Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cancer Causes & Control 2/2010

01-02-2010 | Original paper

Determinants of inequalities in cervical cancer stage at diagnosis and survival in New Zealand

Authors: Patricia Priest, Lynn Sadler, Peter Sykes, Roger Marshall, Julia Peters, Sue Crengle

Published in: Cancer Causes & Control | Issue 2/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study is to assess whether ethnic inequalities in cervical cancer mortality are due to differences in survival independent of stage and age at diagnosis, and to assess the contribution of screening to stage at diagnosis.

Methods

Demographic data and cervical screening history were collected for 402 women with histologically proven primary invasive cervical cancer, diagnosed in New Zealand between 1 January 2000 and 30 September 2002. Date of death was available for women who died up to 30 September 2004.

Results

A Cox proportional hazard model showed that, after adjusting for age, the Māori mortality rate was 1.80 times (95% CI 1.07–3.04) that of non-Māori. This reduced to 1.25 (95% CI 0.74–2.11) when stage at diagnosis was also adjusted for. Among determinants of late stage at diagnosis, older age and being Māori significantly increased the risk, while screening was protective.

Conclusions

These results indicate that later stage at diagnosis is the main determinant of Māori women’s higher mortality from cervical cancer. Improving cervical screening among Māori women would reduce stage at diagnosis and therefore ethnic inequalities in mortality.
Literature
1.
go back to reference New Zealand Health Information Service (2006) Cancer: new registrations and deaths 2002. Ministry of Health, Wellington New Zealand Health Information Service (2006) Cancer: new registrations and deaths 2002. Ministry of Health, Wellington
3.
go back to reference New Zealand Health Information Service (2007) Cancer: new registrations and deaths 2003. Ministry of Health, Wellington New Zealand Health Information Service (2007) Cancer: new registrations and deaths 2003. Ministry of Health, Wellington
4.
go back to reference New Zealand Health Information Service (2007) Cancer: new registrations and deaths 2004. Ministry of Health, Wellington New Zealand Health Information Service (2007) Cancer: new registrations and deaths 2004. Ministry of Health, Wellington
5.
go back to reference Plummer M, Herrero R, Franceschi S, Meijer CJ, Snijders P, Bosch FX et al (2003) Smoking and cervical cancer: pooled analysis of the IARC multi-centric case–control study. Cancer Causes Control 14(9):805–814CrossRefPubMed Plummer M, Herrero R, Franceschi S, Meijer CJ, Snijders P, Bosch FX et al (2003) Smoking and cervical cancer: pooled analysis of the IARC multi-centric case–control study. Cancer Causes Control 14(9):805–814CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Waggoner S, Darcy K, Fuhrman B, Parham G, Lucci Jr J, Monk B (2006) Association between cigarette smoking and prognosis in locally advanced cervical carcinoma treated with chemoradiation: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 103:853–858CrossRefPubMed Waggoner S, Darcy K, Fuhrman B, Parham G, Lucci Jr J, Monk B (2006) Association between cigarette smoking and prognosis in locally advanced cervical carcinoma treated with chemoradiation: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 103:853–858CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Benedet JL, Odicino F, Maisonneuve P, Beller U, Creasman WT, Heintz AP et al (2003) Carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 83(S1):41–78CrossRefPubMed Benedet JL, Odicino F, Maisonneuve P, Beller U, Creasman WT, Heintz AP et al (2003) Carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 83(S1):41–78CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Westbrooke I, Baxter J, Hogan J (2001) Are Māori under-served for cardiac interventions? N Z Med J 114:484–487PubMed Westbrooke I, Baxter J, Hogan J (2001) Are Māori under-served for cardiac interventions? N Z Med J 114:484–487PubMed
9.
go back to reference Independent Monitoring Group (2003) Quarterly Report 10. National Cervical Screening Programme. January–March 2003. Hugh Adam Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin Report No.:50 Independent Monitoring Group (2003) Quarterly Report 10. National Cervical Screening Programme. January–March 2003. Hugh Adam Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin Report No.:50
10.
go back to reference Priest P, Sadler L, Peters J, Crengle S, Bethwaite P, Medley G et al (2006) Pathways to diagnosis of cervical cancer: screening history, delay in follow up, and smear reading. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 114:398–407 Priest P, Sadler L, Peters J, Crengle S, Bethwaite P, Medley G et al (2006) Pathways to diagnosis of cervical cancer: screening history, delay in follow up, and smear reading. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 114:398–407
11.
go back to reference Sadler L, Priest P, Peters J, Crengle S, Jackson R (2004) The New Zealand Cervical Cancer Audit, Whakamaatau Mate Pukupuku Taiawa o Aotearoa. Ministry of Health, Wellington Sadler L, Priest P, Peters J, Crengle S, Jackson R (2004) The New Zealand Cervical Cancer Audit, Whakamaatau Mate Pukupuku Taiawa o Aotearoa. Ministry of Health, Wellington
13.
go back to reference Jeffreys M, Stevanovic V, Tobias M, Lewis C, Ellison-Loschmann L, Pearce N et al (2005) Ethnic inequalities in cancer survival in New Zealand: linkage study. Am J Public Health 95(5):834–837CrossRefPubMed Jeffreys M, Stevanovic V, Tobias M, Lewis C, Ellison-Loschmann L, Pearce N et al (2005) Ethnic inequalities in cancer survival in New Zealand: linkage study. Am J Public Health 95(5):834–837CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Robson B, Purdie G, Cormack D (2006) Unequal impact: Māori and Non-Māori cancer statistics 1996–2001. Ministry of Health, Wellington Robson B, Purdie G, Cormack D (2006) Unequal impact: Māori and Non-Māori cancer statistics 1996–2001. Ministry of Health, Wellington
15.
go back to reference Te Ropu Rangahau Hauora a Eru Pomare (2000) Counting for nothing: understanding the issues in monitoring disparities in health. Soc Policy J N Z 14:1–16 Te Ropu Rangahau Hauora a Eru Pomare (2000) Counting for nothing: understanding the issues in monitoring disparities in health. Soc Policy J N Z 14:1–16
16.
go back to reference Brewer N, Pearce N, Jeffreys M, White P, Ellison-Loschmann L (2009) Demographic differences in stage at diagnosis and cervical cancer in New Zealand, 1994–2005. J Women’s Health 18:955–963CrossRef Brewer N, Pearce N, Jeffreys M, White P, Ellison-Loschmann L (2009) Demographic differences in stage at diagnosis and cervical cancer in New Zealand, 1994–2005. J Women’s Health 18:955–963CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Condon J, Barnes T, Armstrong B, Selva-Nayagam S, Elwood M (2005) Stage at diagnosis and cancer survival for Indigenous Australians in the Northern Territory. Med J Aust 182:277–280PubMed Condon J, Barnes T, Armstrong B, Selva-Nayagam S, Elwood M (2005) Stage at diagnosis and cancer survival for Indigenous Australians in the Northern Territory. Med J Aust 182:277–280PubMed
18.
go back to reference Newman S, Garner E (2005) Social inequities along the cervical cancer continuum: a structured review. Cancer Causes Control 16:63–70CrossRef Newman S, Garner E (2005) Social inequities along the cervical cancer continuum: a structured review. Cancer Causes Control 16:63–70CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Leath C, Straughn MJ, Kirby T, Huggins A, Partridge E, Parham G (2005) Predictors of outcomes for women with cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 99:432–436CrossRefPubMed Leath C, Straughn MJ, Kirby T, Huggins A, Partridge E, Parham G (2005) Predictors of outcomes for women with cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 99:432–436CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Coker A, Du X, Fang S, Eggleston K (2006) Socioeconomic status and cervical cancer survival among older women: Findings from the SEER-Medicare linked data cohorts. Gynecol Oncol 102:278–284CrossRefPubMed Coker A, Du X, Fang S, Eggleston K (2006) Socioeconomic status and cervical cancer survival among older women: Findings from the SEER-Medicare linked data cohorts. Gynecol Oncol 102:278–284CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Farley J, Hines J, Taylor R, Carlson J, Parker M, Kost E et al (2001) Equal care ensures equal survival for African-American women with cervical cancer. Cancer 91:869–873CrossRefPubMed Farley J, Hines J, Taylor R, Carlson J, Parker M, Kost E et al (2001) Equal care ensures equal survival for African-American women with cervical cancer. Cancer 91:869–873CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Brookfield KF, Cheung MC, Lucci J, Fleming LE, Koniaris LG (2009) Disparities in survival among women with invasive cervical cancer: a problem of access to care. Cancer 115:166–178CrossRefPubMed Brookfield KF, Cheung MC, Lucci J, Fleming LE, Koniaris LG (2009) Disparities in survival among women with invasive cervical cancer: a problem of access to care. Cancer 115:166–178CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Determinants of inequalities in cervical cancer stage at diagnosis and survival in New Zealand
Authors
Patricia Priest
Lynn Sadler
Peter Sykes
Roger Marshall
Julia Peters
Sue Crengle
Publication date
01-02-2010
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Cancer Causes & Control / Issue 2/2010
Print ISSN: 0957-5243
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7225
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-009-9451-7

Other articles of this Issue 2/2010

Cancer Causes & Control 2/2010 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine