review and trends. Value Health. 2014;17:A539.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Excellence NIfHaC. Citizens council reports: ultra orphan drugs. 2004. Excellence NIfHaC. Citizens council reports: ultra orphan drugs. 2004.
10.
go back to reference Linley WG, Hughes DA. Societal views on NICE, cancer drugs fund and value-based pricing criteria for prioritising medicines: a cross-sectional survey of 4118 adults in Great Britain. Health Econ. 2013;22:948–64.CrossRefPubMed Linley WG, Hughes DA. Societal views on NICE, cancer drugs fund and value-based pricing criteria for prioritising medicines: a cross-sectional survey of 4118 adults in Great Britain. Health Econ. 2013;22:948–64.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Desser AS, Gyrd-Hansen D, Olsen JA, Grepperud S, Kristiansen IS. Societal views on orphan drugs: cross sectional survey of Norwegians aged 40 to 67. BMJ. 2010;341:c4715.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Desser AS, Gyrd-Hansen D, Olsen JA, Grepperud S, Kristiansen IS. Societal views on orphan drugs: cross sectional survey of Norwegians aged 40 to 67. BMJ. 2010;341:c4715.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Drummond M, Towse A. Orphan drugs policies: a suitable case for treatment. [Review]. Eur J Health Econ. 2014;15:335–40.CrossRefPubMed Drummond M, Towse A. Orphan drugs policies: a suitable case for treatment. [Review]. Eur J Health Econ. 2014;15:335–40.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Clarke JT. Is the current approach to reviewing new drugs condemning the victims of rare diseases to death? A call for a national orphan drug review policy. CMAJ. 2006;174:189–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Clarke JT. Is the current approach to reviewing new drugs condemning the victims of rare diseases to death? A call for a national orphan drug review policy. CMAJ. 2006;174:189–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Panju AH, Bell CM. Policy alternatives for treatments for rare diseases. Can Med Assoc J. 2010;182:E787–92.CrossRef Panju AH, Bell CM. Policy alternatives for treatments for rare diseases. Can Med Assoc J. 2010;182:E787–92.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Adams B. Rare drugs - raw deal? Pharma Times Mag. 2013:35–7. Adams B. Rare drugs - raw deal? Pharma Times Mag. 2013:35–7.
16.
go back to reference Hughes-Wilson W, Palma A, Schuurman A, Simoens S. Paying for the Orphan Drug System: break or bend? Is it time for a new evaluation system for payers in Europe to take account of new rare disease treatments? Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2012;7:74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hughes-Wilson W, Palma A, Schuurman A, Simoens S. Paying for the Orphan Drug System: break or bend? Is it time for a new evaluation system for payers in Europe to take account of new rare disease treatments? Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2012;7:74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Simoens S, Picavet E, Dooms M, Cassiman D, Morel T. Cost-effectiveness assessment of orphan drugs: a scientific and political conundrum. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013;11:1–3.CrossRefPubMed Simoens S, Picavet E, Dooms M, Cassiman D, Morel T. Cost-effectiveness assessment of orphan drugs: a scientific and political conundrum. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013;11:1–3.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Sussex J, Rollet P, Garau M, Schmitt C, Kent A, Hutchings A. A pilot study of multicriteria decision analysis for valuing orphan medicines. Value Health. 2013;16:1163–9.CrossRefPubMed Sussex J, Rollet P, Garau M, Schmitt C, Kent A, Hutchings A. A pilot study of multicriteria decision analysis for valuing orphan medicines. Value Health. 2013;16:1163–9.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Commission E. Transparent value framework (Platform on access to medicines in Europe - Working Group on Mechanism of coordinated access to orphan medicinal products). 2014. Commission E. Transparent value framework (Platform on access to medicines in Europe - Working Group on Mechanism of coordinated access to orphan medicinal products). 2014.
20.
go back to reference Paulden M, Stafinski T, Menon D, McCabe C. Value-based reimbursement decisions for orphan drugs: a scoping review and decision framework. Pharmacoeconomics. 2015;33:255–69.CrossRefPubMed Paulden M, Stafinski T, Menon D, McCabe C. Value-based reimbursement decisions for orphan drugs: a scoping review and decision framework. Pharmacoeconomics. 2015;33:255–69.CrossRefPubMed
21.
22.
go back to reference Winquist E, Bell CM, Clarke JT, Evans G, Martin J, Sabharwal M, Gadhok A, Stevenson H, Coyle D. An evaluation framework for funding drugs for rare diseases. Value Health. 2012;15:982–6.CrossRefPubMed Winquist E, Bell CM, Clarke JT, Evans G, Martin J, Sabharwal M, Gadhok A, Stevenson H, Coyle D. An evaluation framework for funding drugs for rare diseases. Value Health. 2012;15:982–6.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Valverde AM, Reed SD, Schulman KA. Proposed ‘grant-and-access’ program with price caps could stimulate development of drugs for very rare diseases. [Review]. Health Aff. 2012;31:2528–35.CrossRef Valverde AM, Reed SD, Schulman KA. Proposed ‘grant-and-access’ program with price caps could stimulate development of drugs for very rare diseases. [Review]. Health Aff. 2012;31:2528–35.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Rémuzat C, Toumi M, Falissard B. New drug regulations in France: what are the impacts on market access? Part 1 - Overview of new drug regulations in France. 2013. Rémuzat C, Toumi M, Falissard B. New drug regulations in France: what are the impacts on market access? Part 1 - Overview of new drug regulations in France. 2013.
26.
go back to reference Field MJ, Thomas F. Boat ECoARDRaOPDBoHSPIoM: rare diseases and orphan products: accelerating research and development. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2011. Field MJ, Thomas F. Boat ECoARDRaOPDBoHSPIoM: rare diseases and orphan products: accelerating research and development. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2011.
28.
go back to reference Group WMGRS. WHO Child Growth Standards: Length/height-for-age, weight-for-age, weight-for-length, weight-for-height and body mass index-for-age: Methods and development. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006. p. 312. Group WMGRS. WHO Child Growth Standards: Length/height-for-age, weight-for-age, weight-for-length, weight-for-height and body mass index-for-age: Methods and development. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006. p. 312.
30.
go back to reference Wagner M, Khoury H, Willet J, Rindress D, Goetghebeur M. Can the EVIDEM framework tackle issues raised by evaluating treatments for rare diseases: analysis of issues and policies, and context-specific adaptation. Pharmacoeconomics. 2016;34:285–301.CrossRefPubMed Wagner M, Khoury H, Willet J, Rindress D, Goetghebeur M. Can the EVIDEM framework tackle issues raised by evaluating treatments for rare diseases: analysis of issues and policies, and context-specific adaptation. Pharmacoeconomics. 2016;34:285–301.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Highly Specialised Technologies programme: Interim process and methods. 2013. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Highly Specialised Technologies programme: Interim process and methods. 2013.
32.
go back to reference Lo SK, Li IT, Tsou TS, See L. Non-significant in univariate but significant in multivariate analysis: a discussion with examples. Changgeng Yi Xue Za Zhi. 1995;18:95–101.PubMed Lo SK, Li IT, Tsou TS, See L. Non-significant in univariate but significant in multivariate analysis: a discussion with examples. Changgeng Yi Xue Za Zhi. 1995;18:95–101.PubMed
34.
go back to reference Richards T. Orphan diseases: which ones do we adopt? BMJ. 2008;337:a1225. Richards T. Orphan diseases: which ones do we adopt? BMJ. 2008;337:a1225.
35.
go back to reference Messori A, Cicchetti A, Patregani L. Orphan drugs. Relating price determination to disease prevalence. BMJ. 2010;341:c4615.CrossRefPubMed Messori A, Cicchetti A, Patregani L. Orphan drugs. Relating price determination to disease prevalence. BMJ. 2010;341:c4615.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Grand H, Samson AL, Aulois-Griot M. Orphan drug pricing in France: influence of main factors. Value Health. 2014;17:A534.CrossRefPubMed Grand H, Samson AL, Aulois-Griot M. Orphan drug pricing in France: influence of main factors. Value Health. 2014;17:A534.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Determinants of orphan drugs prices in France: a regression analysis
Authors
Daria Korchagina
Aurelie Millier
Anne-Lise Vataire
Samuel Aballea
Bruno Falissard
Mondher Toumi
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1750-1172
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-016-0561-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 1/2017 Go to the issue